Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Catumaxomab for the Treatment of Malignant Ascites in Patients With Chemotherapy-Refractory Ovarian Cancer: A Phase II Study
  1. Jonathan S. Berek, MD, MMS*,
  2. Robert P. Edwards, MD,
  3. Lynn P. Parker, MD,
  4. Leslie R. DeMars, MD§,
  5. Thomas J. Herzog, MD,
  6. Samuel S. Lentz, MD,
  7. Robert T. Morris, MD#,
  8. Wallace L. Akerley, MD**,
  9. Robert W. Holloway, MD††,
  10. Michael W. Method, MD, MPH, MBA‡‡,
  11. Steven C. Plaxe, MD§§,
  12. Joan L. Walker, MD∥∥,
  13. Hilke Friccius-Quecke, PhD¶¶ and
  14. Carolyn N. Krasner, MD##
  1. *Stanford Women’s Cancer Center, Stanford Cancer Institute, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA;
  2. Magee Women’s Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA;
  3. James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Louisville, KY;
  4. §Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH;
  5. Columbia University Cancer Center, New York, NY;
  6. WFU Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC;
  7. #Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI;
  8. **Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT;
  9. ††Florida Hospital Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL;
  10. ‡‡Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium, South Bend, IN;
  11. §§University of California, San Diego, CA;
  12. ∥∥University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK;
  13. ¶¶Neovii Biotech GmbH (formerly Fresenius Biotech GmbH), Munich, Germany;
  14. ##Massachusetts General Hospital, Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA.
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Jonathan S. Berek, MD, MMS, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room HG332, Stanford, CA 94305–5317. E-mail: jberek@stanford.edu.

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal catumaxomab in heavily pretreated patients with chemotherapy-refractory ovarian cancer and recurrent symptomatic malignant ascites.

Methods The study is a single-arm open-label multicenter US phase II study. Patients received 4 three-hour intraperitoneal catumaxomab infusions (10, 20, 50, and 150 μg within 10 days). The primary end point was the percentage of patients with at least a 4-fold increase in the puncture-free interval (PuFI) relative to the pretreatment interval. The main secondary end points were puncture-free survival, overall survival, ascites symptoms, and safety. Time to first therapeutic puncture (TTPu) was analyzed post hoc.

Results Forty patients were screened, and 32 patients (80%) were treated. Seven patients (23%) achieved the primary end point. The median PuFI was prolonged 2-fold from 12 to 27.5 days. The median TTPu was prolonged 4-fold from 12 to 52 days. The median puncture-free survival and overall survival were 29.5 and 111 days, respectively. Nineteen patients (59%) required puncture after catumaxomab treatment. Ascites symptoms improved in most of the 13 predefined categories. At study end, most symptoms were still improved compared with screening. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were related to cytokine release (vomiting, nausea, pyrexia, fatigue, and chills) or intraperitoneal administration (abdominal pain). Transient increases in liver parameters and transient decreases in blood lymphocytes were regularly observed but were generally without clinical relevance.

Conclusions Catumaxomab prolonged PuFI and TTPu had a beneficial effect on quality of life, as shown by the improvement in ascites symptoms, and had an acceptable safety profile, which is consistent with its mode of action.

  • Catumaxomab
  • Trifunctional antibody
  • Malignant ascites
  • Ovarian cancer

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • This study (NCT00326885) was sponsored by Neovii (formerly Fresenius) Biotech GmbH, Munich, Germany.

  • The authors declare no conflicts of interest.