Next Article in Journal
Quinacrine, an Antimalarial Drug with Strong Activity Inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 Viral Replication In Vitro
Next Article in Special Issue
Small-Angle X-ray Scattering Models of APOBEC3B Catalytic Domain in a Complex with a Single-Stranded DNA Inhibitor
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Surveillance through Next-Generation Sequencing to Unveil the Diversity of Human Enteroviruses beyond the Reported Clinical Cases
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mouse APOBEC3 Restriction of Retroviruses
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Battle between Retroviruses and APOBEC3 Genes: Its Past and Present

1
Division of Systems Virology, Department of Infectious Disease Control, International Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 1088639, Japan
2
Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
3
Laboratory of Systems Virology, Institute for Frontier Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
4
Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 6068501, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Viruses 2021, 13(1), 124; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13010124
Submission received: 14 December 2020 / Revised: 7 January 2021 / Accepted: 13 January 2021 / Published: 17 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue APOBECs and Virus Restriction)

Abstract

:
The APOBEC3 family of proteins in mammals consists of cellular cytosine deaminases and well-known restriction factors against retroviruses, including lentiviruses. APOBEC3 genes are highly amplified and diversified in mammals, suggesting that their evolution and diversification have been driven by conflicts with ancient viruses. At present, lentiviruses, including HIV, the causative agent of AIDS, are known to encode a viral protein called Vif to overcome the antiviral effects of the APOBEC3 proteins of their hosts. Recent studies have revealed that the acquisition of an anti-APOBEC3 ability by lentiviruses is a key step in achieving successful cross-species transmission. Here, we summarize the current knowledge of the interplay between mammalian APOBEC3 proteins and viral infections and introduce a scenario of the coevolution of mammalian APOBEC3 genes and viruses.

1. Introduction: Cross-Species Transmission of Pathogenic Viruses

In December 2019, an outbreak of unusual pneumonia, currently termed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), occurred in Wuhan, China. As of December 2020, COVID-19 has been an ongoing pandemic with more than 70 million cases and more than 1.5 million deaths worldwide [1]. A novel coronavirus, termed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was identified as the causative agent of COVID-19 [2,3]. Although it is assumed that SARS-CoV-2 was transmitted from bats to humans [4,5], the mechanisms by which SARS-CoV-2 was successfully transmitted into the human population are unknown.
Similar to SARS-CoV-2, many pathogenic viruses have been transmitted from animals to humans. The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the causative agent of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), is a typical example of a virus that was transmitted from animals. HIV is a positive-sense, single-stranded RNA virus and belongs to the genus Lentivirus in the family Retroviridae [6]. Based on the viral genome sequence, HIV is classified into two viral groups: HIV type 1 (HIV-1) and type 2 (HIV-2). Previous studies have shown that HIV-1 is related to simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) in chimpanzees (SIVcpz) [7,8], while HIV-2 is related to SIV in Old World monkeys and sooty mangabeys (SIVsm) [9]. These results suggest that HIV-1 and HIV-2, respectively, originated from cross-species transmissions of SIVcpz and SIVsm (more details are reviewed in references [10,11]).
To accomplish cross-species transmission, viruses have to overcome certain “species barriers” in the new host (Figure 1). The switching of viral receptor tropism is one of the well-known examples of the mechanisms of actions leading to cross-species viral transmission. For instance, in the case of SARS-CoV-2, the amino acid sequence of the receptor binding domain of the spike protein is highly different from those of bat coronaviruses (CoVs), the putative origin(s) of SARS-CoV-2 [4]. Although the authentic origin of SARS-CoV-2 is not yet identified, it is hypothesized that its affinity for human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) as the viral receptor is crucial for overcoming the species barrier and adapting to humans (Figure 1a) [4]. In addition to host proteins that are used as viral receptors for infection (e.g., human ACE2 for SARS-CoV-2), there are a variety of host factors that are potentially associated with the cross-species viral transmission. For instance, the viral polymerase (e.g., PB2) of avian influenza A virus acquires a single amino acid substitution (E627K) to utilize a mammalian host factor, acidic leucine-rich nuclear phosphoprotein 32 (ANP32A), for efficient viral replication in mammalian cells [12,13] (Figure 1b).
In addition to hijacking the proteins of the new hosts (e.g., ACE2 for SARS-CoV-2 and ANP32A for avian influenza A virus), viruses have to counteract the intrinsic antiviral proteins in the new hosts. Apolipoprotein B mRNA editing, catalytic polypeptide-like 3 (APOBEC3) family proteins, which are among the most investigated host factors, act as species barriers that potentially prevent the cross-species transmission of lentiviruses (reviewed in reference [10]). On the other hand, lentiviruses have acquired a viral factor, called viral infectivity factor (Vif), to overcome APOBEC3-mediated restriction (Figure 1c). Importantly, the interaction between the host APOBEC3 protein and the lentiviral Vif protein is strictly species-specific. Therefore, we can illuminate the scenario of virus–host coevolution by focusing on the interplay between APOBEC3 proteins and Vif.
In this review, we first briefly summarize the antiviral effects of APOBEC3 proteins and their antagonist Vif (Section 2). We then introduce the current understanding of the interplay between mammalian APOBEC3 proteins and viruses in the present (Section 3) and throughout evolution (Section 4). In Section 3, we introduce recent findings on the roles of the APOBEC3 proteins of mammals, particularly those of the great apes, in cross-species lentiviral transmission. In Section 4, we introduce recent knowledge of the evolution of APOBEC3 genes in mammals.

2. Antiretroviral Effect of APOBEC3 Proteins and Its Antagonism by the Lentiviral Vif Protein

The APOBEC3 family of proteins consists of cellular cytosine deaminases that catalyze cytosine-to-uracil (C-to-U) substitutions. APOBEC3 proteins are members of the AID/APOBEC superfamily, the proteins of which commonly possess a zinc-dependent catalytic domain (Z domain) with the HxE/PCxxC motif. Previous studies have revealed that AID/APOBEC superfamily proteins are involved in immunity, metabolism, and infectious diseases (reviewed in [14,15]). In humans, there are seven APOBEC3 members (APOBEC3A, APOBEC3B, APOBEC3C, APOBEC3D, APOBEC3F, APOBEC3G, and APOBEC3H), and these seven genes are clustered in the locus sandwiched between the CBX6 and CBX7 genes on chromosome 22 [16,17]. In 2002, Sheehy et al. first identified APOBEC3G (formerly called CEM15) as a restriction factor that counteracts HIV-1 [18]. Subsequently, some other APOBEC3 proteins such as APOBEC3D, APOBEC3F, and APOBEC3H have been identified as anti-HIV-1 factors [19,20,21,22,23,24]. During the replication of retroviruses, including HIV-1, minus-stranded viral cDNA is synthesized by a viral reverse transcriptase (RT) using viral genomic RNA as the template. Subsequently, the synthesized viral DNA is integrated into the host genome as a provirus by a viral enzyme called integrase. To exhibit antiretroviral effects, APOBEC3 proteins are incorporated into virions and transferred into the newly infected cells. These APOBEC3 proteins target minus-stranded viral cDNA and induce C-to-U mutations. Consequently, G-to-A mutations are accumulated in the positive strand in the proviral sequence, which results in nonsense and/or missense mutations in viral genes. Additionally, the deaminase-independent inhibition of retroviral replication has also been reported: some APOBEC3 proteins directly bind to viral genomic RNA and/or minus-stranded cDNA and physically inhibit the elongation of reverse transcription [25,26,27]. In addition, APOBEC3G interacts directly with viral RT and blocks its function [28,29].
To counteract the antiviral activity of APOBEC3 proteins, lentiviruses have evolutionarily acquired an accessory gene, Vif, which was identified in the early 1980s and formerly called A [30], Q [31], P’ [32], ORF-1 [33], or sor (an abbreviation of short open reading frame) [34]. In 1987, Strebel et al. first demonstrated that Vif is an essential gene for HIV-1 infectivity in the A3.01 human CD4+ T cell line [35]. Then, in 2002, Sheehy et al. revealed that Vif degrades APOBEC3G in virus-producing cells and inhibits its incorporation into nascent viral particles [18]. Subsequent studies in this century have shown that the Vif protein interacts with APOBEC3 proteins as well as with the cellular components of the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, which consists of Cullin 5 (CUL5), Elongin B/C (ELOB/C), RING-box protein 2 (RBX2), and core-binding factor subunit β (CBF-β), and induces the ubiquitination of substrate APOBEC3 proteins, leading to the degradation mediated by the 26S proteasome [36,37,38,39]. Interestingly, the requirement of CBF-β is specific for the Vif proteins of primate lentiviruses, and CBF-β is dispensable for the degradation of APOBEC3 proteins mediated by the Vif proteins of non-primate lentiviruses [40,41,42,43]. Instead of CBF-β, the Vif protein of Maedi-visna virus, a lineage of lentivirus infecting sheep, utilizes another cellular protein, cyclophilin A, for hijacking cellular E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, leading to the degradation of sheep APOBEC3 proteins [44]. These observations suggest that the evolutionary adaptation process of lentiviral Vif proteins is different among the lentivirus lineages.

3. Role of Mammalian APOBEC3 Proteins in Cross-Species Lentiviral Transmission

3.1. Great Ape APOBEC3 Proteins and Their Lentiviruses

Great ape lentiviruses were isolated from chimpanzees and gorillas but not from the other great apes such as the bonobos [45]. Based on phylogenetic analyses, HIV-1 is classified into four groups: M (major), N (non-M-non-O), O (outlier of outgroup), and P. HIV-1M and HIV-1N originated from SIVcpz, while the cross-species transmission of SIVgor (an SIV infecting gorilla) from gorillas to humans led to the emergence of HIV-1O and HIV-1P (in humans) [46,47,48,49]. Molecular phylogenetic analyses using the viral sequences obtained from HIV-1-infected individuals as well as from wild animals (e.g., chimpanzees and gorillas) in recent decades have enabled us to trace the evolutionary routes that led to the birth of HIV-1. However, the molecular mechanisms of the evolution and cross-species transmission of primate lentiviruses remain largely unclear. Elucidating the interplay between host factors and viral factors, including APOBEC3 proteins and Vif, can provide clues with which to understand such molecular mechanisms. There are at least two reports addressing the potential roles of primate APOBEC3 proteins as species barriers in the cross-species transmission of great ape lentiviruses. First, the Vif protein of SIVcpz, the ancestor of SIVgor, cannot counteract gorilla APOBEC3G, while SIVgor Vif can [49]. This observation suggests that gorilla APOBEC3G has played a role in restricting the cross-species transmission of SIVcpz from chimpanzees to gorillas as a species barrier and that SIVcpz Vif evolved into SIVgor Vif by acquiring the ability to counteract gorilla APOBEC3G. Intriguingly, Nakano et al. recently demonstrated that a single amino acid mutation (M16E) enabled SIVcpz Vif to degrade and counteract gorilla APOBEC3G [50]. Methionine (M) at amino acid position 16 is highly conserved in SIVcpz Vif, while glutamic acid (E) is conserved in SIVgor Vif [50]. Second, SIVcpz Vif proteins cannot counteract human antiviral APOBEC3H, while HIV-1M Vif can [51]. Because HIV-1M is the progeny of SIVcpz, this observation suggests that human APOBEC3H has potentially played a role in limiting the cross-species transmission of SIVcpz from chimpanzees to humans. Zhang et al. revealed that two amino-acid substitutions (EN47-48PH) permitted SIVcpz Vif to neutralize human APOBEC3H [51]. These observations suggest that great ape lentiviruses have evolved to adapt to new hosts by acquiring the ability to counteract antiviral factors in the new hosts. Moreover, these findings provide evidence suggesting that cross-species lentiviral transmission can be affected by antiviral APOBEC3 proteins in the new host.

3.2. Feline APOBEC3 Proteins and Their Lentiviruses

Evolutionary conflicts between APOBEC3 proteins and Vif can also be observed in non-primate mammals. For instance, feline APOBEC3 proteins can prevent the replication of feline lentiviruses, including feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV), while FIV Vif proteins can antagonize the antiviral activity of feline APOBEC3 proteins by degrading them [52,53,54]. Similar to primate APOBEC3 proteins, feline APOBEC3 proteins may work as species barriers for lentiviral transmission. In North America, puma lentiviruses (PLVs) have been isolated from two types of felids, namely pumas and bobcats. Based on their molecular phylogenies, these viruses are classified into PLV type A (PLV-A) and type B (PLV-B). Interestingly, PLV-A can be isolated from both pumas and bobcats, while PLV-B can be isolated only from pumas [55]. This observation suggests the possibility that bobcats intrinsically have species barrier(s) that restrict PLV-B infection. Konno et al. showed that puma and bobcat APOBEC3Z3 proteins (the orthologs of human APOBEC3H) can be antiviral [56]. Intriguingly, puma APOBEC3Z3 protein is degraded by both the PLV-A and PLV-B Vif proteins, while bobcat APOBEC3Z3 protein is degraded by PLV-A Vif but is resistant to PLV-B Vif [56]. These findings suggest that the cross-species transmission of PLV-B from pumas to bobcats can be hampered by bobcat APOBEC3Z3 protein. Furthermore, these findings strengthen the theory that APOBEC3 proteins work as a species barrier of lentiviral transmission in mammals.
On the other hand, an evolutionary pattern of lentiviral Vif and APOBEC3 proteins other than an evolutionary “arms race” has been observed in domestic cats (Felis catus). Based on its molecular phylogeny, the FIV that infects domestic cats (FIVfca) is classified into four subtypes: A, B, C and D [57,58,59]. Yoshikawa et al. showed that the Vif protein of FIVfca subtype B cannot degrade the two antiviral APOBEC3 proteins in domestic cats, APOBEC3Z3 and APOBEC3Z2Z3 [57]. Additionally, a molecular phylogenetic analysis has shown that FIVfca subtype B lost its ability to counteract these APOBEC3 proteins after divergence from the other FIVfca subtypes [57]. Furthermore, no Vif proteins of FIVfca subtype B tested (strains TM2, TM3, Aomori, Kyoto, and 2498B) counteracted the feline antiviral APOBEC3 proteins [57]. More intriguingly, previous reports have suggested that FIVfca subtype B is less pathogenic than the other subtypes and spreads worldwide [60,61]. Therefore, the inability of Vif to counteract APOBEC3 proteins implies that lentiviruses (at least for FIVfca subtype B) might be able to adapt to the host to attenuate their virulence.

4. Evolution of APOBEC3 Genes in Mammals

4.1. Duplication and Diversification of APOBEC3 Genes

Human APOBEC3 genes are encoded in a genetic locus sandwiched between the CBX6 and CBX7 genes (the “canonical locus” of APOBEC3 genes) on chromosome 22 [16]. Notably, the numbers of APOBEC3 genes differ among mammalian species. For example, humans have seven APOBEC3 genes, while mice have only one, and marsupials have no APOBEC3 orthologs [10,16,62]. Additionally, a recent study has reported that pteropid bats have 18 APOBEC3 Z domains in the canonical locus [63]. These findings suggest that the family of APOBEC3 genes has been duplicated and diversified through mammalian evolution. Moreover, APOBEC3 genes are under positive selection, and the amino-acid residues exposed on the protein surface, including the binding sites to the lentiviral Vif, are under particularly strong positive selection [62,64]. These observations raise the possibility that the evolution of APOBEC3 genes has been driven by interaction with viral matter.
Recently, Ito, Gifford, and Sato hypothesized that the rapid evolution of mammalian APOBEC3 genes has been driven by conflicts with ancient retroviruses and/or endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) [62]. ERVs are a lineage of retrotransposons and are the “genetic fossils” of ancient exogenous retroviruses because of their infection of germ cells [65]. The fact that ERVs occupy approximately 8% of the human genome [66] suggests there have been massive invasions of exogenous retroviruses into the genome of human ancestors in the past.
To depict the evolution and diversification of mammalian APOBEC3 genes, Ito, Gifford, and Sato conducted a comparative genomic analysis of 160 mammalian species and identified 1420 AID/APOBEC family genes [62]. APOBEC3 genes were found to be highly duplicated in some mammals, such as primates and bats, but other AID/APOBEC family genes were not [62]. By quantifying the number of ERV insertions in each mammalian genome and the level of accumulation of G-to-A mutations, which are the hallmarks of APOBEC3-mediated mutations in ERVs, it was demonstrated that the number of APOBEC3 genes was significantly correlated with the number of ERVs and the frequency of G-to-A mutations in ERVs [62]. Furthermore, Ito, Gifford, and Sato examined the evolutionary timing of APOBEC3 gene family expansion and the intensive genomic insertion of ERVs in primates and found that the times of these two events highly overlapped. These observations suggest that conflict with retroviruses was a major driving force in the evolution and amplification of APOBEC3 genes in mammals.

4.2. The Birth of the APOBEC3G Gene

As described above (Section 2), the APOBEC3G gene belongs to the APOBEC3 family, which was first identified as a robust anti-HIV-1 restriction factor [18]. The gene structure of APOBEC3G contains two Z domains, Z2 and Z1, which are concatenated (i.e., they compose the Z2-Z1 domains) (Figure 2) [16]. Interestingly, the comprehensive genomic analysis by Ito, Gifford, and Sato [62] revealed that, in primates, the APOBEC3 gene composed of Z2-Z1 domains is detectable in Simiiformes, which includes the great apes, Old World monkeys, and New World monkeys, but not in prosimians. These observations suggest that the APOBEC3 gene composed of Z2-Z1 domains, namely, the APOBEC3G gene, emerged in the common ancestor of Simiiformes after diverging from prosimians (Figure 2). More intriguingly, ERVs massively invaded the genome of the common ancestor of Simiiformes approximately 50 million years ago [62]. Thus, the time frames of a massive ERV invasion and the birth of the APOBEC3G gene overlap in the common ancestor of Simiiformes. This provides strong evidence that the invasion of retroviruses and ERVs could be a driving force in the generation of the APOBEC3G gene.

4.3. Amplification of APOBEC3 Genes by Retrotransposition

Most mammalian APOBEC3 genes are encoded in the canonical locus (reviewed in [10,16]), and amplifications of APOBEC3 genes occur mainly within this locus [62,63]. These observations suggest that mammalian APOBEC3 genes are amplified by tandem gene duplication. However, Ito, Gifford, and Sato [62] and Yang et al. [67] recently reported that some APOBEC3-like genes, particularly in New World monkeys, are encoded in genomic regions distinct from the canonical APOBEC3 locus. These genes, encoded in non-canonical loci, have intronless structures and so are assumed to have been generated by the retrotransposition of APOBEC3 genes from the canonical locus. Although most of these retrotransposed APOBEC3G-like genes (Yang et al. designated them “APOBEC3G retrocopies” [67]) are pseudogenized, some of them are intact [62,67]. Moreover, an APOBEC3G retrocopy was found to be conserved among all New World monkeys investigated [67]. Notably, the mRNA expression of APOBEC3G retrocopies has been detected in various tissues [62,67], which suggests the biological roles of APOBEC3G retrocopies in these animals. In fact, Yang et al. demonstrated that some of these retrocopies, particularly in marmosets and capuchins, decreased HIV-1 infectivity, while these genes did not affect the retrotransposition activity of LINE-1 [67]. Altogether, these findings suggest that APOBEC3 genes can be amplified not only by tandem gene duplication but also by retrotransposition with retaining potential antiviral activity.

5. APOBEC3 Proteins and Non-Retroviruses

As described above, Vif is a well-studied viral protein that counteracts host APOBEC3 proteins. Other than Vif, some viral proteins such as HIV-1 protease [68] and RT [69], FIV protease [57], murine leukemia virus protease [70] and glycogag [71], human T-cell leukemia virus type I capsid [72], and mouse mammary tumor virus RT [73] potentially counteract host antiviral APOBEC3 proteins. These observations suggest that retroviruses have evolved a variety of strategies to counteract APOBEC3 proteins. In addition to retroviruses, it has been reported that human APOBEC3 proteins can potentially inhibit infections by human pathogenic non-lentiviruses such as hepatitis B virus (HBV) [74], human T-cell leukemia virus type I [72,75], human papillomavirus [76] and some human herpesviruses [77,78]. To counteract the antiviral effects of human APOBEC3 proteins, HBV utilizes a small nonstructural X (HBx) protein [74]. In contrast to lentiviral Vif (see Section 2), HBx does not induce the degradation of the APOBEC3G proteins expressed in HBV-infected hepatic cells [74]. Instead, HBx enhances the externalization of APOBEC3G protein via exosomes, resulting in decreases in intracellular APOBEC3G protein levels in infected cells [74]. In the case of herpesviruses, Cheng et al. demonstrated that human APOBEC3B protein is an antiviral against the Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), a human gammaherpesvirus, and notably that a viral protein called BORF2 counteracts the antiviral activity of the human APOBEC3B protein [77]. Interestingly, similar to HBV HBx in the case of the APOBEC3G protein, EBV BORF2 does not degrade the human APOBEC3B protein [77]. However, unlike HBV HBx, EBV BORF2 sequesters the human APOBEC3B protein from the nucleus, where EBV replicates [77]. Subsequent studies have further demonstrated that other human herpesviral proteins, such as ICP6 of the herpes simplex virus type 1 and ORF6 of Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus, exhibit similar activities against human APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B proteins [78,79]. Altogether, these observations suggest that mammalian APOBEC3 genes have evolved to combat not only retroviruses (including lentiviruses) but also other pathogenic viruses, and that the respective viruses have sharpened their unique strategies to antagonize the activities of antiviral APOBEC3 proteins in order to support their own replication.

6. Conclusions

Here, we have summarized the current knowledge on the multiple aspects of mammalian APOBEC3 genes, focusing particularly on their roles as species barriers that hamper cross-species transmission of lentiviruses (Section 3) and their evolutionary driving forces (Section 4). A variety of previous studies using biochemical, cell biological and molecular phylogenetic approaches have unveiled the functional and evolutionary relationships between lentiviral Vif proteins and the antiviral APOBEC3 proteins of the host species. The Vif–APOBEC3 interplay has been considered the consequence of an evolutionary “arms race” between lentiviruses and host mammals [10]. In other words, mammals have evolved antiviral genes, such as APOBEC3 genes, to combat invasions of pathogenic viruses, while exogenous viruses have acquired viral genes, such as Vif, to counteract host antiviral genes for efficient replication.
In addition to the Vif–APOBEC3 interplay, we briefly summarized some examples of the interplay between the viral proteins encoded by non-lentiviral pathogenic viruses (e.g., HBV and some human herpesviruses) and antiviral APOBEC3 proteins (Section 5). It is intriguing that different viruses have acquired unique anti-APOBEC3 proteins (e.g., HBV HBx and EBV BORF2) that counteract APOBEC3 proteins in their own manner. On the other hand, the evolutionary scenario of FIVfca subtype B [57] is also interesting in another context: it seems that FIVfca subtype B has attenuated its Vif ability against antiviral APOBEC3 proteins of domestic cats to possibly become apathogenic (see also Section 3.2). In summary, the interactions between antiviral APOBEC3 proteins and their viral counteractants are more complicated than expected. Future investigations into APOBEC3 proteins and their viral counteractants can provide clues to elucidate the complex interactions and coevolution of viruses and host antiviral factors.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, K.U., Y.K., J.I., K.S.; writing—review and editing, K.U., Y.K., J.I., K.S.; visualization, K.S.; supervision, J.I., K.S.; project administration, K.S.; funding acquisition, J.I., K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded in part by AMED Research Program on HIV/AIDS 19fk0410019 (to K.S.) and 19fk0410014 (to K.S.); AMED Research Program on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases 20fk0108146 (to K.S.), 19fk010817 (to K.S.), and 20fk0108270 (to K.S.); JST J-RAPID JPMJJR2007 (to K.S.); KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research B 18H02662 (to K.S.), KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas 16H06429 (to K.S.), 16K21723 (to K.S.), 17H05813 (to K.S.), and 19H04826 (to K.S.), KAKENHI Early-Career Scientists 20K15767 (to J.I.), and Fund for the Promotion of Joint International Research (Fostering Joint International Research) 18KK0447 (to K.S.); JSPS Research Fellow PD 19J01713 (to J.I.); ONO Medical Research Foundation (to K.S.); Ichiro Kanehara Foundation (to K.S.); Lotte Foundation (to K.S.); Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (to K.S.); Daiichi Sankyo Foundation of Life Science (to K.S.); Sumitomo Foundation (to K.S.); Uehara Foundation (to K.S.); Takeda Science Foundation (to K.S.); and The Tokyo Biochemical Research Foundation (to K.S.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Yoshio Koyanagi and Naoko Misawa (Kyoto University, Japan) and Mai Suganami, Akiko Oide, Mai Fujimi, and Miyabishara Yokoyama (The University of Tokyo, Japan) for their generous support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. WHO. Coronavirus Disease 2019. 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 (accessed on 14 December 2020).
  2. Zhou, P.; Yang, X.L.; Wang, X.G.; Hu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Si, H.R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C.L.; et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020, 579, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wu, F.; Zhao, S.; Yu, B.; Chen, Y.M.; Wang, W.; Song, Z.G.; Hu, Y.; Tao, Z.W.; Tian, J.H.; Pei, Y.Y.; et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 2020, 579, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Andersen, K.G.; Rambaut, A.; Lipkin, W.I.; Holmes, E.C.; Garry, R.F. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 450–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Lam, T.T.; Jia, N.; Zhang, Y.W.; Shum, M.H.; Jiang, J.F.; Zhu, H.C.; Tong, Y.G.; Shi, Y.X.; Ni, X.B.; Liao, Y.S.; et al. Identifying SARS-CoV-2-related coronaviruses in Malayan pangolins. Nature 2020, 583, 282–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Freed, E.O.; Martin, M.A. Human Immunodeficiency Viruses: Replication. In Fields Virology, 6th ed.; Knipe, D.M., Howley, P.M., Eds.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2013; Volume 2, pp. 1502–1560. [Google Scholar]
  7. Keele, B.F.; Jones, J.H.; Terio, K.A.; Estes, J.D.; Rudicell, R.S.; Wilson, M.L.; Li, Y.; Learn, G.H.; Beasley, T.M.; Schumacher-Stankey, J.; et al. Increased mortality and AIDS-like immunopathology in wild chimpanzees infected with SIVcpz. Nature 2009, 460, 515–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Keele, B.F.; Van Heuverswyn, F.; Li, Y.; Bailes, E.; Takehisa, J.; Santiago, M.L.; Bibollet-Ruche, F.; Chen, Y.; Wain, L.V.; Liegeois, F.; et al. Chimpanzee reservoirs of pandemic and nonpandemic HIV-1. Science 2006, 313, 523–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Gao, F.; Yue, L.; White, A.T.; Pappas, P.G.; Barchue, J.; Hanson, A.P.; Greene, B.M.; Sharp, P.M.; Shaw, G.M.; Hahn, B.H. Human infection by genetically diverse SIVSM-related HIV-2 in west Africa. Nature 1992, 358, 495–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nakano, Y.; Aso, H.; Soper, A.; Yamada, E.; Moriwaki, M.; Juarez-Fernandez, G.; Koyanagi, Y.; Sato, K. A conflict of interest: The evolutionary arms race between mammalian APOBEC3 and lentiviral Vif. Retrovirology 2017, 14, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hahn, B.H.; Shaw, G.M.; De Cock, K.M.; Sharp, P.M. AIDS as a zoonosis: Scientific and public health implications. Science 2000, 287, 607–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Domingues, P.; Eletto, D.; Magnus, C.; Turkington, H.L.; Schmutz, S.; Zagordi, O.; Lenk, M.; Beer, M.; Stertz, S.; Hale, B.G. Profiling host ANP32A splicing landscapes to predict influenza A virus polymerase adaptation. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Long, J.S.; Giotis, E.S.; Moncorge, O.; Frise, R.; Mistry, B.; James, J.; Morisson, M.; Iqbal, M.; Vignal, A.; Skinner, M.A.; et al. Species difference in ANP32A underlies influenza A virus polymerase host restriction. Nature 2016, 529, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Conticello, S.G. The AID/APOBEC family of nucleic acid mutators. Genome Biol. 2008, 9, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Conticello, S.G.; Langlois, M.A.; Yang, Z.; Neuberger, M.S. DNA deamination in immunity: AID in the context of its APOBEC relatives. Adv. Immunol. 2007, 94, 37–73. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. LaRue, R.S.; Andresdottir, V.; Blanchard, Y.; Conticello, S.G.; Derse, D.; Emerman, M.; Greene, W.C.; Jonsson, S.R.; Landau, N.R.; Lochelt, M.; et al. Guidelines for naming nonprimate APOBEC3 genes and proteins. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 494–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Jarmuz, A.; Chester, A.; Bayliss, J.; Gisbourne, J.; Dunham, I.; Scott, J.; Navaratnam, N. An anthropoid-specific locus of orphan C to U RNA-editing enzymes on chromosome 22. Genomics 2002, 79, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sheehy, A.M.; Gaddis, N.C.; Choi, J.D.; Malim, M.H. Isolation of a human gene that inhibits HIV-1 infection and is suppressed by the viral Vif protein. Nature 2002, 418, 646–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hultquist, J.F.; Lengyel, J.A.; Refsland, E.W.; LaRue, R.S.; Lackey, L.; Brown, W.L.; Harris, R.S. Human and rhesus APOBEC3D, APOBEC3F, APOBEC3G, and APOBEC3H demonstrate a conserved capacity to restrict Vif-deficient HIV-1. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 11220–11234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Nakano, Y.; Misawa, N.; Juarez-Fernandez, G.; Moriwaki, M.; Nakaoka, S.; Funo, T.; Yamada, E.; Soper, A.; Yoshikawa, R.; Ebrahimi, D.; et al. HIV-1 competition experiments in humanized mice show that APOBEC3H imposes selective pressure and promotes virus adaptation. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006348. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sato, K.; Takeuchi, J.S.; Misawa, N.; Izumi, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Kimura, Y.; Iwami, S.; Takaori-Kondo, A.; Hu, W.S.; Aihara, K.; et al. APOBEC3D and APOBEC3F potently promote HIV-1 diversification and evolution in humanized mouse model. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Simon, V.; Zennou, V.; Murray, D.; Huang, Y.; Ho, D.D.; Bieniasz, P.D. Natural variation in Vif: Differential impact on APOBEC3G/3F and a potential role in HIV-1 diversification. PLoS Pathog. 2005, 1, e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Wiegand, H.L.; Doehle, B.P.; Bogerd, H.P.; Cullen, B.R. A second human antiretroviral factor, APOBEC3F, is suppressed by the HIV-1 and HIV-2 Vif proteins. EMBO J. 2004, 23, 2451–2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Zheng, Y.H.; Irwin, D.; Kurosu, T.; Tokunaga, K.; Sata, T.; Peterlin, B.M. Human APOBEC3F is another host factor that blocks human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 6073–6076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Kobayashi, T.; Koizumi, Y.; Takeuchi, J.S.; Misawa, N.; Kimura, Y.; Morita, S.; Aihara, K.; Koyanagi, Y.; Iwami, S.; Sato, K. Quantification of deaminase activity-dependent and -independent restriction of HIV-1 replication mediated by APOBEC3F and APOBEC3G through experimental-mathematical investigation. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 5881–5887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Chaurasiya, K.R.; McCauley, M.J.; Wang, W.; Qualley, D.F.; Wu, T.; Kitamura, S.; Geertsema, H.; Chan, D.S.; Hertz, A.; Iwatani, Y.; et al. Oligomerization transforms human APOBEC3G from an efficient enzyme to a slowly dissociating nucleic acid-binding protein. Nat. Chem. 2014, 6, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Iwatani, Y.; Chan, D.S.; Wang, F.; Stewart-Maynard, K.; Sugiura, W.; Gronenborn, A.M.; Rouzina, I.; Williams, M.C.; Musier-Forsyth, K.; Levin, J.G. Deaminase-independent inhibition of HIV-1 reverse transcription by APOBEC3G. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 7096–7108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pollpeter, D.; Parsons, M.; Sobala, A.E.; Coxhead, S.; Lang, R.D.; Bruns, A.M.; Papaioannou, S.; McDonnell, J.M.; Apolonia, L.; Chowdhury, J.A.; et al. Deep sequencing of HIV-1 reverse transcripts reveals the multifaceted antiviral functions of APOBEC3G. Nat. Microbiol. 2018, 3, 220–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, X.; Ao, Z.; Chen, L.; Kobinger, G.; Peng, J.; Yao, X. The cellular antiviral protein APOBEC3G interacts with HIV-1 reverse transcriptase and inhibits its function during viral replication. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 3777–3786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Rabson, A.B.; Martin, M.A. Molecular organization of the AIDS retrovirus. Cell 1985, 40, 477–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wain-Hobson, S.; Sonigo, P.; Danos, O.; Cole, S.; Alizon, M. Nucleotide sequence of the AIDS virus, LAV. Cell 1985, 40, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Muesing, M.A.; Smith, D.H.; Cabradilla, C.D.; Benton, C.V.; Lasky, L.A.; Capon, D.J. Nucleic acid structure and expression of the human AIDS/lymphadenopathy retrovirus. Nature 1985, 313, 450–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sanchez-Pescador, R.; Power, M.D.; Barr, P.J.; Steimer, K.S.; Stempien, M.M.; Brown-Shimer, S.L.; Gee, W.W.; Renard, A.; Randolph, A.; Levy, J.A.; et al. Nucleotide sequence and expression of an AIDS-associated retrovirus (ARV-2). Science 1985, 227, 484–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ratner, L.; Haseltine, W.; Patarca, R.; Livak, K.J.; Starcich, B.; Josephs, S.F.; Doran, E.R.; Rafalski, J.A.; Whitehorn, E.A.; Baumeister, K.; et al. Complete nucleotide sequence of the AIDS virus, HTLV-III. Nature 1985, 313, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Strebel, K.; Daugherty, D.; Clouse, K.; Cohen, D.; Folks, T.; Martin, M.A. The HIV ‘A’ (sor) gene product is essential for virus infectivity. Nature 1987, 328, 728–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Marin, M.; Rose, K.M.; Kozak, S.L.; Kabat, D. HIV-1 Vif protein binds the editing enzyme APOBEC3G and induces its degradation. Nat. Med. 2003, 9, 1398–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sheehy, A.M.; Gaddis, N.C.; Malim, M.H. The antiretroviral enzyme APOBEC3G is degraded by the proteasome in response to HIV-1 Vif. Nat. Med. 2003, 9, 1404–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jager, S.; Kim, D.Y.; Hultquist, J.F.; Shindo, K.; LaRue, R.S.; Kwon, E.; Li, M.; Anderson, B.D.; Yen, L.; Stanley, D.; et al. Vif hijacks CBF-beta to degrade APOBEC3G and promote HIV-1 infection. Nature 2011, 481, 371–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, W.; Du, J.; Evans, S.L.; Yu, Y.; Yu, X.F. T-cell differentiation factor CBF-beta regulates HIV-1 Vif-mediated evasion of host restriction. Nature 2011, 481, 376–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Harris, R.S.; Anderson, B.D. Evolutionary Paradigms from Ancient and Ongoing Conflicts between the Lentiviral Vif Protein and Mammalian APOBEC3 Enzymes. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1005958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yoshikawa, R.; Takeuchi, J.S.; Yamada, E.; Nakano, Y.; Ren, F.; Tanaka, H.; Munk, C.; Harris, R.S.; Miyazawa, T.; Koyanagi, Y.; et al. Vif determines the requirement for CBF-beta in APOBEC3 degradation. J. Gen. Virol. 2015, 96 Pt 4, 887–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zhang, W.; Wang, H.; Li, Z.; Liu, X.; Liu, G.; Harris, R.S.; Yu, X.F. Cellular requirements for bovine immunodeficiency virus Vif-mediated inactivation of bovine APOBEC3 proteins. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 12528–12540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Han, X.; Liang, W.; Hua, D.; Zhou, X.; Du, J.; Evans, S.L.; Gao, Q.; Wang, H.; Viqueira, R.; Wei, W.; et al. Evolutionarily conserved requirement for core binding factor beta in the assembly of the human immunodeficiency virus/simian immunodeficiency virus Vif-cullin 5-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 3320–3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Kane, J.R.; Stanley, D.J.; Hultquist, J.F.; Johnson, J.R.; Mietrach, N.; Binning, J.M.; Jonsson, S.R.; Barelier, S.; Newton, B.W.; Johnson, T.L.; et al. Lineage-specific viral hijacking of non-canonical E3 ubiquitin ligase cofactors in the evolution of Vif anti-APOBEC3 activity. Cell Rep. 2015, 11, 1236–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Li, Y.; Ndjango, J.B.; Learn, G.H.; Ramirez, M.A.; Keele, B.F.; Bibollet-Ruche, F.; Liu, W.; Easlick, J.L.; Decker, J.M.; Rudicell, R.S.; et al. Eastern chimpanzees, but not bonobos, represent a simian immunodeficiency virus reservoir. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 10776–10791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Plantier, J.C.; Leoz, M.; Dickerson, J.E.; De Oliveira, F.; Cordonnier, F.; Lemee, V.; Damond, F.; Robertson, D.L.; Simon, F. A new human immunodeficiency virus derived from gorillas. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 871–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Takehisa, J.; Kraus, M.H.; Ayouba, A.; Bailes, E.; Van Heuverswyn, F.; Decker, J.M.; Li, Y.; Rudicell, R.S.; Learn, G.H.; Neel, C.; et al. Origin and biology of simian immunodeficiency virus in wild-living western gorillas. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 1635–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Gao, F.; Bailes, E.; Robertson, D.L.; Chen, Y.; Rodenburg, C.M.; Michael, S.F.; Cummins, L.B.; Arthur, L.O.; Peeters, M.; Shaw, G.M.; et al. Origin of HIV-1 in the chimpanzee Pan troglodytes troglodytes. Nature 1999, 397, 436–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. D’Arc, M.; Ayouba, A.; Esteban, A.; Learn, G.H.; Boue, V.; Liegeois, F.; Etienne, L.; Tagg, N.; Leendertz, F.H.; Boesch, C.; et al. Origin of the HIV-1 group O epidemic in western lowland gorillas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, E1343–E1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Nakano, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Ueda, M.T.; Soper, A.; Konno, Y.; Kimura, I.; Uriu, K.; Kumata, R.; Aso, H.; Misawa, N.; et al. A role for gorilla APOBEC3G in shaping lentivirus evolution including transmission to humans. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, Z.; Gu, Q.; de Manuel Montero, M.; Bravo, I.G.; Marques-Bonet, T.; Haussinger, D.; Munk, C. Stably expressed APOBEC3H forms a barrier for cross-species transmission of simian immunodeficiency virus of chimpanzee to humans. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zielonka, J.; Marino, D.; Hofmann, H.; Yuhki, N.; Lochelt, M.; Munk, C. Vif of feline immunodeficiency virus from domestic cats protects against APOBEC3 restriction factors from many felids. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 7312–7324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Larue, R.S.; Lengyel, J.; Jonsson, S.R.; Andresdottir, V.; Harris, R.S. Lentiviral Vif degrades the APOBEC3Z3/APOBEC3H protein of its mammalian host and is capable of cross-species activity. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 8193–8201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Munk, C.; Beck, T.; Zielonka, J.; Hotz-Wagenblatt, A.; Chareza, S.; Battenberg, M.; Thielebein, J.; Cichutek, K.; Bravo, I.G.; O’Brien, S.J.; et al. Functions, structure, and read-through alternative splicing of feline APOBEC3 genes. Genome Biol. 2008, 9, R48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Lee, J.; Malmberg, J.L.; Wood, B.A.; Hladky, S.; Troyer, R.; Roelke, M.; Cunningham, M.; McBride, R.; Vickers, W.; Boyce, W.; et al. Feline immunodeficiency virus cross-species transmission: Implications for emergence of new lentiviral infections. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e02134-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Konno, Y.; Nagaoka, S.; Kimura, I.; Yamamoto, K.; Kagawa, Y.; Kumata, R.; Aso, H.; Ueda, M.T.; Nakagawa, S.; Kobayashi, T.; et al. New World feline APOBEC3 potently controls inter-genus lentiviral transmission. Retrovirology 2018, 15, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Yoshikawa, R.; Takeuchi, J.S.; Yamada, E.; Nakano, Y.; Misawa, N.; Kimura, Y.; Ren, F.; Miyazawa, T.; Koyanagi, Y.; Sato, K. Feline immunodeficiency virus evolutionarily acquires two proteins, Vif and Protease, capable of antagonizing feline APOBEC3. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e00250-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Nishimura, Y.; Goto, Y.; Pang, H.; Endo, Y.; Mizuno, T.; Momoi, Y.; Watari, T.; Tsujimoto, H.; Hasegawa, A. Genetic heterogeneity of env gene of feline immunodeficiency virus obtained from multiple districts in Japan. Virus Res. 1998, 57, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sodora, D.L.; Shpaer, E.G.; Kitchell, B.E.; Dow, S.W.; Hoover, E.A.; Mullins, J.I. Identification of three feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) env gene subtypes and comparison of the FIV and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 evolutionary patterns. J. Virol. 1994, 68, 2230–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Teixeira, B.M.; Hagiwara, M.K.; Cruz, J.C.; Hosie, M.J. Feline immunodeficiency virus in South America. Viruses 2012, 4, 383–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Pistello, M.; Cammarota, G.; Nicoletti, E.; Matteucci, D.; Curcio, M.; Del Mauro, D.; Bendinelli, M. Analysis of the genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationship of Italian isolates of feline immunodeficiency virus indicates a high prevalence and heterogeneity of subtype B. J. Gen. Virol. 1997, 78 Pt 9, 2247–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Ito, J.; Gifford, R.J.; Sato, K. Retroviruses drive the rapid evolution of mammalian APOBEC3 genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 610–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Hayward, J.A.; Tachedjian, M.; Cui, J.; Cheng, A.Z.; Johnson, A.; Baker, M.L.; Harris, R.S.; Wang, L.F.; Tachedjian, G. Differential evolution of antiretroviral restriction factors in pteropid bats as revealed by APOBEC3 gene complexity. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1626–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Munk, C.; Willemsen, A.; Bravo, I.G. An ancient history of gene duplications, fusions and losses in the evolution of APOBEC3 mutators in mammals. BMC Evol. Biol. 2012, 12, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Greenwood, A.D.; Ishida, Y.; O’Brien, S.P.; Roca, A.L.; Eiden, M.V. Transmission, evolution, and endogenization: Lessons learned from recent retroviral invasions. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2018, 82, e00044-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Bannert, N.; Kurth, R. Retroelements and the human genome: New perspectives on an old relation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101 (Suppl. 2), 14572–14579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Yang, L.; Emerman, M.; Malik, H.S.; McLaughlin, R.N.J. Retrocopying expands the functional repertoire of APOBEC3 antiviral proteins in primates. Elife 2020, 9, e58436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ebrahimi, D.; Richards, C.M.; Carpenter, M.A.; Wang, J.; Ikeda, T.; Becker, J.T.; Cheng, A.Z.; McCann, J.L.; Shaban, N.M.; Salamango, D.J.; et al. Genetic and mechanistic basis for APOBEC3H alternative splicing, retrovirus restriction, and counteraction by HIV-1 protease. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Ikeda, T.; Symeonides, M.; Albin, J.S.; Li, M.; Thali, M.; Harris, R.S. HIV-1 adaptation studies reveal a novel Env-mediated homeostasis mechanism for evading lethal hypermutation by APOBEC3G. PLoS Pathog. 2018, 14, e1007010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Abudu, A.; Takaori-Kondo, A.; Izumi, T.; Shirakawa, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Sasada, A.; Fukunaga, K.; Uchiyama, T. Murine retrovirus escapes from murine APOBEC3 via two distinct novel mechanisms. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16, 1565–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Kolokithas, A.; Rosenke, K.; Malik, F.; Hendrick, D.; Swanson, L.; Santiago, M.L.; Portis, J.L.; Hasenkrug, K.J.; Evans, L.H. The glycosylated Gag protein of a murine leukemia virus inhibits the antiretroviral function of APOBEC3. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 10933–10936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Derse, D.; Hill, S.A.; Princler, G.; Lloyd, P.; Heidecker, G. Resistance of human T cell leukemia virus type 1 to APOBEC3G restriction is mediated by elements in nucleocapsid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 2915–2920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Hagen, B.; Kraase, M.; Indikova, I.; Indik, S. A high rate of polymerization during synthesis of mouse mammary tumor virus DNA alleviates hypermutation by APOBEC3 proteins. PLoS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1007533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Turelli, P.; Mangeat, B.; Jost, S.; Vianin, S.; Trono, D. Inhibition of hepatitis B virus replication by APOBEC3G. Science 2004, 303, 1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Sasada, A.; Takaori-Kondo, A.; Shirakawa, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Abudu, A.; Hishizawa, M.; Imada, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Uchiyama, T. APOBEC3G targets human T-cell leukemia virus type 1. Retrovirology 2005, 2, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Warren, C.J.; Westrich, J.A.; Doorslaer, K.V.; Pyeon, D. Roles of APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B in human papillomavirus infection and disease progression. Viruses 2017, 9, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Cheng, A.Z.; Yockteng-Melgar, J.; Jarvis, M.C.; Malik-Soni, N.; Borozan, I.; Carpenter, M.A.; McCann, J.L.; Ebrahimi, D.; Shaban, N.M.; Marcon, E.; et al. Epstein-Barr virus BORF2 inhibits cellular APOBEC3B to preserve viral genome integrity. Nat. Microbiol. 2019, 4, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Cheng, A.Z.; Nobrega de Moraes, S.; Attarian, C.; Yockteng-Melgar, J.; Jarvis, M.C.; Biolatti, M.; Galitska, G.; Dell’Oste, V.; Frappier, L.; Bierle, C.J.; et al. A conserved mechanism of APOBEC3 relocalization by herpesviral ribonucleotide reductase large subunits. J. Virol. 2019, e01539-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Stewart, J.A.; Holland, T.C.; Bhagwat, A.S. Human herpes simplex virus-1 depletes APOBEC3A from nuclei. Virology 2019, 537, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Association of host factors with viral cross-species transmission. (a) Usage of viral receptors for infection. In the case of SARS-CoV-2, its putative ancestral virus, a bat CoV, uses the receptor molecule(s) expressed on bat cells (not yet identified) (left). It is expected that a bat CoV was transferred to humans by a spillover event (although there may have been certain intermediate hosts between bats and humans). At first, the ancestral bat CoV may not have efficiently used human ACE2 as its receptor for infection (middle). However, through adaptive evolution, the bat CoV began to be able to efficiently utilize human ACE2 as the receptor and evolved into SARS-CoV-2 (right). (b) Hijacking of a proviral host protein. In the case of avian influenza A virus, viral proteases, particularly PB2, utilize avian ANP32A for efficient replication in avian cells (left). However, the avian flu polymerase cannot utilize human ANP32A (middle). Through adaptive evolution, the E627K mutation in the PB2 protein enabled the hijacking of human ANP32A for efficient replication in human cells (right). (c) Antagonism of an antiviral host protein. SIVcpz Vif can degrade and counteract the antiviral APOBEC3G protein of its host species (the chimpanzee) (left). In a spillover event, SIVcpz was transferred to gorillas. However, SIVcpz Vif cannot counteract the antiviral APOBEC3G protein of the new host (the gorilla) (middle). Through adaptive evolution, the virus acquired an M16E mutation in Vif, which enabled the virus to counteract gorilla APOBEC3G protein and efficiently replicate (right).
Figure 1. Association of host factors with viral cross-species transmission. (a) Usage of viral receptors for infection. In the case of SARS-CoV-2, its putative ancestral virus, a bat CoV, uses the receptor molecule(s) expressed on bat cells (not yet identified) (left). It is expected that a bat CoV was transferred to humans by a spillover event (although there may have been certain intermediate hosts between bats and humans). At first, the ancestral bat CoV may not have efficiently used human ACE2 as its receptor for infection (middle). However, through adaptive evolution, the bat CoV began to be able to efficiently utilize human ACE2 as the receptor and evolved into SARS-CoV-2 (right). (b) Hijacking of a proviral host protein. In the case of avian influenza A virus, viral proteases, particularly PB2, utilize avian ANP32A for efficient replication in avian cells (left). However, the avian flu polymerase cannot utilize human ANP32A (middle). Through adaptive evolution, the E627K mutation in the PB2 protein enabled the hijacking of human ANP32A for efficient replication in human cells (right). (c) Antagonism of an antiviral host protein. SIVcpz Vif can degrade and counteract the antiviral APOBEC3G protein of its host species (the chimpanzee) (left). In a spillover event, SIVcpz was transferred to gorillas. However, SIVcpz Vif cannot counteract the antiviral APOBEC3G protein of the new host (the gorilla) (middle). Through adaptive evolution, the virus acquired an M16E mutation in Vif, which enabled the virus to counteract gorilla APOBEC3G protein and efficiently replicate (right).
Viruses 13 00124 g001
Figure 2. Birth of the APOBEC3G gene. Because the genomes of members of Monotremata (e.g., platypuses) and Marsupialia (e.g., kangaroos) do not encode APOBEC3 genes in the canonical locus (i.e., the locus sandwiched between the CBX6 and CBX7 genes), it was previously assumed that APOBEC3 genes were acquired in the common ancestor of Placentalia. Ito, Gifford, and Sato [62] revealed that the APOBEC3G gene (i.e., the Z2-Z1-type gene) is encoded in the genomes of Hominidae (e.g., humans and chimpanzees), Old World monkeys (e.g., rhesus macaques), and New World monkeys (e.g., night monkeys) but not in those of prosimians (e.g., bushbabies). These results suggest that the APOBEC3G gene (i.e., the Z2-Z1-type gene) was generated in the common ancestor of Simiiformes. Because the timing of the birth of the APOBEC3G gene overlapped with a period of high ERV invasion in the primate genome (shown as a heatmap) [62], it is speculated that retroviral invasions were a driving force in the generation of the APOBEC3G gene. MYA, million years ago.
Figure 2. Birth of the APOBEC3G gene. Because the genomes of members of Monotremata (e.g., platypuses) and Marsupialia (e.g., kangaroos) do not encode APOBEC3 genes in the canonical locus (i.e., the locus sandwiched between the CBX6 and CBX7 genes), it was previously assumed that APOBEC3 genes were acquired in the common ancestor of Placentalia. Ito, Gifford, and Sato [62] revealed that the APOBEC3G gene (i.e., the Z2-Z1-type gene) is encoded in the genomes of Hominidae (e.g., humans and chimpanzees), Old World monkeys (e.g., rhesus macaques), and New World monkeys (e.g., night monkeys) but not in those of prosimians (e.g., bushbabies). These results suggest that the APOBEC3G gene (i.e., the Z2-Z1-type gene) was generated in the common ancestor of Simiiformes. Because the timing of the birth of the APOBEC3G gene overlapped with a period of high ERV invasion in the primate genome (shown as a heatmap) [62], it is speculated that retroviral invasions were a driving force in the generation of the APOBEC3G gene. MYA, million years ago.
Viruses 13 00124 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Uriu, K.; Kosugi, Y.; Ito, J.; Sato, K. The Battle between Retroviruses and APOBEC3 Genes: Its Past and Present. Viruses 2021, 13, 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13010124

AMA Style

Uriu K, Kosugi Y, Ito J, Sato K. The Battle between Retroviruses and APOBEC3 Genes: Its Past and Present. Viruses. 2021; 13(1):124. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13010124

Chicago/Turabian Style

Uriu, Keiya, Yusuke Kosugi, Jumpei Ito, and Kei Sato. 2021. "The Battle between Retroviruses and APOBEC3 Genes: Its Past and Present" Viruses 13, no. 1: 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13010124

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop