Skip to main content
Log in

Drug Distribution

The Forgotten Relative in Clinical Pharmacokinetics

  • Leading Article
  • Published:
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The target concentration strategy has proved a valuable approach for dose individualisation, giving proper weight to the high interindividual variation in plasma concentrations. Nevertheless, optimisation of plasma concentrations does not necessarily yield optimal pharmacodynamic effects because variability in the plasma concentration-effect relationship is far from insignificant. We argue that this is due not only to unpredictable target tissue sensitivity but also to a highly variable, and equally unpredictable, distribution process from plasma into the interstitial space of the target tissue, the true effect compartment. This is borne out by recent results from studies employing modern techniques that enable direct measurement of target tissue drug concentrations, like magnetic resonance spectroscopy, single photon emission computed tomography, and tissue microdialysis. Such forthcoming results highlight the importance of the distribution process as a key factor determining drug response. Clinical pharmacology should seek an improved understanding of the biological determinants governing not only plasma but tissue drug concentrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sheiner LB, Tozer TN. Clinical pharmacokinetics: the use of plasma concentrations of drugs. In: Melmon KL, Morelli HF, editors. Clinical pharmacology: basic principles of therapeutics. New York: Macmillan, 1978: 71–109.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peck CC. Reply: Concentration-controlled versus concentration-defined trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1993; 53: 385–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Holford HG. The target concentration approach to clinical drug development. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1995; 29(5): 287–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sheiner LB. Learning versus confirming in clinical drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997; 61(3): 275–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Padrini R, Piovan D, Busa M, et al. Pharmacodynamic variability of flecainide assessed by QRS changes. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1993; 53: 59–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Michel CC. Filtration coefficients and osmotic reflexion coefficients of the walls of single frog mesenteric capillaries. J Physiol (Lond). 1980; 309: 341–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Curry FE. Determinants of capillary permeability: a review of mechanisms based on single capillary studies in the frog. Circ Res. 1986; 59: 367–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Beck RB, Schultz JS. Hindrance of solute diffusion with membranes as measured with membranes of knownpore geometry. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972; 255: 273–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Renkin EM. Multiple pathways of capillary permeability. Circ Res. 1997; 41: 735–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Renkin EM. Capillary transport of macromolecules: pores and other endothelial pathways. J Appl Physiol. 1985; 58: 315–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Müller M, Holmäng A, Andersson O, et al. Measurement of interstitial muscle glucose and lactate during an oral glucose tolerance test. Am J Physiol. 1996; 271: E1003–7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lönnroth P, Jansson PA, Smith U. A microdialysis method allowing characterization of intercellular water space in humans. Am J Physiol. 1987; 16: E228–31.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jain RK. Transport of molecules in the tumor interstitium: a review. Cancer Res. 1987; 47: 3039–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Derendorf H, Hochhaus G, editors. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic correlation. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Müller M, Mader RM, Steiner B, et al. 5-Fluorouracil kinetics in the interstitial tumor space: clinical response in breast cancer patients. Cancer Res. 1997; 57: 2598–601.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bertazzoni Minelli E, Benini A, Muner A, et al. Pefloxacin penetration into human pancreatic tissue. J Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996; 38: 237–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Front D, Israel O, Iosilevsky G, et al. Human lung tumors: SPECT quantitation of differences in Co-57 bleomycin uptake. Radiology. 1987; 165: 129–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jynge P, Skjetne T, Gribbestad I, et al. In vivo tissue pharmacokinetics by fluorine magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a study of liver and muscle disposition of fleroxacin in humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1990; 48: 481–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Müller M, Haag O, Burgdorff T, et al. Characterization of peripheral compartment kinetics of antibiotics by in vivo microdialysis in humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996; 40(12): 2703–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pujol JL, Cupissol D, Gestin-Boyer C, et al. Tumor-tissue and plasma concentrations of platinum during chemotherapy of non small cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1990; 27: 72–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Blöchl-Daum B, Müller M, Meisinger V, et al. Measurement of extracellular fluid carboplatin kinetics in melanoma metastases with microdialysis. Br J Cancer. 1996; 73: 920–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Geny F, Costa P, Bressolle F, Galtier M. Ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics in elderly subjects and penetration into epididymis. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1993; 14(2): 161–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans-Georg Eichler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eichler, HG., Müller, M. Drug Distribution. Clin Pharmacokinet 34, 95–99 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-199834020-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-199834020-00001

Keywords

Navigation