Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Molecular basis for ubiquitin ligase CRL2FEM1C-mediated recognition of C-degron

Nature Chemical Biology volume 17, pages 263–271 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Proteome integrity depends on the ubiquitin–proteasome system to degrade unwanted or abnormal proteins. In addition to the N-degrons, C-terminal residues of proteins can also serve as degradation signals (C-degrons) that are recognized by specific cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases (CRLs) for proteasomal degradation. FEM1C is a CRL2 substrate receptor that targets the C-terminal arginine degron (Arg/C-degron), but the molecular mechanism of substrate recognition remains largely elusive. Here, we present crystal structures of FEM1C in complex with Arg/C-degron and show that FEM1C utilizes a semi-open binding pocket to capture the C-terminal arginine and that the extreme C-terminal arginine is the major structural determinant in recognition by FEM1C. Together with biochemical and mutagenesis studies, we provide a framework for understanding molecular recognition of the Arg/C-degron by the FEM family of proteins.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Crystal structure of human FEM1C1–244.
Fig. 2: Characterization of Arg/C-degron recognition by FEM1C.
Fig. 3: Structural basis of Arg/C-degron recognition by FEM1C.
Fig. 4: Mutagenesis studies of the key interactions between FEM1C and Arg/C-degron.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The atomic coordinates and structure factors of FEM1C and the FEM1C–peptide complex have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (https://www.rcsb.org/) with the accession codes 6XKC and 7JYA, respectively. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Hershko, A. & Ciechanover, A. The ubiquitin system. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 425–479 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Balchin, D., Hayer-Hartl, M. & Hartl, F. U. In vivo aspects of protein folding and quality control. Science 353, aac4354 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson, B. M. & DeBose-Boyd, R. A. Underlying mechanisms for sterol-induced ubiquitination and ER-associated degradation of HMG CoA reductase. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 81, 121–128 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sontag, E. M., Samant, R. S. & Frydman, J. Mechanisms and functions of spatial protein quality control. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 86, 97–122 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pickart, C. M. Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 503–533 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Finley, D. Recognition and processing of ubiquitin–protein conjugates by the proteasome. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 477–513 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Varshavsky, A. Naming a targeting signal. Cell 64, 13–15 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lucas, X. & Ciulli, A. Recognition of substrate degrons by E3 ubiquitin ligases and modulation by small-molecule mimicry strategies. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 44, 101–110 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bachmair, A., Finley, D. & Varshavsky, A. In vivo half-life of a protein is a function of its amino-terminal residue. Science 234, 179–186 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Varshavsky, A. The N-end rule pathway and regulation by proteolysis. Protein Sci. 20, 1298–1345 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Varshavsky, A. N-degron and C-degron pathways of protein degradation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 358–366 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hwang, C. S., Shemorry, A. & Varshavsky, A. N-terminal acetylation of cellular proteins creates specific degradation signals. Science 327, 973–977 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, S. J., Wu, X., Wadas, B., Oh, J. H. & Varshavsky, A. An N-end rule pathway that recognizes proline and destroys gluconeogenic enzymes. Science 355, eaal3655 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Timms, R. T. et al. A glycine-specific N-degron pathway mediates the quality control of protein N-myristoylation. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw4912 (2019).

  15. Kim, J. M. et al. Formyl-methionine as an N-degron of a eukaryotic N-end rule pathway. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat0174 (2018).

  16. Dissmeyer, N. Conditional protein function via N-degron pathway-mediated proteostasis in stress physiology. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-095937 (2019).

  17. Liu, Y., Liu, C., Dong, W. & Li, W. Physiological functions and clinical implications of the N-end rule pathway. Front. Med. 10, 258–270 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Choi, W. S. et al. Structural basis for the recognition of N-end rule substrates by the UBR box of ubiquitin ligases. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1175–1181 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Matta-Camacho, E., Kozlov, G., Li, F. F. & Gehring, K. Structural basis of substrate recognition and specificity in the N-end rule pathway. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1182–1187 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kwon, D. H. et al. Insights into degradation mechanism of N-end rule substrates by p62/SQSTM1 autophagy adapter. Nat. Commun. 9, 3291 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, Y. et al. ZZ-dependent regulation of p62/SQSTM1 in autophagy. Nat. Commun. 9, 4373 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Dong, C. et al. Molecular basis of GID4-mediated recognition of degrons for the Pro/N-end rule pathway. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 466–473 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dong, C. et al. Recognition of nonproline N-terminal residues by the Pro/N-degron pathway. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2007085117 (2020).

  24. Koren, I. et al. The eukaryotic proteome is shaped by E3 ubiquitin ligases targeting C-terminal degrons. Cell 173, 1622–1635 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin, H. C. et al. C-terminal end-directed protein elimination by CRL2 ubiquitin ligases. Mol. Cell 70, 602–613 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chatr-Aryamontri, A., van der Sloot, A. & Tyers, M. At long last, a C-terminal bookend for the ubiquitin code. Mol. Cell 70, 568–571 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Timms, R. T. & Koren, I. Tying up loose ends: the N-degron and C-degron pathways of protein degradation. Biochem. Soc. Trans. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20191094 (2020).

  28. Kamura, T. et al. VHL-box and SOCS-box domains determine binding specificity for Cul2–Rbx1 and Cul5–Rbx2 modules of ubiquitin ligases. Genes Dev. 18, 3055–3065 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Mahrour, N. et al. Characterization of cullin-box sequences that direct recruitment of Cul2–Rbx1 and Cul5–Rbx2 modules to elongin BC-based ubiquitin ligases. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 8005–8013 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dankert, J. F., Pagan, J. K., Starostina, N. G., Kipreos, E. T. & Pagano, M. FEM1 proteins are ancient regulators of SLBP degradation. Cell Cycle 16, 556–564 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Starostina, N. G. et al. A CUL-2 ubiquitin ligase containing three FEM proteins degrades TRA-1 to regulate C. elegans sex determination. Dev. Cell 13, 127–139 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Chan, S. L., Yee, K. S., Tan, K. M. & Yu, V. C. The Caenorhabditis elegans sex determination protein FEM-1 is a CED-3 substrate that associates with CED-4 and mediates apoptosis in mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 17925–17928 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Subauste, M. C. et al. Fem1b, a proapoptotic protein, mediates proteasome inhibitor-induced apoptosis of human colon cancer cells. Mol. Carcinog. 49, 105–113 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, S. et al. Atlas on substrate recognition subunits of CRL2 E3 ligases. Oncotarget 7, 46707–46716 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Mosavi, L. K., Cammett, T. J., Desrosiers, D. C. & Peng, Z. Y. The ankyrin repeat as molecular architecture for protein recognition. Protein Sci. 13, 1435–1448 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Blatch, G. L. & Lassle, M. The tetratricopeptide repeat: a structural motif mediating protein–protein interactions. Bioessays 21, 932–939 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Malim, M. H., Bohnlein, S., Hauber, J. & Cullen, B. R. Functional dissection of the HIV-1 Rev trans-activator—derivation of a trans-dominant repressor of Rev function. Cell 58, 205–214 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sedgwick, S. G. & Smerdon, S. J. The ankyrin repeat: a diversity of interactions on a common structural framework. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 311–316 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yen, H. C., Xu, Q., Chou, D. M., Zhao, Z. & Elledge, S. J. Global protein stability profiling in mammalian cells. Science 322, 918–923 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yen, H. C. & Elledge, S. J. Identification of SCF ubiquitin ligase substrates by global protein stability profiling. Science 322, 923–929 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Emanuele, M. J. et al. Global identification of modular cullin-RING ligase substrates. Cell 147, 459–474 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Sokalingam, S., Raghunathan, G., Soundrarajan, N. & Lee, S. G. A study on the effect of surface lysine to arginine mutagenesis on protein stability and structure using green fluorescent protein. PLoS ONE 7, e40410 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Gallivan, J. P. & Dougherty, D. A. Cation-π interactions in structural biology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 9459–9464 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Zheng, N. & Shabek, N. Ubiquitin ligases: structure, function, and regulation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 86, 129–157 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rusnac, D. V. et al. Recognition of the diglycine C-end degron by CRL2KLHDC2 ubiquitin ligase. Mol. Cell 72, 813–822 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Forbes, S. A. et al. COSMIC: somatic cancer genetics at high-resolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D777–D783 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Simonyan, V. & Mazumder, R. High-performance integrated virtual environment (HIVE) tools and applications for big data analysis. Genes 5, 957–981 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Ashkenazy, H., Erez, E., Martz, E., Pupko, T. & Ben-Tal, N. ConSurf 2010: calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W529–W533 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Minor, W., Cymborowski, M., Otwinowski, Z. & Chruszcz, M. HKL-3000: the integration of data reduction and structure solution—from diffraction images to an initial model in minutes. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 62, 859–866 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Hansen, S. et al. Design and applications of a clamp for green fluorescent protein with picomolar affinity. Sci. Rep. 7, 16292 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Cowtan, K. Recent developments in classical density modification. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 470–478 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Cowtan, K. The Buccaneer software for automated model building. 1. Tracing protein chains. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 62, 1002–1011 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Murshudov, G. N. et al. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 355–367 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank W. Tempel and A. Dong for assistance in data collection and structure determination. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 31900865 (C.D.), 32071193 (C.D.), 81974431 (W.M.), 81874039 (X.Y.) and 81771135 (X.Y.)), an NSERC grant (RGPIN-2016-06300 (J.M.)) and the key project of Tianjin Natural Science Grant (19JCZDJC35600 (X.Y.)).

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Xiaojie Yan, Xiaolu Wang.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Province and Ministry Co-sponsored Collaborative Innovation Center for Medical Epigenetics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China

    Xiaojie Yan, Yao Li & Cheng Dong

  2. Department of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China

    Xiaolu Wang

  3. Structural Genomics Consortium and Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Mengqi Zhou, Yanjun Li & Jinrong Min

  4. Department of Immunology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Key Laboratory of Diseases and Microenvironment of Ministry of Education of China, The Province and Ministry Co-sponsored Collaborative Innovation Center for Medical Epigenetics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China

    Lili Song & Wenyi Mi

Authors
  1. Xiaojie Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaolu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yao Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mengqi Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yanjun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lili Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Wenyi Mi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jinrong Min
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Cheng Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.D., J.M. and W.M. conceptualized the project and analyzed the data. X.Y. performed GST pull-down assays, protein purification and crystallization with help from Yao Li. C.D. determined the crystal structures. X.Y. and M.Z. conducted the ITC assays. X.W. performed the GPS assays under the supervision of W.M. X.Y., X.W., L.S. and Yanjun Li cloned the constructs. C.D. wrote the manuscript with critical input from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wenyi Mi, Jinrong Min or Cheng Dong.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Chemical Biology thanks David Dougan and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Comparison of different C-degrons recognition by FEM1C.

a, GST fusion SIL1 peptide immobilized on GST beads, and the pull-down was performed by incubating purified FEM1C (aa 1-371) in the presence of increasing concentrations of REV peptide. b, Stability comparison of the GFP-fused SIL1 and REV degrons by global protein stability assay (GPS experimental design in Fig. 4a). c, Cross-section view of the Arg/C-degron binding pocket. d, Overlay of REV degron (−3RQR−1) and FEM degron (−4KTER−1) binding pockets. The FEM peptide and its interacting residues of FEM1C are shown as cyan and gray sticks, respectively. Hydrogen bonds between FEM peptide and FEM1C are indicated as blue dash lines. The representation of REV-binding mode is same as Fig. 3d. e,f, The electrostatic potential surfaces of the FEM degron (cyan) and the REV degron (yellow) binding pockets. The K-4 of FEM degron and R-3 of REV degron share the same negatively charged binding pocket.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 The effects of C-degron sequence contexts on the binding of FEM proteins.

a, Stability comparison of the GFP-fused SIL1 and its E-3R mutant by global protein stability assay. b, The electrostatic properties of R-3 binding pocket in FEM1C (red, negative; blue, positive). R-3 of REV degron is shown as yellow stick, and its hydrogen-bonding residues in FEM1C are indicated. c, Sequence alignment of FEM1C (aa 182-191), FEM1B (aa 187-196) and FEM1A (aa 183-192). The R-3 interacting residues are colored in red. d, Stability comparison of the GFP-fused REV degron and REV degron capped with a leucine by global protein stability assay. e, f, ITC curve of FEM1C (aa 1-371) binding to the REV degron capped with two serine (e) or three serine residues (f).

Extended Data Fig. 3 Structural comparison of Arg/C-degron and Arg/N-degron recognitions.

a, The electrostatic potential surface of the UBR domain (PDB: 3NIH) bound to an Arg/N-degron plotted at ± 5 kT/e (red, negative; blue, positive). b, The electrostatic potential surface of FEM1C bound to an Arg/C-degron plotted at ± 5 kT/e. c, Interaction of the UBR domain with a Arg/N-degron. The N-terminal arginine is shown as yellow stick and its interacting residues in UBR are shown as salmon sticks. d, Interactions of FEM1C with an Arg/C-degron. The C-terminal arginine is shown as yellow stick and its interacting residues in FEM1C are shown as green sticks.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1–3 and Fig. 1.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data 1

Validation report.

Supplementary Data 2

Validation report.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Unprocessed gel linked to Fig. 1b.

Source Data Fig. 2

Unprocessed gel linked to Fig. 2a.

Source Data Fig. 3

Unprocessed western blots linked to Fig. 4b.

Source Data Fig. 4

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting data linked to Fig. 4c.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Unprocessed gel linked to Extended Data Fig. 1a.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, X., Wang, X., Li, Y. et al. Molecular basis for ubiquitin ligase CRL2FEM1C-mediated recognition of C-degron. Nat Chem Biol 17, 263–271 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-020-00703-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-020-00703-4

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing