Gut microbial diversity and genus-level differences identified in cervical cancer patients versus healthy controls
Introduction
Cervical cancer continues to be the most common gynecologic cancer globally. The American Cancer Society estimates >13,100 new cases of invasive cervical cancer will be diagnosed in the United States in 2019, resulting in >4250 deaths [1]. A previously published review by Chase et al. highlighted an important gap in studies investigating the association between the gut microbiome and gynecologic cancers [2]. The gut microbiome is proposed to alter host immunity by modulating multiple immunologic pathways, thus impacting cancer risk and treatment outcomes in various malignancies [[3], [4], [5]]; however, the relationship between the gut microbiome and cervical cancer has not been reported.
Previous studies theorized that host-dependent immunologic status and human papillomavirus (HPV)-induced immune evasion are responsible for persistent HPV infection and the subsequent development of cervical dysplasia [6]. Independent of HPV status, the immune system's capability to recognize tumor antigens and clear an oncogenic HPV infection ultimately determines whether a patient develops cervical cancer [7]. The ability of high risk HPV to downregulate interferon signaling favors HPV persistence and the development of cervical cancer and its precursor lesions [7,8]. Previous evidence supports that a more diverse, abundant gut microbiota with distinct composition can lead to improved anti-tumoral immune response by priming anti-tumoral T cell activation [9]. In melanoma patients treated with anti-programmed cell death 1 protein (PD-1) immunotherapy, Gopalakrishnan et al. demonstrated that patients with a favorable baseline gut microbiome (high diversity and abundance of Ruminococcaceae and Faecalibacterium) exhibit enhanced systemic and antitumor immune responses mediated by increased antigen presentation and improved effector T cell function [10]. Noting that gut microbial differences could affect cervical cancer risk and treatment through several pathways, we aimed to characterize variations in the fecal or gut microbiome of women with locally advanced cervical cancer. In doing so, we hope to clarify differences in gut microbial diversity and composition within and between cervical cancer patients as compared to cancer-free controls; laying the groundwork for further research aimed at exploring the role of the gut microbiota in cervical cancer risk and treatment.
Section snippets
Participants and clinical data
Gut microbiome samples for cervical cancer patients were collected on an IRB approved prospective protocol (MDACC 2014–0543) for patients with biopsy-proven carcinoma of the cervix treated at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and Harris Health System, Lyndon B. Johnson General Hospital Oncology Clinic between September 22, 2015 and December 21, 2017. Female controls that were comparable to cases in regard to age, race and body mass index (BMI), were derived from the Houston, TX
Results
We characterized the 16S rDNA fecal microbiome in 42 cervical cancer patients. Their clinico-pathologic data are summarized in Table 1. Cervical cancer cases were staged according to the Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2014 staging system. Overall, approximately 64% of the patients (27 of 42) had advanced stage disease (stage IIB, or greater) and the majority of patients had squamous cell cancers with moderate or poor differentiation. With respect to HPV status, HPV-16 was the
Discussion
In this study, we sought to characterize the gut microbiome of women with cervical cancer. We hypothesized that cervical cancer patients would have a microbiome distinct from cancer free controls, which would be more pronounced in higher staged disease. We found that diversity of the fecal microbiome in cervical cancer patients differed between young and older women. We observed significant differences in α and β diversity between cervical cancer patients and controls, suggesting compositional
Research support
This research was supported in part by The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Duncan Family Institute for Cancer Prevention and Risk Assessment (CRD), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) through MD Anderson's Cancer Center Support Grant P30CA016672 and the National Institutes of Health T32 grant #5T32 CA101642-13 (TTS). This study was partially funded by The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center HPV-related Cancers Moonshot (AK).
Role of funding sources
The funding sources were not involved in the development of the research hypothesis, study design, data analysis, or manuscript writing. Data access was limited to the authors of this manuscript.
Author contribution
All authors were involved with subject identification and data collection, interpretation of statistical analysis, and review and approval of final manuscript. Study concept was developed by LEC, CRD, AK and TTS. Drafting of manuscript was done by TTS.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, related to the subject matter of the article submitted.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Duncan Family Institute for Cancer Prevention and Risk Assessment (CRD), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) through MD Anderson's Cancer Center Support Grant P30CA016672 and the National Institutes of Health T32 grant #5T32 CA101642-13 (TTS). This study was partially funded by The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center HPV-related Cancers Moonshot (AK). The human subjects who participated in this
References (38)
- et al.
The vaginal and gastrointestinal microbiomes in gynecologic cancers: a review of applications in etiology, symptoms and treatment
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2015) - et al.
The influence of the gut microbiome on cancer, immunity, and cancer immunotherapy
Cancer Cell
(2018) - et al.
Modulating the microbiome to improve therapeutic response in cancer
Lancet Oncol.
(2019) Immune responses against virus and tumor in cervical carcinogenesis: treatment strategies for avoiding the HPV-induced immune escape
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2013)- et al.
Identification of key amino acid residues that determine the ability of high risk HPV16-E7 to dysregulate major histocompatibility complex class I expression
J. Biol. Chem.
(2011) - et al.
Collection media and delayed freezing effects on microbial composition of human stool
Microbiome
(2015) - et al.
Altered diversity and composition of the gut microbiome in patients with cervical cancer
AMB Express
(2019) - et al.
Cervicovaginal bacteria are a major modulator of host inflammatory responses in the female genital tract
Immunity
(2015) - et al.
US immigration westernizes the human gut microbiome
Cell
(2018) - et al.
An obesity-associated gut microbiome reprograms the intestinal epigenome and leads to altered colonic gene expression
Genome Biol.
(2018)
Role of the gut microbiome in the pathogenesis of obesity and obesity-related metabolic dysfunction
Gastroenterology
Cancer statistics, 2019
CA Cancer J. Clin.
Commensal bacteria at the interface of host metabolism and the immune system
Nat. Immunol.
Papillomavirus type 16 oncogenes downregulate expression of interferon-responsive genes and upregulate proliferation-associated and NF- B-responsive genes in cervical keratinocytes
J. Virol.
Commensal <em>Bifidobacterium</em> promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti–PD-L1 efficacy
Science (80- )
Gut microbiome modulates response to anti–PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients
Science (80- )
Comparison of collection methods for fecal samples in microbiome studies
Am. J. Epidemiol.
Collecting fecal samples for microbiome analyses in epidemiology studies
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev.
A framework for human microbiome research
Nature
Cited by (55)
Gut microbiome-mediated monocytes promote liver metastasis
2024, International ImmunopharmacologyNaringenin suppresses epithelial ovarian cancer by inhibiting proliferation and modulating gut microbiota
2022, PhytomedicineCitation Excerpt :Following naringenin treatment, however, the abundances of beneficial bacteria, such as those in the genera Alistipes and Lactobacillus, were increased. The abundance of Alistipes is high in the gut microflora of healthy people but low in cervical cancer patients (Sims et al., 2019). In addition, the abundance of Bacteroides is greatly elevated in the gut microbiota of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (Qi et al., 2019).
Alterations in gut and genital microbiota associated with gynecological diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2024, Reproductive Biology and EndocrinologyAssociations between gut microbiota and gynecological cancers: A bi-directional two-sample Mendelian randomization study
2024, Medicine (United States)Gut microbiota and female health
2024, World Journal of Gastroenterology