Elsevier

Genomics

Volume 106, Issue 5, November 2015, Pages 268-277
Genomics

Transcriptome meta-analysis reveals common differential and global gene expression profiles in cystic fibrosis and other respiratory disorders and identifies CFTR regulators

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2015.07.005Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Highlights

  • Gene markers common to respiratory diseases identified

  • Significance of DE gene list “overlap” between independent microarray studies measured

  • Transcriptomic similarity assessed using standardized global gene expression values

  • CF-related gene expression highly associated with epithelial de-differentiation and injury

  • Correlation of gene expression values identifies CFTR regulators

Abstract

A meta-analysis of 13 independent microarray data sets was performed and gene expression profiles from cystic fibrosis (CF), similar disorders (COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, IPF: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, asthma), environmental conditions (smoking, epithelial injury), related cellular processes (epithelial differentiation/regeneration), and non-respiratory “control” conditions (schizophrenia, dieting), were compared. Similarity among differentially expressed (DE) gene lists was assessed using a permutation test, and a clustergram was constructed, identifying common gene markers. Global gene expression values were standardized using a novel approach, revealing that similarities between independent data sets run deeper than shared DE genes. Correlation of gene expression values identified putative gene regulators of the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, of potential therapeutic significance. Our study provides a novel perspective on CF epithelial gene expression in the context of other lung disorders and conditions, and highlights the contribution of differentiation/EMT and injury to gene signatures of respiratory disease.

Keywords

Cystic fibrosis
respiratory disease
differentiation
transcriptome
meta-analysis

Cited by (0)