Basic Neuroscience
A Navigation Analysis Tool (NAT) to assess spatial behavior in open-field and structured mazes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.02.018Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Novel analysis tool probing spatial behavior in open-field and structured mazes.

  • Multi-parametric analysis of goal-oriented navigation and decision making policy.

  • Wide range of protocols and data managed within the same relational database.

  • Unified view through observations from multiple spatial navigation paradigms.

  • Results on the ability of mice to learn the Morris watermaze and the starmaze tasks.

Abstract

Spatial navigation calls upon mnemonic capabilities (e.g. remembering the location of a rewarding site) as well as adaptive motor control (e.g. fine tuning of the trajectory according to the ongoing sensory context). To study this complex process by means of behavioral measurements it is necessary to quantify a large set of meaningful parameters on multiple time scales (from milliseconds to several minutes), and to compare them across different paradigms. Moreover, the issue of automating the behavioral analysis is critical to cope with the consequent computational load and the sophistication of the measurements. We developed a general purpose Navigation Analysis Tool (NAT) that provides an integrated architecture consisting of a data management system (implemented in MySQL), a core analysis toolbox (in MATLAB), and a graphical user interface (in JAVA). Its extensive characterization of trajectories over time, from exploratory behavior to goal-oriented navigation with decision points using a wide range of parameters, makes NAT a powerful analysis tool. In particular, NAT supplies a new set of specific measurements assessing performances in multiple intersection mazes and allowing navigation strategies to be discriminated (e.g. in the starmaze). Its user interface enables easy use while its modular organization provides many opportunities of extension and customization. Importantly, the portability of NAT to any type of maze and environment extends its exploitation far beyond the field of spatial navigation.

Introduction

Spatial navigation is a manifold process whose dynamics depend on a wide range of competitive and/or cooperative mechanisms (see Arleo and Rondi-Reig, 2007, for a review). Dissecting spatial behavior into its elementary components is instrumental, for instance, to correlate single neuron activity to specific behavioral patterns (e.g. Whitlock et al., 2012), and then to infer novel anatomo-functional properties based on causal animal–environment interactions. Analyzing spatial behavior can also help to elucidate the link between specific neuronal adaptation deficits (e.g. lack of synaptic plasticity in transgenic animals) and subtle goal-oriented navigation impairments (e.g. Rondi-Reig et al., 2001, Burguière et al., 2005, Rochefort et al., 2011).

Meaningful accounts of spatial behavior require multi-parameter analysis of large experimental datasets. Also, the ability to bind observations across multiple spatial learning tasks (which produce heterogeneous data in terms of performance indicators, protocols, maze shapes, and task complexity) is a necessary condition toward a unified view of the mechanisms underpinning spatial cognition. During the last decades, these considerations have given rise to a substantial effort to conceive automated analysis tools and data management systems (e.g. Bradley et al., 2005, Drai and Golani, 2001, Wolfer and Lipp, 1992; see Section 4 for a Discussion on existing solutions).

This paper presents a Navigation Analysis Tool (NAT) that was explicitly designed to cope with large behavioral datasets, and to draw coherent interpretations across multiple spatial learning tasks (e.g. involving both open-field and structured mazes). NAT provides an extended parameter space to characterize spatial behavior quantitatively, with a focus on goal-directed navigation and decision point analysis. It offers a flexible and easy-to-use tool aimed at benchmarking the analysis of spatial navigation data. The rationale behind the development of NAT is indeed to provide a standardized analysis framework to study learning and memory in the case of spatial navigation. NAT is released as open source software under the CeCILL license (compatible with GNU GPL), and it can be downloaded from the Plume web site www.projet-plume.org/en (see also the Supplementary User Guide).

In the following, we first describe the main features of NAT, which include information processing and management, and statistical behavioral analysis. We then provide a series of results obtained by applying NAT to quantify the spatial behavior of mice in two navigation tasks, namely the watermaze (Morris et al., 1982, Morris, 1981) and the starmaze (Rondi-Reig et al., 2006).

Section snippets

Materials and methods

NAT has a modular environment based on a client/server architecture (Fig. 1). On the client side, a graphical user interface (implemented in JAVA) helps the experimenter throughout the entire analysis process, which is mediated by two primary modules. First, the ‘Input preprocessing and database manager’ module allows behavioral recordings from an acquisition system to be preprocessed and imported into NAT (Section 2.1). Second, the ‘Statistical analysis toolbox’ (implemented in MATLAB) allows

Results

Two different apparatus were employed for the navigation tasks, namely the watermaze and the starmaze (Fig. 3, Fig. 4), illustrating goal-oriented navigation in an open-field (Burguière et al., 2005) and in a multi-intersection environment (Fouquet et al., 2011), respectively.

Discussion

Unfolding spatial behavior requires the assessment of a large spectrum of parameters. Automated tools are therefore suited to improve the efficacy and reliability of spatial behavior analysis. They also foster the interpretation of large data sets gathered across multiple experimental protocols, ultimately providing a unified picture. This paper describes an automated Navigation Analysis Tool (NAT) that quantifies a wide range of meaningful parameters to characterize spatial learning and

Acknowledgements

This work was granted by the ANR Project EvoNeuro, ANR-09-EMER-005-01. It was previously supported by the GIS Program ‘Longevity’ (grant nos. SRI20001117030, L0201), and by the ACI Program ‘Integrative and Computational Neuroscience’ (NIC 0083). The authors thank S. Thierry and C. Poussineau for their help in developing NAT, and F. Maloumian for her help for the figures.

References (36)

  • A. Arleo et al.

    Multimodal sensory integration and concurrent navigation strategies for spatial cognition in real and artificial organisms

    J Integr Neurosci

    (2007)
  • C.A. Barnes

    Memory deficits associated with senescence: a neurophysiological and behavioral study in the rat

    J Comp Physiol Psychol

    (1979)
  • H.D. Beach

    Morphine addiction in rats

    Can J Psychol

    (1957)
  • Y. Benjamini et al.

    Quantifying the buildup in extent and complexity of free exploration in mice

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2011)
  • P. Boguszewski et al.

    Emotional changes related to age in rats—a behavioral analysis

    Behav Brain Res

    (2002)
  • D.C. Bradley et al.

    A relational database for trial-based behavioral experiments

    J Neurosci Methods

    (2005)
  • S.M. Brudzynski et al.

    Analysis of locomotor activity in the rat: parallelism index, a new measure of locomotor exploratory pattern

    Physiol Behav

    (1997)
  • E. Burguière et al.

    Spatial navigation impairment in mice lacking cerebellar LTD: a motor adaptation deficit

    Nat Neurosci

    (2005)
  • E. Burguière et al.

    Role of the cerebellar cortex in conditioned goal-directed behavior

    J Neurosci

    (2010)
  • C.D. Conrad et al.

    Chronic stress impairs rat spatial memory on the Y maze, and this effect is blocked by tianeptine pretreatment

    Behav Neurosci

    (1996)
  • D. Drai et al.

    SEE: a tool for the visualization and analysis of rodent exploratory behavior

    Neurosci Biobehav Rev

    (2001)
  • D. Eilam et al.

    Home base behavior of rats (Rattus norvegicus) exploring a novel environment

    Behav Brain Res

    (1989)
  • T. Flash et al.

    The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model

    J Neurosci

    (1985)
  • E. Fonio et al.

    Freedom of movement and the stability of its unfolding in free exploration of mice

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2009)
  • C. Fouquet et al.

    Early detection of age-related memory deficits in individual mice

    Neurobiol Aging

    (2011)
  • S.N. Fry et al.

    TrackFly: virtual reality for a behavioral system analysis in free-flying fruit flies

    J Neurosci Methods

    (2008)
  • M. Gallagher et al.

    Severity of spatial learning impairment in aging: development of a learning index for performance in the Morris water maze

    Behav Neurosci

    (1993)
  • A. Graziano et al.

    Automatic recognition of explorative strategies in the Morris water maze

    J Neurosci Methods

    (2003)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text