Elsevier

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Volume 26, February 2014, Pages 79-86
Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Morphology and function of membrane-bound organelles

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2013.10.006Get rights and content

The cell interior is a busy and crowded place. A large fraction of the cell volume is taken up by organelles that come in a variety of shapes and sizes. These organelles are surrounded by membrane that not only acts as a diffusion barrier, but also provides each organelle with its unique morphology that contributes to its function, often in ways that are poorly understood. Here we discuss recent discoveries on the relationship between organelle structure and function.

Introduction

Organelles are dynamic, changing size and shape to maintain homeostasis and adjusting to the various needs of the cell. Some changes occur as part of the normal cell cycle, for example during cell division [1, 2, 3]. Other changes happen in response to challenges or stress and reflect a modification in organelle function, such as a change in protein folding capacity of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or ATP production in mitochondria [4, 5]. It is assumed that alterations to organelle morphology reflect an underlying functional optimization. Yet, this relationship is often poorly understood: for example, does the peripheral endoplasmic reticulum (ER) have to be in the shape of tubules in order to carry out its function? Does mitochondrial size matter? In this review we discuss recent advances in our understanding of the relationship between organelle structure and function, focusing primarily on the ER, nucleus and mitochondria. The reader is referred to excellent reviews that cover earlier work on Golgi [1], peroxosime [6] and endosome [7] structure.

Section snippets

Shaping a membrane-bound organelle

How are organelles shaped? The morphology of most organelles is characterized by a combination of flat and curved membrane, such as in the ER (Figure 1a). Cellular membranes are lipid bilayers made predominantly of phospholipids and proteins, both of which can contribute to membrane curvature. A difference in lipid composition between the two bilayers can itself lead to membrane curvature, and this likely drives the formation of the rims of Golgi cisternae and the tubular structures that

Complex shapes allow for distinct functions within a single organelle

While some organelles, such as the nucleus or the vacuole, are simple in shape, other organelles, such as the Golgi and the ER, have complex shapes made up of a network of cisternae and tubules. This complexity allows for segregation of biochemical processes within the organelle: for example, ribosomes are preferentially associated with the flat ER membrane that forms the rough ER [14•, 18]. In contrast, ER tubules are engaged in processes such as lipid synthesis and they are responsible for

Organelle shape and cell function

It is likely that organelle shape, and in particular the membrane configuration, has evolved to suit not only the organelle's biological activity, but also overall cell function. The formation of MCS discussed above is one such example, and recent studies suggest that the reticular nature of the peripheral ER is also important to allow passage of macromolecules from the cytosol to the plasma membrane. In fission yeast, for example, the localization of a plasma membrane protein, Mid1, which

Changing shape in adaptation to stress

In addition to changes associated with the cell cycle, cells may experience a need to increase the functional capacity of an organelle, either due to specialization following differentiation or under stress conditions, when the activity of a certain cellular compartment must be increased in order achieve homeostasis. A well-documented case is the unfolded protein response (UPR), which is activated due to the accumulation of unfolded proteins in the ER and leads to increased phospholipid

The importance of organelle size

In addition to having a distinct shape, organelles also have a specific size. Organelle size may scale with cell size as was shown in yeast for the nucleus [38, 39] and more recently for mitochondria [40]. Organelle size may also expand to accommodate the cell's changing needs, as in the case of ER expansion during the UPR or when mitochondria fuse to evade autophagy, described above. Thus, the size of an organelle undoubtedly affects its function, but in only very few cases has organelle size

Conclusions

In this review we presented examples of the relationship between organelles, their surrounding membranes and morphology, and their function. In describing recent studies, we highlighted some of the possible mechanisms determining organelle shape, as well as the functional consequences of altering their structure. Organelles differ in shape because the lipid and protein building blocks involved in determining membrane shape are distinct, resulting in the prototypical organelle shape we see by

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

We thank Will Prinz, Rebecca Meseroll and Alison Walters for excellent comments on the manuscript, and apologize for all those whose work could not be cited due to space limitations.

RH is supported by NIH: R01 GM057839 and GM098766. OCF is supported by intramural funding from NIDDK.

References (46)

  • A.L. Schlaitz et al.

    REEP3/4 ensure endoplasmic reticulum clearance from metaphase chromatin and proper nuclear envelope architecture

    Dev Cell

    (2013)
  • L.C. Gomes et al.

    During autophagy mitochondria elongate, are spared from degradation and sustain cell viability

    Nat Cell Biol

    (2011)
  • D.W. Hailey et al.

    Mitochondria supply membranes for autophagosome biogenesis during starvation

    Cell

    (2010)
  • S.M. Rafelski et al.

    Mitochondrial network size scaling in budding yeast

    Science

    (2012)
  • K. Crasta et al.

    DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis

    Nature

    (2012)
  • J.T. Arnone et al.

    The dynamic nature of the nuclear envelope: lessons from closed mitosis

    Nucleus

    (2013)
  • M. Puhka et al.

    Progressive sheet-to-tubule transformation is a general mechanism for endoplasmic reticulum partitioning in dividing mammalian cells

    Mol Biol Cell

    (2012)
  • S. Schuck et al.

    Membrane expansion alleviates endoplasmic reticulum stress independently of the unfolded protein response

    J Cell Biol

    (2009)
  • J. Huotari et al.

    Endosome maturation

    Embo J

    (2011)
  • J.R. Friedman et al.

    The ER in 3D: a multifunctional dynamic membrane network

    Trends Cell Biol

    (2011)
  • K. Anwar et al.

    The dynamin-like GTPase Sey1p mediates homotypic ER fusion in S. cerevisiae

    J Cell Biol

    (2012)
  • B.J. Peter et al.

    BAR domains as sensors of membrane curvature: the amphiphysin BAR structure

    Science

    (2004)
  • Y. Shibata et al.

    Mechanisms determining the morphology of the peripheral ER

    Cell

    (2010)
  • Cited by (53)

    • Biological colloids: Unique properties of membraneless organelles in the cell

      2022, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      These functions can be broadly rationalized by the concepts of targeting, localization, protection/shielding or buffering effects, i.e., emerging from altered mass action within the dense internal milieu of the organelle. Whereas these functions are probably key to many MLOs, they are not in the focus of this treatise, so the reader is directed to some excellent reviews in the field [155–157]. Here, we would rather emphasize that another consequence of the formation of an MLO is that it creates a novel and unique molecular interface, which has special properties and can interact with metabolites, macromolecules and cellular structures, thereby providing unique cellular functions (Fig. 5).

    • Enzyme-catalyzed cascade reactions on multienzyme proteinosomes

      2022, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
    • Single fluorescent probes enabling simultaneous visualization of duple organelles: Design principles, mechanisms, and applications

      2022, Coordination Chemistry Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      One of the major differences between prokaryote organisms and eukaryotic cells is that the eukaryotic cells contain subcellular compartments called organelles, such as nucleus, mitochondria, lysosomes, endoplasmic reticulum (ER), lipid droplets (LDs), Golgi apparatus, ribosomes, etc [1]. Most of the organelles except for ribosomes are bounded by lipid bilayer and isolated from the extra-organelle space [2]. As a result, each of the organelles exhibits distinctive contents different of cytoplasm and other compartments, and thus performs unique biological functions.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text