ReviewTGF-β signalling pathways in early Xenopus development
Introduction
The members of the TGF-β superfamily that are important in early Xenopus embryos belong to two subfamilies: those functionally related to Activin, which include members of the Nodal family (Xnr1–6), Derrière, Vg-1, and Activin itself and members of the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) subfamily, in particular BMP2, 4 and 7. The Activin-related ligands are required for mesoderm and endoderm specification and patterning, for promoting gastrulation movements and for establishing left–right asymmetry 1••, 2, 3. The BMPs control the fundamental decision between formation of neural versus other ectodermal cell fates and are also involved in patterning ventral and lateral mesoderm (reviewed in 4). Moreover, TGF-β superfamily members have the ability to act as morphogens, with different doses of ligand turning on particular combinations of downstream genes, and thus instructing different groups of cells to adopt distinct fates 5, 6, 7. Recent advances have now provided some insights into how gradients of active ligand might be established in the embryo. Furthermore, many components of the signalling pathways have now been identified in Xenopus, allowing us to trace the pathways from receptors to nucleus. With this information, it is becoming clear how the same signalling pathway can be involved in distinct biological responses.
Section snippets
Regulation of ligand activity or how to makegradients
Gradients of active ligands have long been thought to underlie the mechanism that establishes position in the developing embryo. Conceptually, gradients of active ligands can be established by a variety of mechanisms. The simplest model involves the production of the ligand at a local source from which it diffuses away to a more distant sink: high ligand concentrations are achieved close to the source and low concentrations at a distance. Alternatively, the ligand may be produced at an equal
Transducing the signals to the nucleus
TGF-β superfamily members function by signalling to the nucleus and regulating the transcription of target genes. A major breakthrough has been the identification of many components of the TGF-β signalling pathways, making it now possible to trace the signalling pathways from receptors to the nucleus, and to identify the critical points at which the pathway can be regulated.
Specificity of the responses
How can the same signalling pathway activate different genes in different regions of the embryo? Recent work 68••, 69, 70••, 71• has identified important determinants of specificity in the form of transcription factors that are required to recruit activated Smad complexes to specific promoter elements.
Smads bind DNA either very weakly (Smad1, 3, 4) or not at all (Smad2), and have a low level of sequence specificity, recognizing a 4 base-pair motif (GTCT) which will occur on average once every
Conclusions and future perspectives
I have focused here on the molecular details of the TGF-β signalling pathways in Xenopus embryos. Many components are known, although given the complexity of other signalling pathways, undoubtedly there are more to be discovered. The most striking feature of these pathways is that a host of different ligands activate a common short signal transduction pathway to elicit a complex array of transcriptional responses, which ultimately specify and pattern the germ layers of the embryo. The pathways
Update
Since completion of this manuscript, a paper from the Whitman group 75• has reported biochemical evidence for the role of the EGF-CFC family member Cripto as a co-receptor for Nodal. Cripto interacts with the type I receptor ALK4 which permits Nodal binding to the receptor complex, resulting in phosphorylation of Smad2. These experiments were performed in Xenopus embryos, but with the mouse family members. It therefore still remains to be demonstrated that FRL-1 plays this role in Xenopus.
In
Acknowledgements
I am very grateful to Mike Howell for Fig. 2 and thank him, Karolien De Bosscher, Les Dale, Gareth Inman, Helen McNeill, Francisco Nicolás, Becky Randall, Jim Smith and Astrid Steinmair for useful discussions and helpful comments on the manuscript. I thank Malcolm Whitman for generously sending a manuscript prior to publication.
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:
• of special interest
•• of outstanding interest
References (76)
Embryonic patterning: to BMP or not to BMP, that is the question
Cell
(1997)- et al.
Signalling by TGF-β family members: short-range effects of Xnr-2 and BMP-4 contrast with the long-range effects of Activin
Curr Biol
(1996) - et al.
The role of maternal VegT in establishing the primary germ layers in Xenopus embryos
Cell
(1998) - et al.
A two-step model for the fate determination of presumptive endodermal blastomeres in Xenopus embryos
Curr Biol
(1999) - et al.
Differential expression of VegT and antipodean protein isoforms in Xenopus
Mech Dev
(1999) - et al.
Expression cloning of Xantivin, a Xenopus lefty/antivin-related gene, involved in the regulation of Activin signaling during mesoderm induction
Mech Dev
(2000) - et al.
Genes for bone morphogenetic proteins are differentially transcribed in early amphibian embryos
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
(1992) - et al.
Dorsoventral patterning in Xenopus: inhibition of ventral signals by direct binding of chordin to BMP-4
Cell
(1996) - et al.
The Spemann organizer signal noggin binds and inactivates bone morphogenetic protein 4
Cell
(1996) - et al.
Establishment of a BMP-4 morphogen gradient by long-range inhibition
Dev Biol
(1998)
Cleavage of Chordin by Xolloid metalloprotease suggests a role for proteolytic processing in the regulation of Spemann organizer activity
Cell
Studies with a Xenopus BMP receptor suggest that ventral mesoderm-inducing signals override dorsal signals in vivo
Cell
Regulation of epidermal induction by BMP2 and BMP7 signaling
Dev Biol
The EGF-CFC gene family in vertebrate development
Trends Genet
The EGF-CFC protein one-eyed pinhead is essential for nodal signaling
Cell
The identification of two novel ligands of the FGF receptor by a yeast screening method and their activity in Xenopus development
Cell
Xenopus Mad proteins transduce distinct subsets of signals for the TGF-β superfamily
Cell
Smad5 induces ventral fates in Xenopus embryo
Dev Biol
Xenopus Smad3 is specifically expressed in the chordoneural hinge, notochord and in the endocardium of the developing heart
Mech Dev
SARA, a FYVE domain protein that recruits Smad2 to the TGFβ receptor
Cell
Xenopus Smad4β is the co-Smad component of developmentally-regulated transcription factor complexes responsible for induction of early mesodermal genes
Dev Biol
Identification of two Smad4 proteins in Xenopus. Their common and distinct properties
J Biol Chem
Xenopus Smad7 inhibits both the Activin and BMP pathways and acts as a neural inducer
Dev Biol
Smad7 inhibits mesoderm formation and promotes neural cell fate in Xenopus embryos
Dev Biol
Dissection of inhibitory Smad proteins: both N- and C-terminal domains are necessary for full activities of Xenopus Smad6 and Smad7
Mech Dev
Smad7 binds to Smurf2 to form an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets the TGF β receptor for degradation
Mol Cell
Smurf1 interacts with transforming growth factor-β type I receptor through Smad7 and induces receptor degradation
J Biol Chem
Visualization of endogenous BMP signaling during Xenopus development
Differentiation
OAZ uses distinct DNA- and protein-binding zinc fingers in separate BMP-Smad and Olf signaling pathways
Cell
Nodal signals to Smads through Cripto-dependent and Cripto-independent mechanisms
Mol Cell
Activin/Nodal responsiveness and asymmetric expression of a Xenopus nodal-related gene converge on a FAST-regulated module in intron 1
Development
Formation and function of Spemann's organizer
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol
Concentration-dependent patterning of the Xenopus ectoderm by BMP4 and its signal transducer Smad1
Development
Graded changes in dose of a Xenopus Activin A homologue elicit stepwise transitions in embryonic cell fate
Nature
Activin signalling and response to a morphogen gradient
Nature
Arkadia enhances nodal-related signalling to induce mesendoderm
Nature
Bmp-4 acts as a morphogen in dorsoventral mesoderm patterning in Xenopus
Development
Cited by (77)
miR-430a regulates the development of left–right asymmetry by targeting sqt in the teleost
2020, GeneCitation Excerpt :Most vertebrate body display bilateral symmetry, however, the visceral organs show left-right (L-R) asymmetric trait, such as heart and liver (Palmer 2004, Bisgrove et al., 2015). It has been reported that the development of endoderm and the establishment of L-R asymmetric pattern was influenced by nodal-related genes, which were expressed in left lateral plate mesoderm (Rebagliati et al., 1998a,b, Hill 2001, Long et al., 2003). There are three homologues of nodal in zebrafish: cyclops (cyc), squint (sqt) and southpaw (spaw) (Erter et al., 1998, Rebagliati et al., 1998a,b, Long et al., 2003).
WDR74 functions as a novel coactivator in TGF-β signaling
2018, Journal of Genetics and GenomicsFoxh1 Occupies cis-Regulatory Modules Prior to Dynamic Transcription Factor Interactions Controlling the Mesendoderm Gene Program
2017, Developmental CellCitation Excerpt :Vegt controls the zygotic transcription of the Xenopus Nodal ligands (Kofron et al., 1999; Xanthos et al., 2001), initiating Nodal signaling and mesendoderm development (reviewed in Whitman, 2001). The Nodal ligands activate the phosphorylation of R-Smad2/3, which complexes with co-Smad4 to activate target genes (reviewed in Hill, 2001). Foxh1 has been implicated as a critical Smad2/3 co-factor (Chen et al., 1996, 1997), and has an essential function during mesoderm and endoderm development based on studies in Xenopus (Howell et al., 2002; Kofron et al., 2004; Chiu et al., 2014), zebrafish (Pogoda et al., 2000; Kunwar et al., 2003; Sirotkin et al., 2000; Slagle et al., 2011), mouse (Hoodless et al., 2001; Yamamoto et al., 2001), and differentiated human embryonic stem cells (Yoon et al., 2011).
Small C-terminal domain phosphatase 3 dephosphorylates the linker sites of receptor-regulated smads (R-Smads) to ensure transforming growth factor β (TGFβ)-mediated germ layer induction in Xenopus embryos
2015, Journal of Biological ChemistryCitation Excerpt :As such, shortly after the MBT, a good supply of responsive R-Smad allows for the rapid activation of TGFβ signaling. Spatially, SCP3 is enriched vegetally, consistent with the vegetally enriched active R-Smads at stage 9.5–10, during which Nodal/Activin and BMP signals start to be highly activated (1, 7, 10, 12). Compared with SCP3 in the vegetal part, the lower level of SCP3 in the animal part causes weaker but necessary dephosphorylation effects, possibly contributing to activation of R-Smads not restricted in the vegetal region, such as activated Smad1 in the ventral side across the animal-vegetal axis during gastrulation (10–12).
A mathematical model of the stoichiometric control of Smad complex formation in TGF-β signal transduction pathway
2009, Journal of Theoretical BiologyTGF-β Superfamily Signaling in Embryonic Development and Homeostasis
2009, Developmental Cell