Regulation of Chromatin Structure and Gene Activity by Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerases

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2153(03)01007-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) is an abundant nuclear protein that plays an important role in repairing DNA and responding to infection. Here we review recent evidence that PARP1 and related proteins also carry out crucial functions regulating genes during normal development. Genetic studies in mammals and Drosophila have implied that PARPs mediate rapid responses to environmental stimuli, including infection, stress, hormones, and growth signals. In addition, these polymerases may control fundamental processes that differentially mold and remodel chromatin within the many cell types of a developing embryo. We discuss a unified mechanism of PARP action during DNA repair, gene transcription, and chromatin modulation.

Introduction

The first evidence that cells contain a polymerase that synthesizes long polymers of poly(ADP-ribose) (pADPr) in vivo from NAD was reported by Chambon et al. (1963). A variety of nuclear proteins including histones, RNA polymerase, transcription factors, and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) itself are covalently modified by this activity, which was found to increase more than 100-fold in response to genotoxic stress. During most of the ensuing decades, research focused largely on the roles played by PARP (and the enzymes pADPr glycohydrolase [PARG] and pADPr lyase that degrade ADP-ribose polymers) in response to DNA damage and related phenomena (reviewed in D'Amours 1999, de Murcia 2000, Ziegler 2001). Genetic studies (Shieh et al., 1998) and whole genome sequencing revealed that virtually all metazoan organisms contain multiple genes encoding PARP-related proteins. These include proteins such as PARP1, PARP2, PARP3, tankyrase, vault PARP (vPARP) (mammals), and PARP-e (Drosophila).

With the discovery of multiple PARPs, awareness has grown that the residual PARP activity in undamaged cells does not simply represent background repair processes but rather that poly(ADP-ribose) modifications play important roles in telomere maintenance (Smith and de Lange, 2000), cell cycle checkpoints (see Pleschke et al., 2000), apoptosis (reviewed in Chiarugi and Moskowitz, 2002), transcription (see de Murcia and Shall, 2000), and even in certain cytoplasmic events (Arnold 2002, Kickhoefer 1999, Mossink 2002). Genetic studies of PARP-deficient mice (Wang et al., 1997) and Drosophila (Tulin 2003, Tulin 2002; see Pirrotta, 2003) have greatly increased our understanding of these non-canonical PARP functions. Today, our view of the PARP family has reached a turning point; it is becoming clear that these abundant and ubiquitous proteins regulate fundamental aspects of chromosome and gene activity. In this review, we focus on how PARP functions to mediate chromatin structure and transcription. We discuss a unified mechanism for these roles and for the proposed action of PARP during DNA repair. First, however, we briefly review some basic information about PARP genes and proteins.

Section snippets

Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymer Metabolism

The basic enzymatic reactions catalyzed by PARP involve transferring ADP-ribose from NAD to either a protein acceptor or to an existing ADP-ribose chain (Fig. 1). One of the most remarkable aspects of PARP from a biochemical perspective is that it is capable of three distinct activities, an unprecedented flexibility for a polymerase. The target is most commonly the COOH residue of a glutamic acid (Glu), but modification of other amino acids may occasionally occur. The first reaction is chain

Mechanism of Action

Previous studies have documented that PARP modulates multiple aspects of chromatin structure, including DNA repair (see de Murcia and Shall, 2000), telomere elongation (Smith and de Lange, 2000), centromere activity (Saxena et al., 2002a), and the availability of nuclear matrix attachment sites (Galande, 2002). In two of these cases, mechanisms were proposed in which PARP inactivated DNA-bound inhibitors by poly(ADP-ribose) modification (Fig. 4). Thus, following DNA damage, PARP1 becomes

Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase and Transcription

It has been well established that PARP can bind to a variety of transcription factors, including NF-κB (Hassa and Hottiger, 2002), YY1 (Oei 2001, Oei 1997), Oct-1 (Oei et al., 1998), and AP-2 (Kannan et al., 1999), whereas other factors are targets of its enzymatic activity, including p53 (Wesierska-Gadek and Schmid, 2001) and fos (Amstad et al., 1992). Furthermore, evidence has been presented, some contradictory, that PARP plays a role in the induction or repression of target genes as a result

Multiple Routes to Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Activation

Based on the evidence, activated PARP1 plays important roles in gene transcription under a wide variety of circumstances. According to our current understanding, PARP1 becomes active following BRCT domain-mediated dimerization (Buki 1995, Mendoza-Alvarez 1993) by recognizing and binding to DNA nicks or double-stranded breaks. The PARP⧸LigIII-type Zn fingers located in the DNA-binding domain (see Fig. 1) mediate damage recognition. Upon binding, a conformational change in the protein is proposed

Specificity of Transcriptional Activation

It is now clear that PARP helps induce many genes during developmental and adult life. Interestingly, most PARP-dependent genes mediate rapid responses to environmental factors such as stress, infection, nutrition, or hormonal signals. PARP might be specifically required when chromatin needs to be changed rapidly or to be under precise control. However, it remains possible that it is a general transcription factor (Meisterernst et al., 1997) that plays a major role only when genes must be

Heterochromatin Condensation

The wide distribution of PARP protein along chromosomes and its overall abundance suggests that it may play a structural role even when inactive. The effects of mutating parp-e in Drosophila strongly support this hypothesis (Tulin et al., 2002). DAPI-stained chromatin in parp-e mutant larval cells appears abnormally extended (Fig. 8a) and is more accessible to nuclease digestion. Heterochromatic regions rich in repetitive DNA sequences that normally condense early in development are

Concluding Thoughts

In this review, we have discussed evidence linking PARP to many fundamental processes governing chromosome structure, function, and maintenance. Although the models discussed remain speculative, PARP can no longer be viewed primarily as an enzyme of DNA repair. Why, then, has PARP evolved to serve such a wide variety of critical functions involving chromatin organization? We suggest that PARP is inherently different from other enzymes that modify target chromatin proteins, such as kinases,

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Gall for providing materials. This work was supported by NIH Grant GM27875. We apologize to those whose work was not cited due to space limitations.

References (124)

  • E Egyhazi et al.

    Heat-shock-specific phosphorylation and transcriptional activity of RNA polymerase II

    Exp. Cell. Res.

    (1998)
  • M Futai et al.

    Mode of action of rat liver phosphodiesterase on a polymer of phosphoribosyl adenosine monophosphate and related compounds

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1968)
  • P.O Hassa et al.

    The enzymatic and DNA binding activity of PARP-1 are not required for NF-kappa B coactivator function

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2001)
  • A Huletsky et al.

    The effect of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation on native and H1-depleted chromatin: A role of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation on core nucleosome structure

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1989)
  • I Kameshita et al.

    Reconstitution and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of proteolytically fragmented poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1986)
  • I Kameshita et al.

    Poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase: Separation and identification of three proteolytic fragments as the substrate-binding domain, the DNA-binding domain, and the automodification domain

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1984)
  • P.G Kaminker et al.

    TANK2, a new TRF1-associated poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, causes rapid induction of cell death upon overexpression

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2001)
  • T Kawamura et al.

    An alternative form of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in Drosophila melanogaster and its ectopic expression in rat-1 cells

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1998)
  • Y Koyama et al.

    Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase interacts with novel Drosophila ribosomal proteins, L22 and 123a, with unique histone-like amino-terminal extensions

    Gene

    (1999)
  • E Kun et al.

    Coenzymatic activity of randomly broken or intact double-stranded DNAs in auto and histone H1 trans-poly(ADP-ribosylation), catalyzed by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP I)

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • J.O Lee et al.

    Crystal structure of the A domain from the alpha subunit of integrin CR3 (CD11b⧸CD18)

    Cell

    (1995)
  • Q Ma

    Induction and superinduction of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-rho-dioxin-inducible poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase: Role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor⧸aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator transcription activation domains and a labile transcription repressor

    Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

    (2002)
  • Q Ma et al.

    TCDD-inducible poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase: A novel response to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (2001)
  • G Mathis et al.

    Release of core DNA from nucleosomal core particles following (ADP-ribose)n-modification in vitro

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1987)
  • H Mendoza-Alvarez et al.

    Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase is a catalytic dimer and the automodification reaction is intermolecular

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1993)
  • H Mendoza-Alvarez et al.

    Regulation of p53 sequence-specific DNA-binding by covalent poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2001)
  • E.M Meyerowitz et al.

    Molecular organization of a Drosophila puff site that responds to ecdysone

    Cell

    (1982)
  • M Miwa et al.

    Splitting of the ribose-ribose linkage of poly(adenosine diphosphate-robose) by a calf thymus extract

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1971)
  • R.I Morimoto

    Dynamic remodeling of transcription complexes by molecular chaperones

    Cell

    (2002)
  • M Mossink et al.

    The genomic sequence of the murine major vault protein and its promoter

    Gene

    (2002)
  • A.Y Nikolaev et al.

    Parc: A cytoplasmic anchor for p53

    Cell

    (2003)
  • S.L Oei et al.

    Interaction of the transcription factor YY1 with human poly(ADP-ribosyl) transferase

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1997)
  • S.L Oei et al.

    Regulation of RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of transcription factors

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1998)
  • S.L Oei et al.

    Transcription factor Yin Yang 1 stimulates poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation and DNA repair

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (2001)
  • J Oka et al.

    ADP-ribosyl protein lyase: Purification, properties, and identification of the product

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1984)
  • P.L Panzeter et al.

    Synthesis of poly(ADP-ribose)-agarose beads: An affinity resin for studying (ADP-ribose)n-protein interactions

    Anal. Biochem.

    (1992)
  • P.L Panzeter et al.

    Targeting of histone tails by poly(ADP-ribose)

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1993)
  • M Pedraza-Reyes et al.

    Oligo(3′-deoxy ADP-ribosyl)ation of the nuclear matrix lamins from rat liver utilizing 3′-deoxyNAD as a substrate

    FEBS Lett.

    (1990)
  • J.M Pleschke et al.

    Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase binds to specific domains in DNA damage checkpoint proteins

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2000)
  • J.F Rippmann et al.

    Functional characterization of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity of tankyrase 1, a potential regulator of telomere length

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (2002)
  • J.F Rippmann et al.

    Corrigendum to Functional characterization of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity of tankyrase 1, a potential regulator of telomere length [J. Mol. Biol. (2002) 323, 217–224]

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (2003)
  • B Roger et al.

    Repression of RNA polymerase I transcription by nucleolin is independent of the RNA sequence that is transcribed

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • A Ruf et al.

    The mechanism of the elongation and branching reaction of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase as derived from crystal structures and mutagenesis

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1998)
  • G Sauermann et al.

    Poly(ADP-ribose) effectively competes with DNA for histone H4 binding

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1986)
  • A Saxena et al.

    Centromere proteins Cenpa, Cenpb, and Bub3 interact with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 protein and are poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • W.M Shieh et al.

    Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase null mouse cells synthesize ADP-ribose polymers

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1998)
  • C.M Simbulan-Rosenthal et al.

    Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of p53 in vitro and in vivo modulates binding to its DNA consensus sequence

    Neoplasia

    (2001)
  • M.D Adams et al.

    The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster

    Science

    (2000)
  • F.R Althaus

    Poly ADP-ribosylation: A histone shuttle mechanism in DNA excision repair

    J. Cell Sci.

    (1992)
  • F.R Althaus et al.

    Histone shuttling by poly ADP-ribosylation

    Mol. Cell. Biochem.

    (1994)
  • Cited by (51)

    • Decreased Enhancer-Promoter Proximity Accompanying Enhancer Activation

      2019, Molecular Cell
      Citation Excerpt :

      Assaying nascent transcription in mESCs and during NPC differentiation using 4-thiouridine (4sU) sequencing also provided no evidence for any additional transcription, apart from Shh and 9530036O11Rik, induced across the Shh intergenic region on either strand during NPC differentiation (Figure S4C). Because poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation) catalyzed by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases has been linked to large-scale changes in chromatin structure such as decompaction (Huletsky et al., 1989; Poirier et al., 1982), with chromatin remodeling (Singh et al., 2017) and gene activation at ecdysone and heat shock-induced puffs on Drosophila polytene chromosomes (Sawatsubashi et al., 2004; Tulin and Spradling, 2003; Tulin et al., 2003), we wanted to determine whether it could be involved in the localized changes in chromosome conformation at Shh. We therefore used TALEs to investigate whether targeting PAR polymerase 1 (PARP1) to Shh, SBE6, or SBE2 altered chromatin conformation at the Shh region (Figure 6A).

    • Histone-mediated epigenetics in addiction

      2014, Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science
    • Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase: Machinery for nuclear processes

      2013, Molecular Aspects of Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      These observations, along with previous studies demonstrating the roles of tankyrase-1, a member of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family, in repair and telomere maintenance (Smith et al., 1998; Smith and de Lange, 2000; Rippmann et al., 2002), led to the suggestion that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases acts in a wide variety of situations by locally derepressing gene transcription or other chromosomal processes that are blocked by the tight binding of histones and other inhibitory chromatin proteins. Two mechanisms by which PARP1 may loosen chromatin have been suggested by biochemical studies (for review, see Tulin et al. (2003)). First, PARP1 may catalyze the transfer of ADP-ribose moieties from NAD to abundant nuclear proteins, such as histones.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text