LETTERS to the EDITOR

Free β-hCG as first-trimester marker for fetal trisomy

Chromosome abnormalities, such as trisomy 21, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, and sex chromosome abnormalities, are quite common, occurring in just under 1% of all live births. Although these conditions are associated with advanced maternal age, age alone is not an adequate way of assessing risk given that most pregnant women are not of advanced maternal age. Here we review the advantages and disadvantages of several modes of screening including first trimester ultrasound, various forms of serum screening, and cell-free DNA testing.

Fetal growth restriction is a major determinant of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Screening for fetal growth restriction is a key element of prenatal care but it is recognized to be problematic. Screening using clinical risk assessment and targeting ultrasound to high-risk women is the standard of care in the United States and United Kingdom, but the approach is known to have low sensitivity. Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials do not demonstrate any benefit from universal ultrasound screening for fetal growth restriction in the third trimester, but the evidence base is not strong. Implementation of universal ultrasound screening in low-risk women in France failed to reduce the risk of complications among small-for-gestational-age infants but did appear to cause iatrogenic harm to false positives. One strategy to making progress is to improve screening by developing more sensitive and specific tests with the key goal of differentiating between healthy small fetuses and those that are small through fetal growth restriction. As abnormal placentation is thought to be the major cause of fetal growth restriction, one approach is to combine fetal biometry with an indicator of placental dysfunction. In the past, these indicators were generally ultrasonic measurements, such as Doppler flow velocimetry of the uteroplacental circulation. However, another promising approach is to combine ultrasonic suspicion of small-for-gestational-age infant with a blood test indicating placental dysfunction. Thus far, much of the research on maternal serum biomarkers for fetal growth restriction has involved the secondary analysis of tests performed for other indications, such as fetal aneuploidies. An exemplar of this is pregnancy-associated plasma protein A. This blood test is performed primarily to assess the risk of Down syndrome, but women with low first-trimester levels are now serially scanned in later pregnancy due to associations with placental causes of stillbirth, including fetal growth restriction. The development of “omic” technologies presents a huge opportunity to identify novel biomarkers for fetal growth restriction. The hope is that when such markers are measured alongside ultrasonic fetal biometry, the combination would have strong predictive power for fetal growth restriction and its related complications. However, a series of important methodological considerations in assessing the diagnostic effectiveness of new tests will have to be addressed. The challenge thereafter will be to identify novel disease-modifying interventions, which are the essential partner to an effective screening test to achieve clinically effective population-based screening.

Pregnancy is accompanied by dramatic physiological changes in maternal plasma proteins. Characterization of the maternal plasma proteome in normal pregnancy is an essential step for understanding changes to predict pregnancy outcome. The objective of this study was to describe maternal plasma proteins that change in abundance with advancing gestational age and determine biological processes that are perturbed in normal pregnancy.

A longitudinal study included 43 normal pregnancies that had a term delivery of an infant who was appropriate for gestational age without maternal or neonatal complications. For each pregnancy, 3 to 6 maternal plasma samples (median, 5) were profiled to measure the abundance of 1125 proteins using multiplex assays. Linear mixed-effects models with polynomial splines were used to model protein abundance as a function of gestational age, and the significance of the association was inferred via likelihood ratio tests. Proteins considered to be significantly changed were defined as having the following: (1) >1.5-fold change between 8 and 40 weeks of gestation; and (2) a false discovery rate–adjusted value of P < .1. Gene ontology enrichment analysis was used to identify biological processes overrepresented among the proteins that changed with advancing gestation.

The following results were found: (1) Ten percent (112 of 1125) of the profiled proteins changed in abundance as a function of gestational age; (2) of the 1125 proteins analyzed, glypican-3, sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-type lectin-6, placental growth factor, C-C motif-28, carbonic anhydrase 6, prolactin, interleukin-1 receptor 4, dual-specificity mitogen-activated protein kinase 4, and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A had more than a 5-fold change in abundance across gestation (these 9 proteins are known to be involved in a wide range of both physiological and pathological processes, such as growth regulation, embryogenesis, angiogenesis immunoregulation, inflammation etc); and (3) biological processes associated with protein changes in normal pregnancy included defense response, defense response to bacteria, proteolysis, and leukocyte migration (false discovery rate, 10%).

The plasma proteome of normal pregnancy demonstrates dramatic changes in both the magnitude of changes and the fraction of the proteins involved. Such information is important to understand the physiology of pregnancy and the development of biomarkers to differentiate normal vs abnormal pregnancy and determine the response to interventions.

There have been tremendous advancements over the past three decades in prenatal screening for aneuploidy and we have changed our practice from screening by maternal age alone to ‘combined’ first trimester screening and circulating cell-free fetal DNA. We currently use the nuchal translucency and biochemical markers of free β-hCG and PAPP-A to determine the risk of fetal aneuploidy. The primary goal is to identify higher risk women for fetal aneuploidy early in pregnancy and give them the option to pursue invasive testing in a timely manner if desired.

L’Arrêté réglementant le dépistage prénatal combiné de la trisomie 21 au premier trimestre de la grossesse et fixant les règles de bonnes pratiques en matière de dépistage et de diagnostic prénatal de la trisomie 21 a été publié au Journal officiel. Toutes les études internationales, notamment anglaises, réalisées depuis longtemps montrent l’intérêt de pratiquer de la sorte, c’est-à-dire de combiner l’âge maternel, la clarté nucale et les marqueurs sériques du premier trimestre (hormone chorionique gonadotrope [hCG] libre et pregnancy-associated plasma protein A [PAPP-A]) entre 11 et 13 semaines d’aménorrhées et six jours, en un calcul unique. La performance de cette stratégie combinée précoce semble supérieure à la stratégie actuelle en augmentant le taux de détection et en diminuant le taux de faux positifs. Nous avons mis en place cette stratégie depuis 2004 et nous rapportons ici nos résultats.

First trimester screening for Down syndrome is yet to become the first intention strategy in France. This screening program at 11–14 weeks of gestation using maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency, maternal serum free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A has already been validated for a long time by many international studies. It seems to improve detection rate and decrease false positive rates. We report here five years prospective experience.