Abstract
Mitochondria are essential organelles of eukaryotic cells. They consist of hundreds of different proteins that exhibit crucial activities in respiration, catabolic metabolism and the synthesis of amino acids, lipids, heme and iron-sulfur clusters. With the exception of a handful of hydrophobic mitochondrially encoded membrane proteins, all these proteins are synthesized on cytosolic ribosomes, targeted to receptors on the mitochondrial surface, and transported across or inserted into the outer and inner mitochondrial membrane before they are folded and assembled into their final native structure. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms and components of the mitochondrial protein import systems with a particular focus on recent developments in the field.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blobel G (1980) Intracellular protein topogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77(3):1496–1500
Vögtle F-N, Burkhart JM, Gonczarowska-Jorge H et al (2017) Landscape of submitochondrial protein distribution. Nat Commun 8(1):290. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00359-0
Paumard P, Vaillier J, Coulary B et al (2002) The ATP synthase is involved in generating mitochondrial cristae morphology. EMBO J 21(3):221–230. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/21.3.221
Pfeffer S, Woellhaf MW, Herrmann JM et al (2015) Organization of the mitochondrial translation machinery studied in situ by cryoelectron tomography. Nat Commun 6:6019. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7019
Hessenberger M, Zerbes RM, Rampelt H et al (2017) Regulated membrane remodeling by Mic60 controls formation of mitochondrial crista junctions. Nat Commun 8:15258. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15258
Tarasenko D, Barbot M, Jans DC et al (2017) The MICOS component Mic60 displays a conserved membrane-bending activity that is necessary for normal cristae morphology. J Cell Biol 216(4):889–899. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201609046
Rampelt H, van der Laan M (2017) The Yin & Yang of mitochondrial architecture—interplay of MICOS and F1Fo-ATP synthase in cristae formation. Microb Cell 4(8):236–239. https://doi.org/10.15698/mic2017.08.583
Eydt K, Davies KM, Behrendt C et al (2017) Cristae architecture is determined by an interplay of the MICOS complex and the F1FO ATP synthase via Mic27 and Mic10. Microb Cell 4(8):259–272. https://doi.org/10.15698/mic2017.08.585
Harner ME, Unger A-K, Izawa T et al (2014) Aim24 and MICOS modulate respiratory function, tafazzin-related cardiolipin modification and mitochondrial architecture. Elife 3:e01684. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01684
Kawano S, Tamura Y, Kojima R et al (2018) Structure-function insights into direct lipid transfer between membranes by Mmm1-Mdm12 of ERMES. J Cell Biol 217(3):959–974. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201704119
Herrmann JM, Riemer J (2010) The intermembrane space of mitochondria. Antioxid Redox Signal 13(9):1341–1358. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2009.3063
Möller-Hergt BV, Carlström A, Stephan K et al (2018) The ribosome receptors Mrx15 and Mba1 jointly organize cotranslational insertion and protein biogenesis in mitochondria. Mol Biol Cell 29(20):2386–2396. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E18-04-0227
Kummer E, Leibundgut M, Rackham O et al (2018) Unique features of mammalian mitochondrial translation initiation revealed by cryo-EM. Nature 560(7717):263–267. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0373-y
Morgenstern M, Stiller SB, Lübbert P et al (2017) Definition of a high-confidence mitochondrial proteome at quantitative scale. Cell Rep 19(13):2836–2852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.014
Calvo SE, Clauser KR, Mootha VK (2016) MitoCarta2.0: an updated inventory of mammalian mitochondrial proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 44(D1):D1251–D1257. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1003
Wrobel L, Topf U, Bragoszewski P et al (2015) Mistargeted mitochondrial proteins activate a proteostatic response in the cytosol. Nature 524(7566):485–488. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14951
Weidberg H, Amon A (2018) MitoCPR-A surveillance pathway that protects mitochondria in response to protein import stress. Science 360(6385). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan4146
Wang X, Chen XJ (2015) A cytosolic network suppressing mitochondria-mediated proteostatic stress and cell death. Nature 524(7566):481–484. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14859
Labbadia J, Brielmann RM, Neto MF et al (2017) Mitochondrial stress restores the heat shock response and prevents proteostasis collapse during aging. Cell Rep 21(6):1481–1494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.038
Fiorese CJ, Schulz AM, Lin Y-F et al (2016) The transcription factor ATF5 mediates a mammalian mitochondrial UPR. Curr Biol 26(15):2037–2043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.002
Gruber A, Hornburg D, Antonin M et al (2018) Molecular and structural architecture of polyQ aggregates in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115(15):E3446–E3453. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717978115
Liu W, Duan X, Fang X et al (2018) Mitochondrial protein import regulates cytosolic protein homeostasis and neuronal integrity. Autophagy 14(8):1293–1309. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2018.1474991
Papsdorf K, Kaiser CJO, Drazic A et al (2015) Polyglutamine toxicity in yeast induces metabolic alterations and mitochondrial defects. BMC Genom 16:662. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1831-7
Aviram N, Schuldiner M (2017) Targeting and translocation of proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum at a glance. J Cell Sci 130(24):4079–4085. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.204396
Young JC, Hoogenraad NJ, Hartl FU (2003) Molecular chaperones Hsp90 and Hsp70 deliver preproteins to the mitochondrial import receptor Tom70. Cell 112(1):41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01250-3
Cichocki BA, Krumpe K, Vitali DG et al (2018) Pex19 is involved in importing dually targeted tail-anchored proteins to both mitochondria and peroxisomes. Traffic. https://doi.org/10.1111/tra.12604
Jores T, Lawatscheck J, Beke V et al (2018) Cytosolic Hsp70 and Hsp40 chaperones enable the biogenesis of mitochondrial β-barrel proteins. J Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201712029
Vögtle F-N, Wortelkamp S, Zahedi RP et al (2009) Global analysis of the mitochondrial N-proteome identifies a processing peptidase critical for protein stability. Cell 139(2):428–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.045
Sinzel M, Tan T, Wendling P et al (2016) Mcp3 is a novel mitochondrial outer membrane protein that follows a unique IMP-dependent biogenesis pathway. EMBO Rep 17(7):965–981. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201541273
Doyle SR, Kasinadhuni NRP, Chan CK et al (2013) Evidence of evolutionary constraints that influences the sequence composition and diversity of mitochondrial matrix targeting signals. PLoS ONE 8(6):e67938. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067938
Geissler A, Krimmer T, Bömer U et al (2000) Membrane potential-driven protein import into mitochondria. The sorting sequence of cytochrome b(2) modulates the deltapsi-dependence of translocation of the matrix-targeting sequence. Mol Biol Cell 11(11):3977–3991. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.11.11.3977
Huang S, Taylor NL, Whelan J et al (2009) Refining the definition of plant mitochondrial presequences through analysis of sorting signals, N-terminal modifications, and cleavage Motifs1WOA. Plant Physiol 150(3):1272–1285. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.137885
Backes S, Hess S, Boos F et al (2018) Tom70 enhances mitochondrial preprotein import efficiency by binding to internal targeting sequences. J Cell Biol 217(4):1369–1382. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201708044
Boos F, Mühlhaus T, Herrmann J (2018) Detection of internal matrix targeting signal-like sequences (iMTS-Ls) in mitochondrial precursor proteins using the TargetP prediction tool. Biol Protoc. https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.2474
Wiedemann N, Pfanner N, Ryan MT (2001) The three modules of ADP/ATP carrier cooperate in receptor recruitment and translocation into mitochondria. EMBO J 20(5):951–960. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.5.951
Fölsch H, Guiard B, Neupert W et al (1996) Internal targeting signal of the BCS1 protein: a novel mechanism of import into mitochondria. EMBO J 15(3):479–487
Ma Y, Taylor SS (2008) A molecular switch for targeting between endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria: conversion of a mitochondria-targeting element into an ER-targeting signal in DAKAP1. J Biol Chem 283(17):11743–11751. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M710494200
Costello JL, Castro IG, Camões F et al (2017) Predicting the targeting of tail-anchored proteins to subcellular compartments in mammalian cells. J Cell Sci 130(9):1675–1687. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.200204
Kemper C, Habib SJ, Engl G et al (2008) Integration of tail-anchored proteins into the mitochondrial outer membrane does not require any known import components. J Cell Sci 121(Pt 12):1990–1998. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.024034
Marty NJ, Teresinski HJ, Hwang YT et al (2014) New insights into the targeting of a subset of tail-anchored proteins to the outer mitochondrial membrane. Front Plant Sci 5:426. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00426
Krumpe K, Frumkin I, Herzig Y et al (2012) Ergosterol content specifies targeting of tail-anchored proteins to mitochondrial outer membranes. Mol Biol Cell 23(20):3927–3935. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-12-0994
Chen Y-C, Umanah GKE, Dephoure N et al (2014) Msp1/ATAD1 maintains mitochondrial function by facilitating the degradation of mislocalized tail-anchored proteins. EMBO J 33(14):1548–1564. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201487943
Okreglak V, Walter P (2014) The conserved AAA-ATPase Msp1 confers organelle specificity to tail-anchored proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(22):8019–8024. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1405755111
Ahting U, Waizenegger T, Neupert W et al (2005) Signal-anchored proteins follow a unique insertion pathway into the outer membrane of mitochondria. J Biol Chem 280(1):48–53. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M410905200
Jores T, Klinger A, Groß LE et al (2016) Characterization of the targeting signal in mitochondrial β-barrel proteins. Nat Commun 7:12036. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12036
Gratzer S (1995) Mas37p, a novel receptor subunit for protein import into mitochondria. J Cell Biol 129(1):25–34. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.129.1.25
Imai K, Fujita N, Gromiha MM et al (2011) Eukaryote-wide sequence analysis of mitochondrial β-barrel outer membrane proteins. BMC Genom 12:79. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-79
Sideris DP, Petrakis N, Katrakili N et al (2009) A novel intermembrane space-targeting signal docks cysteines onto Mia40 during mitochondrial oxidative folding. J Cell Biol 187(7):1007–1022. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200905134
Milenkovic D, Ramming T, Müller JM et al (2009) Identification of the signal directing Tim9 and Tim10 into the intermembrane space of mitochondria. Mol Biol Cell 20(10):2530–2539. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E08-11-1108
Longen S, Bien M, Bihlmaier K et al (2009) Systematic analysis of the twin cx(9)c protein family. J Mol Biol 393(2):356–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.08.041
Gabriel K, Milenkovic D, Chacinska A et al (2007) Novel mitochondrial intermembrane space proteins as substrates of the MIA import pathway. J Mol Biol 365(3):612–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2006.10.038
Vögtle F-N, Burkhart JM, Rao S et al (2012) Intermembrane space proteome of yeast mitochondria. Mol Cell Proteom 11(12):1840–1852. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M112.021105
Peleh V, Zannini F, Backes S et al (2017) Erv1 of Arabidopsis thaliana can directly oxidize mitochondrial intermembrane space proteins in the absence of redox-active Mia40. BMC Biol 15(1):106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0445-8
Peleh V, Cordat E, Herrmann JM (2016) Mia40 is a trans-site receptor that drives protein import into the mitochondrial intermembrane space by hydrophobic substrate binding. Elife 5:e16177. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16177
Emanuelsson O, Nielsen H, Brunak S et al (2000) Predicting subcellular localization of proteins based on their N-terminal amino acid sequence. J Mol Biol 300(4):1005–1016. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2000.3903
Claros MG, Vincens P (1996) Computational method to predict mitochondrially imported proteins and their targeting sequences. Eur J Biochem 241(3):779–786
Ohlmeier S, Kastaniotis AJ, Hiltunen JK et al (2004) The yeast mitochondrial proteome, a study of fermentative and respiratory growth. J Biol Chem 279(6):3956–3979. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M310160200
Hung V, Zou P, Rhee H-W et al (2014) Proteomic mapping of the human mitochondrial intermembrane space in live cells via ratiometric APEX tagging. Mol Cell 55(2):332–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.003
Hung V, Lam SS, Udeshi ND et al (2017) Proteomic mapping of cytosol-facing outer mitochondrial and ER membranes in living human cells by proximity biotinylation. Elife 6:e24463. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24463
Caplan AJ, Cyr DM, Douglas MG (1992) YDJ1p facilitates polypeptide translocation across different intracellular membranes by a conserved mechanism. Cell 71(7):1143–1155
Deshaies RJ, Koch BD, Werner-Washburne M et al (1988) A subfamily of stress proteins facilitates translocation of secretory and mitochondrial precursor polypeptides. Nature 332(6167):800–805. https://doi.org/10.1038/332800a0
Lee DH, Sherman MY, Goldberg AL (1996) Involvement of the molecular chaperone Ydj1 in the ubiquitin-dependent degradation of short-lived and abnormal proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 16(9):4773–4781
Sahi C, Kominek J, Ziegelhoffer T et al (2013) Sequential duplications of an ancient member of the DnaJ-family expanded the functional chaperone network in the eukaryotic cytosol. Mol Biol Evol 30(5):985–998. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst008
Opaliński Ł, Song J, Priesnitz C et al (2018) Recruitment of cytosolic J-proteins by TOM receptors promotes mitochondrial protein biogenesis. Cell Rep 25(8):2036–2043.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.083
Hoseini H, Pandey S, Jores T et al (2016) The cytosolic cochaperone Sti1 is relevant for mitochondrial biogenesis and morphology. FEBS J 283(18):3338–3352. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.13813
Itakura E, Zavodszky E, Shao S et al (2016) Ubiquilins chaperone and triage mitochondrial membrane proteins for degradation. Mol Cell 63(1):21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.020
Gold VAM, Chroscicki P, Bragoszewski P et al (2017) Visualization of cytosolic ribosomes on the surface of mitochondria by elect ron cryo-tomography. EMBO Rep 18(10):1786–1800. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201744261
Wienhues U, Becker K, Schleyer M et al (1991) Protein folding causes an arrest of preprotein translocation into mitochondria in vivo. J Cell Biol 115(6):1601–1609
Gadir N, Haim-Vilmovsky L, Kraut-Cohen J et al (2011) Localization of mRNAs coding for mitochondrial proteins in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA 17(8):1551–1565. https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.2621111
Saint-Georges Y, Garcia M, Delaveau T et al (2008) Yeast mitochondrial biogenesis: a role for the PUF RNA-binding protein Puf3p in mRNA localization. PLoS One 3(6):e2293. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002293
Eliyahu E, Pnueli L, Melamed D et al (2010) Tom20 mediates localization of mRNAs to mitochondria in a translation-dependent manner. Mol Cell Biol 30(1):284–294. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00651-09
Zabezhinsky D, Slobodin B, Rapaport D et al (2016) An essential role for COPI in mRNA localization to mitochondria and mitochondrial function. Cell Rep 15(3):540–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.053
Lesnik C, Cohen Y, Atir-Lande A et al (2014) OM14 is a mitochondrial receptor for cytosolic ribosomes that supports co-translational import into mitochondria. Nat Commun 5:5711. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6711
Ponce-Rojas JC, Avendaño-Monsalve MC, Yañez-Falcón AR et al (2017) αβ‘-NAC cooperates with Sam37 to mediate early stages of mitochondrial protein import. FEBS J 284(5):814–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.14024
Gamerdinger M, Hanebuth MA, Frickey T et al (2015) The principle of antagonism ensures protein targeting specificity at the endoplasmic reticulum. Science 348(6231):201–207. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa5335
Williams CC, Jan CH, Weissman JS (2014) Targeting and plasticity of mitochondrial proteins revealed by proximity-specific ribosome profiling. Science 346(6210):748–751. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257522
Jan CH, Williams CC, Weissman JS (2014) Principles of ER cotranslational translocation revealed by proximity-specific ribosome profiling. Science 346(6210):1257521. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257521
Karniely S, Regev-Rudzki N, Pines O (2006) The presequence of fumarase is exposed to the cytosol during import into mitochondria. J Mol Biol 358(2):396–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2006.02.023
Yogev O, Karniely S, Pines O (2007) Translation-coupled translocation of yeast fumarase into mitochondria in vivo. J Biol Chem 282(40):29222–29229. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M704201200
Sass E, Karniely S, Pines O (2003) Folding of fumarase during mitochondrial import determines its dual targeting in yeast. J Biol Chem 278(46):45109–45116. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M302344200
Hansen KG, Aviram N, Laborenz J et al (2018) An ER surface retrieval pathway safeguards the import of mitochondrial membrane proteins in yeast. Science 361(6407):1118–1122. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar8174
Papic D, Elbaz-Alon Y, Koerdt SN et al (2013) The role of Djp1 in import of the mitochondrial protein Mim1 demonstrates specificity between a cochaperone and its substrate protein. Mol Cell Biol 33(20):4083–4094. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00227-13
Jeong H, Park J, Jun Y et al (2017) Crystal structures of Mmm1 and Mdm12-Mmm1 reveal mechanistic insight into phospholipid trafficking at ER-mitochondria contact sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114(45):E9502–E9511. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715592114
Hirabayashi Y, Kwon S-K, Paek H et al (2017) ER-mitochondria tethering by PDZD8 regulates Ca2 + dynamics in mammalian neurons. Science 358(6363):623–630. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan6009
John Peter AT, Herrmann B, Antunes D et al (2017) Vps13-Mcp1 interact at vacuole-mitochondria interfaces and bypass ER-mitochondria contact sites. J Cell Biol 216(10):3219–3229. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201610055
Kornmann B, Currie E, Collins SR et al (2009) An ER-mitochondria tethering complex revealed by a synthetic biology screen. Science 325(5939):477–481. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1175088
Costa EA, Subramanian K, Nunnari J et al (2018) Defining the physiological role of SRP in protein-targeting efficiency and specificity. Science 359(6376):689–692. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar3607
Vitali DG, Sinzel M, Bulthuis EP et al (2018) The GET pathway can increase the risk of mitochondrial outer membrane proteins to be mistargeted to the ER. J Cell Sci 131(10):jcs211110. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.211110
Kaewsapsak P, Shechner DM, Mallard W et al (2017) Live-cell mapping of organelle-associated RNAs via proximity biotinylation combined with protein-RNA crosslinking. Elife 6:e29224. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29224
Aviram N, Ast T, Costa EA et al (2016) The SND proteins constitute an alternative targeting route to the endoplasmic reticulum. Nature 540(7631):134–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20169
Schuldiner M, Metz J, Schmid V et al (2008) The GET complex mediates insertion of tail-anchored proteins into the ER membrane. Cell 134(4):634–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.025
Bausewein T, Mills DJ, Langer JD et al (2017) Cryo-EM structure of the TOM core complex from Neurospora crassa. Cell 170(4):693–700.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.012
Model K, Meisinger C, Kühlbrandt W (2008) Cryo-electron microscopy structure of a yeast mitochondrial preprotein translocase. J Mol Biol 383(5):1049–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2008.07.087
Shiota T, Imai K, Qiu J et al (2015) Molecular architecture of the active mitochondrial protein gate. Science 349(6255):1544–1548. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac6428
Yamamoto H, Fukui K, Takahashi H et al (2009) Roles of Tom70 in import of presequence-containing mitochondrial proteins. J Biol Chem 284(46):31635–31646. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.041756
Backes S, Herrmann JM (2017) Protein translocation into the intermembrane space and matrix of mitochondria: mechanisms and driving forces. Front Mol Biosci 4:83. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2017.00083
Melin J, Kilisch M, Neumann P et al (2015) A presequence-binding groove in Tom70 supports import of Mdl1 into mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta 1853(8):1850–1859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.04.021
Fan ACY, Kozlov G, Hoegl A et al (2011) Interaction between the human mitochondrial import receptors Tom20 and Tom70 in vitro suggests a chaperone displacement mechanism. J Biol Chem 286(37):32208–32219. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.280446
Abe Y, Shodai T, Muto T et al (2000) Structural basis of presequence recognition by the mitochondrial protein import receptor Tom20. Cell 100(5):551–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80691-1
Yamamoto H, Itoh N, Kawano S et al (2011) Dual role of the receptor Tom20 in specificity and efficiency of protein import into mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(1):91–96. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014918108
Perry AJ, Hulett JM, Likić VA et al (2006) Convergent evolution of receptors for protein import into mitochondria. Curr Biol 16(3):221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.12.034
Garg S, Stölting J, Zimorski V et al (2015) Conservation of transit peptide-independent protein import into the mitochondrial and hydrogenosomal matrix. Genome Biol Evol 7(9):2716–2726. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evv175
Mani J, Desy S, Niemann M et al (2015) Mitochondrial protein import receptors in Kinetoplastids reveal convergent evolution over large phylogenetic distances. Nat Commun 6:6646. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7646
Harbauer AB, Opalińska M, Gerbeth C et al (2014) Mitochondria. Cell cycle-dependent regulation of mitochondrial preprotein translocase. Science 346(6213):1109–1113. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261253
Schmidt O, Harbauer AB, Rao S et al (2011) Regulation of mitochondrial protein import by cytosolic kinases. Cell 144(2):227–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.015
Esaki M, Shimizu H, Ono T et al (2004) Mitochondrial protein import. Requirement of presequence elements and tom components for precursor binding to the TOM complex. J Biol Chem 279(44):45701–45707. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M404591200
Komiya T, Rospert S, Koehler C et al (1998) Interaction of mitochondrial targeting signals with acidic receptor domains along the protein import pathway: evidence for the ‘acid chain’ hypothesis. EMBO J 17(14):3886–3898. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.14.3886
Chacinska A, Koehler CM, Milenkovic D et al (2009) Importing mitochondrial proteins: machineries and mechanisms. Cell 138(4):628–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.005
Neupert W, Herrmann JM (2007) Translocation of proteins into mitochondria. Annu Rev Biochem 76:723–749. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.052705.163409
Melin J, Schulz C, Wrobel L et al (2014) Presequence recognition by the tom40 channel contributes to precursor translocation into the mitochondrial matrix. Mol Cell Biol 34(18):3473–3485. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00433-14
Albrecht R, Rehling P, Chacinska A et al (2006) The Tim21 binding domain connects the preprotein translocases of both mitochondrial membranes. EMBO Rep 7(12):1233–1238. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400828
Shiota T, Mabuchi H, Tanaka-Yamano S et al (2011) In vivo protein-interaction mapping of a mitochondrial translocator protein Tom22 at work. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(37):15179–15183. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1105921108
Mokranjac D, Paschen SA, Kozany C et al (2003) Tim50, a novel component of the TIM23 preprotein translocase of mitochondria. EMBO J 22(4):816–825. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg090
Ramesh A, Peleh V, Martinez-Caballero S et al (2016) A disulfide bond in the TIM23 complex is crucial for voltage gating and mitochondrial protein import. J Cell Biol 214(4):417–431. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201602074
Demishtein-Zohary K, Günsel U, Marom M et al (2017) Role of Tim17 in coupling the import motor to the translocation channel of the mitochondrial presequence translocase. Elife 6:e22696. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22696
Demishtein-Zohary K, Marom M, Neupert W et al (2015) GxxxG motifs hold the TIM23 complex together. FEBS J 282(11):2178–2186. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.13266
Schendzielorz AB, Schulz C, Lytovchenko O et al (2017) Two distinct membrane potential-dependent steps drive mitochondrial matrix protein translocation. J Cell Biol 216(1):83–92. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201607066
Meinecke M, Wagner R, Kovermann P et al (2006) Tim50 maintains the permeability barrier of the mitochondrial inner membrane. Science 312(5779):1523–1526. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127628
Lytovchenko O, Melin J, Schulz C et al (2013) Signal recognition initiates reorganization of the presequence translocase during protein import. EMBO J 32(6):886–898. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2013.23
Chacinska A, Lind M, Frazier AE et al (2005) Mitochondrial presequence translocase: switching between TOM tethering and motor recruitment involves Tim21 and Tim17. Cell 120(6):817–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.011
Los Rios P de, Ben-Zvi A, Slutsky O et al (2006) Hsp70 chaperones accelerate protein translocation and the unfolding of stable protein aggregates by entropic pulling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(16):6166–6171. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510496103
Ting S-Y, Yan NL, Schilke BA et al (2017) Dual interaction of scaffold protein Tim44 of mitochondrial import motor with channel-forming translocase subunit Tim23. Elife 6:e23609. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23609
Miyata N, Tang Z, Conti MA et al (2017) Adaptation of a genetic screen reveals an inhibitor for mitochondrial protein import component Tim44. J Biol Chem 292(13):5429–5442. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M116.770131
Banerjee R, Gladkova C, Mapa K et al (2015) Protein translocation channel of mitochondrial inner membrane and matrix-exposed import motor communicate via two-domain coupling protein. Elife 4:e11897. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11897
D’Silva PD, Schilke B, Walter W et al (2003) J protein cochaperone of the mitochondrial inner membrane required for protein import into the mitochondrial matrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(24):13839–13844. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1936150100
Krayl M, Lim JH, Martin F et al (2007) A cooperative action of the ATP-dependent import motor complex and the inner membrane potential drives mitochondrial preprotein import. Mol Cell Biol 27(2):411–425. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01391-06
Burkhart JM, Taskin AA, Zahedi RP et al (2015) Quantitative profiling for substrates of the mitochondrial presequence processing protease reveals a set of nonsubstrate proteins increased upon proteotoxic stress. J Proteome Res 14(11):4550–4563. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00327
Ieva R, Schrempp SG, Opaliński L et al (2014) Mgr2 functions as lateral gatekeeper for preprotein sorting in the mitochondrial inner membrane. Mol Cell 56(5):641–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.10.010
Bömer U, Meijer M, Guiard B et al (1997) The sorting route of cytochrome b2 branches from the general mitochondrial import pathway at the preprotein translocase of the inner membrane. J Biol Chem 272(48):30439–30446. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.48.30439
Rojo EE, Guiard B, Neupert W et al (1998) Sorting of D-lactate dehydrogenase to the inner membrane of mitochondria. Analysis of topogenic signal and energetic requirements. J Biol Chem 273(14):8040–8047
Zanphorlin LM, Lima TB, Wong MJ et al (2016) Heat shock protein 90 kDa (Hsp90) has a second functional interaction site with the mitochondrial import receptor Tom70. J Biol Chem 291(36):18620–18631. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M115.710137
Webb CT, Gorman MA, Lazarou M et al (2006) Crystal structure of the mitochondrial chaperone TIM9.10 reveals a six-bladed alpha-propeller. Mol Cell 21(1):123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.11.010
Baker MJ, Webb CT, Stroud DA et al (2009) Structural and functional requirements for activity of the Tim9–Tim10 complex in mitochondrial protein import. Mol Biol Cell 20(3):769–779. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E08-09-0903
Hasson SA, Damoiseaux R, Glavin JD et al (2010) Substrate specificity of the TIM22 mitochondrial import pathway revealed with small molecule inhibitor of protein translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(21):9578–9583. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914387107
Weinhäupl K, Lindau C, Hessel A et al (2018) Structural basis of membrane protein chaperoning through the mitochondrial intermembrane space. Cell 175(5):1365–1379.e25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.039
Sirrenberg C, Endres M, Fölsch H et al (1998) Carrier protein import into mitochondria mediated by the intermembrane proteins Tim10/Mrs11 and Tim12/Mrs5. Nature 391:912. https://doi.org/10.1038/36136
Callegari S, Richter F, Chojnacka K et al (2016) TIM29 is a subunit of the human carrier translocase required for protein transport. FEBS Lett 590(23):4147–4158. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.12450
Kang Y, Baker MJ, Liem M et al (2016) Tim29 is a novel subunit of the human TIM22 translocase and is involved in complex assembly and stability. Elife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17463
Pacheu-Grau D, Callegari S, Emperador S et al (2018) Mutations of the mitochondrial carrier translocase channel subunit TIM22 cause early-onset mitochondrial myopathy. Hum Mol Genet 27(23):4135–4144. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddy305
Kang Y, Stroud DA, Baker MJ et al (2017) Sengers syndrome-associated mitochondrial acylglycerol kinase is a subunit of the human TIM22 protein import complex. Mol Cell 67(3):457–470.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2017.06.014
Vukotic M, Nolte H, König T et al (2017) Acylglycerol kinase mutated in sengers syndrome is a subunit of the TIM22 protein translocase in mitochondria. Mol Cell 67(3):471–483.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2017.06.013
Gebert N, Gebert M, Oeljeklaus S et al (2011) Dual function of Sdh3 in the respiratory chain and TIM22 protein translocase of the mitochondrial inner membrane. Mol Cell 44(5):811–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.09.025
Höhr AIC, Lindau C, Wirth C et al (2018) Membrane protein insertion through a mitochondrial β-barrel gate. Science 359(6373):eaah6834. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6834
Wiedemann N, Kozjak V, Chacinska A et al (2003) Machinery for protein sorting and assembly in the mitochondrial outer membrane. Nature 424:565. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01753
Becker T, Guiard B, Thornton N et al (2010) Assembly of the mitochondrial protein import channel: role of Tom5 in two-stage interaction of Tom40 with the SAM complex. Mol Biol Cell 21(18):3106–3113. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E10-06-0518
Mesecke N, Terziyska N, Kozany C et al (2005) A disulfide relay system in the intermembrane space of mitochondria that mediates protein import. Cell 121(7):1059–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.011
Banci L, Bertini I, Ciofi-Baffoni S et al (2012) Structural characterization of CHCHD5 and CHCHD7: two atypical human twin CX9C proteins. J Struct Biol 180(1):190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2012.07.007
Hofmann S, Rothbauer U, Mühlenbein N et al (2005) Functional and mutational characterization of human MIA40 acting during import into the mitochondrial intermembrane space. J Mol Biol 353(3):517–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2005.08.064
Klöppel C, Suzuki Y, Kojer K et al (2011) Mia40-dependent oxidation of cysteines in domain I of Ccs1 controls its distribution between mitochondria and the cytosol. Mol Biol Cell 22(20):3749–3757. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-04-0293
Terziyska N, Grumbt B, Kozany C et al (2009) Structural and functional roles of the conserved cysteine residues of the redox-regulated import receptor Mia40 in the intermembrane space of mitochondria. J Biol Chem 284(3):1353–1363. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M805035200
Fischer M, Horn S, Belkacemi A et al (2013) Protein import and oxidative folding in the mitochondrial intermembrane space of intact mammalian cells. Mol Biol Cell 24(14):2160–2170. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E12-12-0862
Weckbecker D, Longen S, Riemer J et al (2012) Atp23 biogenesis reveals a chaperone-like folding activity of Mia40 in the IMS of mitochondria. EMBO J 31(22):4348–4358. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.263
Petrungaro C, Zimmermann KM, Küttner V et al (2015) The Ca(2+)-Dependent Release of the Mia40-Induced MICU1-MICU2 Dimer from MCU Regulates Mitochondrial Ca(2+) Uptake. Cell Metab 22(4):721–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.08.019
Wurm CA, Neumann D, Lauterbach MA et al (2011) Nanoscale distribution of mitochondrial import receptor Tom20 is adjusted to cellular conditions and exhibits an inner-cellular gradient. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(33):13546–13551. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1107553108
Bohnert M, Zerbes RM, Davies KM et al (2015) Central role of Mic10 in the mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system. Cell Metab 21(5):747–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.04.007
Barbot M, Jans DC, Schulz C et al (2015) Mic10 oligomerizes to bend mitochondrial inner membranes at cristae junctions. Cell Metab 21(5):756–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.04.006
Körner C, Barrera M, Dukanovic J et al (2012) The C-terminal domain of Fcj1 is required for formation of crista junctions and interacts with the TOB/SAM complex in mitochondria. Mol Biol Cell 23(11):2143–2155. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-10-0831
Herrmann JM (2011) MINOS is plus: a Mitofilin complex for mitochondrial membrane contacts. Dev Cell 21(4):599–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.09.013
Varabyova A, Topf U, Kwiatkowska P et al (2013) Mia40 and MINOS act in parallel with Ccs1 in the biogenesis of mitochondrial Sod1. FEBS J 280(20):4943–4959. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.12409
Malsburg K von der, Müller JM, Bohnert M et al (2011) Dual role of mitofilin in mitochondrial membrane organization and protein biogenesis. Dev Cell 21(4):694–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.026
Waegemann K, Popov-Čeleketić D, Neupert W et al (2015) Cooperation of TOM and TIM23 complexes during translocation of proteins into mitochondria. J Mol Biol 427(5):1075–1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2014.07.015
Ellenrieder L, Opaliński Ł, Becker L et al (2016) Separating mitochondrial protein assembly and endoplasmic reticulum tethering by selective coupling of Mdm10. Nat Commun 7:13021. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13021
Flinner N, Ellenrieder L, Stiller SB et al (2013) Mdm10 is an ancient eukaryotic porin co-occurring with the ERMES complex. Biochim Biophys Acta 1833(12):3314–3325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.10.006
Wideman JG, Go NE, Klein A et al (2010) Roles of the Mdm10, Tom7, Mdm12, and Mmm1 proteins in the assembly of mitochondrial outer membrane proteins in Neurospora crassa. Mol Biol Cell 21(10):1725–1736. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e09-10-0844
Elbaz-Alon Y, Eisenberg-Bord M, Shinder V et al (2015) Lam6 regulates the extent of contacts between organelles. Cell Rep 12(1):7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.06.022
González Montoro A, Auffarth K, Hönscher C et al (2018) Vps39 interacts with Tom40 to establish one of two functionally distinct vacuole-mitochondria contact sites. Dev Cell 45(5):621–636.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2018.05.011
Acknowledgements
We thank Janina Laborenz and Clara Stiefel for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was funded by grants of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (He2803/4-2, SPP1710 and IRTG1830 and DIP Mitobalance).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors KGH and JMH declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hansen, K.G., Herrmann, J.M. Transport of Proteins into Mitochondria. Protein J 38, 330–342 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-019-09819-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-019-09819-6