Skip to main content

I-SceI-Based Assays to Examine Distinct Repair Outcomes of Mammalian Chromosomal Double Strand Breaks

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Book cover DNA Repair Protocols

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 920))

Abstract

Chromosomal double strand breaks (DSBs) can be repaired by a number of mechanisms that result in diverse genetic outcomes. To examine distinct outcomes of chromosomal DSB repair, a panel of human cell lines has been developed that contain GFP-based reporters with recognition sites for the rare-cutting endonuclease I-SceI. One set of reporters is used to measure DSB repair events that require access to homology: homology-directed repair, homology-directed repair that requires the removal of a nonhomologous insertion, single strand annealing, and alternative end joining. An additional reporter (EJ5-GFP) is used to measure end joining (EJ) between distal DSB ends of two tandem I-SceI sites. These Distal-EJ events do not require access to homology, and thus are distinct from the repair events described above. Indeed, this assay provides a measure of DSB end protection during EJ, via physical analysis of Distal-EJ products to determine the frequency of I-SceI-restoration. The EJ5-GFP reporter can also be adapted to examine EJ of non-cohesive DSB ends, using co-expression of I-SceI with a non-processive 3′ exonuclease (Trex2), which can cause partial degradation of the 4 nucleotide 3′ cohesive overhangs generated by I-SceI. Such co-expression of I-SceI and Trex2 leads to measurable I-SceI-resistant EJ products that use proximal DSB ends (Proximal-EJ), as well as distal DSB ends (Distal-EJ). Therefore, this co-expression approach can be used to examine the relative frequency of Proximal-EJ versus Distal-EJ, and hence provide a measure of the fidelity of end utilization during repair of multiple DSBs. In this report, the repair outcomes examined by each reporter are described, along with methods for cell culture, transient expression of I-SceI and Trex2, and repair product analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wyman C, Kanaar R (2006) DNA double-strand break repair: all’s well that ends well. Annu Rev Genet 40:363–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bennardo N, Cheng A, Huang N, Stark JM (2008) Alternative-NHEJ is a mechanistically distinct pathway of mammalian chromosome break repair. PLoS Genet 4:e1000110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bennardo N, Gunn A, Cheng A, Hasty P, Stark JM (2009) Limiting the persistence of a chromosome break diminishes its mutagenic potential. PLoS Genet 5:e1000683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moure CM, Gimble FS, Quiocho FA (2003) The crystal structure of the gene targeting homing endonuclease I-SceI reveals the origins of its target site specificity. J Mol Biol 334:685–695

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pierce AJ, Johnson RD, Thompson LH, Jasin M (1999) XRCC3 promotes homology-directed repair of DNA damage in mammalian cells. Genes Dev 13:2633–2638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stark JM, Pierce AJ, Oh J, Pastink A, Jasin M (2004) Genetic steps of mammalian homologous repair with distinct mutagenic consequences. Mol Cell Biol 24:9305–9316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stark JM, Jasin M (2003) Extensive loss of heterozygosity is suppressed during homologous repair of chromosomal breaks. Mol Cell Biol 23:733–743

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson RD, Jasin M (2000) Sister chromatid gene conversion is a prominent double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells. EMBO J 19:3398–3407

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stark JM, Hu P, Pierce AJ, Moynahan ME, Ellis N, Jasin M (2002) ATP hydrolysis by mammalian RAD51 has a key role during homology-directed DNA repair. J Biol Chem 277:20185–20194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Guirouilh-Barbat J, Huck S, Bertrand P, Pirzio L, Desmaze C, Sabatier L, Lopez BS (2004) Impact of the KU80 pathway on NHEJ-induced genome rearrangements in mammalian cells. Mol Cell 14:611–623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Guirouilh-Barbat J, Rass E, Plo I, Bertrand P, Lopez BS (2007) Defects in XRCC4 and KU80 differentially affect the joining of distal nonhomologous ends. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:20902–20907

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lieber MR (2010) The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annu Rev Biochem 79:181–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sartori AA, Lukas C, Coates J, Mistrik M, Fu S, Bartek J, Baer R, Lukas J, Jackson SP (2007) Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature 450:509–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stracker TH, Petrini JH (2011) The MRE11 complex: starting from the ends. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12:90–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang Y-G, Saidi A, Frappart P-O, Min W, Barrucand C, Dumon-Jones V, Michelon J, Herceg Z, Wang Z-Q (2006) Conditional deletion of Nbs1 in murine cells reveals its role in branching repair pathways of DNA double-strand breaks. EMBO J 25:5527–5538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Iliakis G, Rosidi B, Wang M, Wang H (2006) Plasmid-based assays for DNA end-joining in vitro. Methods Mol Biol 314:123–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bennardo N, Stark JM (2010) ATM limits incorrect end utilization during non-homologous end joining of multiple chromosome breaks. PLoS Genet 6:e1001194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen M-J, Ma S-M, Dumitrache LC, Hasty P (2007) Biochemical and cellular characteristics of the 3′  →  5′ exonuclease TREX2. Nucleic Acids Res 35:2682–2694

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Perrino FW, Harvey S, McMillin S, Hollis T (2005) The human TREX2 3′  →  5′-exonuclease structure suggests a mechanism for efficient nonprocessive DNA catalysis. J Biol Chem 280:15212–15218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakanishi K, Yang YG, Pierce AJ, Taniguchi T, Digweed M, D’Andrea AD, Wang ZQ, Jasin M (2005) Human Fanconi anemia monoubiquitination pathway promotes homologous DNA repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:1110–1115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH grant RO1CA120954 to J.M.S. Thanks to Nicole Bennardo, Meilen Muñoz, and Anita Cheng for technical contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy M. Stark .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Gunn, A., Stark, J.M. (2012). I-SceI-Based Assays to Examine Distinct Repair Outcomes of Mammalian Chromosomal Double Strand Breaks. In: Bjergbæk, L. (eds) DNA Repair Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 920. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-998-3_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-998-3_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-997-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-998-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics