Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Methods & Resources
    • Author Interviews
    • Archive
    • Subjects
  • Collections
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • License, Copyright, Fee
    • FAQ
    • Why submit
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editors & Staff
    • Board Members
    • Licensing and Reuse
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • LSA LLC
  • Alerts
  • Other Publications
    • EMBO Press
    • The EMBO Journal
    • EMBO reports
    • EMBO Molecular Medicine
    • Molecular Systems Biology
    • Rockefeller University Press
    • Journal of Cell Biology
    • Journal of Experimental Medicine
    • Journal of General Physiology
    • Journal of Human Immunity
    • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    • Genes & Development
    • Genome Research

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Life Science Alliance
  • Other Publications
    • EMBO Press
    • The EMBO Journal
    • EMBO reports
    • EMBO Molecular Medicine
    • Molecular Systems Biology
    • Rockefeller University Press
    • Journal of Cell Biology
    • Journal of Experimental Medicine
    • Journal of General Physiology
    • Journal of Human Immunity
    • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    • Genes & Development
    • Genome Research
  • My alerts
Life Science Alliance

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Methods & Resources
    • Author Interviews
    • Archive
    • Subjects
  • Collections
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • License, Copyright, Fee
    • FAQ
    • Why submit
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editors & Staff
    • Board Members
    • Licensing and Reuse
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • LSA LLC
  • Alerts
  • Follow LSA on Bluesky
  • Follow lsa Template on Twitter
Research Article
Source Data
Transparent Process
Open Access

Condensate-forming eIF4ET ensures adequate levels of meiotic proteins to support oocyte storage

Priyankaa Bhatia, View ORCID ProfileJudith Tafur, Ruchi Amin, Nicole E Familiari, Kan Yaguchi, View ORCID ProfileVanna M Tran, Alec Bond, Orhan Bukulmez, View ORCID ProfileJeffrey B Woodruff  Correspondence email
Priyankaa Bhatia
1Department of Cell Biology, Department of Biophysics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
Roles: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing—review and editing
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Judith Tafur
1Department of Cell Biology, Department of Biophysics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
Roles: Investigation, Methodology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Judith Tafur
Ruchi Amin
2Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
Roles: Investigation, Methodology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicole E Familiari
1Department of Cell Biology, Department of Biophysics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
Roles: Investigation, Methodology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kan Yaguchi
1Department of Cell Biology, Department of Biophysics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
Roles: Methodology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vanna M Tran
1Department of Cell Biology, Department of Biophysics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
Roles: Methodology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vanna M Tran
Alec Bond
1Department of Cell Biology, Department of Biophysics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
Roles: Methodology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Orhan Bukulmez
2Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
Roles: Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing—review and editing
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey B Woodruff
1Department of Cell Biology, Department of Biophysics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
Roles: Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Methodology, Project administration, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jeffrey B Woodruff
  • For correspondence: Jeffrey.woodruff@utsouthwestern.edu
Published 29 May 2025. DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202503387
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • Metrics
  • Reviewer Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Animals store oocytes in a dormant state for weeks to decades before ovulation. The homeostatic programs that oocytes use to endure long-term storage are poorly understood. Using female nematodes as a short-lived model, we found that oocyte formation and storage required IFET-1, the conserved eIF4E-transporter protein (eIF4ET). IFET-1 co-assembled with CAR-1 (Lsm14) to form micron-scale condensates in stored oocytes, which dissipated after oocyte activation. Depletion of IFET-1 destabilized the stored oocyte proteome, leading to lower translation, a decline in microtubule maintenance proteins, and errors in microtubule organization and meiotic spindle assembly. Deleting domains within IFET-1 impaired oocyte storage without affecting oocyte formation. Thus, in addition to establishing a healthy oocyte reserve in young mothers, IFET-1 ensures that correct levels of cytoskeletal proteins are maintained as oocytes age. eIF4ET also localized to micron-scale puncta in dormant human oocytes. Our results clarify how eIF4ET maintains the oocyte reserve and further support eIF4ET dysfunction as an upstream cause of embryonic aneuploidy and age-related infertility.

Introduction

The survival of many animal species depends on their ability to store high-quality oocytes for prolonged periods of time. Such storage typically involves cell cycle arrest of the oocyte, typically in meiotic prophase I. In mammals, stored oocytes are small (∼25–35 μm in diameter) and exist in a primordial follicle, where they are supported by squamous pre-granulosa cells (1, 2). These oocytes can be reactivated to grow into immature GV oocytes (∼100 μm in diameter), which then are either destroyed (atresia) or mature further into a metaphase-arrested form that is released for fertilization (ovulation) (1, 2). A woman’s pool of stored oocytes, called the ovarian reserve, declines immediately after birth, even before ovulation can occur. This decline continues as the woman ages, ultimately leading to a depleted ovarian reserve and menopause when she reaches 40–50 yr of age (3, 4). Oocyte quality also decreases during long-term storage, as defined by an increase in mitochondrial dysfunction, DNA damage, and meiotic spindle errors (5, 6, 7). These age-related errors are correlated with an increased risk of chromosomal abnormalities in the developing fetus and miscarriage (8). Similar phenomena have been described in a wide variety of animals (9). The confluence of declining oocyte numbers and quality are thus major contributors to age-related infertility in female mammals, yet the upstream molecular causes remain poorly understood.

Although much research has revealed mechanisms of oocyte production, cell cycle arrest at the GV stage, and post-GV maturation (1, 10), comparatively little is known about long-term oocyte maintenance. In preparation for storage, oocytes enter a state of cellular hibernation in part by reducing transcription and mitochondrial production of ATP (11, 12). Understanding storage requires identifying the molecules and mechanisms that continuously provide “life support” for the oocyte during its storage. A potential inroad is through studying a disease that affects oocyte storage. Primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) is characterized by an accelerated decline in the ovarian reserve or general dysfunction of ovarian follicles. Patients with POI typically experience irregular menstrual cycles, low anti-Müllerian hormone, and premature menopause (26–32 yr of age) (13). As these patients start out with a large ovarian reserve and can bear children early (before menopause), this disease represents a case where the body fails to preserve oocytes over time. Mutations in Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E Nuclear Import Factor 1 (EIF4ENIF1), which encodes a protein from the conserved eIF4ET family, are associated with POI, suggesting a link to oocyte quality control (14, 15, 16). Consistent with this theory, EIF4ENIF1 heterozygous knockout mice display reduced follicle pools and subfertility, recapitulating key features of POI (17). In somatic tissue culture cells, EIF4ENIF1 binds to and mediates nuclear import of the mRNA cap-binding protein eIF4E (18, 19, 20). Through the use of nonnatural reporters, these studies concluded that EIF4ENIF1 associates with P-bodies to inhibit protein translation and stabilize mRNAs. Injection of EIF4ENIF1 into frog GV oocytes also repressed translation of a luciferase reporter (21). EIF4ENIF1 is found in P-body–like granules in dormant mouse oocytes (17) and in mitochondria-associated granules (MARDO) in mammalian GV oocytes (22). However, it is not known whether EIF4ENIF1 is required specifically during oocyte storage and whether it regulates the global pool of natural mRNAs and proteins in that context.

The mechanism of oocyte storage remains poorly understood because of the difficulty in accessing dormant oocytes. In mammals, dormant oocytes are obtained only through invasive surgical resection of the ovarian cortex. In vitro gametogenesis also cannot be used because it does not yet recapitulate formation and long-term maintenance of the primordial follicle (23), the fundamental storage unit that comprises the dormant oocyte surrounded by pre-granulosa cells (1). Thus, it is advantageous to use a genetic model organism with a short lifespan and oocytes that are easily visualized in situ.

Here, we use C. elegans females to study oocyte maintenance mechanisms. Most nematodes are gonochoric and store immature oocytes arrested in meiotic prophase I. C. elegans is an outlier in that it recently evolved hermaphroditism, yet C. elegans females retain the ability to store arrested oocytes in cases where sperm are depleted naturally or genetically (fog-2 or fem-1 mutations) (24, 25). Thus, oocyte storage is an ancestral feature of nematodes. As Caenorhabditis species live for several weeks and store their oocytes for less time, they represent an attractive short-lived model for oocyte storage.

Results

Dysfunction of the eIF4ET homolog (IFET-1) impairs oocyte formation and storage in female nematodes

We developed an assay to test the effects of storage time on oocyte quality. We generated a population of genetically identical C. elegans females through the use of a temperature-sensitive fem-1(hc17) loss-of-function allele. After synchronizing their development, all worms reached adulthood and formed arrested oocytes at the same time (first day of adulthood = day 1). We then split the females into cohorts, letting them wait another 1–5 d before introducing young males for mating. At the first day of mating (day 2), the female worms contained, on average, 34 ± 7 oocytes (n= 20). Worms were allowed to mate and lay fertilized eggs over 12–16 h before removing all adults from the plates. Because females can produce new oocytes after ovulating their stored oocytes, we reported on worms that laid 34 or fewer eggs. After 2 d, we measured the number of hatchlings divided by the number of eggs laid (oocyte viability) (Fig 1A). Under these conditions, average oocyte viability declined with storage time, reaching 63.4% by day 6 (Fig 1B). From these data, we infer that C. elegans oocyte quality declines in proportion to their storage time, like what is seen in mammals.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1. IFET-1 is required for long-term storage of quiescent oocytes in C. elegans females.

(A) Strategy to study oocyte storage and viability in C. elegans females. fem-1(hc17) worms were synchronized at L1, grown to adulthood at 25°C to induce feminization and oocyte storage, and then separated into five different cohorts. Female cohorts were mated with young males on different days, and then, offspring were analyzed. (A, B) Percentage of oocytes that hatched, as described in (A) (mean ± 95% C.I.; n = 12–30 worms, brood sizes ≤34 eggs laid). Partial knockdown of ifet-1 was achieved by feeding on RNAi plates for 48 h; full knockdown was achieved by feeding for 72 h. See the Supplemental Data 3 for all viability data. (C) Strategy to deplete IFET-1 in stored oocytes after their formation. Synchronized fem-1(hc17) ifet-1::mScarlet::AID* TIR-1::T2A::BFP adult female worms were placed on plates with 0 or 4 mM auxin for 24 h. Females were removed from auxin for 8 h before mating with males. (D) Left, diagram of a C. elegans female. Right, confocal image of day 3 adult females expressing IFET-1::mScarlet::AID* grown on plates containing 0 mM (control) or 4 mM auxin. Scale bar, 10 μm. (D, E) Integrated fluorescence intensity of IFET-1::mScarlet::AID* signal in stored oocytes from panel (D) (mean ± 95% C.I.; n = 15 worms). (F) Viability of stored oocytes after mating in IFET-1::mScarlet worms with or without auxin treatment (mean ± 95% C.I.; n = 34 [control] versus 28 [auxin] worms, brood sizes =26 [control] versus 13 [auxin] eggs per mother). (G) Live-cell confocal images of IFET-1::mMaple in stored (female, not mated) and activated (hermaphrodite) oocytes. Scale bars, 10 μm. (H) Immunofluorescence images of stored oocytes. Scale bars, 10 μm. (I) Left, images of stored oocytes expressing CAR-1::mMaple. Right, quantification of total mass of CAR-1 condensates per worm (mean ± 95% C.I.; n = 850–900 condensates from 5 to 8 worms). (J) Immunofluorescence staining of mitochondria (HSP60) in stored oocytes expressing IFET-1::mMaple. Scale bars, 10 μm.

IFET-1 is the C. elegans homolog of EIF4ENIF1, but its role during oocyte storage has not been tested. Full depletion of IFET-1 using RNAi rendered almost all stored oocytes inviable (Figs 1B and S1A); IFET-1 levels remained low in stored oocytes, even after worms were removed from the RNAi feeding plates (Fig S1B). IFET-1 depletion also impaired ovulation in females and oocyte viability in hermaphrodites, which do not arrest their oocytes, consistent with a previous study (26). Thus, full knockdown of IFET-1 has pleiotropic effects making it difficult to assess its role specifically during oocyte storage. Patients with EIF4ENIF1-linked POI all have heterozygous mutations, implying that failed oocyte storage could be caused by partial reduction of EIF4ENIF1 activity. In our system, partial knockdown of IFET-1 allowed young mothers to bear healthy progeny, although initial viability was reduced to 31%. Oocyte viability declined faster than in controls, reaching zero after 4 d of storage (Fig 1B). Oocytes in ifet-1(RNAi) females were irregular in shape, as expected; however, all but the most proximal oocyte maintained arrest in diakinesis, as indicated by the presence of intact germinal vesicles and condensed chromosomes (Fig S1C). Thus, oocytes are still arrested in the absence of IFET-1, but they are largely inviable. These results support previous findings that IFET-1 is required for oocyte formation (26), and they further suggest that IFET-1 could be required for maintenance of stored oocytes.

Figure S1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure S1. In vivo control experiments for oocyte proteins.

(A) Western blot against IFET-1; anti-alpha tubulin blotting was used as a loading control. Worm lysates were separated first by SDS–PAGE. (B) Confocal images of stored oocytes expressing IFET-1::mMaple with and without ifet-1(RNAi) treatment across day 2 and 5 of adulthood. Scale bars, 10 μm. (C) Confocal imaging of GFP-labeled histone H2B in stored oocytes (outlined in dashed white lines). Scale bar, 10 μm. (D) DIC images of stored oocytes from the experiment in Fig 1D–F. Scale bar, 10 μm. (E) Images of the IFET-1::mScarlet::AID* signal in various conditions, related to Fig 1C and D. (F) Embryos were dissected in M9 + 1 mM auxin and imaged with DIC (top) and fluorescence (bottom) over time. Scale bar, 10 μm. (F, G) Viability of embryos after auxin treatment in panel (F). (H) Viability of oocytes in fem-1 worms not expressing a degron-tagged version of IFET-1 (mean ± 95% C.I.; n = 27 mothers, <34 laid eggs each). See Supplemental Data 3 for raw data. (I) Viability of embryos laid by hermaphrodite versions of CRISPR-tagged strains (mean ± 95% C.I.; n = 12 mothers, >45 embryos each).

Source data are available for this figure.

Source Data for Figure S1[LSA-2025-03387_SdataFS1.pdf]

To definitively test the necessity of IFET-1 for the storage of healthy oocytes, we sought a way to deplete IFET-1 only after oocyte formation is complete. Thus, we generated a fem-1 strain expressing a version of IFET-1 that is degraded by the addition of auxin (IFET-1::mScarlet::AID*). As outlined in Fig 1C, we placed synchronized adult females, which already have a row of arrested oocytes (day 1) on plates with or without 4 mM auxin for 24 h at 20°C. Then, we allowed worms to recover on normal Nematode Growth Media (NGM) plates for 8 h at 20°C and allowed mating with males and egg laying for 12–16 h at 16°C (day 3). On average, worms laid 26 (control) versus 13 (auxin) eggs during the laying period (n = 34 versus 28 mothers, respectively); thus, any eggs or larvae on the plate derived from preformed, healthy oocytes. Finally, we measured oocyte viability using the same method described above.

Auxin treatment depleted the IFET-1::mScarlet::AID* signal relative to controls (Fig 1D and E). In both cases, oocyte morphology appeared normal, suggesting that oocytes were formed properly (Fig S1D). After 8 h of post-auxin removal, just before mating, the IFET-1 signal did not recover within oocytes but did increase in the gonads (Fig S1E). Thus, auxin-induced depletion of IFET-1::mScarlet::AID* in oocytes is robust and IFET-1 does not re-accumulate in stored oocytes after auxin removal. After mating, we observed that auxin treatment significantly reduced oocyte viability (Fig 1F).

We considered the possibility that this phenotype could be due to IFET-1 being essential during embryogenesis. However, treatment of excised embryos with 1 mM auxin rapidly depleted IFET-1 but had no detectable effect on embryo development and viability (Fig S1F and G). Auxin treatment did not significantly affect the fertility of control females not expressing the degron, indicating that auxin is not generally toxic (Fig S1H). Thus, the oocyte viability phenotype is due to lack of IFET-1 specifically during oocyte storage. We conclude that IFET-1 is required to maintain oocyte quality during days-long storage.

IFET-1 localizes to condensates that do not contain mitochondria

To understand the function of IFET-1 in stored oocytes, we used confocal microscopy to visualize IFET-1 tagged with mMaple (IFET-1::mMaple). Worms expressing IFET-1::mMaple were viable and fertile (Fig S1I). In stored oocytes, IFET-1::Maple localized to numerous micron-scale droplets, which we term condensates. After activation of the oocytes through fertilization, these condensates were dissolved and the IFET-1::Maple signal was redistributed evenly throughout the oocyte cytoplasm (Fig 1G). A similar behavior was reported for CAR-1, which localizes to droplets in stored oocytes (27, 28) and interacts with IFET-1 in embryo extracts (29). To co-visualize CAR-1 and IFET-1, we tagged endogenous CAR-1 at its C terminus with mMaple and generated antibodies against both proteins for immunofluorescence. CAR-1::mMaple localized to condensates in stored oocytes, as expected, and co-localized with untagged IFET-1 (Fig 1H). IFET-1::mMaple also co-localized with untagged CAR-1. RNAi depletion of IFET-1 reduced CAR-1 localization to condensates (Fig 1I). These results indicate that IFET-1 and CAR-1 co-assemble into supramolecular condensates in stored oocytes.

We wondered whether the IFET-1/CAR-1 condensates function as Balbiani bodies, which are reported to encapsulate and confine mitochondria in the dormant oocytes of zebrafish, frogs, and humans (30, 31, 32). However, mitochondria are not spatially confined in stored C. elegans oocytes (33), and we saw no significant co-localization between HSP60 (mitochondrial marker) and IFET-1 condensates (Fig 1J). We conclude that IFET-1 condensates are not primitive Balbiani bodies but rather a distinct class of protein-based supramolecular assembly that exists in stored oocytes.

Disrupting individual domains in IFET-1 perturbs oocyte storage but not formation

We next tested which domains within IFET-1 are critical for its function in oocytes. IFET-1 contains several conserved features: an eIF4E homology domain (Eif4EHD), Cup homology domain (CHD), NLS, a region rich in glutamines (PolyQ), and a C-terminal coiled-coil (Fig 2A). We used CRISPR to delete each of these regions in worms expressing endogenously tagged IFET-1::mMaple (Fig 2A). We first analyzed homozygous mutant hermaphrodite worms, which make and activate oocytes continuously with no storage phase (34). In this condition, all mutant worms produced viable oocytes; ∆CHD, ∆NLS, and ∆PolyQ mutants were nearly identical to controls, whereas the ∆Coiledcoil mutant showed slightly reduced viability (Fig 2B).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2. Specific domains in IFET-1 contribute to oocyte storage.

(A) Design of mutant constructs created with CRISPR modification of ifet-1::mMaple worms. Shown is the protein sequence of IFET-1 (CHD, Cup homology domain; NLS, nuclear localization signal; CC, coiled-coil domain; PolyQ, region rich in glutamines). (B) Quantification of oocyte viability from 2-d-old adult hermaphrodites (non-stored oocytes) and females (stored oocytes) after mating (mean ± 95% C.I.; n = embryos from 15 to 22 worms, brood size ≤34 eggs laid for female worms). See Supplemental Data 3 for raw data. (A, C) Confocal images of stored oocytes expressing the mutant variants of IFET-1::mMaple shown in (A). (D) Quantification of IFET-1::mMaple assembly into stored condensates (mean ± 95% C.I.; n = 500–600 condensates from 5 to 8 worms). (E) Quantification of mean IFET-1::mMaple fluorescence signal in oocytes (mean ± 95% C.I. from 10 to 15 worms).

Mutant female worms (∆CHD, ∆NLS, ∆PolyQ, ∆Coiledcoil) formed oocytes with proper cuboidal morphology but could not store them effectively: after 2 d of oocyte storage followed by mating, embryo viability was reduced compared with eggs laid by age-matched hermaphrodites (Fig 2B). IFET-1::mMaple mutants localized to condensates in stored oocytes to differing degrees (Fig 2C and D). Mutants were expressed at 55–64% of WT levels (Fig 2E). Importantly, for each mutant, expression levels were similar between female worms with stored oocytes and hermaphrodites with non-stored oocytes (Fig S2A and B); thus, the oocyte viability phenotype is due to a distinct role of IFET-1 in storage that is not required during active oogenesis. We speculate that these mutations comprise IFET-1 function, especially the ∆CHD mutation, which had the most severe oocyte viability phenotype (21.8% viability after 2 d of storage) despite being expressed at comparable levels to other mutants. The ∆Coiledcoil mutant had the largest effect on condensate localization, suggesting that the coiled-coil domain helps IFET-1 co-assemble with CAR-1 to form condensates (Fig 2C). These results reveal that (1) IFET-1 functions can be separated based on domains, and (2) multiple domains are required for full-scale IFET-1 expression and function in stored oocytes. These data further support our conclusion that IFET-1 is required to form oocytes and maintain their quality during the storage phase.

Figure S2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure S2. Analysis of IFET-1 mutant worms.

(A) Western blot against IFET-1 in indicated strains. Hermaphrodite and female worms are indicated with symbols. The Ponceau stain was used as a loading control. (A, B) Quantification of (A) indicating gray values of IFET-1 in the Western blot, normalized by the level of Ponceau staining.

Source data are available for this figure.

Source Data for Figure S2[LSA-2025-03387_SdataFS2.pdf]

IFET-1 depletion causes imbalances in meiotic spindle protein levels

To determine how IFET-1 dysfunction impacts oocyte quality, we performed proteomic and transcriptomic analyses in control versus ifet-1(RNAi) female worms containing oocytes stored for 2 d. Because most of IFET-1 is expressed in the germline (oocytes + syncytial gonad; Fig 1), we report data derived from whole worms and follow up on specific hits with fluorescent reporters that are expressed in stored oocytes.

Depletion of IFET-1 caused disruption of the proteome. Out of 3,561 proteins detected in both control and RNAi sets, 530 proteins (14.9%) were significantly down-regulated, whereas 100 proteins (2.8%) were significantly up-regulated in ifet-1(RNAi) worms (Fig 3A; Supplemental Data 1). IFET-1 levels were reduced to 15% of control levels. This result contrasts with the expectation that IFET-1 functions as a broadscale repressor, which was based on non-native reporter assays (26). Transcriptomic analyses revealed few changes in mRNA levels in control versus ifet-1(RNAi) worms. Only 6.8% of all transcripts were significantly altered (4.5% up, 2.3% down) after depletion of IFET-1 (Fig 3B; Supplemental Data 2). However, there was little overlap between significant hits in the proteomic and transcriptomic data sets, suggesting that proteomic changes largely did not result from changes in transcript levels (Fig S3A and B).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3. Proteomic and transcriptomic profiling of oocyte-storing worms lacking IFET-1.

(A) Left, volcano plot of protein abundance in ifet-1(RNAi) females versus control females. Right, pie chart indicating protein changes that surpassed significance thresholds (P < 0.05, fold change > 2; n = 3 replicates). See Supplemental Data 1 for a list of all proteins. (B) Left, volcano plot of mRNA abundance in ifet-1(RNAi) females versus control females. Right, pie chart indicating protein changes that surpassed significance thresholds (P < 0.05, fold change > 2; n = 3 replicates). See Supplemental Data 2 for a list of all transcripts. (C) Analysis of selected proteins related to meiotic spindle formation. Shown is average protein abundance in ifet-1(RNAi) worms relative to controls. (D) Analysis of selected transcripts related to meiotic spindle formation. Shown is average mRNA abundance in ifet-1(RNAi) worms relative to controls. (C, D, E) Comparison of changes in protein and mRNA abundance for genes/proteins listed in (C, D). There is no correlation between the data sets (R2= 0.007; n = 21). (F) SUnSET assay testing translation levels by measuring puromycin incorporation into proteins. Lane 1, control female worms with stored oocytes. Lane 2, ifet-1(RNAi) female worms with stored oocytes. Left, blot probing for puromycin. Middle, Ponceau stain showing total protein levels per sample. Right, quantification of puromycin signal relative to Ponceau signal and normalized to signal of control worms (n = 4 blots).

Source data are available for this figure.

Source Data for Figure 3[LSA-2025-03387_SdataF3.pdf]

Figure S3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure S3. Analysis of proteomic and transcriptomic data for female worms with stored oocytes.

(A) Overlap between proteomic and transcriptomic data sets from Fig 3. (B) List of the 15 gene products where mRNA and protein are significantly down-regulated after RNAi against ifet-1. (C) GO-term analysis of proteomic data in Fig 3. See Supplemental Data 4 for more information. (D) Analysis of selected proteins related to meiotic spindle formation. Shown is average protein abundance in ifet-1(∆CHD) worms relative to ifet-1(WT) controls. Bars indicate means (N= 2 data sets with 3 replicates each). Purple, striped, and gray indicate that the differences were significant in 2, 1, or 0 data sets, respectively. (E) SUnSET assay comparing puromycin incorporation between worms with activated oocytes and worms with arrested oocytes. Quantification of three blots with arrested signal normalized to activated oocyte signal (significance tested with a one-sample t test).

Source data are available for this figure.

Source Data for Figure S3[LSA-2025-03387_SdataFS3.pdf]

Using Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of down-regulated proteins in ifet-1(RNAi) worms, we saw that the highest-ranking category included proteins related to embryo development and egg hatching (Fig S3C; Supplemental Data 4). Within this category were proteins required for meiotic spindle or microtubule function, such as katanin (MEI-1) and oocyte-specific isoforms of tubulin (TBA-1, TBA-2). Focusing on meiotic spindle proteins, we also saw down-regulation of kinesin-like protein 15 (KLP-15), TPX2 (TPXL-1), dynein light intermediate chain (DLI-1), Aurora A kinase (AIR-1), and other tubulin isoforms (TBB-1 and TBB-2) (Fig 3C). Not all microtubule-related proteins were down-regulated; for example, dynein heavy chain (DHC-1), ch-TOG (ZYG-9), and ASPM-1 were slightly up-regulated. Levels of the transcripts encoding these proteins were all slightly down-regulated in ifet-1(RNAi) worms (60–95% of control; Fig 3D) and showed no correlation with proteomic changes (Fig 3E). Thus, IFET-1 regulates levels of meiotic spindle and microtubule-related proteins in a post-transcriptional manner. It is possible that these proteomic changes are, in part, due to defects in the production of full-sized, mature oocytes, which have been reported for worms lacking functional IFET-1(26). However, proteomic analysis also revealed lower MEI-1, AIR-1, DLI-1, and TBB-1 levels in ifet-1(∆CHD) mutant females, which are defective for oocyte storage and not active oogenesis (Fig S3D).

We then analyzed global levels of translation in whole worms using a SUnSET assay. Puromycin incorporation was reduced in worms containing arrested oocytes versus active oocytes (Fig S3E); thus, reduced translation is a hallmark of oocyte storage in C. elegans. In worms containing stored oocytes, depletion of IFET-1 further reduced puromycin incorporation compared with controls (Fig 3F). Our results suggest that lowered meiotic protein levels in ifet-1(RNAi) female worms are in part due to reduced translation.

Loss of IFET-1 disrupts microtubule organization in stored and activated oocytes

Our proteomic and transcriptomic data indicated that several meiotic spindle proteins, but not their mRNAs, were down-regulated in ifet-1 mutants. We hypothesized that such proteostatic dysfunction should affect meiotic progression, which could explain how IFET-1 loss impairs oocyte viability. Thus, we generated feminized worms expressing GFP-labeled beta tubulin (fem-1ts GFP::TBB-2), allowed them to store oocytes, and then mated them with males to induce oocyte activation and meiotic spindle assembly (Fig 4A). In control arrested oocytes (no RNAi), microtubules appeared throughout the cytoplasm, but they concentrated in bright networks near the oocyte periphery, as reported before (35). After oocytes were activated by mating, the cytoplasmic microtubules were disassembled, and the meiotic spindle was formed (Fig 4B). In ifet-1(RNAi) oocytes, GFP::TBB-2 did not localize to bright peripheral networks and overall expression was lower, consistent with our proteomic data (Fig 4C and D). After mating, bipolar formation of a single meiotic spindle per oocyte failed; instead, we observed diminutive spindle-like structures, microtubule clusters, or aggregates of tubulin signal (Fig 4C). Thus, IFET-1 is needed for organization of the microtubule cytoskeleton during oocyte storage and resumption of meiosis.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4. IFET-1 depletion affects organization of the microtubule cytoskeleton and MEI-1/katanin levels in stored oocytes.

(A) Workflow of experiments in female worms with stored oocytes. Mating induces oocyte activation and meiotic spindle assembly. (B) Live-cell confocal images of arrested, activated, and meiosis I oocytes in control female worms expressing GFP::TBB-2 (beta tubulin). Yellow arrowhead, an assembling meiotic spindle. (B, C) Same as in (B), except with ifet-1(RNAi) female worms. Yellow arrowhead, microtubule asters; red arrowheads, tubulin aggregates. (D) Quantification of GFP::TBB-2 levels in arrested oocytes (mean ± 95% C.I.; n = 4–6 worms). (E) Quantification of GFP::MEI-1 (katanin) levels in arrested oocytes relative to gonads (mean ± 95% C.I.; n = 6–8 worms). (F) Images of GFP::MEI-1 expression in arrested oocytes. Top: arrested oocytes; middle: arrested oocytes with ifet-1(RNAi); bottom: arrested oocytes fed on ifet-1(RNAi) and then on bortezomib plates to block the proteasome. Scale bars, 10 μm.

Another protein affected by IFET-1 depletion was MEI-1/Katanin, a microtubule-severing enzyme important for meiotic spindle function (36). It is not known whether MEI-1 is made before oocyte formation, during oocyte storage, or in response to oocyte activation. We thus used CRISPR to fuse MEI-1 with GFP (GFP::MEI-1) in feminized worms. Confocal microscopy revealed GFP::MEI-1 signal was low in the syncytial gonad and increased 3.5-fold in stored oocytes (Fig 4E and F). The GFP::MEI-1 signal was highest in the most proximal oocytes (i.e., the oldest). Thus, MEI-1 is translated into stored oocytes and accumulates over time. GFP::MEI-1 levels dropped dramatically after IFET-1 depletion (Fig 4E and F), consistent with our proteomic data. Treatment of adult worms with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib only weakly restored GFP::MEI-1 levels in the oldest oocytes (Fig 4E and F). Overall, our results suggest that meiotic proteins are produced and maintained in stored oocytes through IFET-1–influenced translation and proteasome-mediated degradation. We conclude that IFET-1 ensures that stored oocytes produce the correct levels of MEI-1/katanin, tubulin, and other proteins needed to organize the microtubule cytoskeleton and, after oocyte activation, to build a functional meiotic spindle.

The homolog of IFET-1 localizes to perinuclear puncta in dormant human oocytes

Our results suggest that IFET-1 plays an oocyte-intrinsic role in maintaining oocyte quality over time in C. elegans. We next examined the localization of the human homolog of IFET-1, called EIF4ENIF1. We surgically removed ovarian cortex strips from a reproductively healthy, 20-yr-old patient (Fig 5A; see the Materials and Methods section), and immediately fixed and processed the tissue for immunofluorescence staining. Stored oocytes reside in primordial follicles identified by a single layer of squamous pre-granulosa cells (2). Within these oocytes, EIF4ENIF1 localized to the cytoplasm and perinuclear, micron-scale puncta that morphologically resemble condensates (Fig 5B). EIF4ENIF1 puncta did not co-localize with mitochondria, similar to IFET-1 condensates in stored C. elegans oocytes (Fig 1). The EIF4ENIF1 puncta were specific to oocytes, as no significant signal was detected in the surrounding tissue (Fig 5C). We conclude that supramolecular assembly of eIF4ET family proteins into mitochondria-free condensates is a conserved feature of oocyte storage.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5. Localization of the IFET-1 homolog EIF4ENIF1 in human stored oocytes.

(A) H&E staining of an ovarian cortical slice resected from a 20-yr-old patient. Primordial follicles containing stored oocytes are labeled. (B) Immunofluorescence staining of mitochondria (HSP60), DNA, and EIF4ENIF1 in a primordial follicle. (C) Larger view of the ovary cortex reveals that EIF4ENIF1 only localized to oocytes within the primordial follicle and not surrounding cells.

Discussion

Diverse animals store and maintain immature eggs, called oocytes, for long periods of time before ovulating them. Here, we used C. elegans females as a short-lived model for oocyte storage and identified the eIF4ET family protein IFET-1 as essential for oocyte formation and long-term maintenance. We report that in stored oocytes, IFET-1 forms condensates and influences proteostasis, ensuring that Katanin, tubulins, and other meiotic spindle proteins are maintained at the correct levels. This program ensures that the oocyte microtubule cytoskeleton is supported during oocyte storage and then properly reorganized into a functional meiotic spindle after oocyte activation.

Oocytes are thought to be largely translationally silent, yet they still produce “housekeeping” proteins, which are presumably needed for survival during long-term storage (37). Our data revealed that IFET-1 is needed for overall translation in oocytes and, more specifically, achieving adequate levels of housekeeping proteins related to microtubule organization and completion of meiosis. IFET-1 co-localized with CAR-1 (Lsm14B) in micron-scale condensates that formed in stored oocytes but not in activated oocytes. Previous work suggested that these condensates serve as super-stoichiometric repressor complexes that allow extreme concentration and silencing of mRNAs (38). If true, one would expect that dissolution of the condensates would cause a massive up-regulation of protein translation. IFET-1 depletion does increase the expression of nonnatural translational reporters (gfp fused to different 3′UTRs) (26) and genes required for sperm production (e.g., fog-1, daz-1, fem-3) (39). However, polysome profiling revealed that translation is reduced in IFET-1–depleted hermaphrodites (39). Our SUnSET assay also showed reduced translation in ifet-1(RNAi) females containing stored oocytes. These seemingly contradictory results are resolved by our unbiased proteomics: 530 proteins are significantly down-regulated, and 100 proteins are significantly up-regulated in ifet-1(RNAi) females. Thus, IFET-1 affects protein expression and stability in a protein-specific manner. eIF4ET proteins are known to sequester eIF4E, thus preventing interaction between the 40S ribosomal subunit and the 5′ mRNA cap (19). By repressing translation of capped mRNAs, IFET-1 could, in theory, favor translation of uncapped mRNAs needed for oocyte maintenance (40).

Why loss of IFET-1 would lead to a decrease in global translation is still unclear. There are several caveats to consider. First, for our puromycin and imaging experiments, we performed RNAi knockdown of ifet-1 before oocyte storage; thus, we currently cannot rule out the possibility that failed translation of some proteins could be an indirect effect of improper oocyte formation. However, our proteomic analysis of ifet-1(∆CHD) females, which produce oocytes normally but cannot effectively store them, revealed decreases in katanin, tubulins, and other cytoskeleton-related proteins. Thus, translation of these proteins is likely influenced by IFET-1 during oocyte storage. Second, loss of select proteins could be due to increased proteasome-mediated degradation, which we showed is active for maintaining MEI-1 levels in stored oocytes. Third, the primary role of IFET-1 may also change in a cell type–specific manner. Our data, which used proteomics and live-cell imaging of GFP-tagged endogenous MEI-1, clearly indicated that IFET-1 depletion reduces MEI-1 levels in stored oocytes. However, a study using immunofluorescence reported higher levels of MEI-1 in the embryos of ifet-1 mutant hermaphrodites (41). MEI-1 is normally degraded during the oocyte–embryo transition (42). It is possible that IFET-1 is required for both translation of MEI-1 during oocyte storage and the factors that degrade MEI-1 during the oocyte–embryo transition. Understanding the mechanistic link between IFET-1 and MEI-1 translation will require future investigation. Our data revealed that many other classes of proteins are affected by ifet-1(RNAi); it is thus possible that IFET-1’s control of MEI-1 and other microtubule-related protein levels is indirect.

IFET-1 shares homology to human EIF4ENIF1, a protein whose function during mammalian oocyte storage remains poorly defined. Women with heterozygous mutations in EIF4ENIF1 suffer a form of early-onset infertility called POI (14, 15, 16). Symptoms typically arise in the patient’s late 20s and early 30s and include amenorrhea, a rapid depletion of the ovarian reserve of quiescent oocytes, and an elevated risk of miscarriage (43). Before diagnosis, patients with POI can bear healthy children, indicating that POI does not block or perturb oocyte development but rather the long-term maintenance of oocytes in the ovary (13). We showed that mutating conserved regions in IFET-1 specifically impairs oocyte storage but not formation, thus mimicking a key feature of POI. Furthermore, we demonstrated that EIF4ENIF1 localizes to micron-scale condensates in dormant primary oocytes in a patient, similar to our observations of IFET-1 in C. elegans. By analogy, it is possible that human oocytes assemble EIF4ENIF1 condensates or smaller cytoplasmic complexes as a quality control mechanism to regulate protein levels during long-term oocyte storage. We hypothesize that EIF4ENIF1 dysregulation could be an upstream cause of meiotic division errors associated with age-related infertility in women.

Materials and Methods

Worm strains and maintenance

All worms were maintained at 16°C on NGM with OP50 until reaching the adult gravid stage and passaged regularly to maintain a steady population of worms. GFP and mMaple knock-ins were generated using CRISPR (44). Worm strains are listed in Table S1.

Table S1. C. elegans strains.

Worm synchronization and feminization

All worms with a fem-1 temperature-sensitive genotype had to be maintained at 16°C to maintain hermaphrodites. When arrested oocytes were needed for an experiment, worms were grown at 16°C until the plate was full of mostly adults and eggs. Plates were washed with 3.5 ml of dH2O and transferred to a Falcon tube. To this, 1 ml of 5% bleach and 0.5 ml of 5M NaOH were added and the Falcon tubes spun for 1–2 min or until all adult worms were dissolved. This embryo-enriched solution was spun on a centrifuge at 1,300 RCF for 1 min, then washed in DI water twice at the same spin settings. The pellet of embryos was resuspended in 1 ml of M9 media and left to rotate at room temperature overnight. The next day, the tubes were collected and contained synchronized L1 hatchlings. These were transferred to NGM plates with OP50 and grown at 25°C for 72 h to fully feminize and mature to adults with oocytes in day 1 arrest. It is at this stage that worms were collected for all subsequent experiments.

RNAi knockdowns

RNAi was done via feeding. The target sequence for ifet-1 is AACGTGGCTAATCCAATGCTTGCAAGACTTTTCGGTCATAGTGGTGGTGATAACAACGCTTCATCTTCTGGAGCTGGTGATATAAAAGGAGGAATGCGGTTGGAAGATTTGGAGAAAGGCATGGAGTCAAAGGAACCTTCAAAAGTCAGTCCATTGCAAGATCCATCACAACAAGCACAACTTCTGCAACATCTGCAAAAATTCGCCAAACAGCAAGCAGAGTCTGGTCAGCACATACATCATCATAGACAACCAACACCACCAAATGGAGGTCCACAGCATCAACAACATTTGCATCACCCTATGGTTCATCCTGGAATGCAAATTATCGCAGATCCAAGCCTTCTTGCAAGCTTCGCACAGAATCCAGTGATTTTGAATGCCTATGTCGAGAATCAACTTCAAGAAGCAGTCAATGCTGCAATTCGTGCAAACAATGGGCAGCAGCTTCCACCACAGCTTCGTATGTTAAGCATTTTTGAATACATTTCATGATTGAATTATTTTTCAGATGAGCAACTTCGTATGGCATCCATGCGTAACAAGGCTTTCCTACAGTCTCAGACTCTCACTTTCGTTAGTCTTCAACAACAGCATCAGAACATCCAGCAGCATCAGCAACAACAACAGCATCATCAACACAAAGGTCGCACTCCTGCTATGATACCTGCGTCTGTGCAGCGGCAATTGCAGAAGAGCTCCTCAAATGCTGATCAGAAGAAAGAAAAGACGAGTCAGAGCCCGCCAGAGAGCAACCAAGAGACTTCCGACGCTCATAATCAATCTGATGCCATGAACCAACTGAAGAAATTGCACATGCAGCAGAACTATGCCAATATGGTGCAGGCAATGAATTCTGGAGTCGGATGGGCACGCGGAAACGGCGTTGTTAACGGACAACAGCAACATCCACAGCAGCAACTTCCACCAAATGTTCAAATGCTGATGGCTCAACACCAGCAAGCTCAAATGCAGCACCTCAAG.

Bacteria containing the target sequence plasmids were seeded onto NGM plates containing 1 mM IPTG and 100 μg/ml ampicillin. Worms were bleached and synchronized as described above. After rotating overnight in M9, the L1 larvae were transferred onto prepared RNAi plates and grown at 25°C for 46–72 h (depending on the experiment). Worms were then transferred off the RNAi plate once they reached day 1 of adulthood and allowed to grow on OP50 at 20°C.

Auxin treatment

Worm synchronization and feminization were conducted as described above. When worms reached day 1 of adulthood, they were transferred to 20°C. Half the adult worms were transferred to NGM plates with OP50 containing 4 mM auxin for 24 h; half were maintained on a normal OP50 plate. After auxin treatment, the worms were transferred back to a regular NGM plate with OP50 for 8 h. Both control and auxin-treated worms were then singled out to mate with three males for ∼12–16 h at 16°C. The males used were also synchronized using the above method and grown to adulthood. At the end of the mating period, adult worms were removed from the mating plates and the total amount of embryos on each plate was counted. 2 d later, the number of hatchlings on each plate was counted and % embryonic viability was calculated. Data included were only from worms that laid 34 or less embryos.

For IFET-1 depletion in embryos, embryos were extracted from IFET-1::mScarlet::AID* hermaphrodite worms using two dissection needles in a solution of M9 containing 1 mM auxin. These embryos were then imaged overnight on a Nikon widefield microscope to visualize hatching and IFET-1::mScarlet signal.

Bortezomib feeding

Agar plates were prepared by diluting bortezomib (#5.04314; MilliporeSigma) to 20 μM in OP-50 and seeding plates as above. Worms were then fed on these plates for 16–24 h to test recovery after RNAi feeding.

Viability assay

Worms were bleached and synchronized as described above. L1 larvae were grown at 25°C for 72 h to feminize. After 72 h, all adult worms on day 1 of oocyte arrest were transferred to 20°C to reduce heat stress and experiments were conducted on this population. 12–15 d 2 adults were picked and transferred to individual mating plates. fog-2 worms were also synchronized and grown at the same rates and temperatures as the feminized line. Three males per adult female were transferred to each mating plate. Worms were allowed to mate and lay eggs for 10–16 h at 16°C. All adults were then removed, and laid eggs were counted and recorded. 48 h later, all hatchling larvae were counted. Oocyte viability is calculated as the number of hatchlings divided by the number of eggs laid per mother. The average viability per strain is reported for worms that laid ≤34 eggs to maintain a brood size that matches average oocyte storage numbers.

Western blot

Worms were grown on agar plates until day 2 of adulthood. They were washed off the plate with M9 and allowed to settle at the bottom of the tube. Worms were transferred onto a fresh agar plate with no bacteria. 40 worms of each condition were picked and transferred to 25 μl DI water. 25 μl SDS was added to the samples, and all were boiled at 95° for 5–10 min (or until worms dissolve). Samples were run on SDS–PAGE gel for 30 min. Proteins were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane using Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer System (Bio-Rad). Nitrocellulose was blocked in 3% blocking buffer for an hour, and then, primary antibody (1:1,000) was added for overnight incubation at 4°C. Membranes were washed the next morning in TBS-T three times, then incubated with secondary antibody (1:10,000) for an hour. Membranes were washed again with TBS-T three times, and chemiluminescence was expressed using SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Membranes were imaged on ChemiDoc Touch Imaging System (Bio-Rad). Western blots were quantified using FIJI. The mean gray value of any protein bands of interest was measured, and the background mean value of the blot was subtracted. The mean gray value of the control was also measured in the same way (whole lane was measured if it was a Ponceau S stain), and the values of the protein of interest were normalized to the amounts of control or total protein stained.

Collection, preparation, and staining of human ovarian tissue

Tissue was collected as described previously (45). Briefly, a 20-yr-old female patient with no known pathology or history of infertility was elected for total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for purposes of transgender care. Informed consent was received before the procedure. The use of human ovarian tissue was approved by the Institute Review Board of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (IRB#0801-404/012012-185). The ovarian tissue was placed in 4% formaldehyde directly from the operating room and incubated for 24 h for fixation. The tissue was embedded in paraffin and cut into 5-mm sections using Leica Rotary Microtome. For immunohistochemistry, the mounted paraffin sections were dewaxed and rehydrated in xylene and serial dilutions of ethanol, respectively. After a wash step with PBS, an antigen retrieval step was performed using a basic retrieval reagent (CTS013; R&D) at 90–95°C for 5 min. The slides were cooled completely in PBS before processing.

For immunohistochemistry, the tissue was inserted into a solution containing 10% goat serum, 3% BSA, and 0.03% Triton X-100 (blocking solution) for 1 h. The tissue was then incubated overnight with primary antibody at 4°C. The following primary antibodies were used: directly labeled mouse monoclonal anti-HSP60 (1:500 dilution; 66041-1-Ig; Proteintech) and rabbit polyclonal anti-EIF4ENIF1 (1:500 dilution; ab277638; Abcam). After primary antibody incubation, a series of washes were performed with PBS. The tissue was then incubated with a goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:1,000 dilution, A-11008; Invitrogen) for 1 h before staining for DNA with Vectashield (DAPI) (H-1000-10; VectorLabs). Negative controls were included by incubating with no primary antibody. The directly labeled anti-HSP60 was created using an Alexa Fluor 647 Lightning-Link kit (Abcam) following their instructions.

Confocal microscopy

Worms were imaged using a Nikon Eclipse Ti2-E microscope with a Yokogawa confocal scanner unit (CSU-W1), piezo Z stage, and an iXon Ultra 888 EMCCD camera (Andor), controlled by Nikon Elements software. Images were collected using a 60X water (NA 1.2) or 100X silicon (NA 1.35) immersion objective, 0.3 μm Z-stacks, 2 × 2 binning, 15% laser power, and 100-ms exposures. Human tissue and worm oocytes were also imaged using a Nikon AX-R confocal microscope with a 40X silicone (NA 1.25) objective.

Proteomics

Worms were feminized and synchronized as described above and plated on three separate plates at 25°C. When the worms reached day 2 of adulthood, they were washed in M9 media for 15 min to wash off bacteria. For each experimental group, three groups of 30 worms each were collected and transferred to 20 μl of dH2O in three separate Eppendorf tubes. 20 μl SDS was added to the tubes, and samples were boiled for 5–10 min (or until all worms were dissolved into SDS solution). These samples were run on an SDS–PAGE gel for 3 min to allow all the sample to enter the gel, and then, the gel was stained with a Coomassie dye. The protein band was cut out of the gel.

Gel samples were digested overnight with trypsin (Pierce) after reduction and alkylation with DTT and iodoacetamide (Sigma-Aldrich). After solid-phase extraction cleanup with an Oasis HLB μElution plate (Waters), the resulting peptides were reconstituted in 2% (vol/vol) acetonitrile (ACN) and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water. 1 μg of each sample was injected onto an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer coupled to an UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano liquid chromatography system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples were injected onto a 75 μm i.d., 75-cm-long EasySpray column (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and eluted with a gradient from 0 to 28% buffer B over 90 min. Buffer A contained 2% (vol/vol) ACN and 0.1% formic acid in water, and buffer B contained 80% (vol/vol) ACN, 10% (vol/vol) trifluoroethanol, and 0.1% formic acid in water. The mass spectrometer operated in positive ion mode with a source voltage of 2.5 kV and an ion transfer tube temperature of 300°C. MS scans were acquired at 120,000 resolution in the Orbitrap, and up to 10 MS/MS spectra were obtained in the Orbitrap for each full spectrum acquired using higher energy collisional dissociation (HCD) for ions with charges 2–7. Dynamic exclusion was set for 25 s after an ion was selected for fragmentation.

Raw MS data files were analyzed using Proteome Discoverer v3.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), with peptide identification performed using Sequest HT searching against the C. elegans reviewed protein database from UniProt along with the sequence of fluorescent mMaple protein. Fragment and precursor tolerances of 10 ppm and 0.6 D were specified, and three missed cleavages were allowed. Carbamidomethylation of Cys was set as a fixed modification, and oxidation of Met was set as a variable modification. The false discovery rate cutoff was 1% for all peptides.

Data were analyzed in XML format. All protein abundance was normalized by averaging the sum of total proteins in each sample sent and getting a ratio to the average of the control samples sent. The ratios derived were used to adjust the protein abundance values up or down accordingly. From these normalized values, the fold change and P-value (two-tailed, unequal variance) were calculated. Anything with a P-value below 0.05 was deemed significant. Data were plotted using GraphPad Prism. Identified proteins are listed in Supplemental Data 1. GO-term analysis was conducted using PANGEA (https://www.flyrnai.org/tools/pangea/web/home/6239).

Transcriptomics

Worms were synchronized, feminized, and grown on two 100-mm plates. When worms reached day 2 of adulthood, they were washed off the plates with M9 and rotated for 20 min to remove all the bacteria. Worms were rinsed twice with M9. Total RNA was extracted from worms with Arcturus PicoPure RNA Isolation Kit (Applied Biosystems). Total RNA was shipped to Novogene. RNA degradation and contamination were monitored on 1% agarose gels. RNA purity was checked using the NanoPhotometer spectrophotometer (IMPLEN). RNA integrity and quantitation were assessed using RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit of the Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies).

A total amount of 1 μg RNA per sample was used as input material for the RNA sample preparations. Sequencing libraries were generated using NEBNext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB) following the manufacturer’s recommendations, and index codes were added to attribute sequences to each sample. Briefly, mRNA was purified from total RNA using poly-T oligo-attached magnetic beads. Fragmentation was carried out using divalent cations under elevated temperature in NEBNext First Strand Synthesis Reaction Buffer (5X). First strand cDNA was synthesized using random hexamer primer and M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase (RNase H-). Second strand cDNA synthesis was subsequently performed using DNA Polymerase I and RNase H. Remaining overhangs were converted into blunt ends via exonuclease/polymerase activities. After adenylation of 3′ ends of DNA fragments, NEBNext Adaptor with a hairpin loop structure was ligated to prepare for hybridization. To select cDNA fragments of preferentially 150∼200 bp in length, the library fragments were purified with the AMPure XP system (Beckman Coulter). Then, 3 μl USER Enzyme (NEB) was used with size-selected, adaptor-ligated cDNA at 37°C for 15 min followed by 5 min at 95°C before PCR. Then, PCR was performed with Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase, universal PCR primers, and index (X) primer. PCR products were purified (AMPure XP system), and library quality was assessed on the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system.

The clustering of the index-coded samples was performed on cBot Cluster Generation System using PE Cluster Kit cBot-HS (Illumina) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After cluster generation, the library preparations were sequenced on an Illumina platform and paired-end reads were generated. Raw data (raw reads) of FASTQ format were firstly processed through fastp. In this step, clean data (clean reads) were obtained by removing reads containing adapter and poly-N sequences and reads with low quality from raw data. At the same time, Q20, Q30, and GC contents of the clean data were calculated. All the downstream analyses were based on the clean data with high quality.

Reference genome and gene model annotation files were downloaded from the genome website browser (NCBI/UCSC/Ensembl) directly. Paired-end clean reads were aligned to the reference genome using Spliced Transcripts Alignment to a Reference (STAR) software, which is based on a previously undescribed RNA-seq alignment algorithm that uses sequential maximum mappable seed search in uncompressed suffix arrays followed by seed clustering and stitching procedure. STAR exhibits better alignment precision and sensitivity than other RNA-seq aligners for both experimental and simulated data. Differential expression analysis between two conditions/groups (three biological replicates per condition) was performed using the DESeq2 R package. DESeq2 provides statistical routines for determining differential expression in digital gene expression data using a model based on the negative binomial distribution. The resulting P-values were adjusted using the Benjamini and Hochberg approach for controlling the false discovery rate. Genes with an adjusted P-value < 0.05 found by DESeq2 were assigned as differentially expressed.

Before differential gene expression analysis, for each sequenced library, the read counts were adjusted by trimmed mean of M-values (TMM) through one scaling normalized factor. Differential expression analysis of two conditions was performed using the edgeR R package. The P-values were adjusted using the Benjamini and Hochberg methods. Corrected P-value of 0.005 and |log2(Fold Change)| of 1 were set as the threshold for significantly differential expression. Identified transcripts are listed in Supplemental Data 2.

Puromycin assay

Worms were synchronized and grown at 25°C on 100-mm NGM plates until they reached day 2 of adulthood. They were washed off the plates with M9 buffer and rinsed in an Eppendorf tube with S-Basal Medium (100 mM NaCl, 5 mM K2HPO4, 50 mM KH2PO4, 5 μg/ml cholesterol, 10 mM potassium citrate, 3 mM MgSO4, 1% trace metal solution) twice. 250 μl of S-Basal Medium was added to the live worm pellet along with 50 μl of 10 mg/ml puromycin and 200 μl of concentrated OP50 and topped off to 1 ml with S-Basal Medium. The tubes were shaken at 200 RPM for 4 h at room temperature in a Thermomixer (Eppendorf). After 4 h, tubes were collected, and the worms were washed with S-Basal three times. Worms were resuspended in 300 μl lysis buffer with protease inhibitors (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Hepes, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% SDS) and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. The tubes were placed on ice and sonicated five to eight times at 20–30% amplitude for 2 s at a time (until most carcasses were dissolved). They were then spun at 13,000 RPM for 30 min, and 300 μl of the supernatant was collected. 20% vol/vol of TCA was added to solution, and the protein was allowed to precipitate for 30 min on ice. Tubes were spun at 14,000 RPM for 5 min, and the supernatant was pipetted off. The pellet was washed twice in 90% acetone and then resuspended and boiled in 40 μl 2X SDS loading buffer. Samples were run on an SDS–PAGE gel, transferred to nitrocellulose, and first stained with Ponceau S stain and imaged. Membranes were then stained with anti-puromycin antibody (MABE343; MilliporeSigma) and imaged using a ChemiDoc imager (Bio-Rad).

Immunostaining of C. elegans

The tube fixation and collagenase protocol was adapted from protocols in www.wormbook.org. Briefly, worms were fixed in 4% formaldehyde in PBS in an Eppendorf tube. Tubes were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and subsequently thawed two to three times. They were shaken at 37°C for 3 h. Fixative was then removed and washed off with PBST. Worms were shaken at 100 rpm in B-mercaptoethanol solution (5% BME, 1% Triton X-100, 120 mM Tris) for 2 h at 37°C. Tubes were spun at 1,000 RCF and washed with PBST up to 10 times if needed, or until fixative is no longer detectable. Samples were transferred to a fresh tube after half the washes. 200 μl of collagenase solution (100 mM Tris, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.1% Triton X-100, pH 7.4, 2,000 U collagenase) was added, and worms were shaken at 37°C at 250 rpm for 38–48 h (depending on the stock of collagenase). Incubation was stopped when a majority of worms were broken in half. Collagenase was washed off, and worms were blocked in 1 ml blocking buffer (PBS, 0.5% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 5% BSA, 0.05% sodium azide) at room temperature for 1 h. The blocking buffer was removed, and worms were incubated with primary antibody in blocking buffer (1:1,000) overnight at 4°C. Worms were washed three times for 15-min washes with antibody buffer (blocking buffer but with only 0.1% BSA) and then incubated with secondary antibody in blocking buffer (1:10,000) for 3 h at room temperature. Three more 15-min washes were done and worms transferred onto a slide with an agar pad or wire spacing. Mounting medium was added, and slides were imaged on a spinning disk confocal microscopy. Rabbit polyclonal anti-IFET-1 and anti-CAR-1 antibodies were made by GenScript.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism. The indicated tests, the n values, and significant values are displayed in the figure legends or on the figures themselves. Significance was reported as follows: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, ***P < 0.0005, ****P < 0.00005.

Data Availability

The Supplemental Material contains processed proteomics data (Supplemental Data 1) and identified transcripts and their abundance from RNA-seq (Supplemental Data 2). Oocyte viability assays and GO-term analyses are available in the Supplemental Material (Supplemental Data 3 and Supplemental Data 4). Other data are available upon request.

Supplemental Data 1.

Proteomic profiles of oocyte-storing worms. [LSA-2025-03387_Supplemental_Data_1.xlsx]

Supplemental Data 2.

Analyzed RNA-seq data for oocyte-storing worms. [LSA-2025-03387_Supplemental_Data_2.xlsx]

Supplemental Data 3.

Raw data for all oocyte viability assays. [LSA-2025-03387_Supplemental_Data_3.xlsx]

Supplemental Data 4.

GO term analysis. [LSA-2025-03387_Supplemental_Data_4.xlsx]

Acknowledgements

We thank the UTSW Proteomics Core Facility for performing mass spectrometry, the UTSW Histology Core for sectioning human tissue, and Abby Dernberg (UC Berkeley) for the mMaple plasmid. This project was funded by a Pew Biomedical Scholars award, a Welch Catalyst award (V-I-0004-20230731), a Human Frontier Science Program fellowship to K Yaguchi (LT0064/2022-L), and the Endowed Scholars program at UT Southwestern (to JB Woodruff). R Amin and O Bukulmez are supported by an Obstetrics and Gynecology departmental fund.

Author Contributions

  • P Bhatia: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, methodology, and writing—review and editing.

  • J Tafur: investigation and methodology.

  • R Amin: investigation and methodology.

  • NE Familiari: investigation and methodology.

  • K Yaguchi: methodology.

  • VM Tran: methodology.

  • A Bond: methodology.

  • O Bukulmez: conceptualization, resources, supervision, funding acquisition, project administration, and writing—review and editing.

  • JB Woodruff: conceptualization, resources, data curation, supervision, funding acquisition, visualization, methodology, project administration, and writing—original draft, review, and editing.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  • Received May 14, 2025.
  • Revision received May 20, 2025.
  • Accepted May 21, 2025.
  • © 2025 Bhatia et al.
Creative Commons logoCreative Commons logohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This article is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Li R,
    2. Albertini DF
    (2013) The road to maturation: Somatic cell interaction and self-organization of the mammalian oocyte. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14: 141–152. doi:10.1038/nrm3531
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Gougeon A
    (1996) Regulation of ovarian follicular development in primates: Facts and hypotheses. Endocr Rev 17: 121–155. doi:10.1210/edrv-17-2-121
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hansen KR,
    2. Knowlton NS,
    3. Thyer AC,
    4. Charleston JS,
    5. Soules MR,
    6. Klein NA
    (2008) A new model of reproductive aging: The decline in ovarian non-growing follicle number from birth to menopause. Hum Reprod 23: 699–708. doi:10.1093/humrep/dem408
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Knowlton NS,
    2. Craig LB,
    3. Zavy MT,
    4. Hansen KR
    (2014) Validation of the power model of ovarian nongrowing follicle depletion associated with aging in women. Fertil Steril 101: 851–856. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Gruhn JR,
    2. Zielinska AP,
    3. Shukla V,
    4. Blanshard R,
    5. Capalbo A,
    6. Cimadomo D,
    7. Nikiforov D,
    8. Chan AC,
    9. Newnham LJ,
    10. Vogel I, et al.
    (2019) Chromosome errors in human eggs shape natural fertility over reproductive life span. Science 365: 1466–1469. doi:10.1126/science.aav7321
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Hassold T,
    2. Jacobs P,
    3. Kline J,
    4. Stein Z,
    5. Warburton D
    (1980) Effect of maternal age on autosomal trisomies. Ann Hum Genet 44: 29–36. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1980.tb00943.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Titus S,
    2. Li F,
    3. Stobezki R,
    4. Akula K,
    5. Unsal E,
    6. Jeong K,
    7. Dickler M,
    8. Robson M,
    9. Moy F,
    10. Goswami S, et al.
    (2013) Impairment of BRCA1-related DNA double-strand break repair leads to ovarian aging in mice and humans. Sci Transl Med 5: 172ra21. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3004925
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Nybo Andersen AM,
    2. Wohlfahrt J,
    3. Christens P,
    4. Olsen J,
    5. Melbye M
    (2000) Maternal age and fetal loss: Population based register linkage study. BMJ 320: 1708–1712. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1708
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Comizzoli P,
    2. Ottinger MA
    (2021) Understanding reproductive aging in wildlife to improve animal conservation and human reproductive health. Front Cell Dev Biol 9: 680471. doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.680471
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Pei Z,
    2. Deng K,
    3. Xu C,
    4. Zhang S
    (2023) The molecular regulatory mechanisms of meiotic arrest and resumption in oocyte development and maturation. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 21: 90. doi:10.1186/s12958-023-01143-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Rodríguez-Nuevo A,
    2. Torres-Sanchez A,
    3. Duran JM,
    4. De Guirior C,
    5. Martínez-Zamora MA,
    6. Böke E
    (2022) Oocytes maintain ROS-free mitochondrial metabolism by suppressing complex I. Nature 607: 756–761. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04979-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Moore GP,
    2. Lintern-Moore S,
    3. Peters H,
    4. Faber M
    (1974) RNA synthesis in the mouse oocyte. J Cell Biol 60: 416–422. doi:10.1083/jcb.60.2.416
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Nelson LM
    (2009) Clinical practice. Primary ovarian insufficiency. N Engl J Med 360: 606–614. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp0808697
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Shang L,
    2. Ren S,
    3. Yang X,
    4. Zhang F,
    5. Jin L,
    6. Zhang X,
    7. Wu Y
    (2022) EIF4ENIF1 variants in two patients with non-syndromic premature ovarian insufficiency. Eur J Med Genet 65: 104597. doi:10.1016/j.ejmg.2022.104597
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Zhao M,
    2. Feng F,
    3. Chu C,
    4. Yue W,
    5. Li L
    (2019) A novel EIF4ENIF1 mutation associated with a diminished ovarian reserve and premature ovarian insufficiency identified by whole-exome sequencing. J Ovarian Res 12: 119. doi:10.1186/s13048-019-0595-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kasippillai T,
    2. MacArthur DG,
    3. Kirby A,
    4. Thomas B,
    5. Lambalk CB,
    6. Daly MJ,
    7. Welt CK
    (2013) Mutations in EIF4ENIF1 are associated with primary ovarian insufficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98: E1534–E1539. doi:10.1210/jc.2013-1102
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Ding Y,
    2. He Z,
    3. Sha Y,
    4. Kee K,
    5. Li L
    (2023) Eif4enif1 haploinsufficiency disrupts oocyte mitochondrial dynamics and leads to subfertility. Development 150: dev202151. doi:10.1242/dev.202151
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ferraiuolo MA,
    2. Basak S,
    3. Dostie J,
    4. Murray EL,
    5. Schoenberg DR,
    6. Sonenberg N
    (2005) A role for the eIF4E-binding protein 4E-T in P-body formation and mRNA decay. J Cell Biol 170: 913–924. doi:10.1083/jcb.200504039
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Dostie J,
    2. Ferraiuolo M,
    3. Pause A,
    4. Adam SA,
    5. Sonenberg N
    (2000) A novel shuttling protein, 4E-T, mediates the nuclear import of the mRNA 5’ cap-binding protein, eIF4E. EMBO J 19: 3142–3156. doi:10.1093/emboj/19.12.3142
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kamenska A,
    2. Simpson C,
    3. Vindry C,
    4. Broomhead H,
    5. Bénard M,
    6. Ernoult-Lange M,
    7. Lee BP,
    8. Harries LW,
    9. Weil D,
    10. Standart N
    (2016) The DDX6-4E-T interaction mediates translational repression and P-body assembly. Nucleic Acids Res 44: 6318–6334. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw565
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Waghray S,
    2. Williams C,
    3. Coon JJ,
    4. Wickens M
    (2015) Xenopus CAF1 requires NOT1-mediated interaction with 4E-T to repress translation in vivo. RNA 21: 1335–1345. doi:10.1261/rna.051565.115
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Cheng S,
    2. Altmeppen G,
    3. So C,
    4. Welp LM,
    5. Penir S,
    6. Ruhwedel T,
    7. Menelaou K,
    8. Harasimov K,
    9. Stützer A,
    10. Blayney M, et al.
    (2022) Mammalian oocytes store mRNAs in a mitochondria-associated membraneless compartment. Science 378: eabq4835. doi:10.1126/science.abq4835
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. McLaughlin M,
    2. Albertini DF,
    3. Wallace WHB,
    4. Anderson RA,
    5. Telfer EE
    (2018) Metaphase II oocytes from human unilaminar follicles grown in a multi-step culture system. Mol Hum Reprod 24: 135–142. doi:10.1093/molehr/gay002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Spence AM,
    2. Coulson A,
    3. Hodgkin J
    (1990) The product of fem-1, a nematode sex-determining gene, contains a motif found in cell cycle control proteins and receptors for cell-cell interactions. Cell 60: 981–990. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90346-g
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Schedl T,
    2. Kimble J
    (1988) Fog-2, a germ-line-specific sex determination gene required for hermaphrodite spermatogenesis in caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 119: 43–61. doi:10.1093/genetics/119.1.43
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Sengupta MS,
    2. Low WY,
    3. Patterson JR,
    4. Kim HM,
    5. Traven A,
    6. Beilharz TH,
    7. Colaiácovo MP,
    8. Schisa JA,
    9. Boag PR
    (2013) ifet-1 is a broad-scale translational repressor required for normal p granule formation in C. elegans. J Cell Sci 126: 850–859. doi:10.1242/jcs.119834
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Noble SL,
    2. Allen BL,
    3. Goh LK,
    4. Nordick K,
    5. Evans TC
    (2008) Maternal mRNAs are regulated by diverse p body-related mRNP granules during early caenorhabditis elegans development. J Cell Biol 182: 559–572. doi:10.1083/jcb.200802128
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Hubstenberger A,
    2. Noble SL,
    3. Cameron C,
    4. Evans TC
    (2013) Translation repressors, an RNA helicase, and developmental cues control RNP phase transitions during early development. Dev Cell 27: 161–173. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2013.09.024
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Chen JX,
    2. Cipriani PG,
    3. Mecenas D,
    4. Polanowska J,
    5. Piano F,
    6. Gunsalus KC,
    7. Selbach M
    (2016) In vivo interaction proteomics in caenorhabditis elegans embryos provides new insights into P granule dynamics. Mol Cell Proteomics 15: 1642–1657. doi:10.1074/mcp.M115.053975
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Boke E,
    2. Ruer M,
    3. Wühr M,
    4. Coughlin M,
    5. Lemaitre R,
    6. Gygi SP,
    7. Alberti S,
    8. Drechsel D,
    9. Hyman AA,
    10. Mitchison TJ
    (2016) Amyloid-like self-assembly of a cellular compartment. Cell 166: 637–650. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.051
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Marlow FL,
    2. Mullins MC
    (2008) Bucky ball functions in Balbiani body assembly and animal-vegetal polarity in the oocyte and follicle cell layer in zebrafish. Dev Biol 321: 40–50. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.05.557
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Hertig AT,
    2. Adams EC
    (1967) Studies on the human oocyte and its follicle. I. Ultrastructural and histochemical observations on the primordial follicle stage. J Cell Biol 34: 647–675. doi:10.1083/jcb.34.2.647
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Bohnert KA,
    2. Kenyon C
    (2017) A lysosomal switch triggers proteostasis renewal in the immortal C. elegans germ lineage. Nature 551: 629–633. doi:10.1038/nature24620
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. McCarter J,
    2. Bartlett B,
    3. Dang T,
    4. Schedl T
    (1999) On the control of oocyte meiotic maturation and ovulation in caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 205: 111–128. doi:10.1006/dbio.1998.9109
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Harris JE,
    2. Govindan JA,
    3. Yamamoto I,
    4. Schwartz J,
    5. Kaverina I,
    6. Greenstein D
    (2006) Major sperm protein signaling promotes oocyte microtubule reorganization prior to fertilization in caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 299: 105–121. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.07.013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Yang HY,
    2. McNally K,
    3. McNally FJ
    (2003) Mei-1/katanin is required for translocation of the meiosis i spindle to the oocyte cortex in C. elegans. Dev Biol 260: 245–259. doi:10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00216-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Richter JD,
    2. Lasko P
    (2011) Translational control in oocyte development. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3: a002758. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a002758
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Cardona AH,
    2. Ecsedi S,
    3. Khier M,
    4. Yi Z,
    5. Bahri A,
    6. Ouertani A,
    7. Valero F,
    8. Labrosse M,
    9. Rouquet S,
    10. Robert S, et al.
    (2023) Self-demixing of mRNA copies buffers mRNA:mRNA and mRNA:Regulator stoichiometries. Cell 186: 4310–4324.e23. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.018
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Huggins HP,
    2. Subash JS,
    3. Stoffel H,
    4. Henderson MA,
    5. Hoffman JL,
    6. Buckner DS,
    7. Sengupta MS,
    8. Boag PR,
    9. Lee MH,
    10. Keiper BD
    (2020) Distinct roles of two eIF4E isoforms in the germline of Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Sci 133: jcs237990. doi:10.1242/jcs.237990
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Keiper BD
    (2019) Cap-independent mRNA translation in germ cells. Int J Mol Sci 20: 173. doi:10.3390/ijms20010173
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. 41.↵
    1. Li W,
    2. DeBella LR,
    3. Guven-Ozkan T,
    4. Lin R,
    5. Rose LS
    (2009) An eIF4E-binding protein regulates katanin protein levels in C. elegans embryos. J Cell Biol 187: 33–42. doi:10.1083/jcb.200903003
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Kurz T,
    2. Pintard L,
    3. Willis JH,
    4. Hamill DR,
    5. Gönczy P,
    6. Peter M,
    7. Bowerman B
    (2002) Cytoskeletal regulation by the Nedd8 ubiquitin-like protein modification pathway. Science 295: 1294–1298. doi:10.1126/science.1067765
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Dean DD,
    2. Agarwal S,
    3. Tripathi P
    (2018) Connecting links between genetic factors defining ovarian reserve and recurrent miscarriages. J Assist Reprod Genet 35: 2121–2128. doi:10.1007/s10815-018-1305-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Paix A,
    2. Folkmann A,
    3. Rasoloson D,
    4. Seydoux G
    (2015) High efficiency, homology-directed genome editing in caenorhabditis elegans using CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Genetics 201: 47–54. doi:10.1534/genetics.115.179382
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Amin R,
    2. Bukulmez O,
    3. Woodruff JB
    (2023) Visualization of Balbiani Body disassembly during human primordial follicle activation. MicroPubl Biol 2023. doi:10.17912/micropub.biology.000989
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Life Science Alliance.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Condensate-forming eIF4ET ensures adequate levels of meiotic proteins to support oocyte storage
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Life Science Alliance
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Life Science Alliance web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The role of eIF4ET in oocyte storage
Priyankaa Bhatia, Judith Tafur, Ruchi Amin, Nicole E Familiari, Kan Yaguchi, Vanna M Tran, Alec Bond, Orhan Bukulmez, Jeffrey B Woodruff
Life Science Alliance May 2025, 8 (8) e202503387; DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202503387

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The role of eIF4ET in oocyte storage
Priyankaa Bhatia, Judith Tafur, Ruchi Amin, Nicole E Familiari, Kan Yaguchi, Vanna M Tran, Alec Bond, Orhan Bukulmez, Jeffrey B Woodruff
Life Science Alliance May 2025, 8 (8) e202503387; DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202503387
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
Issue Cover

In this Issue

Volume 8, No. 8
August 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Masthead (PDF)
Advertisement

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Data Availability
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • Metrics
  • Reviewer Comments
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Aging
  • Cell Biology
  • Development

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • HU modulates thiol–disulfide homeostasis
  • GSK3A, a proviral host factor for HAdV-B7 replication
  • PSME3 regulates myogenesis
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

EMBO Press LogoRockefeller University Press LogoCold Spring Harbor Logo

Content

  • Home
  • Newest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Guidelines
  • License, copyright, Fee

Other Services

  • Alerts
  • Bluesky
  • X/Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • Editors & Staff
  • Reviewer Guidelines
  • Feedback
  • Licensing and Reuse
  • Privacy Policy

ISSN: 2575-1077
© 2025 Life Science Alliance LLC

Life Science Alliance is registered as a trademark in the U.S. Patent and Trade Mark Office and in the European Union Intellectual Property Office.