Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Methods & Resources
    • Archive
    • Subjects
  • Collections
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • License, Copyright, Fee
    • FAQ
    • Why Submit
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editors & Staff
    • Board Members
    • Licensing and Reuse
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • LSA LLC
  • Alerts
  • Other Publications
    • EMBO Press
    • The EMBO Journal
    • EMBO reports
    • EMBO Molecular Medicine
    • Molecular Systems Biology
    • Rockefeller University Press
    • Journal of Cell Biology
    • Journal of Experimental Medicine
    • Journal of General Physiology
    • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    • Genes & Development
    • Genome Research

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Life Science Alliance
  • Other Publications
    • EMBO Press
    • The EMBO Journal
    • EMBO reports
    • EMBO Molecular Medicine
    • Molecular Systems Biology
    • Rockefeller University Press
    • Journal of Cell Biology
    • Journal of Experimental Medicine
    • Journal of General Physiology
    • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    • Genes & Development
    • Genome Research
  • My alerts
Life Science Alliance

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Methods & Resources
    • Archive
    • Subjects
  • Collections
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • License, Copyright, Fee
    • FAQ
    • Why Submit
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editors & Staff
    • Board Members
    • Licensing and Reuse
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • LSA LLC
  • Alerts
  • Follow lsa Template on Twitter
Research Article
Source Data
Transparent Process
Open Access

OXSR1 inhibits inflammasome activation by limiting potassium efflux during mycobacterial infection

View ORCID ProfileElinor Hortle  Correspondence email, Vi LT Tran, View ORCID ProfileKathryn Wright, View ORCID ProfileAngela RM Fontaine, View ORCID ProfileNatalia Pinello, Matthew B O’Rourke, View ORCID ProfileJustin J-L Wong, Philip M Hansbro, Warwick J Britton, View ORCID ProfileStefan H Oehlers  Correspondence email
Elinor Hortle
1Tuberculosis Research Program Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
2The University of Sydney, Discipline of Infectious Diseases and Immunology and Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases, Camperdown, Australia
3Centre for Inflammation and University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Life Sciences, Sydney, Australia
Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Project administration, Writing—original draft, review, and editing
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elinor Hortle
  • For correspondence: e.hortle@centenary.org.au stefan_oehlers@idlabs.a-star.edu.sg
Vi LT Tran
1Tuberculosis Research Program Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
Roles: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathryn Wright
1Tuberculosis Research Program Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
Roles: Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kathryn Wright
Angela RM Fontaine
4Centenary Imaging and Sydney Cytometry at the Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
Roles: Formal analysis, Visualization, Methodology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Angela RM Fontaine
Natalia Pinello
5Epigenetics and RNA Biology Program Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
6The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Camperdown, Australia
Roles: Investigation, Methodology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Natalia Pinello
Matthew B O’Rourke
3Centre for Inflammation and University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Life Sciences, Sydney, Australia
Roles: Resources, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Justin J-L Wong
5Epigenetics and RNA Biology Program Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
6The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Camperdown, Australia
Roles: Investigation, Methodology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Justin J-L Wong
Philip M Hansbro
3Centre for Inflammation and University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Life Sciences, Sydney, Australia
Roles: Resources
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Warwick J Britton
1Tuberculosis Research Program Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
7Department of Clinical Immunology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
Roles: Resources, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing—review and editing
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan H Oehlers
1Tuberculosis Research Program Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
2The University of Sydney, Discipline of Infectious Diseases and Immunology and Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases, Camperdown, Australia
8A*STAR Infectious Diseases Labs (A*STAR ID Labs), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore
Roles: Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Project administration, Writing—original draft, review, and editing
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stefan H Oehlers
  • For correspondence: e.hortle@centenary.org.au stefan_oehlers@idlabs.a-star.edu.sg
Published 11 May 2022. DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202201476
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • Metrics
  • Reviewer Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Graphical Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Pathogenic mycobacteria inhibit inflammasome activation to establish infection. Although it is known that potassium efflux is a trigger for inflammasome activation, the interaction between mycobacterial infection, potassium efflux, and inflammasome activation has not been investigated. Here, we use Mycobacterium marinum infection of zebrafish embryos and Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection of THP-1 cells to demonstrate that pathogenic mycobacteria up-regulate the host WNK signalling pathway kinases SPAK and OXSR1 which control intracellular potassium balance. We show that genetic depletion or inhibition of OXSR1 decreases bacterial burden and intracellular potassium levels. The protective effects of OXSR1 depletion are at least partially mediated by NLRP3 inflammasome activation, caspase-mediated release of IL-1β, and downstream activation of protective TNF-α. The elucidation of this druggable pathway to potentiate inflammasome activation provides a new avenue for the development of host-directed therapies against intracellular infections.

Introduction

Inflammasomes are large cytosolic multi-protein complexes that are critical for the immune response to infection. They facilitate the production of bioactive IL-1β (Wawrocki & Druszczynska, 2017), which directs pathogen killing through up-regulation of TNF-α (Jayaraman et al, 2013) and orchestrates systemic immune control through paracrine signalling. Inflammasomes typically consist of a sensor protein, which detects specific stimuli within the cytosol, and an adaptor protein which facilitates the oligomerization of the sensor with pro-caspase-1 (Taxman et al, 2010; Lu & Wu, 2015). Inflammasome assembly triggers activation of caspase-1, which then cleaves pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18 into their active forms. Caspase-1 also cleaves Gasdermin D, the N-terminal fragment of which forms pores in the cell membrane, allowing secretion of active IL-1β and IL-18, and triggering cell death via pyroptosis (Lu & Wu, 2015). These events contribute to host defence by both rapidly inducing the inflammatory response and limiting replication of intracellular pathogens.

To escape this immune control, many successful intracellular pathogens have evolved methods to limit inflammasome activation (Taxman et al, 2010). Influenza A, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Baculovirus, Vaccinia virus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Myxoma virus, and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis have all been shown to limit IL-1β production by inhibiting caspase-1 activation (Taxman et al, 2010). In the case of pathogenic mycobacteria, their interactions with inflammasome activation are more complex. One study has shown that Mycobacterium tuberculosis actively inhibits inflammasome activation via a zinc metalloprotease (Master et al, 2008), and that clinical isolates associated with severe disease evade NLRP3 activation (Sousa et al, 2020). Others have shown that M. tuberculosis induces both NLRP3 inflammasome and caspase-1 activation (Koo et al, 2008; Kurenuma et al, 2009; Dorhoi et al, 2012). Further studies suggest that M. tuberculosis actively inhibits activation of the AIM2 inflammasome and dampens activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by up-regulation of NOS and IFN-β (Carlsson et al, 2010; Dorhoi et al, 2012; Briken et al, 2013; Mishra et al, 2013; Wawrocki & Druszczynska, 2017).

The NLRP3 inflammasome, one of the best studied inflammasomes, can be triggered by numerous stimuli, including ATP, heme, pathogen-associated RNA, and a variety of bacterial components (Gupta et al, 2014; Li et al, 2014; Eigenbrod & Dalpke, 2015; Greaney et al, 2015; Erdei et al, 2018). Because these triggers are so diverse, it has been suspected that these activation stimuli are not detected by NLRP3 directly, but rather NLRP3 activation is the result of converging cellular signals. There is evidence that mitochondrial dysfunction, reactive oxygen species, and lysosomal damage contribute to NLRP3 activation (as reviewed elsewhere [He et al, 2016; Kelley et al, 2019]). A common event that occurs downstream of almost every NLRP3 stimulus is potassium (K+) efflux. Studies have shown that K+ ionophores stimulate NLRP3 (Perregaux & Gabel, 1994), that high extracellular K+ can inhibit NLRP3 activation (Franchi et al, 2007; Pétrilli et al, 2007), and that K+ efflux alone is sufficient to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome (Muñoz-Planillo et al, 2013). Evidence suggests that K+ efflux occurs upstream of NLRP3 activation and induces a conformational change in NLRP3 that favours oligemerization (Meng et al, 2009; Muñoz-Planillo et al, 2013; Tapia-Abellan et al, 2021). This raises the possibility that K+ efflux pathways could be targeted to therapeutically activate, or potentiate the activation of, NLRP3 to control intracellular pathogens.

One of the master regulators of cellular K+ flux is the With-No-Lysine (WNK) kinase signalling pathway. In response to cellular stress or osmotic changes, WNK kinase activates the SPAK and OXSR1 kinases. SPAK and OXSR1 inhibit the KCC channels, which pump K+ out of the cell, and activate the NKCC channels, which pump K+ into the cell (Gagnon & Delpire, 2012). It has previously been shown that blocking the interaction of SPAK/OXSR1 and KCC1 leads to net K+ efflux from the cell (Brown et al, 2015). Indeed, a contemporary article has demonstrated WNK1 deficiency potentiates NLRP3 inflammasome activation in mice (Mayes-Hopfinger et al, 2021). We have further shown that constitutively active KCC1 alters the inflammatory response to malaria infection in mice, and that this effect is associated with dramatically increased survival (Hortle et al, 2019b). Here we sought to investigate whether the SPAK/OXSR1 pathway is involved in the host response to mycobacterial infection, and if this pathway could be manipulated as a host-directed therapy against infection.

Results

Infection-induced activation of OXSR1 aids the growth of pathogenic mycobacteria

To determine if SPAK and OXSR1 are involved in immunity, we infected zebrafish embryos with Mycobacterium marinum and analysed gene expression at 3 days post infection (dpi). Both stk39 and oxsr1a (the zebrafish orthologs of SPAK and OXSR1, respectively) were significantly up-regulated at 3 dpi compared with uninfected embryos (Fig 1A). This result is consistent with previous data showing oxsr1a is up-regulated in M. marinum–infected macrophages (Rougeot et al, 2019).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1. Infection-induced OXSR1 aids the growth of M. marinum in zebrafish.

(A) Relative expression of oxsr1a and stk39 in zebrafish embryos at 3 dpi with WT M. marinum, compared with age-matched uninfected controls. Biological replicates (n = 6) each represent pooled RNA from 7 to 10 embryos. (B) Representative images of M. marinum–tdTomato (red) bacterial burden in WT and mosaic F0 oxsr1a crispant embryos. (C) Quantification of M. marinum bacterial burden in WT and mosaic F0 oxsr1a crispant embryos and F0 stk39 crispant embryos. Each graph shows combined results of two independent experiments. (D) Quantification of M. marinum bacterial burden in WT, heterozygous and homozygous oxsr1a knockout embryos. Graph shows combined results of two independent experiments. (E) Quantification of WT M. marinum bacterial burden in DMSO vehicle control and Compound B-treated embryos at 1.8 μM. (F) Quantification of axenic M. marinum–tdTomato growth by fluorescence in 7H9 broth culture supplemented with Compound B. Red line (1.8 μM) indicates the concentration used to treat infected embryos.

To determine if the up-regulation of stk39 and oxsr1a results in increased bacterial growth, we depleted each kinase individually by CRISPR-Cas9 knockdown and infected the embryos with fluorescent M. marinum (Fig S1). M. marinum burden was significantly reduced in oxsr1a, but not stk39, knockdown embryos (Fig 1B and C). To confirm these results, we created a stable oxsr1a knockout allele oxsr1asyd5 (Fig S2). Homozygous, but not heterozygous, oxsr1asyd5 embryos showed reduced bacterial burden (Fig 1D).

Figure S1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure S1. Knockdown efficacy.

(A, B, C, D) Knockdown efficacy for CRISPR-Cas9 depletion of (A) oxsr1a, (B) stk39, (C) il1b, and (D) tnfa in zebrafish embryos.

Figure S2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure S2. Generation of the oxsr1asyd5 allele.

(A) Map of primer-binding sites (blue) and gRNA binding site (pink) around the oxsr1asyd5 allele. Sequence shows exon 1 (upper case) and part of intron 1 (lower case) of oxsr1a. (B) Chromatograms showing partial sequence of the oxsr1asyd5 allele. (C) Predicted OXSR1 protein sequence of the oxsr1asyd5 allele. (D) Representative genotyping results of hetxhet F2 cross. FAM = WT allele; HEX = oxsr1asyd5 allele.

Because SPAK/OXSR1-modulated K+ channels also shuttle Cl−, Na2+, and Ca2+, this pathway has been studied for its role in hypertension. The small molecule, Compound B, reduces hypertension in animal models by inhibiting WNK phosphorylation of SPAK/OXSR1 (Ishigami-Yuasa et al, 2017), preventing SPAK/OXSR1 activation (Mori et al, 2013). We first determined that 1.8 μM was the maximum dose of Compound B that could be tolerated by zebrafish larvae for 5 d for infection (Table 1). Immersion of M. marinum–infected zebrafish embryos in 1.8 μM Compound B immediately after infection replicated the effect of oxsr1a knockdown by decreasing bacterial burden (Fig 1E). This concentration of Compound B did not affect the growth of M. marinum in axenic culture (Fig 1F).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Compound B toxicity.

In contrast, we did not observe an up-regulation of either kinase when embryos were infected with avirulent ΔESX1–M. marinum, which, in the absence of the ESX1 secretion complex, cannot escape the macrophage phagocytic vacuole and fails to activate the inflammasome (Smith et al, 2008) (Fig 2A). The burdens of infection with ΔESX1–M. marinum were unchanged by either oxsr1a knockdown (Fig 2B), oxsr1a knockout (Fig 2C) or Compound B treatment at 1.8 μM (Fig 2D).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2. ∆ESX1-M. marinum does not induce OXSR1 gene expression.

(A) Relative expression of oxsr1a and stk39 in zebrafish embryos at 3 days post infection with ∆ESX1–M. marinum compared with age-matched uninfected controls. Biological replicates (n = 4) represent pooled RNA from 7 to 10 embryos. (B) Quantification of ∆ESX1–M. marinum bacterial burden in WT and mosaic F0 oxsr1a CRISPR embryos. (C) Quantification of ∆ESX1–M. marinum bacterial burden in WT, heterozygous and homozygous oxsr1a knockout embryos. (D) Quantification of ∆ESX1–M. marinum bacterial burden in DMSO vehicle control and Compound B–treated embryos at 1.8 μM.

The immunomodulatory role of OXSR1 is conserved across species

To determine whether the immunomodulatory role of OXSR1 is conserved across species, we first differentiated WT THP-1 cells with PMA and infected with M. marinum. At 1 dpi OXSR1 protein expression was significantly up-regulated in infected cells compared with uninfected cells (Fig 3A), mirroring the increased oxsr1a expression observed in infected zebrafish embryos. Infected THP-1 cells also showed a significant increase in intracellular K+ concentration (Fig 3B and C). To determine whether this up-regulation would affect bacterial burden, we generated an OXSR1 knockdown human THP-1 cell line (Figs 3D and S3). Although OXSR1 knockdown cells showed minimal difference in basal K+ concentration compared with control cells, they showed significantly lower K+ concentration when placed in high K+ media (Fig 3E). This suggests that OXSR1 knockdown cells have increased K+ efflux during osmotic challenge, and is consistent with the known role of OXSR1 in preventing K+ efflux through KCC channels.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3. OXSR1 aids the growth of M. tuberculosis in human THP-1 cells.

(A) Quantification of OXSR1 protein in M. marinum–infected WT differentiated THP-1 cells, measured by mass spectrometry. (B) ION K+ green mean fluorescence intensity (measured by flow cytometry) of M. marinum–infected THP-1 cells. (B, C) Representative flow cytometry plots of (B). (D) Western blot of OXSR1 knockdown and vector control THP-1 cell lines, showing loss of OXSR1. Full un-edited blots are included in Source Data. (E) Fold change of ION K+ green mean fluorescence intensity (measured by flow cytometry) of undifferentiated control and OXSR1 knockdown THP-1 cells in media with increasing K+ content. (F) Quantification of intracellular M. marinum burden in WT and OXSR1 knockdown differentiated THP-1 cells at 1 dpi. (G) Quantification of intracellular M. tuberculosis burden in WT and OXSR1 knockdown differentiated THP-1 cells at 3 dpi. (H) Quantification of intracellular M. marinum burden in WT differentiated THP-1 cells treated with Compound B or vehicle control at 1 dpi. (I) Quantification of intracellular M. tuberculosis burden in WT differentiated THP-1 cells treated with Compound B or vehicle control at 3 dpi. Each dot represents the CFU from an infected well in a single representative experiment and the experiment was repeated three times. M. tuberculosis burden data are presented as CFU adjusted to 0 day post infection intracellular bacterial burden.

Source data are available for this figure.

Source Data for Figure 3[LSA-2022-01476_SdataF3.tif]

Figure S3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure S3. OXSR1 knockdown increases K+ efflux during infection.

(A, B, C) Representative flow plots showing gating strategy used for (B) and (C). (B) Fold change in ION K+ green mean fluorescence intensity (measured by flow cytometry) of dye positive control and OXSR1 knockdown THP-1 cells. Measurements are from cells in uninfected wells, WT–M. marinum infected wells or ∆ESX1–M. marinum–infected wells at 3 dpi. Fold change is calculated relative to uninfected wells of the same THP-1 genotype. (C) Fold change in ION K+ green dye negative population, as a percentage of all cells. Measurements are from cells in uninfected wells, WT–M. marinum–infected wells or ∆ESX1–M. marinum infected wells at 3 dpi. Fold change is calculated relative to uninfected wells of the same THP-1 genotype.

We next infected our OXSR1 knockdown THP-1 cells with M. marinum and M. tuberculosis H37Rv and quantified bacterial growth by CFU recovery. At 1 dpi, knockdown THP-1 cells had reduced intracellular M. marinum load compared with control THP-1 cells (Fig 3F). At 3 dpi, knockdown THP-1 cells had reduced intracellular M. tuberculosis load compared with WT THP-1 cells (Fig 3G). Treatment of infected THP-1 cells with Compound B phenocopied the effect of OXSR1 knockdown, with reduced M. marinum burden at 1 dpi (Fig 3H) and reduced M. tuberculosis H37Rv burden at 3 dpi compared with DMSO treatment (Fig 3I).

When we measured K+ concentration in response to WT M. marinum infection (Fig S3A), we observed that OXSR1 knockdown THP-1 cells had a much smaller increase in intracellular K+ than control cells (Fig S3B). We also observed that a large proportion of cells were IPG negative, indicating they had very low K+ content. The increase in IPG negative cells was much higher in OXSR1 knockdown cells than in control cells (Fig S3C). Together, these results suggest that OXSR1 knockdown increases K+ efflux during infection. These changes were not observed in ∆ESX1 M. marinum infection.

Together, these results indicate that OXSR1 controls cellular potassium flux during mycobacterial infection and that the immunomodulatory role of OXSR1 is conserved between zebrafish and humans.

Infection-induced OXSR1 suppresses inflammasome activity to aid mycobacterial infection

To determine if the reduced bacterial burden in oxsr1a knockdown was due to increased inflammasome activation, we used CRISPR to knockdown si:zfos-364h11.1, a zebrafish protein with orthology to mouse and rat NLRP3, hereafter referred to as nlrp3, and the il1b gene which encodes IL-1β (Fig S1). Knockdown of nlrp3 alone did not affect the M. marinum burden but ameliorated the protective effect of oxsr1a knockdown against M. marinum infection (Fig 4A and B). The same effect was observed in zebrafish embryos subjected to il1b knockdown in combination with oxsr1a knockdown during M. marinum infection (Fig 4C).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4. Infection-induced OXSR1 suppresses inflammasome activity to aid mycobacterial infection.

(A) Representative images of M. marinum–tdTomato (red) bacterial burden in 5 dpi WT, mosaic F0 oxsr1a, nlrp3, and dual oxsr1a nlrp3 crispant embryos. (B) Quantification of WT M. marinum bacterial burden in WT, mosaic F0 oxsr1a, nlrp3, and dual oxsr1a nlrp3 crispant embryos. Combined results of three biological replicates. (C) Quantification of WT M. marinum bacterial burden in WT, mosaic F0 oxsr1a, Il1b, and dual oxsr1a Il1b crispant embryos. Combined results of two biological replicates. (D) Quantification of intracellular M. tuberculosis bacterial burden in WT and OXSR1 knockdown differentiated THP-1 cells at 3 dpi. (E) Quantification of intracellular M. tuberculosis burden in WT and OXSR1 knockdown differentiated NLRP3 knockout THP-1 cells at 3 dpi. (F) IL-1β content in the supernatant of M. tuberculosis–infected WT and OXSR1 knockdown differentiated THP-1 cells at 3 dpi. For cell experiments (D, E, F): each dot represents the CFU from an infected well in a single representative experiment and the experiment was repeated three times.

In THP-1 cells infected with M. tuberculosis H37Rv, the OXSR1 knockdown-mediated reduction in M. tuberculosis CFU observed at 3 dpi was ameliorated by treatment with the NLRP3 inhibitor MCC950 (Fig 4D), and by NLRP3 knockout (Fig 4E) Supernatant IL-1β was significantly higher in media from OXSR1 knockdown cells compared with the WT THP-1 cells after M. tuberculosis H37Rv infection and this increase in IL-1β was ablated by MCC950 treatment (Fig 4F). Together, these data indicate that infection-induced increased expression of oxsr1a increases the mycobacterial burden through suppression of inflammasome activation.

Infection-induced OXSR1 suppresses host protective TNF-α and cell death early in infection

Inflammasome-mediated IL-1β increases the macrophage killing of mycobacteria through up-regulation of TNF-α (Jayaraman et al, 2013). We therefore repeated our infection experiments in TgBAC(tnfa:GFP)pd1028 embryos to determine if increased TNF-α production was mediating the resistance to mycobacterial infection in oxsr1a knockdown zebrafish. The ratio of tnfa promoter activity driven GFP per mycobacteria was increased specifically at sites of infection in oxsr1a knockdown embryos (Fig 5A) and also in Compound B-treated embryos (Fig 5B). This effect was dependent on il1b expression as knockdown of il1b suppressed TgBAC(tnfa:GFP)pd1028-driven GFP expression around sites of infection (Fig 5C).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5. Infection-induced OXSR1 suppresses inflammasome activity to aid mycobacterial infection.

(A) Representative images of Tg(tnfa:GFP)pd1028 fluorescence around M. marinum granulomas. Scale bar represents 200 μM. (B) Quantification of TNF-α fluorescence per bacterial area in WT embryos treated with Compound B. (C) Quantification of TNF-α fluorescence per bacterial area in WT, mosaic F0 oxsr1a, Il1b, and dual oxsr1a Il1b crispant embryos. Combined results of two independent experiments. (D) Quantification of TNF-α fluorescence per bacterial area in WT, mosaic F0 oxsr1a, tnfa, and dual oxsr1a tnfa crispant embryos. Combined results of two independent experiments. (E) Quantification of bacterial burden in WT, mosaic F0 oxsr1a, tnfa, and dual oxsr1a tnfa crispant embryos. Combined results of two independent experiments. Fish were infected with WT M. marinum by caudal vein injection at 30 h post fertilization and analysed 5 dpi.

To determine if tnfa expression acts downstream of oxsr1a depletion, we knocked down tnfa expression with CRISPR-Cas9 in the TgBAC(tnfa:GFP)pd1028 background to monitor knockdown efficacy (Fig 5D). Knockdown efficacy was also shown by qPCR (Fig S1D). Knockdown of tnfa reduced the amount of infection-induced tnfa promoter-driven GFP produced around sites of infection and ameliorated the protective effect of oxsr1a knockdown against M. marinum infection (Fig 5E). Together, these data suggest increased TNF-α downstream of inflammasome-processed IL-1β is the mechanism driving the lower bacterial burden in oxsr1a knockdown embryos.

Discussion

Here, we used the zebrafish–M. marinum and in vitro human–M. tuberculosis experimental systems to show that the WNK-OSXR1 signalling pathway potentially has a role in infection-induced activation of the inflammasome. We present evidence that pathogenic mycobacteria increase macrophage K+ concentration and induce expression of OXSR1. Infection-induced OXSR1 may suppress protective NLRP3 inflammasome responses and downstream IL-1β/TNF-α production. Several studies have suggested that mycobacteria modulate inflammasome activation either by active inhibition or by up-regulation of NOS, IFN-β, and other negative inflammasome regulators (Briken et al, 2013). Our data expand this literature by showing depletion or inhibition of infection-induced OXSR1 increases host immunity to mycobacterial infection.

In our infection model we found that WT, but not avirulent ∆ESX1, M. marinum induced expression of both OXSR1 and SPAK. The ESX1 secretion system is essential for the virulence of M. marinum and is required for escape of the mycobacteria into the cytoplasm (Conrad et al, 2017; Lienard et al, 2020). This suggests that SPAK/OXSR1 up-regulation is driven by the bacteria and fits with the well-established paradigm that pathogenic mycobacteria co-opt host pathways to establish persistent infection (Oehlers et al, 2015, 2017; Johansen et al, 2018; Hortle et al, 2019a; Hortle & Oehlers, 2020).

We found stk39 knockdown had no effect on host control of mycobacterial infection in zebrafish embryos. Previous studies have shown that mouse SPAK can play a role in activating macrophage inflammation in both lung injury and inflammatory bowel disease models (Yan et al, 2011; Zhang et al, 2013; Hung et al, 2020). These data raise the possibility that SPAK and OXSR1 may have species or organ specific roles in innate immunity and may respond differently to sterile and infectious triggers of inflammation. It is also likely that OXSR1 interacts with intracellular infections independently of NLRP3 inflammasome (Mayes-Hopfinger et al, 2021), potentially through the direct control of intracellular and vacuolar ion concentrations.

The effect of Compound B on mycobacterial growth showed that small-molecule inhibition of OXSR1 activity can reproduce the impact of OXSR1 knockdown on mycobacterial survival. This observation provides proof of concept that OXSR1 may be a suitable target for host-directed therapies against mycobacterial and other intracellular infections. The reduction in bacterial burden was not as large in Compound B-treated fish as the reduction observed in OXSR1 knockdown embryos. This result may be because the maximum tolerated dose of Compound B was 1.8 μM, which is low compared with some reported EC50 values (Mori et al, 2013). Therefore, Compound B may not have reduced OXSR1 activity to the same extent as in the OXSR1 knockdown embryos.

The results from the THP-1-derived macrophages confirm that the role of OXSR1 in the host response to infection is conserved across species. We showed that infection with WT M. marinum decreased the K+ content of OXSR1 knockdown cells but did not significantly affect the K+ content of WT cells. Paired with our data showing that WT M. marinum increases expression of oxsr1a, this suggests that virulent mycobacteria manipulate the SPAK/OXSR1 pathway to maintain high intracellular K+.

Several studies have shown that K+ concentration can affect mycobacterial growth and dormancy, and that successful colonisation of macrophages relies on the ability of the bacteria to maintain K+ homeostasis (Steel et al, 1999; Salina et al, 2014; MacGilvary et al, 2019). Although here we have examined the effects of K+ efflux on inflammasome activation, it is possible that the high K+ maintained in WT cells also aids mycobacterial growth by helping the bacteria maintain the correct ion homeostasis. The mycobacterial infections in THP-1–derived macrophages revealed that both OXSR1 knockdown and treatment with Compound B resulted in reduced growth of both M. marinum and M. tuberculosis H37Rv in the human macrophage cell line. With M. marinum the maximum reduction was observed at 1 dpi, whereas with M. tuberculosis this was not seen until 3 dpi. This is likely to be due to the differing replication times of both pathogens, which are 7 and 24 h, respectively.

Here we have shown that OXSR1 knockdown can only reduce bacterial burden in zebrafish embryos if NLRP3, IL-1β, and TNFα are functional. In human cells we have shown that infected OXSR1 knockdown cells release significantly more IL-1β into the supernatant and that this is ablated by the NLRP3 inhibitor MCC950. Together this suggests that OXSR1 knockdown reduces bacterial burden via a first step of NLRP3 activation. Previous work in the zebrafish–M. marinum model has shown both host detrimental and host beneficial effects of inflammasome activation. Whereas morpholino knockdown of il1b has been reported to increase bacterial burden, suggesting that il1b plays a host protective role, morpholino knockdown of caspa reduced bacterial burden, suggesting caspase-associated cell death of infected macrophages benefits the bacteria (Varela et al, 2019 Preprint). In our experiments, we did not find any effect of il1b or nlrp3 knockdown on bacterial burden compared with control embryos. This may have been because we were using mosaic F0 CRISPR knockout, which is not a complete removal or because of M. marinum strain differences between studies.

We found either Compound B treatment or oxsr1a knockdown results in localised increased TNFα production at sites of infection. The fact that we only observed increased TNFα localised to sites of infection, and not throughout the whole embryo, suggests that oxsr1a knockdown primes cells for NLRP3 activation but does not cause excess systemic inflammation. Full activation of NLRP3 requires both a priming signal, to induce transcription of NLRP3 components, and pro-IL-1β and an activation signal, to induce oligomerization of NLRP3 (He et al, 2016; Kelley et al, 2019). K+ efflux should provide only the second signal (Muñoz-Planillo et al, 2013; Kelley et al, 2019); therefore, in cells which have not been primed by infection with bacteria we would not expect to see significant NLRP3 activation. This suggests that OXSR1 inhibition may be an effective host-directed therapy strategy that induces beneficial inflammation at sites of infection without inducing detrimental systemic inflammation. Any therapy that seeks to increase inflammation must be treated with caution as chronic production of IL-1β and TNFα are likely to be detrimental during chronic infection.

Our findings that OXSR1 can be targeted to decrease bacterial burden define a new avenue for the development of host-directed therapy. Although numerous studies have investigated the potential of inhibiting NLRP3 to minimize pathology (Yang et al, 2019), the possibility of activating inflammasomes to increase pathogen clearance has been largely unexplored. Here we have shown that enhancing inflammasome activation via K+ efflux can provide the dual benefits of maximising the anti-pathogen effects of inflammation without causing excess tissue damage. Given mycobacteria are not the only pathogens which inhibit inflammasome activation, OXSR1 inhibition may be an effective host-directed therapy with broad applicability.

Materials and Methods

Zebrafish husbandry

Adult zebrafish were housed at the Centenary Institute (Sydney Local Health District AWC Approval 2017-036). Zebrafish embryos were obtained by natural spawning and embryos were raised at 28°C in E3 media.

Zebrafish lines

Wild type zebrafish are the TAB background. Transgenic line was Tg(tnfa:GFP)pd1028 (Marjoram et al, 2015).

Infection of zebrafish embryos

Embryos were infected by microinjection with ∼400 fluorescent M. marinum M strain and ∆ESX1 M. marinum as previously described (Matty et al, 2016). Embryos were recovered into E3 supplemented with 0.036 g/l PTU, housed at 28°C, and imaged on day 5 of infection unless otherwise stated.

Quantitative (q)RT-PCR

RNA was extracted from 5 to 10 embryos using TRIzol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Equal amounts of RNA (either 1 or 2 μg depending on RNA yield) were used for the cDNA synthesis reaction. qRT-PCR reactions were carried out on a Biorad CFX machine using Thermo Fisher Scientific PowerUP SYBR green and primers described in Table 2. The relative quantity of transcripts was calculated by the delta–delta CT method.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Primers used for gene expression studies.

Imaging

Live zebrafish embryos were anaesthetized in M-222 (Tricaine) and mounted in 3% methylcellulose for static imaging on a Leica M205FA fluorescence stereomicroscope. Fluorescent pixel count analyses were carried out with Image J Software Version 1.51j and intensity measurements were performed as previously described (Matty et al, 2016).

CRISPR-Cas9 knockdown and mutant generation

Primers used for gRNA transcription are detailed in Table 3 and were designed by Wu et al (2018). Templates for gRNA transcription were produced by annealing and amplifying gene specific oligos to the scaffold oligo using the NEB Q5 polymerase. Pooled transcription of gRNAs was carried out using the NEB HiScribe T7 High Yield RNA Synthesis Kit.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Primers used to generate gRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 knockdown.

Embryos were injected at the single cell stage with an injection mix containing 1 μl phenol red, 2 μl 500 ng/μl pooled guides, and 2 μl of 10 μM Cas9. All “Scram” embryos are injected with scrambled guide RNA.

To create oxsr1a knockout line, F0 crispants were outcrossed to WT AB, and HRM analysis was conducted on F1 progeny. F1s with a visible HRM shift using primers amplifying the four predicted cut sites (primer 3 spanned two cut sites) were sent for sanger sequencing (Table 4). An F1 zebrafish was discovered carrying an 8-bp deletion predicted to cause a premature stop at amino acid 13 (Fig S2). F2 progeny were genotyped with a custom KASP assay ordered from LGC Biosearch Technologies.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Genotyping primers.

Drug treatments

Embryos and cells were treated with vehicle control (DMSO or water as appropriate), 10 μM MCC950, or 1.8 μM Compound B (Stock2S 26016 Tocris) immediately after infection. For zebrafish, the drugs and E3 were replaced on days 0, 2, and 4 dpi. For cell culture, drugs were replaced at 4 h post infection.

Axenic culture

A mid-log culture of fluorescent M. marinum was diluted 1:100 and aliquoted into 96-well plates for drug treatment. Cultures were maintained at 28°C in a static incubator and bacterial fluorescence was measured in a BMG Fluorostar plate reader.

THP-1 cell culture

Human THP-1 cells (ATCC TIB-202) were cultured in RPMI media (22400089; Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 1% (vol/vol) non-essential amino acids (11140050; Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (11360070; Thermo Fisher Scientific), 10% (vol/vol) FCS (Hyclone; GE Healthcare), and 0.1 mg/ml penicillin/streptomycin (15140122; Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37°C, 5% CO2.

NLRP3 knockout THP-1 cells were purchased from InvivoGen (catalog code thp-konlrpez), and cultured according to the manufacturer’s instructions before transduction with virus.

Viral production

24 h before transfection, 4 × 106 HEK2937 cells were seeded in a 100 mm culture dish. On the day of transfection, cells were co-transfected with 15 μg of the pLKO.1_GFP (#30323; Addgene) vector containing OXSR1_Sh1, OXSR1_Sh2 or AthmiR, 6.5 μg of the packaging plasmid pMDL-g/prre (#12251; Addgene), 2.5 μg of the packaging plasmid pRSV-Rev (#12253; Addgene), and 3.5 μg of the envelop expressing plasmid pMD2-VSV-G (#12259; Addgene) by the calcium phosphate transfection method. Culture media was changed the following day and cells were cultured for another 24 h. Medium containing lentiviral particles was then collected, debris was cleared by centrifugation at 430g for 5 min, filtered through a 0.45-μm filter, aliquoted, and stored at −80°C.

Transduction

Briefly, 5 × 105 THP-1 cells were resuspended in 500 μl of fresh culture media containing 10 μg/ml polybrene. After adding 50 μl of virus, cells were spinoculated for 90 min at 462g, 22°C. After spinning, pelleted cells were resuspended in in the same media and incubated for 4 h at 37C, 5% CO2. After incubation, the cells were pelleted, resuspended in fresh culture media and transferred to a six-well plate. The cells were cultured for 48 h before FACS selection.

Western blotting

Protein lysates were loaded onto 4–12% BIS-Tris Protein gels (NP0336BOX; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for electrophoresis followed by transfer onto a PVDF membrane (MILIPVH00010; Merck Millipore). Membrane was blocked with 5% (vol/vol) skim milk for 1 h at room temperature, incubated overnight with a 1:1,000 dilution of rabbit anti-OXSR1 (ab97694; Abcam) followed by incubation with a 1:5,000 dilution of a donkey anti-rabbit IgG HRP antibody (AP182P; Merck Millipore) and 1:5,000 dilution of mouse anti-GAPDH (ab8245; Abcam) antibody, followed by incubation with a 1:5,000 dilution of a donkey anti-mouse IgG HRP antibody (AP192P; Merck Millipore). Protein detection was performed using SuperSignal West Pico PLUS (34579; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and imaged on a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc Imaging System.

Mass spectrometry

LCMS grade reagents obtained from Sigma-Aldrich included: acetonitrile (ACN), TFA, formic acid (FA), sodium deoxycholate (SDC), Tris–HCl pH 8.0, chloroacetamide (CLA), and Tris(2-carboxyethyl)-phosphine (TCEP). Trypsin gold was purchased from Promega and sulfonated divinylbenzene (SDB-RPS) discs were purchased from Affinsep. “MasterMix” consists of: 1% SDC, 10 mM TCEP, 40 mM CLA, and 100 mM tris and was made in bulk, aliquoted and frozen. Appropriate amounts were thawed before use.

Samples were prepared as described previously (O’Rourke et al, 2021) with some modifications: Cell samples suspended in RIPA buffer were first normalized and 50 μl of “MasterMix” was added. Each sample was then boiled at 95°C for 10 min and allowed to cool on the bench. Using the previous quantitation as a guide, Sequencing grade Trypsin was added to a ratio of between 1:50 and 1:100 before being incubated overnight at 37°C (∼16 h).

Digested samples were then desalted and delipidated by STAGE-Tip purification using a custom 3D printed STAGE tip Bracket (O’Rourke et al, 2021) and the following method: First dilute samples with 10X volumes of 100% ACN next add samples to STAGE TIPS and spin for 3 min at 1,000g in a centrifuge. Samples were then washed in sequence with 100 μl of: 90% ACN 1% TFA and 10% ACN 0.1% TFA followed by elution into a fresh 96-well plate with 100 μl of elution buffer containing 71 μL 1M NH4OH3, 800 μL of 100% acetonitrile, and 129 μL water. Samples were then allowed to dry in ambient conditions in a fume hood until dry.

Dry peptides were re-constituted in 25 μl of buffer A (0.1% FA) followed by LCMS analysis. Using an Acquity M-class nanoLC system (Waters), 5 μl of the sample (1 mg) was loaded at 15 ml/min for 3 min onto a nanoEase Symmetry C18 trapping column (180 × 20 mm) before being washed onto a PicoFrit column (75 mmID × 250 mm; New Objective) packed with Magic C18AQ resin (Michrom Bioresources). Peptides were eluted from the column and into the source of a Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the following program: 5–30% MS buffer B (98% Acetonitrile + 0.2% FA) over 90 min, 30–80% MS buffer B over 3 min, 80% MS buffer B for 2 min, and 80–5% for 3 min. The eluting peptides were ionised at 2,000 V. A data-dependant MS/MS (dd-MS2) experiment was performed, with a survey scan of 350–1,500 D performed at 70,000 resolution for peptides of charge state 2+ or higher with an AGC target of 3 × 106 and maximum Injection Time of 50 ms. The top 12 peptides were selected fragmented in the HCD cell using an isolation window of 1.4 m/z, an AGC target of 1 × 105 and maximum injection time of 100 ms. Fragments were scanned in the Orbitrap analyser at 17,500 resolution and the product ion fragment masses measured over a mass range of 120–2,000 D. The mass of the precursor peptide was then excluded for 30 s.

The MS/MS data files were searched using Peaks Studio (version 8.5) against the Human Proteome database combined with the M. marinum proteome and a database of common contaminants with the following parameter settings. Fixed modifications: none. Variable modifications: oxidised methionine and deamidated asparagine carbamidomethylation of cystine. Enzyme: trypsin. Number of allowed missed cleavages: 3. Peptide mass tolerance: 30 ppm. MS/MS mass tolerance: 0.1 D. Charge state: 2+, 3+, and 4+. The results of the search were then filtered to include peptides with a −log10P score that was determined by the false discovery rate (FDR) of <1%, the score being that where decoy database search matches were <1% of the total matches. LFQ calculations were also performed as part of the workflow using an FDR of 1% with the reference samples being the uninfected control group.

ION K+ green (undifferentiated cells)

For flow cytometry, 2 × 105 undifferentiated THP-1 cells/well (ATCC TIB-202) were seeded into a 96 well plate and incubated at 37°C for 1.5–2 h with either furosemide, 37.5 mM or 75 mM KCl. ION potassium green-2 AM (ab142806; Abcam) was added to a final concentration of 52.8 mM and cells were incubated for a further 15 min. Cells were spun down for 5 min at 462g and resuspended in PBS + 2% FCS supplemented with either furosemide, 37.5 mM or 75 mM KCl. ION K+ green fluorescence was captured on a BD Fortessa through the PE channel. 5,000 events were captured per sample.

Proteomics

Samples were prepared as previously described (O’Rourke et al, 2021), with minor modifications (Appendix Supplementary Methods). The MS/MS data files were searched using Peaks Studio (version 8.5) against the Human Proteome database combined with the M. marinum proteome and a database of common contaminants with the following parameter settings. Fixed modifications: none. Variable modifications: oxidized methionine and deamidated asparagine carbamidomethylation of cystine. Enzyme: tyrypsin. Number of allowed missed cleavages: 3. Peptide mass tolerance: 30 ppm. MS/MS mass tolerance: 0.1 D. Charge state: 2+, 3+ and 4+. The results of the search were then filtered to include peptides with a −log10P score that was determined by the FDR of <1%, the score being that where decoy database search matches were <1% of the total matches. LFQ calculations were also performed as part of the workflow using an FDR of 1% with the reference samples being the uninfected control group. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (Perez-Riverol et al, 2019) partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD030631.

ION K+ green staining

2 × 105 THP-1 cells/well were seeded into a 96-well plate and differentiated for 24 h with 100 mM PMA. Cells were then infected with frozen single cell preparation M. marinum–Katushka at an MOI of 1. After 4 h, extracellular bacteria were removed by washing with PBS + 2% FCS, and cells were incubated at 32°C for 3 d. Cells were lifted from the plate by 15 min incubation at 37°C with Accutase (StemCell Technologies), then washed with PBS + 2% FCS. ION K+ green was added to a final concentration of 52.8 mM and cells were incubated for a further 15 min. Cells were spun down for 5 min at 462g and resuspended in PBS + 2% FCS for flow cytometry. ION K+ Green fluorescence was captured on a BD Fortessa through the FITC channel (so as not to overlap with Katushka). 5,000 events were captured per sample.

Mycobacterial infection of THP-1 cells

2 × 105 THP-1 cells/well were seeded into a 96 well plate and differentiated for 24 h with 100 mM PMA. Cells were then infected with either mid log culture of M. tuberculosis H37Rv or frozen single cell preparation of M. marinum at an MOI of 1. After 4 h, extracellular bacteria were removed by washing with PBS + 2% FCS, and cells were incubated at either 32°C for M. marinum infections or 37°C for M. tuberculosis infections.

Mycobacterial CFU recovery from THP-1 cells

Cells were washed in PBS + 2% FCS and lysed with TDW + 1% Triton X100 for 10 min. Lysate was serially diluted and plated on 7H10 agar supplemented with 50 μg/ml hygromycin for the recovery of M. marinum or a mix of 200,000 units/l polymyxin B, 50 mg/l carbenicillin, 10 mg/l amphotericin B, and 20 mg/l trimethoprim lactate for the recovery of M. tuberculosis. Plates were incubated at 32°C for 7 d (M. marinum) or 37°C for 14 d (M. tuberculosis).

Measurement of human IL-1β in supernatants

IL-1β was measured by cytometric bead array, using a human IL-1β enhanced-sensitivity flex set (BD Biosciences). Undiluted cell supernatant was stained according to the manufacturer’s instructions and run on a BD FACS Canto II. Data were analysed using FCAP array software.

Statistics

All statistical tests were calculated in GraphPad Prism. T tests were unpaired t tests with Welch’s correction. All ANOVA were ordinary one-way ANOVA, comparing the means of specified pairings, using Turkey’s multiple comparisons test with a single pooled variance. In cases where data were pooled from multiple experiments, data from each were normalized to its own within-experiment control (usually DMSO) before pooling. Error bars indicate SEM. Outliers were removed using ROUT, with Q = 1%.

Data Availability

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD030631 (Perez-Riverol et al, 2019).

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Kristina Jahn of Sydney Cytometry for assistance with imaging equipment, Ms Kaiming Luo and Dr Pradeep Cholan for technical assistance, and all members of the Tuberculosis Research Program at the Centenary Institute for helpful comments. This work was supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (grant numbers APP1099912, APP1053407 to SH Oehlers; APP1153493 to WJ Britton); University of Sydney Fellowship (grant number G197581 to SH Oehlers); NSW Ministry of Health under the NSW Health Early-Mid Career Fellowships Scheme (grant number H18/31086 to SH Oehlers); the Kenyon Family Inflammation Award (2019 to E Hortle); and the Centenary Institute Booster Grant (2020 to E Hortle).

Author Contributions

  • E Hortle: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, supervision, funding acquisition, investigation, visualization, methodology, project administration, and writing—original draft, review, and editing.

  • VLT Tran: data curation, formal analysis, and investigation.

  • K Wright: formal analysis, validation, and investigation.

  • ARM Fontaine: formal analysis, visualization, and methodology.

  • N Pinello: investigation and methodology.

  • MB O’Rourke: resources, data curation, software, formal analysis, investigation, and methodology.

  • JJL Wong: investigation and methodology.

  • PM Hansbro: resources.

  • WJ Britton: resources, formal analysis, supervision, funding acquisition, and writing—review and editing.

  • SH Oehlers: conceptualization, resources, data curation, formal analysis, supervision, funding acquisition, validation, investigation, visualization, methodology, project administration, and writing—original draft, review, and editing.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  • Received April 8, 2022.
  • Revision received April 15, 2022.
  • Accepted April 19, 2022.
  • © 2022 Hortle et al.
Creative Commons logoCreative Commons logohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This article is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Briken V,
    2. Ahlbrand SE,
    3. Shah S
    (2013) Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the host cell inflammasome: A complex relationship. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 3: 62. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2013.00062
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Brown FC,
    2. Conway AJ,
    3. Cerruti L,
    4. Collinge JE,
    5. McLean C,
    6. Wiley JS,
    7. Kile BT,
    8. Jane SM,
    9. Curtis DJ
    (2015) Activation of the erythroid K-Cl cotransporter Kcc1 enhances sickle cell disease pathology in a humanized mouse model. Blood 126: 2863–2870. doi:10.1182/blood-2014-10-609362
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Carlsson F,
    2. Kim J,
    3. Dumitru C,
    4. Barck KH,
    5. Carano RA,
    6. Sun M,
    7. Diehl L,
    8. Brown EJ
    (2010) Host-detrimental role of Esx-1-mediated inflammasome activation in mycobacterial infection. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000895. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000895
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Conrad WH,
    2. Osman MM,
    3. Shanahan JK,
    4. Chu F,
    5. Takaki KK,
    6. Cameron J,
    7. Hopkinson-Woolley D,
    8. Brosch R,
    9. Ramakrishnan L
    (2017) Mycobacterial ESX-1 secretion system mediates host cell lysis through bacterium contact-dependent gross membrane disruptions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114: 1371–1376. doi:10.1073/pnas.1620133114
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Dorhoi A,
    2. Nouailles G,
    3. Jörg S,
    4. Hagens K,
    5. Heinemann E,
    6. Pradl L,
    7. Oberbeck-Müller D,
    8. Duque-Correa MA,
    9. Reece ST,
    10. Ruland J, et al.
    (2012) Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by Mycobacterium tuberculosis is uncoupled from susceptibility to active tuberculosis. Eur J Immunol 42: 374–384. doi:10.1002/eji.201141548
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Eigenbrod T,
    2. Dalpke AH
    (2015) Bacterial RNA: An underestimated stimulus for innate immune responses. J Immunol 195: 411–418. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1500530
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Erdei J,
    2. Tóth A,
    3. Balogh E,
    4. Nyakundi BB,
    5. Bányai E,
    6. Ryffel B,
    7. Paragh G,
    8. Cordero MD,
    9. Jeney V
    (2018) Induction of NLRP3 inflammasome activation by heme in human endothelial cells. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2018: 4310816. doi:10.1155/2018/4310816
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Franchi L,
    2. Kanneganti TD,
    3. Dubyak GR,
    4. Núñez G
    (2007) Differential requirement of P2X7 receptor and intracellular K+ for caspase-1 activation induced by intracellular and extracellular bacteria. J Biol Chem 282: 18810–18818. doi:10.1074/jbc.M610762200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Gagnon KB,
    2. Delpire E
    (2012) Molecular physiology of SPAK and OSR1: Two Ste20-related protein kinases regulating ion transport. Physiol Rev 92: 1577–1617. doi:10.1152/physrev.00009.2012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Greaney AJ,
    2. Leppla SH,
    3. Moayeri M
    (2015) Bacterial exotoxins and the inflammasome. Front Immunol 6: 570. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2015.00570
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Gupta R,
    2. Ghosh S,
    3. Monks B,
    4. DeOliveira RB,
    5. Tzeng T-C,
    6. Kalantari P,
    7. Nandy A,
    8. Bhattacharjee B,
    9. Chan J,
    10. Ferreira F, et al.
    (2014) RNA and β-hemolysin of group B streptococcus induce interleukin-1β (IL-1β) by activating NLRP3 inflammasomes in mouse macrophages. J Biol Chem 289: 13701–13705. doi:10.1074/jbc.c114.548982
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. He Y,
    2. Hara H,
    3. Núñez G
    (2016) Mechanism and regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Trends Biochem Sci 41: 1012–1021. doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2016.09.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Hortle E,
    2. Johnson KE,
    3. Johansen MD,
    4. Nguyen T,
    5. Shavit JA,
    6. Britton WJ,
    7. Tobin DM,
    8. Oehlers SH
    (2019a) Thrombocyte inhibition restores protective immunity to mycobacterial infection in zebrafish. J Infect Dis 220: 524–534. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiz110
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Hortle E,
    2. Oehlers SH
    (2020) Host-directed therapies targeting the tuberculosis granuloma stroma. Pathog Dis 78: ftaa015. doi:10.1093/femspd/ftaa015
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Hortle E,
    2. Starrs L,
    3. Brown FC,
    4. Jane SM,
    5. Curtis DJ,
    6. McMorran BJ,
    7. Foote SJ,
    8. Burgio G
    (2019b) KCC1 activation protects mice from the development of experimental cerebral malaria. Sci Rep 9: 6356. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42782-x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Hung CM,
    2. Peng CK,
    3. Yang SS,
    4. Shui HA,
    5. Huang KL
    (2020) WNK4-SPAK modulates lipopolysaccharide-induced macrophage activation. Biochem Pharmacol 171: 113738. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2019.113738
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Ishigami-Yuasa M,
    2. Watanabe Y,
    3. Mori T,
    4. Masuno H,
    5. Fujii S,
    6. Kikuchi E,
    7. Uchida S,
    8. Kagechika H
    (2017) Development of WNK signaling inhibitors as a new class of antihypertensive drugs. Bioorg Med Chem 25: 3845–3852. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2017.05.034
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Jayaraman P,
    2. Sada-Ovalle I,
    3. Nishimura T,
    4. Anderson AC,
    5. Kuchroo VK,
    6. Remold HG,
    7. Behar SM
    (2013) IL-1β promotes antimicrobial immunity in macrophages by regulating TNFR signaling and caspase-3 activation. J Immunol 190: 4196–4204. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1202688
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Johansen MD,
    2. Kasparian JA,
    3. Hortle E,
    4. Britton WJ,
    5. Purdie AC,
    6. Oehlers SH
    (2018) Mycobacterium marinum infection drives foam cell differentiation in zebrafish infection models. Dev Comp Immunol 88: 169–172. doi:10.1016/j.dci.2018.07.022
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Kelley N,
    2. Jeltema D,
    3. Duan Y,
    4. He Y
    (2019) The NLRP3 inflammasome: An overview of mechanisms of activation and regulation. Int J Mol Sci 20: 3328. doi:10.3390/ijms20133328
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Koo IC,
    2. Wang C,
    3. Raghavan S,
    4. Morisaki JH,
    5. Cox JS,
    6. Brown EJ
    (2008) ESX-1-dependent cytolysis in lysosome secretion and inflammasome activation during mycobacterial infection. Cell Microbiol 10: 1866–1878. doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01177.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Kurenuma T,
    2. Kawamura I,
    3. Hara H,
    4. Uchiyama R,
    5. Daim S,
    6. Dewamitta SR,
    7. Sakai S,
    8. Tsuchiya K,
    9. Nomura T,
    10. Mitsuyama M
    (2009) The RD1 locus in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome contributes to activation of caspase-1 via induction of potassium ion efflux in infected macrophages. Infect Immun 77: 3992–4001. doi:10.1128/IAI.00015-09
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Li Q,
    2. Fu W,
    3. Yao J,
    4. Ji Z,
    5. Wang Y,
    6. Zhou Z,
    7. Yan J,
    8. Li W
    (2014) Heme induces IL-1β secretion through activating NLRP3 in kidney inflammation. Cell Biochem Biophys 69: 495–502. doi:10.1007/s12013-014-9823-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Lienard J,
    2. Nobs E,
    3. Lovins V,
    4. Movert E,
    5. Valfridsson C,
    6. Carlsson F
    (2020) The Mycobacterium marinum ESX-1 system mediates phagosomal permeabilization and type I interferon production via separable mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117: 1160–1166. doi:10.1073/pnas.1911646117
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Lu A,
    2. Wu H
    (2015) Structural mechanisms of inflammasome assembly. FEBS J 282: 435–444. doi:10.1111/febs.13133
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. MacGilvary NJ,
    2. Kevorkian YL,
    3. Tan S
    (2019) Potassium response and homeostasis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis modulates environmental adaptation and is important for host colonization. PLoS Pathog 15: e1007591. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1007591
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. Marjoram L,
    2. Alvers A,
    3. Deerhake ME,
    4. Bagwell J,
    5. Mankiewicz J,
    6. Cocchiaro JL,
    7. Beerman RW,
    8. Willer J,
    9. Sumigray KD,
    10. Katsanis N, et al.
    (2015) Epigenetic control of intestinal barrier function and inflammation in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112: 2770–2775. doi:10.1073/pnas.1424089112
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Master SS,
    2. Rampini SK,
    3. Davis AS,
    4. Keller C,
    5. Ehlers S,
    6. Springer B,
    7. Timmins GS,
    8. Sander P,
    9. Deretic V
    (2008) Mycobacterium tuberculosis prevents inflammasome activation. Cell Host Microbe 3: 224–232. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2008.03.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Matty MA,
    2. Oehlers SH,
    3. Tobin DM
    (2016) Live imaging of host-pathogen interactions in zebrafish larvae. Methods Mol Biol 1451: 207–223. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3771-4_14
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. Mayes-Hopfinger L,
    2. Enache A,
    3. Xie J,
    4. Huang CL,
    5. Köchl R,
    6. Tybulewicz VLJ,
    7. Fernandes-Alnemri T,
    8. Alnemri ES
    (2021) Chloride sensing by WNK1 regulates NLRP3 inflammasome activation and pyroptosis. Nat Commun 12: 4546. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24784-4
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Meng G,
    2. Zhang F,
    3. Fuss I,
    4. Kitani A,
    5. Strober W
    (2009) A mutation in the Nlrp3 gene causing inflammasome hyperactivation potentiates Th17 cell-dominant immune responses. Immunity 30: 860–874. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2009.04.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Mishra BB,
    2. Rathinam VA,
    3. Martens GW,
    4. Martinot AJ,
    5. Kornfeld H,
    6. Fitzgerald KA,
    7. Sassetti CM
    (2013) Nitric oxide controls the immunopathology of tuberculosis by inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent processing of IL-1β. Nat Immunol 14: 52–60. doi:10.1038/ni.2474
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Mori T,
    2. Kikuchi E,
    3. Watanabe Y,
    4. Fujii S,
    5. Ishigami-Yuasa M,
    6. Kagechika H,
    7. Sohara E,
    8. Rai T,
    9. Sasaki S,
    10. Uchida S
    (2013) Chemical library screening for WNK signalling inhibitors using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Biochem J 455: 339–345. doi:10.1042/BJ20130597
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Muñoz-Planillo R,
    2. Kuffa P,
    3. Martínez-Colón G,
    4. Smith BL,
    5. Rajendiran TM,
    6. Núñez G
    (2013) K+ efflux is the common trigger of NLRP3 inflammasome activation by bacterial toxins and particulate matter. Immunity 38: 1142–1153. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.05.016
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. O’Rourke MB,
    2. Sahni S,
    3. Samra J,
    4. Mittal A,
    5. Molloy MP
    (2021) Data independent acquisition of plasma biomarkers of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Proteomics 231: 103998. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2020.103998
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Oehlers SH,
    2. Cronan MR,
    3. Beerman RW,
    4. Johnson MG,
    5. Huang J,
    6. Kontos CD,
    7. Stout JE,
    8. Tobin DM
    (2017) Infection-induced vascular permeability aids mycobacterial growth. J Infect Dis 215: 813–817. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiw355
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Oehlers SH,
    2. Cronan MR,
    3. Scott NR,
    4. Thomas MI,
    5. Okuda KS,
    6. Walton EM,
    7. Beerman RW,
    8. Crosier PS,
    9. Tobin DM
    (2015) Interception of host angiogenic signalling limits mycobacterial growth. Nature 517: 612–615. doi:10.1038/nature13967
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Perez-Riverol Y,
    2. Csordas A,
    3. Bai J,
    4. Bernal-Llinares M,
    5. Hewapathirana S,
    6. Kundu DJ,
    7. Inuganti A,
    8. Griss J,
    9. Mayer G,
    10. Eisenacher M, et al.
    (2019) The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: Improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res 47: D442–D450. doi:10.1093/nar/gky1106
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Perregaux D,
    2. Gabel CA
    (1994) Interleukin-1 beta maturation and release in response to ATP and nigericin. Evidence that potassium depletion mediated by these agents is a necessary and common feature of their activity. J Biol Chem 269: 15195–15203. doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(17)36591-2
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Pétrilli V,
    2. Papin S,
    3. Dostert C,
    4. Mayor A,
    5. Martinon F,
    6. Tschopp J
    (2007) Activation of the NALP3 inflammasome is triggered by low intracellular potassium concentration. Cell Death Differ 14: 1583–1589. doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4402195
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Rougeot J,
    2. Torraca V,
    3. Zakrzewska A,
    4. Kanwal Z,
    5. Jansen HJ,
    6. Sommer F,
    7. Spaink HP,
    8. Meijer AH
    (2019) Corrigendum: RNAseq profiling of leukocyte populations in zebrafish larvae reveals a cxcl11 chemokine gene as a marker of macrophage polarization during mycobacterial infection. Front Immunol 10: 2720. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.02720
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. ↵
    1. Salina EG,
    2. Waddell SJ,
    3. Hoffmann N,
    4. Rosenkrands I,
    5. Butcher PD,
    6. Kaprelyants AS
    (2014) Potassium availability triggers Mycobacterium tuberculosis transition to, and resuscitation from, non-culturable (dormant) states. Open Biol 4: 140106. doi:10.1098/rsob.140106
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Smith J,
    2. Manoranjan J,
    3. Pan M,
    4. Bohsali A,
    5. Xu J,
    6. Liu J,
    7. McDonald KL,
    8. Szyk A,
    9. LaRonde-LeBlanc N,
    10. Gao LY
    (2008) Evidence for pore formation in host cell membranes by ESX-1-secreted ESAT-6 and its role in Mycobacterium marinum escape from the vacuole. Infect Immun 76: 5478–5487. doi:10.1128/IAI.00614-08
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Sousa J,
    2. Cá B,
    3. Maceiras AR,
    4. Simões-Costa L,
    5. Fonseca KL,
    6. Fernandes AI,
    7. Ramos A,
    8. Carvalho T,
    9. Barros L,
    10. Magalhães C, et al.
    (2020) Mycobacterium tuberculosis associated with severe tuberculosis evades cytosolic surveillance systems and modulates IL-1β production. Nat Commun 11: 1949. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15832-6
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. ↵
    1. Steel HC,
    2. Matlola NM,
    3. Anderson R
    (1999) Inhibition of potassium transport and growth of mycobacteria exposed to clofazimine and B669 is associated with a calcium-independent increase in microbial phospholipase A2 activity. J Antimicrob Chemother 44: 209–216. doi:10.1093/jac/44.2.209
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Tapia-Abellán A,
    2. Angosto-Bazarra D,
    3. Alarcón-Vila C,
    4. Baños MC,
    5. Hafner-Bratkovič I,
    6. Oliva B,
    7. Pelegrín P
    (2021) Sensing low intracellular potassium by NLRP3 results in a stable open structure that promotes inflammasome activation. Sci Adv 7: eabf4468. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abf4468
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  47. ↵
    1. Taxman DJ,
    2. Huang MT,
    3. Ting JP
    (2010) Inflammasome inhibition as a pathogenic stealth mechanism. Cell Host Microbe 8: 7–11. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2010.06.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Varela M,
    2. van der Vaart M,
    3. Groenewoud A,
    4. Meijer AH
    (2019) Extracellular mycobacterial DNA drives disease progression by triggering Caspase-11-dependent pyroptosis of infected macrophages. BioRxiv. doi:10.1101/514125. (Preprint posted February 17, 2019)
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Wawrocki S,
    2. Druszczynska M
    (2017) Inflammasomes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis-driven immunity. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2017: 2309478. doi:10.1155/2017/2309478
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. ↵
    1. Wu RS,
    2. Lam II,
    3. Clay H,
    4. Duong DN,
    5. Deo RC,
    6. Coughlin SR
    (2018) A rapid method for directed gene knockout for screening in G0 zebrafish. Dev Cell 46: 112–125.e4. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2018.06.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Yan Y,
    2. Laroui H,
    3. Ingersoll SA,
    4. Ayyadurai S,
    5. Charania M,
    6. Yang S,
    7. Dalmasso G,
    8. Obertone TS,
    9. Nguyen H,
    10. Sitaraman SV, et al.
    (2011) Overexpression of Ste20-related proline/alanine-rich kinase exacerbates experimental colitis in mice. J Immunol 187: 1496–1505. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1002910
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Yang Y,
    2. Wang H,
    3. Kouadir M,
    4. Song H,
    5. Shi F
    (2019) Recent advances in the mechanisms of NLRP3 inflammasome activation and its inhibitors. Cell Death Dis 10: 128. doi:10.1038/s41419-019-1413-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Viennois E,
    3. Xiao B,
    4. Baker MT,
    5. Yang S,
    6. Okoro I,
    7. Yan Y
    (2013) Knockout of Ste20-like proline/alanine-rich kinase (SPAK) attenuates intestinal inflammation in mice. Am J Pathol 182: 1617–1628. doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.01.028
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Life Science Alliance.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
OXSR1 inhibits inflammasome activation by limiting potassium efflux during mycobacterial infection
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Life Science Alliance
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Life Science Alliance web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
OXSR1 inhibits inflammasome activation
Elinor Hortle, Vi LT Tran, Kathryn Wright, Angela RM Fontaine, Natalia Pinello, Matthew B O’Rourke, Justin J-L Wong, Philip M Hansbro, Warwick J Britton, Stefan H Oehlers
Life Science Alliance May 2022, 5 (9) e202201476; DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202201476

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
OXSR1 inhibits inflammasome activation
Elinor Hortle, Vi LT Tran, Kathryn Wright, Angela RM Fontaine, Natalia Pinello, Matthew B O’Rourke, Justin J-L Wong, Philip M Hansbro, Warwick J Britton, Stefan H Oehlers
Life Science Alliance May 2022, 5 (9) e202201476; DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202201476
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
Issue Cover

In this Issue

Volume 5, No. 9
September 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Masthead (PDF)
Advertisement

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Data Availability
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • Metrics
  • Reviewer Comments
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Cell Biology
  • Immunology
  • Microbiology, Virology & Host Pathogen Interaction

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • SorCS1 in amyloid-β synaptic pathology
  • The GET pathway acts in promoting mitophagy
  • Proximity to the SC promotes exchanges
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

EMBO Press LogoRockefeller University Press LogoCold Spring Harbor Logo

Content

  • Home
  • Newest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Guidelines
  • License, copyright, Fee

Other Services

  • Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • Editors & Staff
  • Reviewer Guidelines
  • Feedback
  • Licensing and Reuse
  • Privacy Policy

ISSN: 2575-1077
© 2023 Life Science Alliance LLC

Life Science Alliance is registered as a trademark in the U.S. Patent and Trade Mark Office and in the European Union Intellectual Property Office.