Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Methods & Resources
    • Archive
    • Subjects
  • Collections
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • License, Copyright, Fee
    • FAQ
    • Why submit
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editors & Staff
    • Board Members
    • Licensing and Reuse
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • LSA LLC
  • Alerts
  • Other Publications
    • EMBO Press
    • The EMBO Journal
    • EMBO reports
    • EMBO Molecular Medicine
    • Molecular Systems Biology
    • Rockefeller University Press
    • Journal of Cell Biology
    • Journal of Experimental Medicine
    • Journal of General Physiology
    • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    • Genes & Development
    • Genome Research

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Life Science Alliance
  • Other Publications
    • EMBO Press
    • The EMBO Journal
    • EMBO reports
    • EMBO Molecular Medicine
    • Molecular Systems Biology
    • Rockefeller University Press
    • Journal of Cell Biology
    • Journal of Experimental Medicine
    • Journal of General Physiology
    • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    • Genes & Development
    • Genome Research
  • My alerts
Life Science Alliance

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Methods & Resources
    • Archive
    • Subjects
  • Collections
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • License, Copyright, Fee
    • FAQ
    • Why submit
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editors & Staff
    • Board Members
    • Licensing and Reuse
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • LSA LLC
  • Alerts
  • Follow lsa Template on Twitter
Research Article
Transparent Process
Open Access

In utero exposure to chlordecone affects histone modifications and activates LINE-1 in cord blood

Louis Legoff, Shereen Cynthia D’Cruz, Katia Bouchekhchoukha, Christine Monfort, Christian Jaulin, View ORCID ProfileLuc Multigner, View ORCID ProfileFatima Smagulova  Correspondence email
Louis Legoff
1University of Rennes, EHESP, Inserm, Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail (Irset)–UMR_S 1085, Rennes, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shereen Cynthia D’Cruz
1University of Rennes, EHESP, Inserm, Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail (Irset)–UMR_S 1085, Rennes, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katia Bouchekhchoukha
1University of Rennes, EHESP, Inserm, Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail (Irset)–UMR_S 1085, Rennes, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine Monfort
1University of Rennes, EHESP, Inserm, Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail (Irset)–UMR_S 1085, Rennes, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Jaulin
2Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes, Epigenetics and Cancer Group, UMR 6290 CNRS, Université Rennes 1, Rennes Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luc Multigner
1University of Rennes, EHESP, Inserm, Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail (Irset)–UMR_S 1085, Rennes, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Luc Multigner
Fatima Smagulova
1University of Rennes, EHESP, Inserm, Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail (Irset)–UMR_S 1085, Rennes, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Fatima Smagulova
  • For correspondence: fatima.smagulova@inserm.fr
Published 9 April 2021. DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202000944
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • Metrics
  • Reviewer Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Environmental factors can induce detrimental consequences into adulthood life. In this study, we examined the epigenetic effects induced by in utero chlordecone (CD) exposure on human male cord blood as well as in blood-derived Ke-37 cell line. Genome-wide analysis of histone H3K4me3 distribution revealed that genes related to chromosome segregation, chromatin organization, and cell cycle have altered occupancy in their promoters. The affected regions were enriched in ESR1, SP family, and IKZF1 binding motifs. We also observed a global reduction in H3K9me3, markedly in repeated sequences of the genome. Decrease in H3K9me3 after CD exposure correlates with decreased methylation in LINE-1 promoters and telomere length extension. These observations on human cord blood were assessed in the Ke-37 human cell line. H3K4me3 and the expression of genes related to immune response, DNA repair, and chromatin organization, which were affected in human cord blood were also altered in CD-exposed Ke-37 cells. Our data suggest that developmental exposure to CD leads to profound changes in histone modification patterns and affects the processes controlled by them in human cord blood.

Introduction

The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease concept postulates that exposure to certain environmental factors during critical period of development and growth may have significant consequences on an individual’s short- and long-term health (1). During embryonic stage, just after fertilization, a global reprogramming event occurs to reset and establish new cell lineages in a developing organism. The second reprogramming window occurs in germ cells during somatic-to-germline transition, when the germ cells are committed to become future oocytes or gonocytes. Exposure to toxic substances during both critical reprogramming windows leads to profound changes in somatic and germ cells. In some instances, the effects can persist in adult life and can even be transmitted to subsequent generations, see for review (2).

Epigenetic reprogramming during development is associated with a cascade of events. The combination of epigenetic marks such as DNA methylation, histone posttranslational modifications (PTMs) and binding of noncoding RNAs determines the “active” or “silent” chromatin states at particular sites. The state of the chromatin can be influenced by several internal and external factors including environmental toxicants. A recent review has documented the effects of various pollutants on either site-specific or global DNA methylation in the humans (3). The authors summarized a large number of publications wherein the effects of several pollutants such as aflatoxin B1, arsenic, bisphenol A (BPA), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, tobacco smoke, and nutritional factors on genomic DNA methylation state were measured (3). In smoking mothers, the presence of differentially methylated CpGs in the vicinity of leucine, glutamate, and lysine rich 1 (LEKR1) (4) and RUNX family transcription factor 3 (RUNX3) (5) genes in the placenta have also been documented. It was suggested that alterations in the regulation of these genes could be implicated in preterm and low birth weight of newborns. Importantly, changes in DNA methylation were also observed in the umbilical cord blood of children whose mothers smoked during pregnancy. For example, DNA methylation changes were detected in the vicinity of genes related to oxidative stress response (aryl-hydrocarbon receptor repressor [AHRR]), the cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily A member 1 (CYP1A1), transport (myosin IG [MYO1G]), metabolism (acyl-CoA synthetase medium chain family member 3 [ACSM3]), transcription and signaling (growth factor independent 1 transcriptional repressor [GFI1]), contactin associated protein 1 (CNTNAP), SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domains 2 (SHANK2), and tripartite motif containing 36 (TRIM36) (6,7). It was suggested that changes in DNA methyltransferase enzyme activity could be a major cause for differential DNA methylation (3).

Histone-PTM mechanisms are also sensitive to exposure to environmental factors and their alterations can contribute to phenotypic changes. In animal experiments, it has been shown that histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3) was affected after prenatal in utero exposure to some pesticides such as atrazine, chlordecone (8, 9, 10, 11), or the chemical plastifier bisphenol A (12), as well as by the paternal preconceptional exposure to high-fat diet (13). In humans, the effects on histone PTMs alterations upon environmental exposure were less studied compared with DNA methylation because of scarce availability of biological material. In a recent study, it has been shown that smoking during pregnancy leads to activation of chromatin sites that correlated with an increase in H3K4me1 and H3K27Ac and a decrease in H3K9me3 histone occupancies in the children’s blood (14). Another study conducted in human blood samples demonstrated that environmental pollutants such as fine particulate matter (PM2.5) cause global changes in H3K27 acetylation, notably in genes involved in immune cell activation (15). Besides, exposure to particulate matter, urban air pollution also leads to reduction in repressive H3K9me3 and H3K9me2 marks in the postmortem human brain (16).

Changes in histone marks can interfere with chromatin structure and with the accessibility of transcription factors to DNA, which results in gene expression changes. H3K4me3, H3K4me1, H3K27Ac, and H3K79me3 at the promoters and enhancers are found to be associated with transcription activation (17). Marks related to gene silencing include H3K9me2, H3K9me3, and H3K27me3, and they are normally found within 10 kb around the promoters (17). Silencing marks such as H3K9me3 are important for the formation of pericentromeric chromatin, which is rich in repetitive DNA and plays a role in centromere functions and chromosome segregation. Besides pericentromere formation, the silencing histone marks, together with DNA methylation, are also involved in the control of transposable elements, which comprise up to 45% of the human genome (18). Among all the transposable elements, long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1 or L1) is the most active and most abundant mammalian retrotransposon element, and it encompasses 17% of the human genome. L1 elements contain a 5′ UTR promoter region and two ORFs (ORF1 and ORF2) encoding for proteins involved in reverse transcription and retrotransposition. L1 promoter hypomethylation and increased expression have been described in several cancers, including prostate (19), liver (20), and leukemia (21). L1 promoters are hypomethylated when cells are exposed to environmental pollutants (3, 22), and the activation of retrotransposons could lead to genome rearrangements (23). For example, the suppression of tumorigenicity 18 (ST18) gene—a gene frequently amplified in hepatocellular carcinoma—was activated by a tumor-specific L1 insertion (24).

Besides roles in controlling gene expression and chromatin structure, epigenetic mechanisms are one of the major mechanisms supporting “cell identity.” All different cell types in metazoan organisms originate from a single cell, so a set of epigenetic marks serves to establish “cell identity,” and these epigenetic marks are preserved during each cell division, for review see reference 25.

Thus, the importance of epigenetic mechanisms in the establishment and maintenance of fundamental cellular processes and the fact that these mechanisms can be altered by both internal or external factors prompted us to assess whether major pollutants exposure could be a source of epigenetic deregulation.

In this study, we assessed the epigenetic effects promoted by in utero chlordecone (CD) exposure. Chlordecone (also known as Kepone) is an organochlorine insecticide with well-recognized estrogenic properties (26, 27). It was extensively used from 1973 to 1993 in the French West Indies to fight against the banana root borer. This pesticide undergoes no significant biotic or abiotic degradation in the environment (28). As a consequence, permanently polluted soils and waterways have remained the primary source of foodstuff contamination and human beings continue to be exposed to this chemical. Chlordecone is a recognized neurotoxicant, reprotoxicant, and cancerogenic substance in both rodents and humans (29, 30, 31). Epidemiological studies have shown that prenatal exposure to CD affects development of the nervous system and child growth (32, 33). In men, CD exposure at adulthood was associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer (34). Because populations are still exposed to CD, there is an immediate urge to assess the potential deleterious effects of CD, especially on fragile developmental organism.

We hypothesized that in utero CD exposure affects the epigenetic mechanisms important for the control of gene expression and silencing. To investigate this hypothesis, we used umbilical cord blood samples obtained at birth from the TIMOUN mother–child cohort in Guadeloupe and applied improved ChIP-seq techniques. We analyzed only males in our study as in utero exposed boys have developmental problems related to fine motor skills (32) and men exposed during adult life have a high risk of prostate cancer development (34). The data from human study were complemented with experimental work using the human Ke-37 cell line to identify the mechanism of action involved.

Our data show that in utero exposure to CD leads to a decrease in the amount of H3K4me3 and H3K9me3 notably in genes involved in chromosome segregation, chromatin organization, and cell cycle–related functions. CD-exposed blood cells also display a decrease in H3K9me3 in satellite DNA. The decrease in H3K9me3 was associated with decreased L1 promoter DNA methylation, altered H3K4me3 at some L1s promoters, and with telomere elongation. Our data suggest that in utero CD exposure affects epigenetic marks and thereby impacts the downstream processes controlled by epigenetic mechanisms.

Results

A graphical overview of the experiments performed in this study is provided in Fig S1. Human cord blood samples were obtained from the mother–child Timoun cohort (see the Materials and Methods section). We analyzed histone H3K4me3 occupancy at the genome-wide level, telomere length copy number variations and LINE L1 DNA methylation changes by using genomic DNA from cord blood samples. However, for these human cord blood studies, given the limited amount of material, global amounts of H3K4me3, H3K9me3, and H4Ac were determined by the immunofluorescence method using structurally preserved nuclei (SPN) slides.

Figure S1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure S1. Schematic presentation of the experiments.

In left panel, we describe the experiments carried out in umbilical cord blood samples; in right, Ke-37 cell line experiments are described.

Human cord blood studies were complemented with analysis of the effects of in vitro CD exposure on the Ke-37 cell line, which originated from a human T-cell leukemia patient. In this cell line, global histone H3K4me3, H3K9me3, and H4Ac relative levels and gene expression were assessed using two doses of CD (100 and 300 nM). Nuclear ESR1 abundance was determined using immunofluorescence methods, and its binding at selected promoters was analyzed using ChIP-qPCR.

Distribution of histone modifications are affected in newborns exposed to CD in utero

We first examined modified histone levels for modifications involved in the control of DNA repair (H4 hyperacetylation and H4Ac), transcription (H3K4me3), and epigenetic silencing (H3K9me3) in cord blood cells. We prepared SPN from umbilical cord blood and performed quantitative analysis of immunostaining images as described in the Materials and Methods section. We found no significant changes in the levels of H4Ac, but we observed a 15% decrease in H3K4me3 and a 21% decrease for H3K9me3 levels in CD-exposed groups (Fig 1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1. H3K4me3 and H3K9me3 histone marks were decreased in CD-exposed umbilical cord blood cells.

Representative images of structurally preserved nuclei stained with anti-H4ac (upper panel), anti-H3K9me3 (middle panel), or anti-H3K4me3 (lower panel) antibodies. Pictures were taken with fixed exposure time at ×63 objective. Corresponding quantitative analysis of the nuclear specific signal is presented as relative fluorescence compared with control ± SD. *P < 0.05, Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test, n = 8 for each group (H4ac), n = 10 for each group (H3K9me3), n = 8 for control, and n = 10 for CD (H3K4me3).

H3K4me3 is a pivotal mark of active chromatin; it acts as a platform for the binding of chromatin factors and nucleosome-remodeling complexes (35, 36). To reveal the possible effects of in utero CD exposure on the regulation of gene expression, we analyzed the genome-wide distribution of H3K4me3 marks using chromatin from the umbilical cord blood using six biological replicates for each group (the details are provided in the Materials and Methods section). Notably, the identified peaks had Spearman’s correlation score in the range 0.95–0.99 (Fig S2), signifying that the experiments were technically reproducible. We observed that global H3K4me3 occupancy has slightly decreased in CD-exposed newborns compared with nonexposed (Fig S3), which is consistent with our immunofluorescence data (Fig 1). Using the peak calling program MACS (with stringency P-value 10–5), we detected on average 24,644 peaks in control and 24,536 peaks in the CD group.

Figure S2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure S2. Pairwise Spearman’s correlation analysis.

The correlation analysis was performed using R application.

Figure S3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure S3. Scatter plot of H3K4me3 peaks.

Peaks with increased and decreased H3K4me3 signals are shown in red and blue, respectively. Peaks with less than 1.2-fold change are shown in gray.

Using cutoff values fold change (FC) ≥ 1.5 and false dicovery rate (FDR) < 0.1, we determined that 706 peaks were differential between controls and exposed newborns (Table S1); details of analysis is provided in the Materials and Methods section. For example, we detected an increased H3K4me3 occupancy at ret proto-oncogene (RET) and reduced occupancy at BRCA1 DNA repair–associated (BRCA1) genes (Fig 2A). Of the differential peaks, 673 peaks were decreased in CD-exposed newborns, and 33 were found to be increased. Among the differential H3K4me3 marks, 593 were located inside coding genes (±2 kb around coding sequences); this comprised 2.5% of the total identified peaks (Figs 2B and S4A and B). We detected a significant overrepresentation of very broad peaks (>4 kb peaks) within differential peaks (P-value = 2.52 × 10−12; hypergeometric test). These broad differential peaks include genes with transcription factor functions, such as AT-rich interaction domain 2 (ARID2), AT-rich interaction domain 5B (ARID5B), ETS proto-oncogene 1, transcription factor (ETS1), zinc finger protein 131 (ZNF131), nuclear receptor binding factor 2 (NRBF2), and genes with chromatin factor functions, such as chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 2 (CHD2) and lysine methyltransferase 2E (KMT2E). In the regions showing increased H3K4me3 occupancy, many genes encoded developmental transcription factors, for example, Wnt family member 4 (WNT4), SRY-box transcription factor 18 (SOX18), and jagged canonical Notch ligand 2 (JAG2) among others.

Table S1 H3K4me3 differential peaks identified in human cord blood in newborns in utero exposed to CD (FC > 1.5, FDR < 0.1).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2. The occupancy of H3K4me3 is globally decreased in CD-exposed umbilical cord blood cells.

(A) H3K4me3 occupancy has decreased in the promoter of BRCA1. In contrast, it has increased in the vicinity of proto-oncogene RET. The image represents the averaged signal of six replicates. Dashed boxes indicate the position of strongest changes. (B) Most differential peaks are located near TSS ± 2 kb. (C) Differential peaks were enriched in a G-rich (upper panel) and a T-rich (low panel) motif. The parts of the motifs were similar to the sequences of SP family and IRF3 binding sites, respectively. (D) Several biological functions are overrepresented within the genes located in the neighborhood of the differential genes. Gene Ontology clusters are sorted by P-values. Adjusted P-values (hypergeometric test, FDR) are indicated at the end of each bar of the histogram. (E) Differential peaks are enriched in the genes regulated by JARID2 and ESR1 proteins.

Figure S4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure S4. Most H3K4me3 peaks are located in the vicinity of the TSS.

(A, B) The whole set of H3K4me3 peaks identified in cord blood and (B) differential H3K4me3 peaks identified in CD-exposed newborns have preferential TSS distribution.

To address whether regulatory DNA motifs are present within the regions containing altered peaks, we used MEME-CHIP (37). We found significantly enriched motifs among the differential peaks (Fig 2C). The first discovered motif sequence is similar to the SP family of transcription factor consensus binding site, and part of the second motif is similar to interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3)–binding sites (Fig 2C). MEME-CHIP detected 272 target genes containing SP-binding sites including the above mentioned differential transcriptional factors (SOX18, WNT4, and JAG2), genes involved in DNA damage response (X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis [XIAP], denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase homolog [DTL], and SNW domain containing 1 [SNW1]), and chromatin remodeling genes (RB binding protein 4, chromatin remodeling factor [RBBP4], SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a, containing DEAD/H box [SMARCAD1]). Almost all genes with an increase in H3K4me3 contain binding sites for SP family members.

Next, we asked whether differential H3K4me3 regions were located near genes that share common biological functions. We assigned genes within differential peaks using GREAT (details and analysis parameters are given in the Materials and Methods section). 954 genes were enriched for several Gene Ontology (GO) clusters, biological functions, molecular processes, or cellular components (Fig 2D). Interestingly, this analysis revealed GO clusters containing genes that were related to chromosome segregation, chromatin organization, and cell cycle functions (Fig 2D and Table S2). For example, the enriched cluster “chromatin regulation related functions” contains genes such as AT-rich interaction domain 2 (ARID2), centromere protein C (CENPC), chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 2 (CHD2), and stromal antigen 2 (STAG2).

Table S2 Significant Gene Ontology terms clusters identified by GREAT.

Next, we compared the genes identified in differential regions using Enrichr webtool, which identify the protein–protein interactions based on previously described experimental datasets. The analysis revealed that the targets of jumonji AT-rich interactive domain 2 (JARID2) and estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) were significantly enriched in our differential peaks (Fig 2E). For example, ESR1 has 43 targets in our differential peaks (adj. P-value = 1.51 × 10−03), out of the 871 targets identified in the protein–protein interactions database. Among the targets of ESR1 that are found in the vicinity of differential peaks, there are genes involved in chromosome organization such as H2B clustered histone 5 (H2BC5), lysine demethylase 5A (KDM5A), X-ray repair cross complementing 5 (XRCC5), or the DNA repair gene BRCA1 (Table S3).

Table S3 Protein–protein interactions identified by using Enrichr database.

To experimentally validate our analysis, we studied ESR1 expression using human Ke-37 cells treated with 100 nM of CD. The cells were fixed on slides and analyzed using immunofluorescence techniques. We found that ESR1 appears as dots in the nucleus of the cells. We performed z-stacks and the quantitative analysis for each of 21 images per stack (Fig 3A). Our analysis revealed that ESR1 nuclear staining had increased by 45% in CD-exposed Ke-37 cells compared with control (Fig 3B), suggesting that exposure to CD activates ESR1 expression. To reveal whether ESR1 could directly bind to the promoters of its target genes, we performed ChIP-qPCR analysis of some of these targets. To this end, we first identified the ESR1 binding sites using Find Individual Motif Occurrence. In total, 52,590 targets were identified in the human genome hg38 (P-value ≤ 1.0 × 10−04). Second, we chose the gene promoters located in our differential peaks containing the ESR1-binding motif. Third, we designed ChIP-qPCR primers as described in the Materials and Methods section. For example, Find Individual Motif Occurrence analysis predicted an ESR1 binding site within the altered H3K4me3 peak located in the vicinity of lysine methyltransferase 2E (KMT2E) (Fig 3C). We performed ChIP-qPCR analysis using Ke-37 cells, and we measured 1.6 times decrease in ESR1 binding at the KMT2E promoter. Besides KMT2E, ESR1 binding has decreased in ETS proto-oncogene 1, transcription factor (ETS1), signal transducer and activator of transcription 2 (STAT2), and E3 ubiquitin protein ligase RAD18 genes by 1.60 and 1.41 and 1.42 times, respectively (Fig 3D).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3. ESR1 binding was altered in CD-exposed cells.

(A) Representative images of z-stack sums obtained from structurally preserved nuclei immunostained with ESR1 antibody. Images were taken with fixed exposure time at x63 objective. ESR1 (green) is localized in the nucleus (visualized by DAPI staining—blue). (B) Quantitative analysis of ESR1 signal in nuclei was performed using ImageJ software. Data are presented as relative fluorescence compared with control ± SD. *P < 0.05, Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test, and n = 8 for each group. (C) Representation of the conservative ESR1 binding site within the KMT2E gene. The binding site is highlighted in green. (D) ESR1 binding at the promoter of target genes was assessed by ChIP-qPCR. Values were normalized to the RPLP0 region. Control samples are in blue and CD-treated samples are in red. The data were averaged and presented as normalized ChIP fold change compared with control ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test, n = 7 for control, and n = 8 for CD.

Our immunofluorescence data showed that CD exposure leads to a global decrease in H3K9me3 levels in the nucleus (Fig 1). Therefore, we asked whether CD treatment of cultured cells can induce redistribution of H3K9me3. To this end, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation using H3K9me3 antibody in Ke-37 cells that were exposed to CD. We analyzed the H3K9me3 occupancy at alpha-satellite (SATα) and satellite 2 (SAT2) repeats—which are enriched in centromere regions of the genome—as well as at some other targets by using qPCR on immunoprecipitated DNA. We detected decreased levels of H3K9me3 at both SAT2 and SATα (by 2.2 and 2.4 times, respectively) in immunoprecipitated DNA from cells exposed to CD (Fig 4A). However, no significant changes were observed for other genes, except at signal transducer and activator of transcription 2 (STAT2) suggesting that exposure to CD preferentially affect H3K9me3 occupancy at satellite DNA. Thus, both immunofluorescence and ChIP methods indicated that H3K9me3 amounts have decreased in exposed cells.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4. H3K9me3 occupancy and telomere length changes in CD-exposed umbilical cord blood.

(A) H3K9me3 occupancy at the promoter of target genes and satellite was assessed by ChIP-qPCR. Values were normalized to the RPLP0 region. Control samples are in blue, and CD-treated samples are in red. The data were averaged and presented as normalized ChIP fold change compared with control ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test, and n = 6 for each group. (B) Telomere length was assessed by qRT-PCR and normalized to the qPCR value of a single-copy gene (RPLP0) to determine the T/S ratio. **P < 0.01, Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test, n = 16 for control, and n = 18 for CD. (C) Histone occupancy of H3K4me3 at the promoter of genes involved in telomere maintenance function. Control samples are in blue and CD-treated samples are in red. Peak intensities were extracted from ChIP-seq data and were plotted as fold change compared with control ± SD. All plotted regions displayed statistical difference in H3K4me3 occupancy (moderated t test, Limma package), n = 6 for each group.

To sum up, our data show that exposure in utero to CD causes a global decrease in H3K4me3 occupancy, notably in the genes associated with chromatin organization, DNA repair, and cell cycle and in genes potentially regulated by ESR1, whereas H3K9me3 marks were mostly decreased in SAT2 and SATα.

Telomere length is increased in cord blood from CD-exposed newborns

Because H3K9me3 are important for telomere function (38), we asked whether decrease in H3K9me3 after CD exposure could affect telomeres length. Telomeres are essential for protecting the end of chromosomes, and they consist of hexanucleotide repeats. The numbers of repeats vary among different tissues and telomere length is reduced upon cellular senescence (39). To determine whether telomere length is altered in CD-exposed newborns, we analyzed the average telomere copies ratio compared with a single-copy gene (T/S) in genomic DNA extracted from umbilical cord blood using qPCR as described in the Materials and Methods section. We found that T/S is significantly increased by 1.7 times in exposed samples compared with controls (Fig 4B). To reveal the potential candidate genes involved in telomere length changes, we extracted all the telomere maintenance function target genes from AMIGO database. 145 genes are relevant to telomere maintenance function (GO:0000723). We found that 15 genes in our datasets have altered H3K4me3 occupancy including ATM serine/threonine kinase (ATM), protection of telomeres 1 (POT1), cAMP-dependent protein kinase inhibitor beta (PKIB), DNA primase subunit 1 (PRIM1), DNA primase subunit 2 (PRIM2), replication factor C subunit 3 (RFC3), XRCC5, BRCA2 DNA repair–associated (BRCA2) and 5′-3′ exoribonuclease 1 (XRN1) genes (Fig 4C). Whereas the occupancy of H3K4me3 in the vicinity of these genes globally decreased in CD-exposed neonates, H3K4me3 signal had increased at the promoter of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) (Fig S5A); however, the value did not pass the statistical significance cutoff (FC = 1.3, P-value = 0.1) (Fig S5B). To determine whether telomere length was also affected in vitro, we performed the analysis of telomere length in CD-exposed Ke-37 cells. We did not observe significant differences in relative telomere length neither at low nor at high dose of CD (Fig S6), suggesting that short-term exposure to CD in our experimental conditions does not induce telomere length change. However, our data suggest that telomere length was elongated in cord blood cells because of long-term CD exposure.

Figure S5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure S5. H3K4me3 occupancy has increased in umbilical cord blood of newborn exposed to CD.

(A) H3K4me3 occupancy at the promoter of TERT in CD and control group visualized by Integrative Genomics Viewer genomic viewer. (B) Normalized H3K4me3 signal calculated at the promoter of TERT tends to increase.

Figure S6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure S6. Telomere length was not affected in Ke-37 CD-exposed cells.

Telomere length was assessed by qRT-PCR, and values were normalized to a single-copy gene (RPLP0) to determine the T/S ratio, n = 8 for each group.

LINE-1 activation in CD-exposed newborns

Because we observed a decrease in H3K9me3 amounts, we asked whether retroelements activity could be induced in CD-exposed cells. To determine whether methylation of L1 promoters could be altered by CD exposure, we performed qPCR on HpaII enzymatically digested and undigested genomic DNA from umbilical cord blood. For the analysis of L1 promoter methylation, we chose previously published sequence of L1.12 element (accession number U93565), the sequence of the promoter we studied (354 bp) is presented in Fig 5A. Blast analysis of this promoter compared with the human reference genome showed that this sequence is present 116 times (alignment length ≥ 350 bp, % of identity >95%, maximum five mismatches). Out of the three CpGs tested, we observed that methylation of CpG3 was significantly decreased by 21.3% in CD-exposed samples compared with control, *P < 0.05 (Fig 5A), suggesting that CD exposure could lead to decreased methylation at least at some targets.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5. Exposure to low dose of CD leads to DNA methylation reduction and increased H3K4me3 at the UID-34 L1 in umbilical cord blood cells and increased expression of LINE-1 in Ke-37 cells.

(A) Methylation analysis was performed by qPCR analysis using the intact cord blood genomic DNA or digested by methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme from control samples (in blue) and CD-treated samples (in red). Data are presented as relative methylation compared with control ± SD. *P < 0.05, Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test, and n = 8 for each group. Below the graph, the sequence of the L1.12 promoter with CpG positions is shown. (B) H3K4me3 occupancy at the promoter of UID-34 L1. The image represents the averaged signal of six replicates. Dashed boxes indicate the position of the strongest changes. CpGs positions are indicated. (C) H3K4me3 occupancy at CpG3 of the L1 promoter. Values were normalized to the RPLP0 region. The data were averaged and presented as normalized ChIP fold change compared with control ± SD. P = 0.1, Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test, and n = 7 for each group. (D) The expressions of LINE-1 ORF1 and ORF2 in Ke-37 cells were assessed by qRT-PCR following exposure to 100 nM. (E) The expressions of LINE-1 ORF1 and ORF2 at 300 nM of CD. The expression of target genes was normalized to the expression of the housekeeping RPL37A gene. The data were averaged and presented as normalized expression fold change compared with control ± SD. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test, n = 18 for control, n = 20 for CD (100 nM), and n = 6 for each group (300 nM).

Next, we asked whether DNA methylation at CpG is associated with changes in H3K4me3 in L1s of CD-exposed newborns. To this end, we extracted coordinates of full-length L1s using L1Base (v2), a database containing putatively active LINE-1 (http://l1base.charite.de/index.php). We remapped the sequencing reads of H3K4me3 to the reference human genome without filtering multimapped reads (i.e., reads mapping to multiple positions on the genome). We detected 186 L1s having H3K4me3 peaks out of 13,671 L1s. Of these 186 L1 elements, 90 have altered H3K4me3 occupancy in the CD group compared with control (FC ≥ 1.2, 22 increased, 78 decreased, Table S4). For example, we detected increased H3K4me3 at the promoter of UID-34 L1, retroelement is located on chromosome 19 between the LINC01801 and LINC00904 genes (Fig 5B). The promoter of UID-34 contains three CpGs, in which the DNA methylation was analyzed and described above. The decrease in DNA methylation in CpG3 is associated with an increase in H3K4me3, suggesting possible activation of transcription of UID-34 retroelement. Interestingly, within L1 promoters with decreased H3K4me3, we detected an overlap with protein-coding gene promoters (such as at the dual promoter of RABL3/GTF2E1) see Table S4.

Table S4 H3K4me3 peaks overlapping L1s in human cord blood.

Next, we analyzed H3K4me3 occupancy in the vicinity of CpG3 using ChIP on Ke-37 cells exposed or not to 100 nM of CD. We detected a 16% H3K4me3 increase in treated cells compared with control; however, the difference did not pass the significance cutoff (exact P-value = 0.08) (Fig 5C). To determine whether the expression of L1 was altered by CD exposure, we performed qRT-PCR on RNAs extracted from Ke-37 cells. The analysis revealed that both ORFs of L1 were significantly overexpressed by 1.5 and 1.3 times, respectively, following exposure to 100 nM of CD (Fig 5D). The exposure to 300 nM of CD did not show any significant change in L1 expression (Fig 5E). Our data suggest that exposure to CD leads to increased transcription of LINE-1 retrotransposon sequences that could result from decreased methylation at least in some promoters.

Gene expression and histone H3K4me3 occupancies increased in CD-exposed Ke-37 cells at a 100 nM dose and decreased at a 300 nM dose

To confirm the results that we have observed on umbilical cord blood, we performed in vitro analysis using the cultured cell line Ke-37. First, we asked whether exposure to CD affects gene expression at targets where H3K4me3 was affected in umbilical cord blood. We exposed Ke-37 cells to two different doses of CD, 100 and 300 nM. We measured the expression of genes encoding DNA repair, chromatin remodeling, and transcription factors. Surprisingly, we found that exposure to low and high doses led to different results. Low-dose exposures led to gene expression increase, whereas high-dose exposure led to a decrease in gene expression. For example, at low dose, we observed 1.2 times increase in transcription of the DNA repair gene BRCA1, 1.3 times in the adenylate cyclase 9 (ADCY9) gene, 1.2 times in chromatin remodeling genes KMT2E and ARID2, respectively, and 1.4 times in transcriptional factor ESR1 (Fig 6A). In contrast, at high dose, the observed changes were opposite, with expression being decreased in BRCA1 2.1 times; ARID2, 3.0 times; KMT2E, 2.0 times (Fig 6B).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6. Gene expression changes were associated with H3K4me3 occupancy alterations in CD-exposed Ke-37 cells.

(A, B) Gene expression in Ke-37 cells was assessed by qRT-PCR after exposure to 100 nM (A) or 300 nM (B) of CD. The expression of target genes was normalized to the expression of the housekeeping RPL37A gene. The data were averaged and presented as normalized expression fold change compared with control ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test, n = 18 for control, n = 20 for CD (100 nM), and n = 6 each group (300 nM). (C, D) H3K4me3 occupancy at the promoter of target genes in Ke-37 cells was assessed by ChIP-qPCR after exposure to 100 (C) or 300 nM (D) of CD. Values were normalized to the RPLP0 region. The data were averaged and presented as normalized ChIP fold change compared with control ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test, n = 7 for each group (100 nM), n = 5 for control, and n = 6 for CD (300 nM).

To address whether these changes are associated with histone H3K4me3 occupancy changes, we performed ChIP-qPCR and found that in the majority of the cases, the changes in RNA levels are correlated with alterations in histone H3K4me3 occupancy (Fig 6C and D). For example, the expression of BRCA1 and the histone occupancy at its promoter has consistently increased at dose “100 nM” 1.2 and 1.7 times, respectively, and decreased at dose “300 nM” 2.1 and 4.3 times, respectively. To address whether histone marks H3K4me3 and H3K9me3 were affected in Ke-37, we analyzed these histone marks by immunostaining SPN. Quantitative analysis revealed that exposure to 300 nM of CD leads to 1.9 times decrease in H3K4me3 levels compared with control. No significant difference was observed for H3K9me3 levels (Fig S7).

Figure S7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure S7. H3K4me3 but not H3K9me3 histone marks were decreased in Ke-37 cells after exposure to 300 nM of CD.

Representative images of structurally preserved nuclei stained with anti-H3K4me3 (upper panel) or anti-H3K9me3 (lower panel) antibodies. Pictures were taken with fixed exposure time at ×63 objective. For each mark, quantitative analysis of the nuclear specific signal is presented as relative fluorescence compared with control ± SD. *P < 0.05, Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test, n = 5 for each group (H3K4me3), and n = 6 for each group (H3K9me3).

Thus, our analysis shows that exposure of cultured cells to CD leads to gene activation at low dose and repression at high dose for targets which were previously identified in human samples.

Discussion

In animal models, it has been shown that exposure to CD affects germ cells in both sexes (9, 11) and causes global alterations in somatic tissues such as prostate and liver (40). This study is designed to evaluate the effects of CD on humans by using cord blood obtained from males. How is it relevant to use umbilical cord blood for analysis of prenatal effects of chlordecone on its target tissue? In a previous study, a strong correlation between gestational bisphenol A (BPA) exposure and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) DNA methylation in the umbilical cord blood was observed in the children from Columbia Center for Children’s Environmental Health cohort (41). The DNA methylation profile at promoter was correlated in blood and brain as was proved by analysis of the postmortem brain (42). The CD exposure occurred during entire early embryonic period, including early embryonic stage, when the tissue layers start to form, so common progenitors of many tissues could be affected. One could imagine that the promoted effects could be observed in many tissues, including blood, similar to BPA exposure.

We found that exposure to CD leads to global decrease in H3K4me3 occupancy in human cord blood and in Ke-37 cells exposed to high doses of CD. We previously observed such a decrease in gene expression in murine embryonic testis exposed to low dose of CD (9), suggesting that CD exposure affects transcription. Similar to CD, exposure to another estrogenic compound, diethylstilbestrol, also led to a decrease in DNA repair genes’ expression (43). We reported that female mice exposed to CD display an excess of 8-oxoguanine in exposed embryonic ovaries and γH2AX signals were detected in adult ovaries, suggesting a genotoxic property for CD, perhaps via the generation of an oxidative stress (11). We believe that the global decrease in histone marks in this study might be the consequence of a cellular response to CD-induced genotoxic stress. Indeed, it has been shown that under toxic conditions the transcription is generally globally reduced (44).

Among the most profound changes in cord blood, genes involved in chromosome segregation, chromatin organization, cell cycle, and DNA repair were detected. For example, we found a decrease in H3K4me3 occupancy in the BRCA1 gene in human cord blood and in Ke-37 cells exposed to a high CD dose. Our observation is consistent with previous studies where it was shown that DNA damaging agents induce significant decrease in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA levels (45). Because cells defective in BRCA1 show genomic instability, telomere dysfunction (46), and increased telomerase activity (47), we believe that decrease in BRCA1 in CD-exposed samples could eventually lead to genomic instability.

Notably, we found a decreased intensity of broad H3K4me3 peaks. In general, these peaks are located in key genome maintenance genes. Decrease in peak intensity is associated with repression of tumor suppressor activity (48). For example, we observed a H3K4me3 peak decrease at the tumor suppressor gene KMT2E that is frequently deleted in myeloid malignancies; the product of this gene controls cell cycle and genomic stability and regulates hematopoiesis (49). Thus, we suggest that decrease in H3K4me3 at the KMT2E gene promoter after CD exposure could also contribute to a higher risk of genetic instability.

We observed a large number of ESR1 potential targets in our differential peaks. We previously determined that exposure to CD leads to an increase in both protein and RNA levels of ESR1 and affects the binding of ESR1 to its targets in embryonic testis (9). To date, the role of ESR1 in blood cells is not well documented. There is evidence that lymphocytes and monocytes are responsive to estrogens (50). Moreover, it was reported that exposure to estrogen is likely to limit the efficiency of viral emergence from latency in blood cells, suggesting that ESR1 could modulate immune response (51). Considering the CD-induced alteration of several ESR1 target genes involved in immune response (interleukin enhancer-binding factor 2 [ILF2], CD53 molecule [CD53], and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV [CAMK4]) in our ChIP-seq data (Table S1), it is conceivable that developmental exposure to CD could alter the sensitivity to infections. However, the detailed effects of CD on immune response remain to be investigated.

Besides immune response, ESR1 could be involved in the alteration of telomere length that we have observed. We noted that among ESR potential targets, several genes are essential for telomere maintenance function: XRCC5, chaperonin-containing TCP1 subunit 4 (CCT4), and tumor protein p53 (TP53). Moreover, in men, a high estradiol level is associated with longer telomere length (52). Because an estrogen response element is present in the promoter of the telomerase gene (TERT), it was proposed that estrogens could directly stimulate telomerase expression (53). Estrogen-induced increased telomerase activity was demonstrated in several cell lines (54, 55, 56). Although telomerase activity is repressed in most somatic tissues, in highly proliferative tissues such as hematopoietic system, digestive system, and skin, TERT is still expressed (57), which makes possible the regulation of the TERT gene by estrogens (58).

On the other hand, histone trimethylation on H3K9 and H4K20 in telomeric regions could also regulate telomere lengthening (59). Since telomere elongation was found to be associated with decreased histone H3K9 trimethylation (60, 61), it is also conceivable that the observed increase in telomere length in exposed samples is a consequence of CD-induced H3K9me3 decrease. We observed that H3K9me3 occupancy has decreased in satellite regions. We believe that it could affect the transcription at centromeric satellite DNAs. Overexpression of centromeric transcripts leads to chromosome missegregation, reviewed in reference 62. Notably, we observed that decrease in H3K9me3 is also associated with DNA methylation decrease in L1 retrotransposon elements. Our data are consistent with several studies showing that exposure to environmental toxicants leads to LINE-1 methylation decrease. Remarkably, changes in the methylation state of retroelements can be caused by exposure to different compounds, such as arsenic (63), cadmium (64), as well as air pollution (65). It is suggested that oxidative DNA damage affects the capacity of methyltransferases to interact with DNA, resulting in lower methylation levels at CpG sites (66). Many studies have shown that L1s are involved in genetic rearrangements and somatic L1 insertions were detected in some types of human cancers, such as colon cancer (67). To explain the strong correlation between TP53 mutation and LINE-1 expression, it was suggested that its product, p53, could play a role in L1 repression (67). Because we observed reduced H3K4me3 at the TP53 gene, it is conceivable that impaired regulation of TP53 could contribute to L1 expression changes. L1s become more active in somatic tissues during the course of aging (68). Thus, decreased methylation at L1 could also contribute to premature cellular senescence in spite of telomeres elongation. The decreased LINE-1 DNA methylation correlates with an increased H3K4me3 occupancy at L1 promoters. The changes in DNA methylation could lead to altered chromatin conformation as DNA methylation and histone modifications are functionally linked.

We found that exposure to low and high CD doses leads to different responses in terms of H3K4me3 occupancy and gene expression. The most plausible explanation is that a low-dose exposure possibly reflects the most specific answer to CD. In contrast, high-dose exposure would lead to a more general toxic effect. Some differences between cell line and blood cell CD-induced effects could be explained by the fact that the cell composition in umbilical cord is not the same as in cell line. Besides that, in vivo samples have influence from other organs, for example, hormones and secreted factors from hormonal tissues.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that exposure to chlordecone leads to alterations in epigenetic marks that regulate gene activation and silencing. Dysregulation in those mechanisms may increase the risk of genetic instability.

Materials and Methods

Human cord samples

The TIMOUN study is a prospective mother–child cohort study from the Guadeloupe archipelago in the French West Indies. Between November 2004 and December 2007, 1,068 pregnant women were enrolled during third-trimester check-up visits at public and private health centers (69). At delivery, umbilical cord blood samples were obtained and collected into spray-coated EDTA tubes. Centrifuged plasma samples and whole blood samples were stored for further analysis. Plasma chlordecone concentration was determined by high-resolution gas chromatography and Ni63 electron capture detection. Detailed information about sampling, analysis, and quality assurance and control has been provided elsewhere (34, 70). After analysis of the quality control samples consisting of human plasma spiked with a series of concentrations of chlordecone, we defined the limit of detection (LOD) for plasma chlordecone as 0.02 ng/ml. From the 344 male umbilical cord blood samples available (chlordecone range < LOD to 12.47 ng/ml; median: 0.20 ng/ml; Fig S8), we selected 16 with the highest chlordecone values (range: 0.83–12.47 ng/ml; median: 1.15 ng/ml) and 16 were randomly selected among samples with less than LOD values. They were referred to as the exposed and control groups, respectively.

Figure S8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure S8. Chlordecone concentration measured in umbilical cord blood.

The values of CD in umbilical cord blood were presented in Excel graph as ng of CD per ml of blood.

Whole umbilical cord blood samples were used for genomic DNA extraction from 1 ml of blood. Briefly, DNA was treated with proteinase K and RNAse A and was loaded on a spin column (DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit; 69506; QIAGEN). After subsequent several washes, DNA was eluted and the quantity of DNA was estimated using nanodrop to verify the A260/A280 and A230/A260 ratios. In addition, the concentration was verified by a fluorescence method using the QuantiFluor ds DNA System dye (E2670; Promega). To verify DNA integrity, we ran DNA on agarose gel and we observed normal undegraded intact DNA.

SPN from umbilical cord blood for three-dimensional analysis were prepared from frozen blood by several times of washing in DMEM medium (Life Technologies, GIBCO) with 0.5% EASYpack protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (04 693 132 001; Roche). 100 μl of blood was pelleted at 1,000 g and rinsed three times in 1 ml DMEM. The final pellet was resuspended in 200 μl DMEM. 25 μl of cell suspension was mixed with equal amounts of 3.7% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde and 0.1 M sucrose and spread on glass slides, and the slides were air-dried and kept at −80°C.

Cell culture

The Ke-37 cell line was cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics and glutamine. Two million cells were treated with 100 or 300 nM of chlordecone (sc-394278; Santa Cruz), diluted in DMSO. The dose 100 nM that was used in our study is four times higher than the highest concentration of CD found in our exposed neonate group (12 ng/ml or 24 nM). Considering that concentration of CD in humans could reach up to 20 ng/ml or 40 nM, this dose is relevant to environmental exposure. We also opted to study the effects of CD at a higher dose (300 nM) to better understand the mechanism of CD action on human cells. Cells were harvested 18 h after exposure, spin washed in PBS, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and kept at −80°C until use. Slides with SPN from Ke-37 cells were prepared similarly to cord blood samples, except only one wash in PBS was performed prior to fixation.

Immunofluorescence

Slides were washed several times with PBS before use and 2 min with 0.1 M glycine in PBS to remove traces of paraformaldehyde. Slides were permeabilized during 30 min in PBS/0.5%Triton at RT, washed with PBS, and incubated for 30 min in blocking solution (0.1% [vol/vol] donkey serum, 0.03% [wt/vol] BSA, and 0.005% [vol/vol] Triton X-100 in PBS). SPN were immunostained with rabbit polyclonal H4Ac (06-946 1:500; Millipore), or rabbit polyclonal H3K4me3 (07-473, 1:500; Millipore) or rabbit polyclonal H3K9me3 (ab8898, 1:500; Abcam) or rabbit polyclonal ESR1 (ab32063, 1:50; Abcam) antibodies at 4°C overnight followed by several washes and incubation with fluorescent Alexa secondary antibodies. Z-stacks were acquired with 500 nm steps; 21 individual planes were taken for each individual channel, for DAPI (Blue, 350 nm), or histone marks (Green, 488 nm) using Zen Pro (version 2.3) program. All images for control and exposed samples were taken with fixed exposure time. For immunofluorescence analysis, we chose cells with similar nucleus morphology. Considering that highest cell population are granulocyte and lymphocyte cells, our results reflect changes in these major cell populations. Deconvolution was performed using the “fast iterative” algorithm provided by Zen Pro. The mean intensity images were generated for each z-stack and the resulting images were analyzed in ImageJ v1.52n. We used the lasso tool for nucleus and cytoplasm contouring and the integrated density immunofluorescence for each nucleus was calculated. The similar area with background was used and the background was subtracted. We analyzed 12 independent biological replicates for control and treated groups and at least 15 cells for each replicate. The data are presented as corrected total cell fluorescence of normalized fluorescence compared with control ±SD. The Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test was used to assess the statistical significance.

RNA extraction and qRT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (QIAGEN), which includes the DNA elimination step. The snap-frozen Ke-37 cells were lysed, DNA eliminated, and DNA-free RNA was placed on column, washed, and eluted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For qRT-PCR analysis, a minimum of six biological replicates was used for both control and CD-exposed cells. Reverse transcription was performed with 1 μg of RNA using the iScript Reverse Transcription kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The resulting cDNA was diluted 10 times to a final volume of 200 μl, and 4 μl was used for quantitative PCR. QPCR was performed using a Bio-Rad 384 plate machine using iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (1725124; Bio-Rad). Ct values for RPL37A, a housekeeping gene, were used for normalization using CFX manager software provided with Bio-Rad 384 plate machine. The primer sequences used for qPCR are shown in Table S4. The data were analyzed and are presented as mean values of FC compared with control ±SD. Minimum six replicates was used for control and exposed groups. The Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test was used to assess the statistical significance.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), ChIP-seq, and ChIP-qPCR

ChIP from cells was performed as previously described (71) with small modifications. We performed ChIP-seq experiments using six replicates for control or CD-exposed samples. 200 μl of cord blood cells was resuspended in 10 ml of PBS, fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature, quenched with 0.125 M glycine, and pelleted at 900g for 10 min. Centrifugation at 900g during 10 min precipitate mainly intact nuclei; we verified the cell suspension under microscope, and we observed that most nuclei were intact. Partially broken nuclei were eliminated in the next step by washing with low detergent solution and sedimentation at 900g, the broken nuclei will not precipitate at this speed. The pellet was lysed in 300 μl lysis buffer (1% SDS, 10 mM EDTA, and 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8), and sonication was performed using Qsonica 700 sonicator supplied with cup horn 431C2. Sonication was performed in 300 μl in Eppendorf tubes using the following conditions: efficiency 60%, sonication 20 s on, 20 s off, and total time 4 min. Average chromatin fragments size was 300 bp. The sonicated chromatin was diluted six times in ChIP dilution buffer (1.1% Triton X-100, 1.2 mM EDTA, 16.7 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8, and 167 mM NaCl) supplemented with protease inhibitors (Roche). We performed ChIP using 0.5 μg of H3K4me3 (07-473; Merck Millipore) or 0.5 μg of H3K9me3 (ab8898; Abcam), or 0.5 μg of ESR1 (ab32063; Abcam) antibodies and 20 μl of magnetic beads (Dynabeads; 10002D; Thermo Fisher Scientific). After several washes, immunoprecipitated DNA was eluted, treated with proteinase K, and purified using the QIAGEN MinElute kit (28004; QIAGEN). Sequencing libraries were prepared using NEBNext Ultra DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (E7645S; NEB). We used 3–5 ng DNA for library preparation, and 15 cycles were used for library amplification. Sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq4000 sequencer using a single-end 50-base read in multiplexed mode. Adapter dimer reads were removed using DimerRemover. The reads were mapped to the reference genome hg38 using Bowtie2 v2.2.7. The numbers of mapped reads were normalized by a scale factor to adjust the total number of reads. From the aligned reads, H3K4me3 peaks were identified using 12 biological replicates and the corresponding input by MACS2 (v2.1.1) algorithm; the following parameters were applied: a shift-size window of 73 bp, no model, and a P-value threshold <10 × 10−05. To compare the H3K4me3 ChIP datasets of the CD-exposed and control samples, differential peaks were identified using the following steps: first, from all of the peaks called using MACS2, we retained only peaks with average values above the median; second, we selected peaks with fold changes above 1.5 and FDR < 0.1. Statistical significance was calculated using R package Limma v3.38.3 that was designed to work with a limited number of replicates. We performed functional annotation of the differential peaks using the web-based tool GREAT v3.0.0 (default parameters). The differential peaks were visualized using the Integrative Genomics Viewer (v2.4.2). In umbilical cord blood, there are several cell types; the granulocytes and lymphocytes are the major cell types. Because each cell type have cell-specific marker expression, it is feasible to verify the proportion of given cell type (72). For example, there are a large number of commonly used macrophage markers such as CD14, CD16, CD64, CD68, CD71, and CCR5. We detected in our ChIP-seq data that cell-specific markers for different cell types have no altered promoter H3K4me3 occupancy in control and exposed samples, suggesting that cell population is not altered by CD exposure, Fig S9.

Figure S9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure S9. H3K4me3 occupancy is unaffected at nucleated blood cell–specific markers.

The cell-specific marker H3K4me3 occupancies were shown for CD4 and CD8A (T lymphocytes), CD14 (monocytes), CD56/NCAM1 (natural killer cells), CD19 (B lymphocytes), CD71/TFRC (nucleated red blood cells), and CD15/FUT4 (granulocytes). The images represent the averaged signal of six replicates for control (blue) and CD group (red).

For retroelement LINE L1 studies, genome-wide alignment and peak calling of the sequencing reads were mapped to the reference genome hg38 using Bowtie2 v2.2.7 as described above. For the second mapping, multimapped reads were not discarded from the alignment file. For each multimapped read identified, only the best alignment was conserved. In the case of perfect multiple matches (based on the MAPQ field), one of the best alignments was randomly conserved. This corresponds to the default algorithm of bowtie2 when analyzing the multimapped reads. The numbers of mapped reads were normalized by a scale factor to adjust the total number of reads. From the aligned reads, H3K4me3 peaks were identified using 12 biological replicates and the corresponding input by MACS2 (v2.1.1) algorithm; the following parameters were applied: a shift-size window of 73 bp, no model, and a P-value threshold <0.05. The identified peaks were intersected with coordinates of putatively active L1s, downloaded from L1Base (v2).

For ChIP-qPCR, six biological replicates were used for Ke-37 cells treated with 300 nM of CD. For ChIP-qPCR of cells treated with 100 nM of CD, we used 18 biological replicates for control and 20 biological replicates for CD. The primer sequences used for ChIP-qPCR are shown in Table S5. QPCR was carried out as described in the previous section. The internal region (far from promoter) of the GAPDH or RPLP0 gene was used for normalization. We assessed the efficiency of ChIP by analyzing ChIP/input ratio. In most of the cases, we observed an enrichment of immunoprecipitated regions compared to input. The data were analyzed and are presented as mean values of FC compared with control ±SD. The Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test was used to assess the statistical significance.

Table S5 Primers used for qPCR experiments.

MEME-CHIP

For the analysis, we used the sequences from differential peaks. Motif enrichment analysis was performed with MEME-CHIP using the default parameters. Identified motifs were compared with known motifs using TomTom (73) and the HOCOMO database v11 with a P-value threshold of 0.05.

DNA methylation analysis

Methylated DNA was extracted and enriched using the EpiMark kit (E3317S; NEB) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. We used 500 ng for the digestion by the methylation-sensitive enzyme HpaII that recognizes only unmethylated GGCC/CCGG sites. After enzyme digestion and proteinase K treatment, DNA was diluted to concentration 0.3 ng/μl. For qPCR analysis, we used 1.2 ng of DNA and primers were designed for LINE L1. Each pair of primers amplifies a region with a unique CpG site. We normalized LINE L1 PCR with amplification of a DNA fragment that has no HpaII site within the unique gene POLR2K. The percent of methylation was calculated as the ratio of “cut” to “uncut” product and presented as changes compared with control.

Primer design for ChIP-qPCR (for unique regions)

To design primers for ChIP-qPCR analysis of regions found with differential H3K4me3 occupancies, we identified the coordinates of altered regions using the Integrative Genomics Viewer genome browser and bed file results from MACS2 peak calling. We extracted the coordinates of the peaks from the bed file and we used the UCSC genome browser to upload DNA genomic sequences. We masked the repeated sequences to obtain the sequences without repetitive sequences to avoid multiple priming. We designed primers near the center of the peaks (±200 bp) by using Primer-BLAST tool from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).

Data Availability

All sequencing and ChIP-seq data from this study are publicly available and have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus. The GEO number is GSE171285 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE171285.

Ethics statement

The research procedures were approved by the Guadeloupean Ethics Committee for biomedical studies involving human subjects (Project no. 03-04 01/10/2004). Written informed consent was obtained from parents of each participating newborn.

Acknowledgements

Sequencing was performed by the GenomEast platform, a member of the “France Génomique” consortium (ANR-10-INBS-0009). Funding: This work was supported by funding from Atip-Avenir to F Smagulova (R13139NS). L Legoff was supported by Allocations de Recherche Doctorale (ARED)/l’Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) fellowship. This work was also supported by the French National Health Directorate Grant (Grant R20024NN) to Luc Multigner. However, the funder has no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

  • L Legoff: software, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, methodology, and writing—original draft.

  • SC D’Cruz: investigation, methodology, and writing—original draft, review, and editing.

  • K Bouchekhchoukha: investigation and methodology.

  • C Monfort: methodology and writing—original draft.

  • C Jaulin: methodology and writing—original draft, review, and editing.

  • L Multigner: resources, methodology, and writing—original draft.

  • F Smagulova: conceptualization, supervision, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, and writing—original draft, review, and editing.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  • Received October 21, 2020.
  • Revision received March 26, 2021.
  • Accepted March 29, 2021.
  • © 2021 Legoff et al.
Creative Commons logoCreative Commons logohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This article is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Barker DJP
    (2007) The origins of the developmental origins theory. J Intern Med 261: 412–417. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01809.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Legoff L,
    2. D’Cruz SC,
    3. Tevosian S,
    4. Primig M,
    5. Smagulova F
    (2019) Transgenerational inheritance of environmentally induced epigenetic alterations during mammalian development. Cells 8: 1559. doi:10.3390/cells8121559
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Martin EM,
    2. Fry RC
    (2018) Environmental influences on the epigenome: Exposure-associated DNA methylation in human populations. Annu Rev Public Health 39: 309–333. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014629
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Morales E,
    2. Vilahur N,
    3. Salas LA,
    4. Motta V,
    5. Fernandez MF,
    6. Murcia M,
    7. Llop S,
    8. Tardon A,
    9. Fernandez-Tardon G,
    10. Santa-Marina L, et al.
    (2016) Genome-wide DNA methylation study in human placenta identifies novel loci associated with maternal smoking during pregnancy. Int J Epidemiol 45: 1644–1655. doi:10.1093/ije/dyw196
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Maccani JZ,
    2. Maccani MA
    (2015) Altered placental DNA methylation patterns associated with maternal smoking: Current perspectives. Adv Genomics Genet 2015: 205–214. doi:10.2147/agg.s61518
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Miyake K,
    2. Kawaguchi A,
    3. Miura R,
    4. Kobayashi S,
    5. Tran NQV,
    6. Kobayashi S,
    7. Miyashita C,
    8. Araki A,
    9. Kubota T,
    10. Yamagata Z, et al.
    (2018) Association between DNA methylation in cord blood and maternal smoking: The Hokkaido study on environment and children’s health. Sci Rep 8: 5654. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-23772-x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Witt SH,
    2. Frank J,
    3. Gilles M,
    4. Lang M,
    5. Treutlein J,
    6. Streit F,
    7. Wolf IAC,
    8. Peus V,
    9. Scharnholz B,
    10. Send TS, et al.
    (2018) Impact on birth weight of maternal smoking throughout pregnancy mediated by DNA methylation. BMC Genomics 19: 290. doi:10.1186/s12864-018-4652-7
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Gely-Pernot A,
    2. Saci S,
    3. Kernanec P-Y,
    4. Hao C,
    5. Giton F,
    6. Kervarrec C,
    7. Tevosian S,
    8. Mazaud-Guittot S,
    9. Smagulova F
    (2017) Embryonic exposure to the widely-used herbicide atrazine disrupts meiosis and normal follicle formation in female mice. Sci Rep 7: 3526. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03738-1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Gely-Pernot A,
    2. Hao C,
    3. Legoff L,
    4. Multigner L,
    5. D’Cruz SC,
    6. Kervarrec C,
    7. Jégou B,
    8. Tevosian S,
    9. Smagulova F
    (2018) Gestational exposure to chlordecone promotes transgenerational changes in the murine reproductive system of males. Sci Rep 8: 10274. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-28670-w
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Hao C,
    2. Gely-Pernot A,
    3. Kervarrec C,
    4. Boudjema M,
    5. Becker E,
    6. Khil P,
    7. Tevosian S,
    8. Jégou B,
    9. Smagulova F
    (2016) Exposure to the widely used herbicide atrazine results in deregulation of global tissue-specific RNA transcription in the third generation and is associated with a global decrease of histone trimethylation in mice. Nucleic Acids Res 44: 9784–9802. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw840
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Legoff L,
    2. Dali O,
    3. D’Cruz SC,
    4. Suglia A,
    5. Gely-Pernot A,
    6. Hémery C,
    7. Kernanec P-Y,
    8. Demmouche A,
    9. Kervarrec C,
    10. Tevosian S, et al.
    (2019) Ovarian dysfunction following prenatal exposure to an insecticide, chlordecone, associates with altered epigenetic features. Epigenetics Chromatin 12: 29. doi:10.1186/s13072-019-0276-7
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Kumar D,
    2. Thakur MK
    (2017) Effect of perinatal exposure to Bisphenol-A on DNA methylation and histone acetylation in cerebral cortex and hippocampus of postnatal male mice. J Toxicol Sci 42: 281–289. doi:10.2131/jts.42.281
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Masuyama H,
    2. Mitsui T,
    3. Eguchi T,
    4. Tamada S,
    5. Hiramatsu Y
    (2016) The effects of paternal high-fat diet exposure on offspring metabolism with epigenetic changes in the mouse adiponectin and leptin gene promoters. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 311: E236–E245. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00095.2016
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Bauer T,
    2. Trump S,
    3. Ishaque N,
    4. Thürmann L,
    5. Gu L,
    6. Bauer M,
    7. Bieg M,
    8. Gu Z,
    9. Weichenhan D,
    10. Mallm J-P, et al.
    (2016) Environment-induced epigenetic reprogramming in genomic regulatory elements in smoking mothers and their children. Mol Syst Biol 12: 861. doi:10.15252/msb.20156520
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Liu C,
    2. Xu J,
    3. Chen Y,
    4. Guo X,
    5. Zheng Y,
    6. Wang Q,
    7. Chen Y,
    8. Ni Y,
    9. Zhu Y,
    10. Joyce BT, et al.
    (2015) Characterization of genome-wide H3K27ac profiles reveals a distinct PM2.5-associated histone modification signature. Environ Health 14: 65. doi:10.1186/s12940-015-0052-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Calderón-Garcidueñas L,
    2. Herrera-Soto A,
    3. Jury N,
    4. Maher BA,
    5. González-Maciel A,
    6. Reynoso-Robles R,
    7. Ruiz-Rudolph P,
    8. van Zundert B,
    9. Varela-Nallar L
    (2020) Reduced repressive epigenetic marks, increased DNA damage and Alzheimer’s disease hallmarks in the brain of humans and mice exposed to particulate urban air pollution. Environ Res 183: 109226. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109226
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    1. Barski A,
    2. Cuddapah S,
    3. Cui K,
    4. Roh T-Y,
    5. Schones DE,
    6. Wang Z,
    7. Wei G,
    8. Chepelev I,
    9. Zhao K
    (2007) High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129: 823–837. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. van de Lagemaat LN,
    2. Landry J-R,
    3. Mager DL,
    4. Medstrand P
    (2003) Transposable elements in mammals promote regulatory variation and diversification of genes with specialized functions. Trends Genet 19: 530–536. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2003.08.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Santourlidis S,
    2. Florl A,
    3. Ackermann R,
    4. Wirtz HC,
    5. Schulz WA
    (1999) High frequency of alterations in DNA methylation in adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Prostate 39: 166–174. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0045(19990515)39:3<166::aid-pros4>3.0.co;2-j
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Lin CH,
    2. Hsieh SY,
    3. Sheen IS,
    4. Lee WC,
    5. Chen TC,
    6. Shyu WC,
    7. Liaw YF
    (2001) Genome-wide hypomethylation in hepatocellular carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 61: 4238–4243.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Dante R,
    2. Dante-Paire J,
    3. Rigal D,
    4. Roizès G
    (1992) Methylation patterns of long interspersed repeated DNA and alphoid repetitive DNA from human cell lines and tumors. Anticancer Res 12: 559–563.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Teneng I,
    2. Montoya-Durango DE,
    3. Quertermous JL,
    4. Lacy ME,
    5. Ramos KS
    (2011) Reactivation of L1 retrotransposon by benzo(a)pyrene involves complex genetic and epigenetic regulation. Epigenetics 6: 355–367. doi:10.4161/epi.6.3.14282
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Sassaman DM,
    2. Dombroski BA,
    3. Moran JV,
    4. Kimberland ML,
    5. Naas TP,
    6. DeBerardinis RJ,
    7. Gabriel A,
    8. Swergold GD,
    9. Kazazian HH Jr..
    (1997) Many human L1 elements are capable of retrotransposition. Nat Genet 16: 37–43. doi:10.1038/ng0597-37
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Shukla R,
    2. Upton KR,
    3. Muñoz-Lopez M,
    4. Gerhardt DJ,
    5. Fisher ME,
    6. Nguyen T,
    7. Brennan PM,
    8. Baillie JK,
    9. Collino A,
    10. Ghisletti S, et al.
    (2013) Endogenous retrotransposition activates oncogenic pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell 153: 101–111. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.032
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Stewart-Morgan KR,
    2. Petryk N,
    3. Groth A
    (2020) Chromatin replication and epigenetic cell memory. Nat Cell Biol 22: 361–371. doi:10.1038/s41556-020-0487-y
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. Eroschenko VP
    (1982) Surface changes in oviduct, uterus and vaginal cells of neonatal mice after estradiol-17 beta and the insecticide chlordecone (Kepone) treatment: A scanning electron microscopic study. Biol Reprod 26: 707–720. doi:10.1095/biolreprod26.4.707
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Hammond B,
    2. Katzenellenbogen BS,
    3. Krauthammer N,
    4. McConnell J
    (1979) Estrogenic activity of the insecticide chlordecone (Kepone) and interaction with uterine estrogen receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76: 6641–6645. doi:10.1073/pnas.76.12.6641
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Cabidoche Y-M,
    2. Achard R,
    3. Cattan P,
    4. Clermont-Dauphin C,
    5. Massat F,
    6. Sansoulet J
    (2009) Long-term pollution by chlordecone of tropical volcanic soils in the French West Indies: A simple leaching model accounts for current residue. Environ Pollut 157: 1697–1705. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2008.12.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. ATSDR
    (2019) Toxicological profile for mirex and chlordecone 332. Draft for Public Comment.
  30. 30.↵
    1. Cohn WJ,
    2. Boylan JJ,
    3. Blanke RV,
    4. Fariss MW,
    5. Howell JR,
    6. Guzelian PS
    (1978) Treatment of chlordecone (Kepone) toxicity with cholestyramine. Results of a controlled clinical trial. N Engl J Med 298: 243–248. doi:10.1056/nejm197802022980504
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Multigner L,
    2. Kadhel P,
    3. Rouget F,
    4. Blanchet P,
    5. Cordier S
    (2016) Chlordecone exposure and adverse effects in French West Indies populations. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23: 3–8. doi:10.1007/s11356-015-4621-5
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    1. Boucher O,
    2. Simard M-N,
    3. Muckle G,
    4. Rouget F,
    5. Kadhel P,
    6. Bataille H,
    7. Chajès V,
    8. Dallaire R,
    9. Monfort C,
    10. Thomé J-P, et al.
    (2013) Exposure to an organochlorine pesticide (chlordecone) and development of 18-month-old infants. Neurotoxicology 35: 162–168. doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2013.01.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Costet N,
    2. Pelé F,
    3. Comets E,
    4. Rouget F,
    5. Monfort C,
    6. Bodeau-Livinec F,
    7. Linganiza EM,
    8. Bataille H,
    9. Kadhel P,
    10. Multigner L, et al.
    (2015) Perinatal exposure to chlordecone and infant growth. Environ Res 142: 123–134. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2015.06.023
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Multigner L,
    2. Ndong JR,
    3. Giusti A,
    4. Romana M,
    5. Delacroix-Maillard H,
    6. Cordier S,
    7. Jégou B,
    8. Thome JP,
    9. Blanchet P
    (2010) Chlordecone exposure and risk of prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 28: 3457–3462. doi:10.1200/jco.2009.27.2153
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Kirmizis A,
    2. Santos-Rosa H,
    3. Penkett CJ,
    4. Singer MA,
    5. Vermeulen M,
    6. Mann M,
    7. Bähler J,
    8. Green RD,
    9. Kouzarides T
    (2007) Arginine methylation at histone H3R2 controls deposition of H3K4 trimethylation. Nature 449: 928–932. doi:10.1038/nature06160
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Vermeulen M,
    2. Eberl HC,
    3. Matarese F,
    4. Marks H,
    5. Denissov S,
    6. Butter F,
    7. Lee KK,
    8. Olsen JV,
    9. Hyman AA,
    10. Stunnenberg HG, et al.
    (2010) Quantitative interaction proteomics and genome-wide profiling of epigenetic histone marks and their readers. Cell 142: 967–980. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.08.020
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Machanick P,
    2. Bailey TL
    (2011) MEME-ChIP: Motif analysis of large DNA datasets. Bioinformatics 27: 1696–1697. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr189
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Schoeftner S,
    2. Blasco MA
    (2009) A “higher order” of telomere regulation: Telomere heterochromatin and telomeric RNAs. EMBO J 28: 2323–2336. doi:10.1038/emboj.2009.197
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Victorelli S,
    2. Passos JF
    (2017) Telomeres and cell senescence-size matters not. EBioMedicine 21: 14–20. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.03.027
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Legoff L,
    2. D’Cruz SC,
    3. Lebosq M,
    4. Gely-Pernot A,
    5. Bouchekhchoukha K,
    6. Monfort C,
    7. Kernanec P-Y,
    8. Tevosian S,
    9. Multigner L,
    10. Smagulova F
    (2021) Developmental exposure to chlordecone induces transgenerational effects in somatic prostate tissue which are associated with epigenetic histone trimethylation changes. Environ Int 152: 106472. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2021.106472
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. 41.↵
    1. Kundakovic M,
    2. Gudsnuk K,
    3. Herbstman JB,
    4. Tang D,
    5. Perera FP,
    6. Champagne FA
    (2015) DNA methylation of BDNF as a biomarker of early-life adversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112: 6807–6813. doi:10.1073/pnas.1408355111
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Davies MN,
    2. Volta M,
    3. Pidsley R,
    4. Lunnon K,
    5. Dixit A,
    6. Lovestone S,
    7. Coarfa C,
    8. Harris RA,
    9. Milosavljevic A,
    10. Troakes C, et al.
    (2012) Functional annotation of the human brain methylome identifies tissue-specific epigenetic variation across brain and blood. Genome Biol 13: R43. doi:10.1186/gb-2012-13-6-r43
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Roy D,
    2. Palangat M,
    3. Chen CW,
    4. Thomas RD,
    5. Colerangle J,
    6. Atkinson A,
    7. Yan ZJ
    (1997) Biochemical and molecular changes at the cellular level in response to exposure to environmental estrogen-like chemicals. J Toxicol Environ Health 50: 1–29. doi:10.1080/009841097160573
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Chen C
    1. Bernstein C,
    2. Prasad AR,
    3. Nfonsam V,
    4. Bernstei H
    (2013) DNA damage, DNA repair and cancer. In New Research Directions in DNA Repair. Chen C (ed.). London: InTech. https://www.intechopen.com/books/new-research-directions-in-dna-repair/dna-damage-dna-repair-and-cancer
  45. 45.↵
    1. Andres JL,
    2. Fan S,
    3. Turkel GJ,
    4. Wang JA,
    5. Twu NF,
    6. Yuan RQ,
    7. Lamszus K,
    8. Goldberg ID,
    9. Rosen EM
    (1998) Regulation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 expression in human breast cancer cells by DNA-damaging agents. Oncogene 16: 2229–2241. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1201752
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Al-Wahiby S,
    2. Slijepcevic P
    (2005) Chromosomal aberrations involving telomeres in BRCA1 deficient human and mouse cell lines. Cytogenet Genome Res 109: 491–496. doi:10.1159/000084208
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Ballal RD,
    2. Saha T,
    3. Fan S,
    4. Haddad BR,
    5. Rosen EM
    (2009) BRCA1 localization to the telomere and its loss from the telomere in response to DNA damage. J Biol Chem 284: 36083–36098. doi:10.1074/jbc.m109.025825
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Chen K,
    2. Chen Z,
    3. Wu D,
    4. Zhang L,
    5. Lin X,
    6. Su J,
    7. Rodriguez B,
    8. Xi Y,
    9. Xia Z,
    10. Chen X, et al.
    (2015) Broad H3K4me3 is associated with increased transcription elongation and enhancer activity at tumor-suppressor genes. Nat Genet 47: 1149–1157. doi:10.1038/ng.3385
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Novera W,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Deng L-W
    (2017) MLL5 (KMT2E): Structure, function, and clinical relevance. Cell Mol Life Sci 74: 2333–2344. doi:10.1007/s00018-017-2470-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. 50.↵
    1. Scariano JK,
    2. Emery-Cohen AJ,
    3. Pickett GG,
    4. Morgan M,
    5. Simons PC,
    6. Alba F
    (2008) Estrogen receptors alpha (ESR1) and beta (ESR2) are expressed in circulating human lymphocytes. J Recept Signal Transduct Res 28: 285–293. doi:10.1080/10799890802084614
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Das B,
    2. Dobrowolski C,
    3. Luttge B,
    4. Valadkhan S,
    5. Chomont N,
    6. Johnston R,
    7. Bacchetti P,
    8. Hoh R,
    9. Gandhi M,
    10. Deeks SG, et al.
    (2018) Estrogen receptor-1 is a key regulator of HIV-1 latency that imparts gender-specific restrictions on the latent reservoir. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115: E7795–E7804. doi:10.1073/pnas.1803468115
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    1. Yeap BB,
    2. Hui J,
    3. Knuiman MW,
    4. Paul CSA,
    5. Ken KYH,
    6. Flicker L,
    7. Divitini ML,
    8. Arscott GM,
    9. Twigg SM,
    10. Almeida OP, et al.
    (2020) Associations of plasma IGF1, IGFBP3 and estradiol with leucocyte telomere length, a marker of biological age, in men. Eur J Endocrinol 182: 23–33. doi:10.1530/eje-19-0638
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. 53.↵
    1. Bayne S,
    2. Jones MEE,
    3. Li H,
    4. Liu J-P
    (2007) Potential roles for estrogen regulation of telomerase activity in aging. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1114: 48–55. doi:10.1196/annals.1396.023
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Calado RT,
    2. Yewdell WT,
    3. Wilkerson KL,
    4. Regal JA,
    5. Kajigaya S,
    6. Stratakis CA,
    7. Young NS
    (2009) Sex hormones, acting on the TERT gene, increase telomerase activity in human primary hematopoietic cells. Blood 114: 2236–2243. doi:10.1182/blood-2008-09-178871
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    1. Kyo S,
    2. Takakura M,
    3. Kanaya T,
    4. Zhuo W,
    5. Fujimoto K,
    6. Nishio Y,
    7. Orimo A,
    8. Inoue M
    (1999) Estrogen activates telomerase. Cancer Res 59: 5917–5921.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    1. Nanni S,
    2. Narducci M,
    3. Della Pietra L,
    4. Moretti F,
    5. Grasselli A,
    6. De Carli P,
    7. Sacchi A,
    8. Pontecorvi A,
    9. Farsetti A
    (2002) Signaling through estrogen receptors modulates telomerase activity in human prostate cancer. J Clin Invest 110: 219–227. doi:10.1172/jci0215552
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    1. Artandi SE,
    2. DePinho RA
    (2010) Telomeres and telomerase in cancer. Carcinogenesis 31: 9–18. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgp268
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    1. Yeap BB,
    2. Hui J,
    3. Knuiman MW,
    4. Handelsman DJ,
    5. Flicker L,
    6. Divitini ML,
    7. Arscott GM,
    8. McLennan SV,
    9. Twigg SM,
    10. Almeida OP, et al.
    (2019) Cross-sectional associations of sex hormones with leucocyte telomere length, a marker of biological age, in a community-based cohort of older men. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 90: 562–569. doi:10.1111/cen.13918
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  59. 59.↵
    1. Blasco MA
    (2007) Telomere length, stem cells and aging. Nat Chem Biol 3: 640–649. doi:10.1038/nchembio.2007.38
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    1. García-Cao M,
    2. O’Sullivan R,
    3. Peters AHFM,
    4. Jenuwein T,
    5. Blasco MA
    (2004) Epigenetic regulation of telomere length in mammalian cells by the Suv39h1 and Suv39h2 histone methyltransferases. Nat Genet 36: 94–99. doi:10.1038/ng1278
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. 61.↵
    1. Zeng S,
    2. Liu L,
    3. Sun Y,
    4. Xie P,
    5. Hu L,
    6. Yuan D,
    7. Chen D,
    8. Ouyang Q,
    9. Lin G,
    10. Lu G
    (2014) Telomerase-mediated telomere elongation from human blastocysts to embryonic stem cells. J Cell Sci 127: 752–762. doi:10.1242/jcs.131433
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. 62.↵
    1. Wong CYY,
    2. Lee BCH,
    3. Yuen KWY
    (2020) Epigenetic regulation of centromere function. Cell Mol Life Sci 77: 2899–2917. doi:10.1007/s00018-020-03460-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. 63.↵
    1. Hossain K,
    2. Suzuki T,
    3. Hasibuzzaman MM,
    4. Islam MS,
    5. Rahman A,
    6. Paul SK,
    7. Tanu T,
    8. Hossain S,
    9. Saud ZA,
    10. Rahman M, et al.
    (2017) Chronic exposure to arsenic, LINE-1 hypomethylation, and blood pressure: A cross-sectional study in Bangladesh. Environ Health 16: 20. doi:10.1186/s12940-017-0231-7
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  64. 64.↵
    1. Hossain MB,
    2. Vahter M,
    3. Concha G,
    4. Broberg K
    (2012) Low-level environmental cadmium exposure is associated with DNA hypomethylation in Argentinean women. Environ Health Perspect 120: 879–884. doi:10.1289/ehp.1104600
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. 65.↵
    1. Breton CV,
    2. Yao J,
    3. Millstein J,
    4. Gao L,
    5. Siegmund KD,
    6. Mack W,
    7. Whitfield-Maxwell L,
    8. Lurmann F,
    9. Hodis H,
    10. Avol E, et al.
    (2016) Prenatal air pollution exposures, DNA methyl transferase genotypes, and associations with newborn LINE1 and Alu methylation and childhood blood pressure and carotid intima-media thickness in the children’s health study. Environ Health Perspect 124: 1905–1912. doi:10.1289/ehp181
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. 66.↵
    1. O’Hagan HM,
    2. Wang W,
    3. Sen S,
    4. Destefano Shields C,
    5. Lee SS,
    6. Zhang YW,
    7. Clements EG,
    8. Cai Y,
    9. Van Neste L,
    10. Easwaran H, et al.
    (2011) Oxidative damage targets complexes containing DNA methyltransferases, SIRT1, and polycomb members to promoter CpG islands. Cancer Cell 20: 606–619. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2011.09.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. 67.↵
    1. Rodić N,
    2. Sharma R,
    3. Sharma R,
    4. Zampella J,
    5. Dai L,
    6. Taylor MS,
    7. Hruban RH,
    8. Iacobuzio-Donahue CA,
    9. Maitra A,
    10. Torbenson MS, et al.
    (2014) Long interspersed element-1 protein expression is a hallmark of many human cancers. Am J Pathol 184: 1280–1286. doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.01.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. 68.↵
    1. De Cecco M,
    2. Ito T,
    3. Petrashen AP,
    4. Elias AE,
    5. Skvir NJ,
    6. Criscione SW,
    7. Caligiana A,
    8. Brocculi G,
    9. Adney EM,
    10. Boeke JD, et al.
    (2019) L1 drives IFN in senescent cells and promotes age-associated inflammation. Nature 566: 73–78. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0784-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. 69.↵
    1. Kadhel P,
    2. Monfort C,
    3. Costet N,
    4. Rouget F,
    5. Thomé J-P,
    6. Multigner L,
    7. Cordier S
    (2014) Chlordecone exposure, length of gestation, and risk of preterm birth. Am J Epidemiol 179: 536–544. doi:10.1093/aje/kwt313
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. 70.↵
    1. Debier C,
    2. Pomeroy PP,
    3. Dupont C,
    4. Joiris C,
    5. Comblin V,
    6. Boulengé EL,
    7. Larondelle Y,
    8. Thome JP
    (2003) Dynamics of PCB transfer from mother to pup during lactation in UK grey seals Halichoerus grypus: Differences in PCB profile between compartments of transfer and changes during the lactation period. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 247: 249–256. doi:10.3354/meps247249
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  71. 71.↵
    1. Gely-Pernot A,
    2. Hao C,
    3. Becker E,
    4. Stuparevic I,
    5. Kervarrec C,
    6. C"alert_halmel F,
    7. Primig M,
    8. Jégou B,
    9. Smagulova F
    (2015) The epigenetic processes of meiosis in male mice are broadly affected by the widely used herbicide atrazine. BMC Genomics 16: 885. doi:10.1186/s12864-015-2095-y
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  72. 72.↵
    1. Bakulski KM,
    2. Feinberg JI,
    3. Andrews SV,
    4. Yang J,
    5. Brown S,
    6. McKenney SL,
    7. Witter F,
    8. Walston J,
    9. Feinberg AP,
    10. Fallin MD
    (2016) DNA methylation of cord blood cell types: Applications for mixed cell birth studies. Epigenetics 11: 354–362. doi:10.1080/15592294.2016.1161875
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  73. 73.↵
    1. Tanaka E,
    2. Bailey T,
    3. Grant CE,
    4. Noble WS,
    5. Keich U
    (2011) Improved similarity scores for comparing motifs. Bioinformatics 27: 1603–1609. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr257
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Life Science Alliance.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In utero exposure to chlordecone affects histone modifications and activates LINE-1 in cord blood
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Life Science Alliance
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Life Science Alliance web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Chlordecone alters histone modifications & LINE-1
Louis Legoff, Shereen Cynthia D’Cruz, Katia Bouchekhchoukha, Christine Monfort, Christian Jaulin, Luc Multigner, Fatima Smagulova
Life Science Alliance Apr 2021, 4 (6) e202000944; DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202000944

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Chlordecone alters histone modifications & LINE-1
Louis Legoff, Shereen Cynthia D’Cruz, Katia Bouchekhchoukha, Christine Monfort, Christian Jaulin, Luc Multigner, Fatima Smagulova
Life Science Alliance Apr 2021, 4 (6) e202000944; DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202000944
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
Issue Cover

In this Issue

Volume 4, No. 6
June 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Masthead (PDF)
Advertisement

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Data Availability
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • Metrics
  • Reviewer Comments
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Chromatin & Epigenetics
  • Development
  • Genomics & Functional Genomics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Apo-RopB represses speB transcription
  • UPF3A does not repress NMD in murine cells
  • Bats experience age-related hearing loss
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

EMBO Press LogoRockefeller University Press LogoCold Spring Harbor Logo

Content

  • Home
  • Newest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Guidelines
  • License, copyright, Fee

Other Services

  • Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • Editors & Staff
  • Reviewer Guidelines
  • Feedback
  • Licensing and Reuse
  • Privacy Policy

ISSN: 2575-1077
© 2023 Life Science Alliance LLC

Life Science Alliance is registered as a trademark in the U.S. Patent and Trade Mark Office and in the European Union Intellectual Property Office.