Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Methods & Resources
    • Archive
    • Subjects
  • Collections
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • License, Copyright, Fee
    • FAQ
    • Why Submit
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editors & Staff
    • Board Members
    • Licensing and Reuse
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • LSA LLC
  • Alerts
  • Other Publications
    • EMBO Press
    • The EMBO Journal
    • EMBO reports
    • EMBO Molecular Medicine
    • Molecular Systems Biology
    • Rockefeller University Press
    • Journal of Cell Biology
    • Journal of Experimental Medicine
    • Journal of General Physiology
    • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    • Genes & Development
    • Genome Research

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Life Science Alliance
  • Other Publications
    • EMBO Press
    • The EMBO Journal
    • EMBO reports
    • EMBO Molecular Medicine
    • Molecular Systems Biology
    • Rockefeller University Press
    • Journal of Cell Biology
    • Journal of Experimental Medicine
    • Journal of General Physiology
    • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    • Genes & Development
    • Genome Research
  • My alerts
Life Science Alliance

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Methods & Resources
    • Archive
    • Subjects
  • Collections
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • License, Copyright, Fee
    • FAQ
    • Why Submit
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editors & Staff
    • Board Members
    • Licensing and Reuse
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • LSA LLC
  • Alerts
  • Follow lsa Template on Twitter
Research Article
Source Data
Transparent Process
Open Access

In vitro education of human natural killer cells by KIR3DL1

View ORCID ProfileJason Pugh, Neda Nemat-Gorgani, View ORCID ProfileZakia Djaoud, Lisbeth A Guethlein, View ORCID ProfilePaul J Norman, View ORCID ProfilePeter Parham  Correspondence email
Jason Pugh
1Departments of Structural Biology and Microbiology & Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jason Pugh
Neda Nemat-Gorgani
1Departments of Structural Biology and Microbiology & Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zakia Djaoud
1Departments of Structural Biology and Microbiology & Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Zakia Djaoud
Lisbeth A Guethlein
1Departments of Structural Biology and Microbiology & Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul J Norman
2Division of Biomedical Informatics and Personalized Medicine, Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Paul J Norman
Peter Parham
1Departments of Structural Biology and Microbiology & Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Peter Parham
  • For correspondence: peropa@stanford.edu
Published 13 November 2019. DOI: 10.26508/lsa.201900434
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • Metrics
  • Reviewer Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1. General approach to in vitro NK cell education.

    In the training phase (left), NK cells isolated from either Bw4+ or Bw4− donors are co-cultured with training cells that express either Bw4+HLA-B (educating) or Bw4−HLA-B (control). Testing lines are pretreated with etoposide VP-16. In the testing phase (right), K562 cells, which lack HLA class I, are added. The missing-self response of KIR3DL1+ NK cells to the HLA− targets is then measured by IFNγ and/or degranulation assays using flow cytometry.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2. After 5 d of in vitro cell culture, NK cell education is detectable by IFNγ production but not degranulation.

    NK cells isolated from PBMCs were cultured in medium with rhIL-2 at the concentrations indicated. After 5 d, the K562 cells were added at a 10:1 E:T ratio, in medium with 500 U/ml rhIL-2 and anti-CD107a. 6 h later, the NK cells were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. Shown are the mean ± SD of three experiments combined totaling 21 Bw4− donors and 18 Bw4+ donors. (A) Frequency of IFNγ+ cells in the viable KIR3DL1+NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cell gate. Shown are the results of a t test. *P < 0.05. (B) Frequency of CD107a+ cells in the viable KIR3DL1+NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cell gate. Shown are the results of a t test. NS = not significant.

    Source data are available for this figure.

    Source Data for Figure 2[LSA-2019-00434_SdataF2.xlsx]

  • Figure S1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure S1. In vivo NK cell education after 1 d of cell culture, HLA expression on training lines, and an analysis of NK cells after the training phase.

    (A) NK cells from 10 Bw4− donors to 7 Bw4+ donors were isolated from PBMCs and cultured in media with 500 U/ml rhIL-2. 1 d later, K562 cells were added at a 10:1 E:T ratio in media with anti-CD107a. 6 h later, the NK cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Shown is the frequency of CD107a+ cells in the KIR3DL1+KIR2D−NKG2A− gate. Shown is the result of an unpaired t test. *P < 0.05. (B) Flow cytometry histogram of cell lines Bw4+BCL (blue) and Bw4−BCL (orange) stained with anti-HLA class I antibody clone W6/32. HLA− K562 cells (gray filled) shown for reference. (C) NK cells were isolated from the PBMCs of 16 Bw4− donors and co-cultured with either Bw4+BCL cells or Bw4−BCL cells, each pretreated with etoposide. Training occurred in medium with 500 U/ml rhIL-2 and bromodeoxyuridine (BrDU) to track cell division. After 5 d, the NK cells were stained with a panel of surface antibodies and assayed by flow cytometry. Shown is the percentage of living KIR3DL1+ NK cells. The results of a paired t test is shown. (C, D) NK cells treated as in (C), but the percentage of living KIR3DL1+ BrDU+ NK cells is shown. The results of a paired t test is shown. NS = not significant.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3. In vitro training of KIR3DL1+ cells with Bw4+BCL improves the missing-self response by IFNγ production but not degranulation.

    NK cells were isolated from the PBMCs of 17 Bw4− donors and six Bw4+ donors. NK cells were then co-cultured with either Bw4+BCL or Bw4−BCL at an 8:3 E:T ratio in medium with rhIL-2 at the concentrations indicated. After 5 d, K562 cells were added at a 10:1 E:T ratio, in medium with 500 U/ml rhIL-2 and anti-CD107a. 6 h later, NK cells were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. All panels are representative of at least three replicate experiments. Mean ± SD are shown. (A) Frequency of IFNγ+ cells in the viable KIR3DL1+NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cell gate. Shown are the results of a Sidak’s multiple comparison test from paired two-way ANOVAs. **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05. (B) Frequency of CD107a+ cells in the viable KIR3DL1+NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cell gate. Shown are the results of a Sidak’s multiple comparison test from a paired two-way ANOVA. NS = not significant.

    Source data are available for this figure.

    Source Data for Figure 3[LSA-2019-00434_SdataF3.xlsx]

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4. In vitro training with Bw4+BCL and rhIL-12 maximizes the missing-self response of KIR3DL1+ NK cells.

    For (A, B, C, D), NK cells were isolated from the PBMCs of 17 Bw4− donors and six Bw4+ donors. NK cells were then co-cultured with either Bw4+BCL or Bw4−BCL at an 8:3 E:T ratio in medium with 500 U/ml rhIL-2 and 50 ng/ml rhIL-12. After 5 d, K562 cells were added at a 10:1 E:T ratio, in medium with 500 U/ml rhIL-2 and anti-CD107a. 6 h later, NK cells were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. (A, B, C, D) are representative of at least three replicate experiments. Mean ± SD are shown. (A) Frequency of IFNγ+ cells in the viable KIR3DL1+NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cell gate. Shown are the results of a Sidak’s multiple comparison test from a paired two-way ANOVA. (B) Frequency of CD107a+ cells in the viable KIR3DL1+NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cell gate. Shown are the results of a Sidak’s multiple comparison test from a paired two-way ANOVA. *P < 0.05. (C) Frequency of IFNγ+CD107a+ cells in the viable KIR3DL1+NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cell gate. Shown are the results of a Sidak’s multiple comparison test from a paired two-way ANOVA. **P < 0.01. (D) Frequency of IFNγ+CD107a+ cells in the viable KIR3DL1+NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cell gate divided by the frequency of IFNγ+CD107a+ cells in the viable KIR3DL1−KIR2D+NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cell gate. Shown are the results of a Sidak’s multiple comparison test from a paired two-way ANOVA. *P < 0.05. (E) MRC-5 cells were either co-cultured alone or with human CMV for 4 d. MRC-5 cells were then isolated and stained with anti-Bw4+HLA-B antibody and analyzed by flow cytometry. Viable MRC-5 cells are shown. (F) NK cells isolated from PBMCs were co-cultured with either Bw4+BCL or Bw4−BCL at an 8:3 E:T ratio. After 5 d, CMV-infected MRC-5 cells were added at a 10:1 E:T ratio. 6 h later, the NK cells were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. Shown are the combined results of two experiments, representing three replicate experiments. The frequency of IFNγ+CD107a+ cells in the viable KIR3DL1+NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cell gate are shown. Shown are the results of a Sidak’s multiple comparison test from a paired two-way ANOVA. NS = not significant. *P < 0.05.

    Source data are available for this figure.

    Source Data for Figure 4[LSA-2019-00434_SdataF4.xlsx]

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5. The increased missing-self response of NK cells trained with Bw4+BCL is dependent on the binding of KIR3DL1 to HLA.

    (A) Y-axis: AB&EF was assigned to each of 13 donors based on published KIR3DL1-HLA-B binding data (Boudreau et al, 2016), the HLA-B genotypes of Bw4+BCL, and the surface KIR3DL1 expression for each donor’s NK cells as measured by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). X-axis: Difference between Bw4+BCL and Bw4−BCL training in the frequency of IFNγ+CD107a+ cells responding to missing-self, as presented in Fig 4D. Shown is the linear regression with the significance of non-zero slope and the goodness of fit calculation. These data are representative of at least three replicate experiments. (B) Bw4+BCL and Bw4−BCL were treated with F(ab′)2, fragments of the anti-HLA antibody W6/32. NK cells were isolated from PBMCs and co-cultured with either treated or untreated Bw4+BCL or Bw4−BCL. Cells were co-cultured at an 8:3 E:T ratio in medium with 500 U/ml rhIL-2 and 50 ng/ml rhIL-12. After 5 d, K562 cells were added at a 10:1 E:T ratio. 6 h later, the NK cells were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. Shown is the frequency of IFNγ+CD107a+ cells in the viable KIR3DL1+NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cell gate. Shown are the combined results of two experiments comprising 11 Bw4− donors and 7 Bw4+ donors. These results represent at least three replicate experiments. Shown are mean ± SD and the results of a Sidak’s multiple comparison test from a paired two-way ANOVA. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. (C) NK cells were isolated from PBMCs and co-cultured with 721.221 cells transfected to express either HLA-B*58:01 (Bw4+) or B*08:01 (Bw4−). The cells were co-cultured at an 8:3 E:T ratio in medium with 500 U/ml rhIL-2. After 3 d, the K562 cells were added at a 10:1 E:T ratio. 6 h later, the NK cells were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. The frequency of IFNγ+ cells in the KIR3DL1+ gate is shown. Shown are combined data from two experiments comprising six Bw4− donors and nine Bw4+ donors. These data represent at least three replicate experiments. Shown are mean ± SD and the results of a Sidak’s multiple comparison tests from a paired two-way ANOVA. *P < 0.05. (D) 721.221 cells were transfected to express HLA-B*51:01 mutated to either abolish the Bw4 epitope (L82R, Bw4−), or leave it intact (I80N, Bw4+). The NK cells were isolated from PBMCs and co-cultured with either Bw4+I80N or Bw4−L82R in medium with 500 U/ml rhIL-2. 6 h later, the NK cells were stained with antibodies and analyzed by flow cytometry. The frequency of IFNγ+ cells in the KIR3DL1+ gate is shown. Shown are mean ± SD and the results of a t test. **P < 0.01. (E) NK cells were isolated from PBMC and co-cultured with 721.221 cells transfected to express HLA-B*51:01 with either the I80N (Bw4+) or L82R (Bw4−) mutation. Cells were co-cultured at an 8:3 E:T ratio in medium with 500 U/ml rhIL-2. Additional isolated NK cells were cultured alone in medium with 500 U/ml rhIL-2 (No training). After 3 d, K562 cells were added to co-cultures at a 10:1 E:T ratio, except for a portion of the NK cells cultured alone, which received only medium (No training or targets). 6 h later, NK cells were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. The frequency of IFNγ+ cells in the KIR3DL1+NKG2A− gate is shown. Shown are the combined data comprising 20 Bw4− donors and 8 Bw4+ donors from two experiments. These data represent at least three replicate experiments. Shown are mean ± SD and the results of a Sidak’s multiple comparison tests from a paired two-way ANOVA. NS = not significant. *P < 0.05.

    Source data are available for this figure.

    Source Data for Figure 5[LSA-2019-00434_SdataF5.xlsx]

  • Figure S2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure S2. A verification of F(ab′)2 efficacy, Bw4 expression on beads and mutated cell lines, and the results of NK cell training without etoposide treatment.

    (A) Bw4+BCL cells, 221-B*58:01 cells, or K562 cells were each stained with W6/32 F(ab′)2 or left unstained for 30 min at either 37°C or 4°C. The cells were washed three times and then stained with fluorescently conjugated W6/32 antibody (anti-HLA class I) and assayed by flow cytometry. (B) Flow cytometry histograms of mutant HLA-B*51 cell lines. B*51-L82R cells and B*51-I80N were either stained with anti-HLA W6/32 (left panel) or anti-Bw4 epitope antibody (right panel), or left unstained, and assayed by flow cytometry. Dotted line = stained B*51-I80N. Red line = stained B*51-L82R. Green line = unstained B*51-I80N. Orange line = unstained B*51-L82R. (C) NK cells from nine Bw4− donors to five Bw4+ donors were co-cultured with either B*51-L82R or B*51-I80N, neither of which were treated with etoposide. After 3 d, the K562 cells were added to each co-culture at a 10:1 E:T ratio. After 6 h, the IFNγ response of KIR3DL1+ NK cells was assayed by flow cytometry. (D) NK cells were isolated from the PBMCs of 17 Bw4− donors and six Bw4+ donors. NK cells were then co-cultured with either Bw4+BCL or Bw4−BCL at an 8:3 E:T ratio in media with 500 U/ml rhIL-2. After 5 d, the NK cells were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. Shown is the granzyme B expression as measured by MFI of cells in the living KIR3DL1+NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cell gate. Shown are mean ± SD and the results of a Sidak’s multiple comparison test from a paired two-way ANOVA. (E) Anti-CD2-DNAM1 beads were co-cultured for 24 h with NK cells from a Bw4+ donor or a Bw4− donor. Beads were then magnetically isolated from the co-cultures, stained with anti-Bw4 antibody, and assayed by flow cytometry. NS = not significant.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6. Training NK cells from Bw4− donors with Bw4+BCL improves their missing-self response to multiple rounds of HLA− cells, and increases their expression of granzyme B.

    (A) NK cells were isolated from the PBMCs of 13 Bw4− donors and six Bw4+ donors. Two replicate groups of NK cells were then co-cultured with Bw4+BCL and one group with Bw4−BCL, at an 8:3 E:T ratio in medium with 500 U/ml rhIL-2. After 5 d, K562 cells were added at a 10:1 E:T ratio (first testing). 6 h later, NK cells from co-cultures with Bw4−BCL and one of the Bw4+BCL co-cultures were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. The other Bw4+BCL co-culture was rested for 24 h, after which more K562 cells were added at a 10:1 E:T ratio (second testing). 6 h later, NK cells were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. The frequency of IFNγ+ cells in the viable KIR3DL1+NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cell gate is shown. These data represent at least three replicate experiments. Shown are mean ± SD and the results of a Sidak’s multiple comparison tests from a paired two-way ANOVA. *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001. (B) NK cells were isolated from the PBMCs of five Bw4− donors and co-cultured with either Bw4+BCL or Bw4−BCL at an 8:3 E:T ratio in medium with 500 U/ml rhIL-2 (day 1). On days 5, 7, and 9, K562 cells were added at a 10:1 E:T ratio in medium with 500 U/ml rhIL-2. 6 h after adding K562 cells on day 9, NK cells were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. The frequency of IFNγ+ cells in the viable KIR3DL1+NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cell gate is shown. Shown are mean ± SD and the results of a paired t test. *P < 0.05. (C, D) NK cells were isolated from the PBMCs of four Bw4− donors and four Bw4+ donors. NK cells were then co-cultured with either Bw4+BCL or Bw4−BCL at an 8:3 E:T ratio in medium with 500 U/ml rhIL-2. After 5 d, K562 cells were added at a 10:1 E:T ratio, in medium with 500 U/ml rhIL-2. Two days later, the NK cells were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. (C) Shown is a histogram of granzyme B expression of cells in the viable KIR3DL1+NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cell gate, obtained from concatenated flow cytometry data files for all eight donors. (D) Shown is the ratio between the granzyme B MFI for cells in the KIR3DL1+NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cell gate and the cells in the KIR2D+KIR3DL1−NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cell gate. Shown are mean ± SD and the results of a Sidak’s multiple comparison tests from a paired two-way ANOVA. *P < 0.05. (E, F) NK cells were isolated from PBMCs and co-cultured with 721.221 cells transfected to express HLA-B*51:01 with either the I80N (Bw4+) or L82R (Bw4−) mutation. The cells were co-cultured at an 8:3 E:T ratio in medium with 500 U/ml rhIL-2. After 5 d, K562 cells were added at a 10:1 E:T ratio. After 2 more days, NK cells were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. (E) Shown is a histogram of granzyme B expression for viable cells in either the KIR3DL1+NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cell gate or the KIR3DL1−NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cells gate. These data were obtained from concatenated flow cytometry data files from seven Bw4− donors to five Bw4+ donors. (F) Shown is the granzyme B expression as measured by MFI of cells in the viable KIR3DL1+NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cell gate. These data were obtained from 18 Bw4− donors to 13 Bw4+ donors from three replicate experiments. Shown are mean ± SD and the results of a Sidak’s multiple comparison tests from a paired two-way ANOVA. NS = not significant. *P < 0.05.

    Source data are available for this figure.

    Source Data for Figure 6[LSA-2019-00434_SdataF6.xlsx]

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7. Synthetic beads displaying Bw4+HLA-B are sufficient to educate KIR3DL1+ NK cells in vitro.

    (A) Biotinylated antibodies against CD2 and DNAM1 were bound to streptavidin-coated paramagnetic beads and co-cultured with NK cells isolated from PBMC for 2 d in medium with 500 U/ml rhIL-2. The beads were separated with a magnet, stained with anti-HLA class I, and analyzed by light and fluorescent microscopy. (B) NK cells were co-cultured for 2 d with paramagnetic beads coated with either anti-DNAM1, anti-CD2, or both anti-DNAM1 and anti-CD2 antibodies. Co-cultures occurred in medium with 500 U/ml rhIL-2. Beads were isolated with a magnet, stained with anti-HLA class I and Alexa Fluor 700–labeled streptavidin, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Shown is the HLA signal of particles in the streptavidin+ gate, which excludes all cells. Representative of at least three replicate experiments. (C) Two sets of reverse-trogocytosed beads were constructed by co-culturing beads coated with anti-DNAM1 and anti-CD2 antibodies with NK cells from either Bw4+ or Bw4− donors. This produced beads coated in NK cell-derived membranes displaying Bw4+ or Bw4− HLA-B. Beads were then isolated with a magnet, washed, and co-cultured with NK cells isolated from either Bw4+ or Bw4− donors. Co-cultures occurred in medium with 500 U/ml rhIL-2. After 7 d, NK cells were separated from the beads with a magnet and combined with K562 cells at a 10:1 E:T ratio. 6 h later, the NK cells were stained with antibodies and analyzed by flow cytometry. Shown is combined data comprising nine Bw4− donors and five Bw4+ donors from three replicate experiments. Shown are mean ± SD and the results of a Sidak’s multiple comparison tests from a paired two-way ANOVA. NS = not significant. *P < 0.05.

    Source data are available for this figure.

    Source Data for Figure 7[LSA-2019-00434_SdataF7.xlsx]

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Results of in vitro training with Bw4 on the missing-self response of KIR3DL1+ NK cells.

    Donor AllotypeBw4−% Change (IFNγ)% Change (CD107a)Bw4+% Change (IFNγ)% Change (CD107a)
    Training Cell AllotypeBw4−Bw4+Bw4−Bw4+
    Type of Response to K562IFNγ+ (%)CD107a+ (%)IFNγ+ (%)CD107a+ (%)IFNγ+ (%)CD107a+ (%)IFNγ+ (%)CD107a+ (%)
    Training conditionsLow IL210.522.414.522.938.1**2.26.920.711.619.168.1**−7.7
    High IL214.819.819.718.733.1**−5.611.915.922.014.884.8*−6.9
    • NK cells were co-cultured with either Bw4+BCL or Bw4−BCL in medium with either 100 U/ml rhIL-2 or 500 U/ml rhIL-2. After 5 d, K562 cells were added at a 10:1 E:T ratio, in medium with 500 U/ml rhIL-2 and anti-CD107a. 6 h later, the NK cells were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. Combined data from three experiments, totaling 25 Bw4− donors and 20 Bw4+ donors, are shown. The frequency of either CD107a+ or IFNγ+ NK cells in the viable KIR3DL1+NKG2A−LILRB1− NK cell gate is shown. Percent change was calculated as: ([Bw4+ training − Bw4− training]/Bw4− training). Bold type indicates a significant statistical result as assessed by Sidak’s multiple comparison test from paired two-way ANOVAs. Asterisks denote the degree of significance: **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Life Science Alliance.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In vitro education of human natural killer cells by KIR3DL1
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Life Science Alliance
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Life Science Alliance web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
In vitro education of human natural killer cells by KIR3DL1
Jason Pugh, Neda Nemat-Gorgani, Zakia Djaoud, Lisbeth A Guethlein, Paul J Norman, Peter Parham
Life Science Alliance Nov 2019, 2 (6) e201900434; DOI: 10.26508/lsa.201900434

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
In vitro education of human natural killer cells by KIR3DL1
Jason Pugh, Neda Nemat-Gorgani, Zakia Djaoud, Lisbeth A Guethlein, Paul J Norman, Peter Parham
Life Science Alliance Nov 2019, 2 (6) e201900434; DOI: 10.26508/lsa.201900434
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
Issue Cover

In this Issue

Volume 2, No. 6
December 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Masthead (PDF)
Advertisement

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • Metrics
  • Reviewer Comments
  • PDF

EMBO Press LogoRockefeller University Press LogoCold Spring Harbor Logo

Content

  • Home
  • Newest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Guidelines
  • License, copyright, Fee

Other Services

  • Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • Editors & Staff
  • Reviewer Guidelines
  • Feedback
  • Licensing and Reuse
  • Privacy Policy

ISSN: 2575-1077
© 2022 Life Science Alliance LLC

Life Science Alliance is registered as a trademark in the U.S. Patent and Trade Mark Office and in the European Union Intellectual Property Office.