Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Methods & Resources
    • Archive
    • Subjects
  • Collections
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • License, Copyright, Fee
    • FAQ
    • Why Submit
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editors & Staff
    • Board Members
    • Licensing and Reuse
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • LSA LLC
  • Alerts
  • Other Publications
    • EMBO Press
    • The EMBO Journal
    • EMBO reports
    • EMBO Molecular Medicine
    • Molecular Systems Biology
    • Rockefeller University Press
    • Journal of Cell Biology
    • Journal of Experimental Medicine
    • Journal of General Physiology
    • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    • Genes & Development
    • Genome Research

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Life Science Alliance
  • Other Publications
    • EMBO Press
    • The EMBO Journal
    • EMBO reports
    • EMBO Molecular Medicine
    • Molecular Systems Biology
    • Rockefeller University Press
    • Journal of Cell Biology
    • Journal of Experimental Medicine
    • Journal of General Physiology
    • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    • Genes & Development
    • Genome Research
  • My alerts
Life Science Alliance

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Methods & Resources
    • Archive
    • Subjects
  • Collections
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • License, Copyright, Fee
    • FAQ
    • Why Submit
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editors & Staff
    • Board Members
    • Licensing and Reuse
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • LSA LLC
  • Alerts
  • Follow lsa Template on Twitter
Research Article
Transparent Process
Open Access

d-amino acid oxidase promotes cellular senescence via the production of reactive oxygen species

Taiki Nagano, Shunsuke Yamao, Anju Terachi, Hidetora Yarimizu, Haruki Itoh, Ryoko Katasho, Kosuke Kawai, Akio Nakashima, Tetsushi Iwasaki, Ushio Kikkawa, View ORCID ProfileShinji Kamada  Correspondence email
Taiki Nagano
1Biosignal Research Center, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
2Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shunsuke Yamao
2Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anju Terachi
2Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hidetora Yarimizu
2Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Haruki Itoh
2Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryoko Katasho
3Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kosuke Kawai
2Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Akio Nakashima
1Biosignal Research Center, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
4Department of Bioresource Science, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tetsushi Iwasaki
1Biosignal Research Center, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
2Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
3Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ushio Kikkawa
1Biosignal Research Center, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
4Department of Bioresource Science, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shinji Kamada
1Biosignal Research Center, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
2Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
3Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Shinji Kamada
  • For correspondence: skamada@kobe-u.ac.jp
Published 18 January 2019. DOI: 10.26508/lsa.201800045
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • Metrics
  • Reviewer Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1. Knockdown of DAO inhibits DNA damage–induced senescence.

    (A) U2OS cells transfected with siRNAs for DAO (DAO-1 and DAO-2) were treated with 2 μM etoposide for 7 d, and the expression levels of DAO were determined by qPCR. (B) HepG2 cells transfected with siRNAs for DAO (DAO-1 and DAO-2) were treated with 10 μM etoposide for 48 h, and the expression levels of DAO were determined by immunoblot analysis. (C, D) U2OS (C) and HepG2 (D) cells depleted of DAO were treated with 2 and 10 μM etoposide for 7 d and 48 h, respectively, and subjected to SA-β-gal staining. The percentage of SA-β-gal–positive cells (C left panel, D) and representative microscopic images (C right panel) are shown. Bars, 50 μm. (E) U2OS cells depleted of DAO were treated with 2 μM etoposide for 7 d and subjected to colony-formation assay. Relative proliferation rate (upper panel) and representative images (lower panel) are shown. (F) U2OS cells treated as in (E) but for 2 d instead of 7 d were subjected to immunoblot analysis. The protein levels relative to the γ-tubulin levels were quantified using NIH ImageJ software and are indicated at the bottom of each lane. Data are mean ± SD (n = 3 except in (A) where n = 2 independent experiments). Statistical significance is shown using the t test analysis; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2. Pharmacological inhibition of DAO impairs DNA damage– and oncogene-induced senescence.

    (A–D) U2OS (A, C) and HepG2 (B, D) cells treated with etoposide in the presence of 50 or 100 μM CBIO were subjected to SA-β-gal staining (A, B) and colony-formation assay (C, D). (E, F) U2OS (E) and HepG2 (F) cells were treated with 2 and 10 μM etoposide, respectively, for 2 d in the presence of 50 μM CBIO, and the expression levels of the indicated proteins were determined by immunoblot analysis. The protein levels relative to the γ-tubulin levels, except for the phosphorylated p53 (p53 pS15), which was normalized to the total p53 levels, were quantified using NIH ImageJ software and are indicated at the bottom of each lane. (G, H) Hs68 cells treated with 0.5 μM etoposide for 7 d in the presence of 50 μM CBIO were subjected to SA-β-gal staining (G) and EdU incorporation assay (H). The percentage of EdU-positive cells (H, left panel) and representative microscopic images (H right panel) are shown. Bars, 50 μm. (I) Hs68 cells treated with 0.5 μM etoposide for 2 d in the presence of 50 μM CBIO were subjected to immunoblot analysis. The protein levels were quantified as in (E, F). (J) WI-38 cells were transfected with pcDNA3-HA containing oncogenic RasG12V, and the protein expression of RasG12V was confirmed by immunoblot analysis. (K, L) WI-38 cells transfected as in (J) were selected with 300 μg/ml G418 and treated with 50 μM CBIO. After incubation for 8 d, the cells were subjected to SA-β-gal staining (K) and EdU incorporation assay (L). Data are mean ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical significance is shown using the t test analysis; **P < 0.01.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3. Ectopic expression of wt-DAO, but not the inactive mutant, promotes senescence.

    (A) U2OS cells were transfected with pcDNA3-HA containing wt- and R199W-DAO, and the protein expression of DAO was confirmed by immunoblot analysis. (B, C) U2OS cells transfected as in (A) were selected with 800 μg/ml G418 and treated with 2 μM etoposide. After incubation for 7 d, the cells were subjected to SA-β-gal staining (B) and EdU incorporation assay (C). Data are mean ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical significance is shown using the t test analysis; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4. d-arginine and d-serine enhances the senescence-promoting effect of DAO.

    (A, B) U2OS cells were transfected with pcDNA3-HA containing wt-DAO, selected with 800 μg/ml G418, and treated with each of seven d-amino acids at 5 mM (except for d-tyrosine which was used at 2.5 mM) in the presence of 2 μM etoposide as indicated. After incubation for 7 d, the cells were subjected to SA-β-gal staining (A) and EdU incorporation assay (B). (C, D) U2OS cells were transfected as in (A, B) in the presence of d-arginine, d-serine, l-arginine, or l-serine at 5 mM for 7 d and subjected to SA-β-gal staining (C) and EdU incorporation assay (D). Data are mean ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical significance is shown using the t test analysis; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5. Riboflavin treatment activates the DAO activity in the absence of DNA damage.

    (A) U2OS cells transfected with siRNA for RFVT1 were treated with 2 μM etoposide for 7 d, and the expression levels of RFVT1 were determined by qPCR. (B) U2OS cells depleted of RFVT1 were treated with 2 μM etoposide for 7 d and subjected to FAD quantification. The concentrations of FAD per mg protein of the cells are shown. (C, D) U2OS cells were transfected with pcDNA3-HA containing wt-DAO, selected with 800 μg/ml G418, and treated with 50 μM riboflavin and 5 mM d-serine in the presence of 2 μM etoposide as indicated. After incubation for 7 d, the cells were subjected to SA-β-gal staining (C) and EdU incorporation assay (D). (E) U2OS cells were treated as in (C, D), and the expression levels of IL-6 were determined by qPCR. (F) U2OS cells overexpressing DAO were treated with 50 μM riboflavin and 5 mM d-serine for 7 d and subjected to immunostaining for 53BP1, HA, and Hoechst staining. Representative microscopic images (left) and box plots of the number of 53BP1 foci in HA-DAO–expressing cells (right) are shown. The upper and lower limits of the boxes and the lines across the boxes indicate the 75th and 25th percentiles and the median, respectively. Error bars (whiskers) indicate the 90th and 10th percentiles, respectively. Statistical significance (P-value) is shown using the t test analysis (n = 50 cells). Data are mean ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical significance is shown using the t test analysis; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and n.s.: not significant (P > 0.05).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6. DAO enhances DNA damage–induced ROS accumulation, cooperating with PRODH.

    (A) U2OS cells transfected with siRNAs for DAO (DAO-1 and DAO-2) were treated with 2 μM etoposide for 2 d, and the ROS level was measured. (B, C) U2OS (B) and HepG2 (C) cells treated with 2 and 10 μM etoposide, respectively, for 2 d in the presence of 50 μM CBIO were subjected to ROS assay. (D) U2OS cells transfected with pcDNA3-HA-DAO and treated with 2 μM etoposide were subjected to ROS assay. (E, F) U2OS cells overexpressing DAO were treated with etoposide in the presence of 1 mM NAC for 7 d and subjected to SA-β-gal staining (E) and EdU incorporation assay (F). (G) U2OS cells treated as in (E, F) but for 2 d instead of 7 d were subjected to immunoblot analysis. The protein levels relative to the γ-tubulin levels were quantified using NIH ImageJ software and are indicated at the bottom of each lane. (H, I) U2OS cells treated with etoposide in combination with 50 μM CBIO and 1 mM NAC as indicated for 7 d were subjected to SA-β-gal staining (H) and EdU incorporation assay (I). (J) U2OS cells treated as in (H, I) but for 2 d instead of 7 d were subjected to immunoblot analysis. The protein levels were quantified as in (G). (K, L) U2OS cells treated as in (H, I) but 5 mM THFA instead of NAC were subjected to SA-β-gal staining (K) and EdU incorporation assay (L). (M) U2OS cells treated as in (K, L) but for 2 d instead of 7 d were subjected to immunoblot analysis. The protein levels were quantified as in (G). (N, O) Hs68 cells treated as in (K, L) were subjected to SA-β-gal staining (N) and EdU incorporation assay (O). (P) Hs68 cells treated as in (N, O) but for 2 d instead of 7 d were subjected to immunoblot analysis. The protein levels were quantified as in (G). Data are mean ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical significance is shown using the t test analysis; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and n.s. = not significant (P > 0.05).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Concentrations of free d-/l-amino acids in HepG2 cells treated with 10 μM etoposide for 48 h.

    FormConcentration (μM)Ratio (Etoposide/DMSO)
    DMSOEtoposide
    AladN/DN/D—
    l7791101521.30
    Argd1001301.3
    l1201601.33
    AspdTraceTrace—
    l62410061.61
    PhedN/DN/D—
    l3284371.33
    ProdN/DN/D—
    l203324391.20
    SerdTraceTrace—
    l231230681.33
    TyrdN/DN/D—
    l3805701.5
    • N/D, not detected; trace, detected but below limit of quantification.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Life Science Alliance.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
d-amino acid oxidase promotes cellular senescence via the production of reactive oxygen species
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Life Science Alliance
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Life Science Alliance web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
DAO hastens senescence by ROS production
Taiki Nagano, Shunsuke Yamao, Anju Terachi, Hidetora Yarimizu, Haruki Itoh, Ryoko Katasho, Kosuke Kawai, Akio Nakashima, Tetsushi Iwasaki, Ushio Kikkawa, Shinji Kamada
Life Science Alliance Jan 2019, 2 (1) e201800045; DOI: 10.26508/lsa.201800045

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
DAO hastens senescence by ROS production
Taiki Nagano, Shunsuke Yamao, Anju Terachi, Hidetora Yarimizu, Haruki Itoh, Ryoko Katasho, Kosuke Kawai, Akio Nakashima, Tetsushi Iwasaki, Ushio Kikkawa, Shinji Kamada
Life Science Alliance Jan 2019, 2 (1) e201800045; DOI: 10.26508/lsa.201800045
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
Issue Cover

In this Issue

Volume 2, No. 1
February 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Masthead (PDF)
Advertisement

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • Metrics
  • Reviewer Comments
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Aging

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Neutrophils delay repair in Wallerian degeneration
  • Vacuoles drive nuclear and rDNA morphology
  • Cdh5-lineage–independent origin of dermal lymphatics
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

EMBO Press LogoRockefeller University Press LogoCold Spring Harbor Logo

Content

  • Home
  • Newest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Guidelines
  • License, copyright, Fee

Other Services

  • Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • Editors & Staff
  • Reviewer Guidelines
  • Feedback
  • Licensing and Reuse
  • Privacy Policy

ISSN: 2575-1077
© 2022 Life Science Alliance LLC

Life Science Alliance is registered as a trademark in the U.S. Patent and Trade Mark Office and in the European Union Intellectual Property Office.