Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Methods & Resources
    • Archive
    • Subjects
  • Collections
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • License, Copyright, Fee
    • FAQ
    • Why Submit
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editors & Staff
    • Board Members
    • Licensing and Reuse
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • LSA LLC
  • Alerts
  • Other Publications
    • EMBO Press
    • The EMBO Journal
    • EMBO reports
    • EMBO Molecular Medicine
    • Molecular Systems Biology
    • Rockefeller University Press
    • Journal of Cell Biology
    • Journal of Experimental Medicine
    • Journal of General Physiology
    • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    • Genes & Development
    • Genome Research

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Life Science Alliance
  • Other Publications
    • EMBO Press
    • The EMBO Journal
    • EMBO reports
    • EMBO Molecular Medicine
    • Molecular Systems Biology
    • Rockefeller University Press
    • Journal of Cell Biology
    • Journal of Experimental Medicine
    • Journal of General Physiology
    • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    • Genes & Development
    • Genome Research
  • My alerts
Life Science Alliance

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Methods & Resources
    • Archive
    • Subjects
  • Collections
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • License, Copyright, Fee
    • FAQ
    • Why Submit
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editors & Staff
    • Board Members
    • Licensing and Reuse
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • LSA LLC
  • Alerts
  • Follow lsa Template on Twitter
Research Article
Transparent Process
Open Access

RNase E cleavage shapes the transcriptome of Rhodobacter sphaeroides and strongly impacts phototrophic growth

View ORCID ProfileKonrad U Förstner  Correspondence email, View ORCID ProfileCarina M Reuscher, Kerstin Haberzettl, Lennart Weber, View ORCID ProfileGabriele Klug  Correspondence email
Konrad U Förstner
1German National Library of Medicine—Information Center for Life Sciences, Cologne, Germany
2Technical University of Cologne, Faculty for Information and Communication Sciences, Cologne, Germany
3Core Unit Systems Medicine, Institutes of Molecular Infection Biology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Konrad U Förstner
  • For correspondence: konrad.foerstner@uni-wuerzburg.de
Carina M Reuscher
4Institut für Mikrobiologie und Molekularbiologie, Interdisciplinary Research Center for Biosystems, Universität Giessen, Giessen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Carina M Reuscher
Kerstin Haberzettl
4Institut für Mikrobiologie und Molekularbiologie, Interdisciplinary Research Center for Biosystems, Universität Giessen, Giessen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lennart Weber
4Institut für Mikrobiologie und Molekularbiologie, Interdisciplinary Research Center for Biosystems, Universität Giessen, Giessen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gabriele Klug
4Institut für Mikrobiologie und Molekularbiologie, Interdisciplinary Research Center for Biosystems, Universität Giessen, Giessen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gabriele Klug
  • For correspondence: gabriele.klug@mikro.bio.uni-giessen.de
Published 1 August 2018. DOI: 10.26508/lsa.201800080
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • Metrics
  • Reviewer Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Supplementary Materials
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1. Generation of stable 5′ ends in wild type and 2.4.1rneE. coli(ts) strains of R. sphaeroides.

    (A) Internal cleavage by RNase E. The ends of primary transcripts are protected from degradation by a triphosphate at their 5′ end and by secondary structures (often terminators) at their 3′ end. Internal cleavage of RNase E generates an unprotected 3′ end, which allows rapid degradation by 3′–5′ exoribonucleases. The new monophosphorylated 5′ end is a new target for RNase E. The 5′ end stemming from RNase E cleavage is accumulated in the wild type at the nonpermissive temperature. (B) 5′ end–dependent degradation by RNase E. RNase E can bind to monophosphorylated 5′ ends if a stretch of unpaired nt is present and will subsequently introduce cleavages in an overall 5′–3′ direction. The 5′ monophosphate ends can stem from previous RNase E cleavage, from cleavage by other endoribonucleases, or by the action of a pyrophosphohydrolase. The 5′ monophosphate end is enriched in the rne mutant strain compared with the wild type at the nonpermissive temperature. Global analysis of 5′ end profiles at a permissive (32°C) (C) and a nonpermissive temperature (42°C) (D). The plots show average first-base-in-read-coverage level in wild-type samples compared with 2.4.1rneE. coli(ts) samples and the relative log2 fold change. The x axis (base mean) represents the average, library-size normalized coverage values, whereas the y axis (fold change) represents the ratio of the normalized coverage values of the mutant in comparison with the wild type (both base-means and fold changes were calculated by DESeq2). The green dots represent sites with a significant (i.e., Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted, P < 0.05) enrichment in the wild type, whereas the brown dots represent sites with a significant enrichment in the mutant. Black dots represent sites without a significant enrichment.

  • Figure S1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure S1. Scatterplot of PCA done as part of the DESeq2 analysis.
  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2. Statistics of cleavage sites and mutant-enriched sites.

    (A) Sum of all RNase E cleavage sites mapped to different RNA categories. (B) Sum of all enriched sites mapped to different RNA categories. (C) Box plot of the cleavage site density for the individual genes per kilobase sorted by gene type. (D) Box plot of mutant enriched site density for the individual genes per kilobase sorted by gene type. (E) Histogram of the distribution of RNase E cleavage site density in genes per kilobase. (F) Histogram of the distribution of mutant enriched site density in genes per kilobase.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3. Consensus sequence motifs.

    (A) Sequence motif of RNase E cleavage sites based on alignment of all mapped cleavage sites (with one base of shifting allowed). (B) Sequence motif around 5′ ends enriched in the rne mutant based on the alignment of all mapped cleavage sites (with one base of shifting allowed).

  • Figure S2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure S2. Frequency of cleavage site dependent on their relative position (A) to start codon and (B) to stop codon.
  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4. Northern blot analysis of the sRNAs UpsM (A) and SorX (B) in the wild type and the 2.4.1rneE. coli(ts) mutant.

    For RNA isolation, the strains were cultivated under microaerobic conditions at 32°C and shifted for 20 min to 42°C. 10 μg of total RNA was blotted. 5S rRNA was used as a loading control. Read coverage for UpsM (A) and SorX (B) in the wild type (green/light green) and 2.4.1rneE. coli(ts) (brown/orange) at 32°C (dark colors) and 42°C (bright colors). Upper panels show the coverage of all reads, whereas the lower panels show the 5′ ends with single-nucleotide resolution.

  • Figure S3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure S3. Northern blot analysis of the sRNAs 1624 (A), 1771 (B), SorY (C), and PcrZ (D), and the mRNAs RSP_7527 (E) and RSP_7517 (F) in the wild type and the 2.4.1rneE. coli(ts) mutant.

    Strains for RNA isolation were cultivated under microaerobic conditions at 32°C and shifted to 42°C for 20 min. 10 μg of total RNA was plotted. 5S rRNA probe was used as loading control. Read coverage for the wild type is shown in green/light green and for 2.4.1rneE. coli(ts) mutant, in brown/bright orange at 32°C (dark colors) and 42°C (bright colors). Upper panels show the coverage of all reads, whereas the lower panels show the 5′ ends with single-nucleotide resolution.

  • Figure S4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure S4. Bacteriochlorophyll a concentration in the wild-type and the 2.4.1rneE. coli(ts) strain.

    Cells for BChl measurement were cultivated under either microaerobic (LO) or phototrophic conditions (PT) at 32°C (n = 3).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    (A) Absorption spectra of cell-free extracts. Spectra were obtained from cultures grown either under microaerobic or phototrophic conditions to an OD660 of 0.8. The absorption between 450 and 600 nm is caused by carotenoids, whereas the peaks at 800 and 850 nm are caused by the BChls bound to LHII (B800-850) and LHI (B870). The spectra are each for one representative culture. (B) Cultures of the wild type of R. sphaeroides (green) and 2.4.1rneE. coli(ts) (orange) mutant were cultivated at 32°C under microaerobic conditions in the dark or in the presence of light (60 W) under anaerobic conditions. Optical density was measured at 660 nm. The curves represent the mean value of biological triplicates. (C) Survival assay of the wild type of R. sphaeroides and 2.4.1rneE. coli(ts) mutant. The strains were cultivated at 32°C under microaerobic conditions in the dark to an OD660 of 0.4 and shifted to 42°C for 1 h either under no-stress conditions for control or in the presence of either 0.5 mM H2O2, 1.5 mM tBOOH, or 1 mM paraquat. For photooxidative stress, bacteria were cultivated at 32°C under aerobic conditions in the dark and in the presence of 0.2 μM methylene blue until reaching an OD660 of 0.4. The cells were then shifted to 42°C in the presence of light (800 W/m2) for 1 h, whereas the controls were cultivated in the dark. Survival is displayed as the percentage of colony numbers forming in serial dilutions of the stressed bacterial cultures relative to the control culture (referred to as 100% survival). The average of two measurements of two independent cultures is shown.

  • Figure S5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure S5. pufL coverages.
  • Figure S6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure S6. Zone of inhibition assay.

    R. sphaeroides strains were cultivated under microaerobic conditions at 32°C in biological triplicates. 200 μl culture with an OD660 of 0.4 was mixed with prewarmed top agar (0.8% agar) and layered onto malate minimal salt medium plates. When top agar was solidified, a filter disk containing 5 μl of the oxidative stress agent was placed in the center of the plate. Concentration of the agents used are 1 M H2O2, 0.5 M tBOOH, 0.5 M paraquat, and 10 mM methylene blue (MB). Values of the diameter (millimeter) of the zone of growth inhibition are displayed in the diagram. The given values are the means of the technical duplicates of three independent biological replicates.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6. Schematic overview of the importance of RNase E for R. sphaeroides.

    Although RNase E is only one of several RNases acting on mRNAs and sRNAs, it significantly affects the transcriptome of R. sphaeroides, which most likely also affects the proteome. These effects on RNA processing/degradation strongly impact phototrophic growth, whereas no significant effect on chemotrophic growth is observed.

Supplementary Materials

  • Figures
  • Table S1 Oligodeoxynucleotides used for hybridization.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Life Science Alliance.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
RNase E cleavage shapes the transcriptome of Rhodobacter sphaeroides and strongly impacts phototrophic growth
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Life Science Alliance
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Life Science Alliance web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
RNase E and the transcriptome of R. sphaeroides
Konrad U Förstner, Carina M Reuscher, Kerstin Haberzettl, Lennart Weber, Gabriele Klug
Life Science Alliance Aug 2018, 1 (4) e201800080; DOI: 10.26508/lsa.201800080

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
RNase E and the transcriptome of R. sphaeroides
Konrad U Förstner, Carina M Reuscher, Kerstin Haberzettl, Lennart Weber, Gabriele Klug
Life Science Alliance Aug 2018, 1 (4) e201800080; DOI: 10.26508/lsa.201800080
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
Issue Cover

In this Issue

Volume 1, No. 4
August 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Masthead (PDF)
Advertisement

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Results and Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Supplementary Information
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • Metrics
  • Reviewer Comments
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Systems & Computational Biology
  • Microbiology, Virology & Host Pathogen Interaction
  • Genomics & Functional Genomics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Cited By...

  • Transcriptome-wide in vivo mapping of cleavage sites for the compact cyanobacterial ribonuclease E reveals insights into its function and substrate recognition
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • p14ARF and MDM2 AD inhibit RING activity
  • RECODE for scRNA-seq data
  • Pldo/ZSWIM8 and actin polymerization
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

EMBO Press LogoRockefeller University Press LogoCold Spring Harbor Logo

Content

  • Home
  • Newest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Guidelines
  • License, copyright, Fee

Other Services

  • Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • Editors & Staff
  • Reviewer Guidelines
  • Feedback
  • Licensing and Reuse
  • Privacy Policy

ISSN: 2575-1077
© 2022 Life Science Alliance LLC

Life Science Alliance is registered as a trademark in the U.S. Patent and Trade Mark Office and in the European Union Intellectual Property Office.