Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Chromosome- and spindle-pole-derived signals generate an intrinsic code for spindle position and orientation

Abstract

Mitotic spindle positioning by cortical pulling forces1 defines the cell division axis and location2, which is critical for proper cell division and development3. Although recent work has identified developmental and extrinsic cues that regulate spindle orientation4,5,6, the contribution of intrinsic signals to spindle positioning and orientation remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that cortical force generation in human cells is controlled by distinct spindle-pole- and chromosome-derived signals that regulate cytoplasmic dynein localization. First, dynein exhibits a dynamic asymmetric cortical localization that is negatively regulated by spindle-pole proximity, resulting in spindle oscillations to centre the spindle within the cell. We find that this signal comprises the spindle-pole-localized polo-like kinase (Plk1), which regulates dynein localization by controlling the interaction between dynein–dynactin and its upstream cortical targeting factors NuMA and LGN. Second, a chromosome-derived RanGTP gradient restricts the localization of NuMA–LGN to the lateral cell cortex to define and maintain the spindle orientation axis. RanGTP acts in part through the nuclear localization sequence of NuMA to locally alter the ability of NuMA–LGN to associate with the cell cortex in the vicinity of chromosomes. We propose that these chromosome- and spindle-pole-derived gradients generate an intrinsic code to control spindle position and orientation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Dynein and dynactin localize asymmetrically to the cell cortex during metaphase.
Figure 2: Plk1 negatively regulates the localization of cortical dynein.
Figure 3: The chromosome-derived Ran gradient negatively regulates LGN localization.
Figure 4: The Ran gradient regulates the association of the LGN–NuMA complex with membranes.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grill, S. W. & Hyman, A. A. Spindle positioning by cortical pulling forces. Dev. Cell 8, 461–465 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Glotzer, M. The mechanism and control of cytokinesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 815–823 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gonczy, P. Mechanisms of asymmetric cell division: flies and worms pave the way. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 355–366 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thery, M. et al. The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 947–953 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Toyoshima, F. & Nishida, E. Integrin-mediated adhesion orients the spindle parallel to the substratum in an EB1- and myosin X-dependent manner. EMBO J. 26, 1487–1498 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Siller, K. H. & Doe, C. Q. Spindle orientation during asymmetric cell division. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 365–374 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kardon, J. R. & Vale, R. D. Regulators of the cytoplasmic dynein motor. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 854–865 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Woodard, G. E. et al. Ric-8A and Gi α recruit LGN, NuMA, and dynein to the cell cortex to help orient the mitotic spindle. Mol. Cell Biol. 30, 3519–3530 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Du, Q. & Macara, I. G. Mammalian Pins is a conformational switch that links NuMA to heterotrimeric G proteins. Cell 119, 503–516 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sumara, I. et al. Roles of polo-like kinase 1 in the assembly of functional mitotic spindles. Curr. Biol. 14, 1712–1722 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bayliss, R., Sardon, T., Vernos, I. & Conti, E. Structural basis of Aurora-A activation by TPX2 at the mitotic spindle. Mol. Cell 12, 851–862 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lampson, M. A. & Cheeseman, I. M. Sensing centromere tension: Aurora B and the regulation of kinetochore function. Trends Cell Biol. 21, 133–140 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kalab, P., Weis, K. & Heald, R. Visualization of a Ran–GTP gradient in interphase and mitotic Xenopus egg extracts. Science 295, 2452–2456 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kalab, P. & Heald, R. The RanGTP gradient—a GPS for the mitotic spindle. J. Cell Sci. 121, 1577–1586 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kornbluth, S., Dasso, M. & Newport, J. Evidence for a dual role for TC4 protein in regulating nuclear structure and cell cycle progression. J. Cell Biol. 125, 705–719 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nishitani, H. et al. Loss of RCC1, a nuclear DNA-binding protein, uncouples the completion of DNA replication from the activation of cdc2 protein kinase and mitosis. EMBO J. 10, 1555–1564 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wiese, C. et al. Role of importin- β in coupling Ran to downstream targets in microtubule assembly. Science 291, 653–656 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nachury, M. V. et al. Importin β is a mitotic target of the small GTPase Ran in spindle assembly. Cell 104, 95–106 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wee, B., Johnston, C. A., Prehoda, K. E. & Doe, C. Q. Canoe binds RanGTP to promote PinsTPR/Mud-mediated spindle orientation. J. Cell Biol. 195, 369–376 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fink, J. et al. External forces control mitotic spindle positioning. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 771–778 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Knoblich, J. A. Asymmetric cell division: recent developments and their implications for tumour biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 849–860 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kline, S. L., Cheeseman, I. M., Hori, T., Fukagawa, T. & Desai, A. The human Mis12 complex is required for kinetochore assembly and proper chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 173, 9–17 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cheeseman, I. M. et al. A conserved protein network controls assembly of the outer kinetochore and its ability to sustain tension. Genes Dev. 18, 2255–2268 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schmidt, J. C. et al. Aurora B kinase controls the targeting of the Astrin-SKAP complex to bioriented kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 191, 269–280 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hutchins, J. R. et al. Systematic analysis of human protein complexes identifies chromosome segregation proteins. Science 328, 593–599 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheeseman, I. M. & Desai, A. A combined approach for the localization and tandem affinity purification of protein complexes from metazoans. Sci. STKE 2005, pl1 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Washburn, M. P., Wolters, D. & Yates, J. R. 3rd Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 242–247 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Weis, K., Dingwall, C. & Lamond, A. I. Characterization of the nuclear protein import mechanism using Ran mutants with altered nucleotide binding specificities. EMBO J. 15, 7120–7128 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank P. Meraldi, D. Pellman, D. Yarar, K. Ribbeck and members of the Cheeseman and Hochwagen laboratories for discussions and critical reading of the manuscript, and T. DiCesare for help with generating the movie. We also thank D. Compton, T. Hyman-Mitocheck, C. Basilico and A. C. Groen for reagents. This work was supported by awards to I.M.C. from the Massachusetts Life Sciences Center, the Searle Scholars Program and the Human Frontiers Science Foundation, a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM088313) and a Research Scholar Grant (121776) from the American Cancer Society. I.M.C. is a Thomas D. and Virginia W. Cabot Career Development Professor of Biology. T.K. is supported by a long-term fellowship of the Human Frontiers Science Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.K. and I.M.C. designed the experiments. T.K. carried out all of the experiments. I.M.C. assisted with some experiments including protein purification and mass spectrometry. T.K. and I.M.C. analysed the data and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iain M. Cheeseman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 1177 kb)

Supplementary Movie 1

Supplementary Information (MOV 3289 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kiyomitsu, T., Cheeseman, I. Chromosome- and spindle-pole-derived signals generate an intrinsic code for spindle position and orientation. Nat Cell Biol 14, 311–317 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2440

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2440

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing