Elsevier

Virus Research

Volume 206, 3 August 2015, Pages 62-73
Virus Research

Picornavirus IRES elements: RNA structure and host protein interactions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2015.01.012Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Picornavirus infection triggers host factors modification impacting on cellular gene expression.

  • Picornavirus RNA translation is governed by IRES elements which are resistant to cap-dependent inactivation.

  • Diversity of picornavirus IRES RNA structural organization.

  • Implication of host RNA-binding proteins in picornavirus protein synthesis.

Abstract

Internal ribosome entry site (IRES) elements were discovered in picornaviruses. These elements are cis-acting RNA sequences that adopt diverse three-dimensional structures and recruit the translation machinery using a 5′ end-independent mechanism assisted by a subset of translation initiation factors and various RNA binding proteins termed IRES transacting factors (ITAFs). Many of these factors suffer important modifications during infection including cleavage by picornavirus proteases, changes in the phosphorylation level and/or redistribution of the protein from the nuclear to the cytoplasm compartment. Picornavirus IRES are amongst the most potent elements described so far. However, given their large diversity and complexity, the mechanistic basis of its mode of action is not yet fully understood. This review is focused to describe recent advances on the studies of RNA structure and RNA–protein interactions modulating picornavirus IRES activity.

Section snippets

Picornavirus genome organization

Picornaviruses are non-enveloped positive strand RNA viruses with an icosahedral capsid, which cause important diseases in humans and animals, such as common-cold illnesses, polio, or chronic livestock infections. Picornaviruses are currently classified into 26 genera (Table 1), and unassigned species continue to be described (http://www.picornaviridae.com/). It is widely accepted that the entire life cycle of all picornaviruses occurs in the cytoplasm of the infected cell. Their genome

Features of the picornavirus untranslated region

The genomic RNA of picornaviruses differs from the cellular RNAs in two critical features. First, they do not contain a cap structure at the 5′ end. Instead, a viral protein (VPg) is covalently linked to the 5′UTR. Second, an internal cis-acting region within the 5′UTR, designated internal ribosome entry site (IRES) element, governs the recruitment of the ribosomal subunits using a process independent of the cap-binding protein eIF4E.

IRES elements were initially reported in poliovirus (PV) and

Picornavirus-induced modification of host factors

Picornavirus infections exert a strong influence on the host gene expression as a result of the proteolysis of specific host factors induced by the 2A, L and 3C picornavirus proteases (Table 2). Indeed, as a consequence of the cleavage of cellular proteins, several processes critical for cell viability are profoundly altered. This is noticed at the level of transcription, mRNA processing, nucleo-cytoplasmic transport, translation, or RNA granules composition. Among other proteins, proteolysis

Translation initiation in eukaryotic cells

Most cellular mRNAs initiate translation by a mechanism that depends on the recognition of the m7G(5′)ppp(5′)N structure (termed cap) located at the 5′ end of mRNAs (Sonenberg and Hinnebusch, 2009). In these RNAs, the 5′ cap structure is recognized by eIF4F, a trimeric factor composed of the cap-binding protein eIF4E, the scaffolding protein eIF4G, and the RNA helicase eIF4A (Fig. 3A). The cap-binding capacity of eIF4E is regulated by phosphorylation levels of eIF4E-binding proteins (eIF4E-BP

IRES-dependent translation initiation in picornavirus RNAs

As mentioned above, cap-dependent translation initiation is inhibited in picornavirus-infected cells. In addition to eIF4G and PABP proteolysis, eIF4E is targeted in EMCV and PV infected cells through dephosphorylation of 4E-BPs (Gingras et al., 1996). Hypophosphorylated 4E-BPs bind strongly to eIF4E preventing the binding to eIF4G, and thus, inactivating cap-dependent translation. These adverse situations, however, allow translation of picornavirus RNAs that evade translation shutdown taking

RNA–protein interactions involved in picornavirus IRES activity

In addition to the eIFs described in the above sections, auxiliary factors termed IRES-transacting factors (ITAFs) contribute to modulate (either stimulate or repress) IRES activity. Early studies demonstrated that poliovirus IRES activity in reticulocyte lysates was dependent on the addition of factors present in HeLa cells (Dorner et al., 1984). More recently it has been shown that ITAFs stimulate the assembly of 48S complex in vitro on the cardio- and aphthovirus IRES (Andreev et al., 2007,

Implications of long-range 5′–3′ viral RNA interactions on IRES activity

On the opposite end of the picornavirus genome, the 3′UTR plays a critical role in virus multiplication (Duque and Palmenberg, 2001, Melchers et al., 1997, Saiz et al., 2001, Todd et al., 1997). This region harbors a heterogeneous sequence, ranging between 42 nts in HRV and 317 nts in DHAV, in addition to a relative short polyA tail. Enterovirus 3′UTR RNA structure models suggest the presence of two stem-loops, with a kissing loop predicted in some instances (Pilipenko et al., 1996, Wang et al.,

Conclusions and perspectives

The understanding of RNA structure organization and host protein interaction relevant for viral IRES elements function has made considerable progress in recent years (Hashem et al., 2013, Plank and Kieft, 2012). The three-dimensional structure of picornavirus IRES elements is yet unknown despite being the first functional IRES elements ever described, but progress in this direction has being made (Jung and Schlick, 2014, King et al., 2013, Lozano et al., 2014). Noteworthy, understanding the

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants BFU2011-25437 and CSD2009-00080 from MINECO, and by an Institutional grant from Fundación Ramón Areces.

References (183)

  • S. Garcia-Nunez et al.

    Enhanced IRES activity by the 3′UTR element determines the virulence of FMDV isolates

    Virology

    (2014)
  • J.R. Hollister et al.

    Molecular and phylogenetic analyses of bovine rhinovirus type 2 shows it is closely related to foot-and-mouth disease virus

    Virology

    (2008)
  • M. Honda et al.

    Structural requirements for initiation of translation by internal ribosome entry within genome-length hepatitis C virus RNA

    Virology

    (1996)
  • S. Jung et al.

    Interconversion between parallel and antiparallel conformations of a 4H RNA junction in domain 3 of foot-and-mouth disease virus IRES captured by dynamics simulations

    Biophys. J.

    (2014)
  • P. Kafasla et al.

    Polypyrimidine tract binding protein stabilizes the encephalomyocarditis virus IRES structure via binding multiple sites in a unique orientation

    Mol. Cell

    (2009)
  • V.G. Kolupaeva et al.

    Translation eukaryotic initiation factor 4G recognizes a specific structural element within the internal ribosome entry site of encephalomyocarditis virus RNA

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1998)
  • B.J. Lamphear et al.

    Mapping the cleavage site in protein synthesis initiation factor eIF-4 gamma of the 2A proteases from human Coxsackievirus and rhinovirus

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1993)
  • P. Lawrence et al.

    The nuclear protein Sam68 is cleaved by the FMDV 3C protease redistributing Sam68 to the cytoplasm during FMDV infection of host cells

    Virology

    (2012)
  • W. Li et al.

    Cleavage of translation initiation factor 4AI (eIF4AI) but not eIF4AII by foot-and-mouth disease virus 3C protease: identification of the eIF4AI cleavage site

    FEBS Lett.

    (2001)
  • Q. Liao et al.

    Genomic characterization of a novel picornavirus in Pekin ducks

    Vet. Microbiol.

    (2014)
  • I.K. Ali et al.

    Activity of the hepatitis A virus IRES requires association between the cap-binding translation initiation factor (eIF4E) and eIF4G

    J. Virol.

    (2001)
  • L.L. Almstead et al.

    Inhibition of U snRNP assembly by a virus-encoded proteinase

    Genes Dev.

    (2007)
  • D.E. Andreev et al.

    Differential factor requirement to assemble translation initiation complexes at the alternative start codons of foot-and-mouth disease virus RNA

    RNA

    (2007)
  • D.E. Andreev et al.

    Glycyl-tRNA synthetase specifically binds to the poliovirus IRES to activate translation initiation

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2012)
  • S.H. Back et al.

    Translation of polioviral mRNA is inhibited by cleavage of polypyrimidine tract-binding proteins executed by polioviral 3C(pro)

    J. Virol.

    (2002)
  • J.M. Bailey et al.

    Structure of the 5′ nontranslated region of the coxsackievirus b3 genome: chemical modification and comparative sequence analysis

    J. Virol.

    (2007)
  • M. Bakhshesh et al.

    The picornavirus avian encephalomyelitis virus possesses a hepatitis C virus-like internal ribosome entry site element

    J. Virol.

    (2008)
  • G. Bassili et al.

    Sequence and secondary structure requirements in a highly conserved element for foot-and-mouth disease virus internal ribosome entry site activity and eIF4G binding

    J. Gen. Virol.

    (2004)
  • N.J. Baxter et al.

    Structure and dynamics of coxsackievirus B4 2A proteinase, an enyzme involved in the etiology of heart disease

    J. Virol.

    (2006)
  • K.M. Bedard et al.

    A nucleo-cytoplasmic SR protein functions in viral IRES-mediated translation initiation

    EMBO J.

    (2007)
  • G.J. Belsham

    Dual initiation sites of protein synthesis on foot-and-mouth disease virus RNA are selected following internal entry and scanning of ribosomes in vivo

    EMBO J.

    (1992)
  • G.J. Belsham et al.

    Foot-and-mouth disease virus 3C protease induces cleavage of translation initiation factors eIF4A and eIF4G within infected cells

    J. Virol.

    (2000)
  • L.B. Blyn et al.

    Requirement of poly(rC) binding protein 2 for translation of poliovirus RNA

    J. Virol.

    (1997)
  • J.M. Bonderoff et al.

    Cleavage of poly(A)-binding protein by poliovirus 3C proteinase inhibits viral internal ribosome entry site-mediated translation

    J. Virol.

    (2008)
  • O. Boussadia et al.

    Unr is required in vivo for efficient initiation of translation from the internal ribosome entry sites of both rhinovirus and poliovirus

    J. Virol.

    (2003)
  • S.S. Bradrick et al.

    Identification of gemin5 as a novel 7-methylguanosine cap-binding protein

    PLoS ONE

    (2009)
  • E.A. Brown et al.

    The 5′ nontranslated region of hepatitis A virus RNA: secondary structure and elements required for translation in vitro

    J. Virol.

    (1991)
  • X. Cao et al.

    Functional analysis of the two alternative translation initiation sites of foot-and-mouth disease virus

    J. Virol.

    (1995)
  • A. Castello et al.

    RNA nuclear export is blocked by poliovirus 2A protease and is concomitant with nucleoporin cleavage

    J. Cell Sci.

    (2009)
  • A.L. Cathcart et al.

    Cellular mRNA decay protein AUF1 negatively regulates enterovirus and human rhinovirus infections

    J. Virol.

    (2013)
  • N. Chamond et al.

    40S recruitment in the absence of eIF4G/4A by EMCV IRES refines the model for translation initiation on the archetype of Type II IRESs

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2014)
  • L.S. Chard et al.

    Hepatitis C virus-related internal ribosome entry sites are found in multiple genera of the family Picornaviridae

    J. Gen. Virol.

    (2006)
  • L.S. Chard et al.

    Functional analyses of RNA structures shared between the internal ribosome entry sites of hepatitis C virus and the picornavirus porcine teschovirus 1 Talfan

    J. Virol.

    (2006)
  • A.J. Chase et al.

    Inhibition of poliovirus-induced cleavage of cellular protein PCBP2 reduces the levels of viral RNA replication

    J. Virol.

    (2014)
  • A.J. Chase et al.

    Viral subversion of host functions for picornavirus translation and RNA replication

    Future Virol.

    (2012)
  • L.L. Chen et al.

    Enterovirus 71 infection cleaves a negative regulator for viral internal ribosomal entry site-driven translation

    J. Virol.

    (2013)
  • K. Choi et al.

    Identification of cellular proteins enhancing activities of internal ribosomal entry sites by competition with oligodeoxynucleotides

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2004)
  • M.R. Conte et al.

    Structure of tandem RNA recognition motifs from polypyrimidine tract binding protein reveals novel features of the RRM fold

    EMBO J.

    (2000)
  • S. de Breyne et al.

    Factor requirements for translation initiation on the Simian picornavirus internal ribosomal entry site

    RNA

    (2008)
  • S. de Breyne et al.

    Direct functional interaction of initiation factor eIF4G with type 1 internal ribosomal entry sites

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (100)

    • RNA virus replication

      2023, Molecular Medical Microbiology, Third Edition
    • Experimental evidence for occurrence of putative copy-choice recombination between two Senecavirus A genomes

      2022, Veterinary Microbiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      A number of viruses harbor their own IRESes, and can take advantage of the IRES-mediated translation to subvert host translation machinery (Lee et al., 2017). Picornaviral IRES elements can adopt diverse three-dimensional structures, and recruit the translation machinery using a 5′ end-independent mechanism, assisted by translation initiation factors and RNA binding proteins (Martínez-Salas et al., 2015). The picornaviral IRES elements are structurally classified into five types: type I, II, III, hepatitis C virus (HCV)-like and aichivirus-like IRESes (Lozano and Martínez-Salas, 2015).

    • Proteomic elucidation of the targets and primary functions of the picornavirus 2A protease

      2022, Journal of Biological Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      We conclude that prior to exponential viral protein production, 2Apro specifically targets eIF4G (likely by binding to the adjacent eIF3L) and Nup98, key players in regulating critical functions of host cells, rapidly destroying both proteins. eIF4G cleavage results in an arrest of host translation, preventing accumulation of new host proteins, and creating eIF4G cleavage products, which partake in internal ribosome entry site-mediated translation of the picornaviral genome and promotion of viral translation (78). Nup98 degradation largely abrogates a number of nuclear export pathways, including cellular mRNA export; together with eIF4G cleavage, these changes attenuate the ability of infected cells to mount an innate immune response.

    • Impacts of single nucleotide deletions from the 3′ end of Senecavirus A 5′ untranslated region on activity of viral IRES and on rescue of recombinant virus

      2021, Virology
      Citation Excerpt :

      A viral protein (VPg) is covalently linked to the 5′ end of SVA genome that is infectious and functions as mRNA. The SVA 5′ UTR is an approximately 665-bp-long sequence, containing a hepatitis C virus (HCV)-like internal ribosome entry site (IRES) (Fig. 1B), which recruits ribosomal subunits using a process independent of the cap-binding protein, eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4E (Martínez-Salas et al., 2015). The HCV-like IRES forms a defined secondary structure that contains two major hairpins, termed domain II and III (Chard et al., 2006; Easton et al., 2009).

    • Motif mutations in pseudoknot stem I upstream of start codon in Senecavirus A genome: Impacts on activity of viral IRES and on rescue of recombinant virus

      2021, Veterinary Microbiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Referring to other picornaviruses (Sun et al., 2016), the polyprotein precursor can be stepwisely cleaved into twelve polypeptides, namely the L, VP4, VP2, VP3, VP1, 2A, 2B, 2C, 3A, 3B, 3C and 3D. The SVA 5′ UTR is an approximately 665-bp-long sequence, containing a hepatitis C virus (HCV)-like internal ribosome entry site (IRES) (Fig. 1, IRES), which recruits ribosomal subunits using a process independent of the cap-binding protein, eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4E (Martínez-Salas et al., 2015). The HCV-like IRES forms a defined secondary structure that contains two major hairpins, termed domain II and III (Chard et al., 2006; Easton et al., 2009).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text