Elsevier

DNA Repair

Volume 3, Issues 8–9, August–September 2004, Pages 1057-1062
DNA Repair

Review
Constitutively active DNA damage checkpoint pathways as the driving force for the high frequency of p53 mutations in human cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.03.036Get rights and content

Abstract

If the major function of the p53 protein is to function as a DNA damage checkpoint protein, then it is reasonable to hypothesize that its inactivation in human cancer must be related to its DNA damage checkpoint function. This hypothesis further implies that in tumor cells one or more of the DNA damage checkpoint pathways has been activated. Otherwise, p53 would not be active and there would be no selective pressure for TP53 mutations. I make the argument that tumorigenic transformation is intrinsically associated with formation of DNA DSBs in every cell cycle leading to activation of DNA damage checkpoint pathways. In turn, activation of the DNA DSB checkpoint provides the selective pressure for the high frequency of p53 inactivation in human cancer.

Section snippets

p53 as the most frequently inactivated gene in human cancer

p53 has been one of the best studied molecules in human cancer claiming such distinctions as “molecule of the year” in 1993, a workshop series dedicated exclusively to it and more than 14,000 publications in the biomedical literature with the keyword “p53” in their title [1], [2]. The interest in p53 stems from the high frequency of p53 inactivation in human cancer. About half of all human tumors have a mutation in the p53 gene, which encodes the p53 protein, that inactivates its function and a

Hypotheses to explain the high frequency of p53 inactivation in human cancer

Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the high frequency of p53 inactivation in human cancer. A hypothesis that has caught a lot of attention is the “guardian of the genome” hypothesis [15]. As its name indicates, p53 is proposed to guard the genome from accumulation of oncogenic mutations. The strongest evidence in support of this hypothesis comes from analysis of p53 knockout mice [7]. Since these mice develop tumors with 100% penetrance, the absence of p53 function must be

A hypothesis to explain the high frequency of p53 inactivation in human cancer based on the function of p53 as a DNA damage checkpoint protein

A large number of functions have been attributed to the p53 protein. Of all these functions, the role of p53 in the DNA damage response [23] is probably the best understood, as evidenced by the elucidation of specific pathways by which DNA damage leads to p53 activation (Fig. 1). In response to DNA DSBs several proteins, including 53BP1, NFBD1/MDC1 and the Nbs1–Mre11–Rad50 complex accumulate at the sites of DNA DSBs, a process required for activation of the ATM protein kinase, which in turn

Evidence for constitutive activation of the DNA DSB checkpoint in human cancer

As the DNA damage checkpoint pathways are being elucidated, markers are becoming available to assay whether these pathways are active or inactive in human cancer cell lines and tumors. The Chk2 kinase is activated by ATM in response to DNA DSBs (Fig. 1) and activation involves phosphorylation of Thr68 of Chk2 by ATM [37]. This phosphorylation event can be monitored with a phosphospecific antibody, which is suitable for both Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry. In a small panel of

DNA DSBs in human tumors and experimentally transformed cells

The highly aberrant karyotype of most cancer cells de facto implies that DNA DSBs must have occurred at some point during cancer development. It is generally thought that DSBs occur during “crisis”, when telomeres become eroded and chromosomal ends are recognized by the cell as DNA DSBs [39], [40]. Cancer cells emerge from crisis with chromosomal rearrangements arising from aberrant DNA repair and with the ability to maintain their telomeres most often by regaining expression of telomerase [41]

Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint as a survival mechanism for cancer cells with DNA DSBs

Irrespective of the mechanism by which cancer cells develop DNA DSBs, the presence of breaks constitutes a threat to cell survival. DNA DSBs in cells entering mitosis will lead to chromosome fragments lacking centrosomes; such fragments cannot be properly segregated between the two daughter cells resulting in loss of genetic material and cell death. Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint is probably critical to preventing entry of cancer cells with DNA DSBs into mitosis. Thus, the genes

Therapeutic implications

The concept that at least a subset of tumors constantly form DNA DSBs suggests that these cells will be vulnerable to agents that compromise the DNA damage checkpoint and DNA repair pathways. In fact, current cancer therapy uses agents that block DNA replication or directly induce DNA damage. These agents may be effective, in part, because they further challenge the ability of cancer cells to complete DNA replication and repair the DNA DSBs that arise as a byproduct of their transformed

Acknowledgements

It was impossible within the confines of this review to present all points of view relevant to this topic, as well as to cite all the relevant literature. Work from my laboratory presented in this review was supported by grant CA76367 from the National Institutes of Health.

References (56)

  • D.E. Koshland

    Molecule of the year

    Science

    (1993)
  • Y. Haupt et al.

    Deconstruction of p53 functions and regulation

    Oncogene

    (2002)
  • M. Hollstein et al.

    p53 mutations in human cancers

    Science

    (1991)
  • J.D. Oliner et al.

    Amplification of a gene encoding a p53-associated protein in human sarcomas

    Nature

    (1992)
  • C.J. Sherr

    Tumor surveillance via the ARF-p53 pathway

    Genes Dev.

    (1998)
  • S. Srivastava et al.

    Germ-line transmission of a mutated p53 gene in a cancer-prone family with Li–Fraumeni syndrome

    Nature

    (1990)
  • L.A. Donehower et al.

    Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours

    Nature

    (1992)
  • C.J. Hussussian et al.

    Germline p16 mutations in familial melanoma

    Nat. Genet.

    (1994)
  • A. Kamb et al.

    Analysis of the p16 gene (CDKN2) as a candidate for the chromosome 9p melanoma susceptibility locus

    Nat. Genet.

    (1994)
  • J.L. Bos

    ras oncogenes in human cancer: a review

    Cancer Res.

    (1989)
  • R. Dalla-Favera et al.

    Human c-myc onc gene is located on the region of chromosome 8 that is translocated in Burkitt lymphoma cells

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (1982)
  • R. Taub et al.

    Translocation of the c-myc gene into the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus in human Burkitt lymphoma and murine plasmacytoma cells

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (1982)
  • C.R. King et al.

    Amplification of a novel v-erbB-related gene in a human mammary carcinoma

    Science

    (1985)
  • J. Yokota et al.

    Amplification of c-erbB-2 oncogene in human adenocarcinomas in vivo

    Lancet

    (1986)
  • D.P. Lane

    p53, guardian of the genome

    Nature

    (1992)
  • S.J. Baker et al.

    Suppression of human colorectal carcinoma cell growth by wild-type p53

    Science

    (1990)
  • H. Symonds et al.

    p53-dependent apoptosis suppresses tumor growth and progression in vivo

    Cell

    (1994)
  • T.G. Graeber et al.

    Hypoxia induces accumulation of p53 protein, but activation of a G1-phase checkpoint by low-oxygen conditions is independent of p53 status

    Mol. Cell. Biol.

    (1994)
  • C. Koumenis et al.

    Regulation of p53 by hypoxia: dissociation of transcriptional repression and apoptosis from p53-dependent transactivation

    Mol. Cell. Biol.

    (2001)
  • G.S. Jimenez et al.

    A transactivation-deficient mouse model provides insights into Trp53 regulation and function

    Nat. Genet.

    (2000)
  • S.M. Frisch et al.

    Disruption of epithelial cell-matrix interactions induces apoptosis

    J. Cell Biol.

    (1994)
  • J. Grossmann

    Molecular mechanisms of “detachment-induced apoptosis—anoikis”

    Apoptosis

    (2002)
  • S.J. Kuerbitz et al.

    Wild-type p53 is a cell cycle checkpoint determinant following irradiation

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (1992)
  • L.B. Schultz et al.

    p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) is an early participant in the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks

    J. Cell Biol.

    (2000)
  • Y.L. Shang et al.

    NFBD1, a novel nuclear protein with signature motifs of FHA and BRCT, and an internal 41-amino acid repeat sequence, is an early participant in DNA damage response

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2003)
  • B.E. Nelms et al.

    In situ visualization of DNA double-strand break repair in human fibroblasts

    Science

    (1998)
  • T. Uziel et al.

    Requirement of the MRN complex for ATM activation by DNA damage

    EMBO J.

    (2003)
  • T.A. Mochan, M. Venere, R.A. DiTullio, Jr., T.D. Halazonetis, 53BP1 and NFBD1/MDC1-Nbs1 function in parallel...
  • Cited by (37)

    • Human microbiota: role in cancer progression and therapy

      2022, Microbial Crosstalk with Immune System: New Insights in Therapeutics
    • Phosphoproteomic analysis of signaling pathways in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patient samples

      2011, American Journal of Pathology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our results in primary HNSCC are consistent with previous reports describing constitutive activation of Chk2 and Chk1 in several other cancer types.56,57 Because cell cycle checkpoints generally represent a barrier to carcinogenesis, tumors commonly evolve with defects in certain components of their DNA damage response (eg, mutations in p53).56,58 Tumors with p53 mutations become more dependent on remaining checkpoints, such as Chk1 or Chk2, to arrest and repair after exposure to DNA-damaging agents.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text