Trends in Biochemical Sciences
TechniquesMapping chromosomal proteins in vivo by formaldehyde-crosslinked-chromatin immunoprecipitation
Section snippets
The chemistry of formaldehyde crosslinking: the advantage of de-crosslinking
Formaldehyde is a tight (2 Å) crosslinking agent that efficiently produces both protein–nucleic acid and protein–protein crosslinks in vivo. Formaldehyde is a very reactive dipolar compound in which the carbon atom acts as a nucleophilic centre. Amino and imino groups of amino acids (lysines, arginines and histidines) and of DNA (primarily adenines and cytosines) readily react with formaldehyde leading to the formation of a Schiff base. This intermediate can further react with a second amino
Extent of crosslinking: finding the right balance
Efficient fixation of a protein to chromatin in vivo is crucial for the X-CHIP technique. The extent of crosslinking is probably the most important parameter. Two major problems concerning the subsequent immunoprecipitation step should be taken into account: first, an excess of crosslinking can result in the loss of material or reduced antigen availability in chromatin, or both, and second, the relative sensitivity of the antigen epitopes to formaldehyde.
Crosslinking times range between 10
Antibodies and immunoprecipitation conditions
In the X-CHIP assay, the immunoprecipitation step requires highly stringent conditions. A buffer, called RIPA, of intermediate ionic strength and containing a combination of denaturing and non-denaturing detergents [Triton, sodiumdeoxycholate and sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS)], is used to ensure solubility of chromatin6, 9. The use of affinity-purified antibodies is highly recommended, and polyclonal antibodies are preferred to monoclonals to avoid potential epitope masking problems in
The use of a caesium chloride gradient
In the original protocol by Varshavsky and co-workers designed for Drosophila tissue culture cells, the purification of crosslinked chromatin using caesium cloride (CsCl) gradients was described6. This procedure is rather time-consuming as it involves 72 hours of ultracentrifugation6, 10. An alternative method is the sonication of fixed material in high-detergent buffer and adjustment to immunoprecipitation-compatible conditions by simple dilution11. This procedure has been successfully applied
Analysis by PCR of X-CHIP DNA
Michael Grunstein’s team has described a method for the analysis of X-CHIP products based on a quantitative PCR approach12, 13. After DNA purification from immunoprecipitated chromatin, the enrichment of specific genomic fragments corresponding to specific protein-binding sites are scored by quantitative PCR.
Specific pairs of primers covering contiguous fragments of the genomic region of interest are designed. An empirically defined number of amplification cycles is used and the amplified
Southern-blot analysis of X-CHIP DNA
A different approach utilizes the X-CHIP DNA as a probe in Southern-blot analysis9, 10. The advantage of this ‘one-step’ analysis is the rapid identification of binding sites within large genomic regions without relying on multiple PCR reactions. The resolution with this method is also ∼300 bp. In this type of analysis, the genomic fraction obtained by immunoprecipitation, containing virtually all the in vivo binding sites of a given chromatin protein, is radiolabelled and used as a probe
Future applications and conclusions: identification of target genes
The ability to determine the in vivo binding sites of chromosomal proteins by X-CHIP could be of interest for the identification of target genes of specific transcription factors. X-CHIP has been used successfully in mammals for the identification of target genes of the HoxC8 and Oct4 proteins5, 25. In the case of HoxC8, fixed chromatin from whole-mouse spinal cord was used for X-CHIP and the specifically enriched DNA subcloned in l-vectors. Each subclone was then used as a probe to screen a
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Andreas Hecht and Michael Grunstein for providing their original data, Bhavin Parekh and Tom Maniatis for sharing technical information prior to publication, Renato Paro and members of his laboratory for having shared the navigation in the X-CHIP hyperspace, and Paul Orban for proofreading the manuscript. This work is supported by the Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro and Telethon.
References (32)
Studies on histone organization in the nucleosome using formaldehyde as a reversible crosslinking agent
Cell
(1978)Mapping protein-DNA interactions in vivo with formaldehyde: evidence that histone H4 is retained on a highly transcribed gene
Cell
(1988)Analysis of chromatin structure by in vivo formaldehyde crosslinking
Methods
(1997)- et al.
Mapping Polycomb-repressed domains in the BX-C using in vivo formaldehyde crosslinked chromatin
Cell
(1993) A simplified formaldehyde-fixation and immunoprecipitation technique for studying protein-DN interactions
Anal. Biochem.
(1991)- et al.
Virus infection leads to localized hyperacetylation of histones H3 and H4 at the IFN-β promoter
Mol. Cell
(1999) Regulation of hormone-induced histone hyperacetylation and gene activation via acetylation of an acetylase
Cell
(1999)Loading of an Mcm protein onto DNA replication origins is regulated by Cdc6p and CDKs
Cell
(1997)Ordered recruitment of transcription and chromatin remodeling factors to a cell-cycle- and developmentally regulated promoter
Cell
(1999)Identification of cohesin association sites at centromeres and along chromosome arms
Cell
(1999)
Visualization of chromosomal domains with boundary element-associated factor BEAF-32
Cell
Formaldehyde as a probe of DNA structure. I. Reaction with exocyclic amino groups of DNA bases
Biochemistry
Formaldehyde as a probe of DNA structure. II. Reaction with endocyclic imino groups of DNA bases
Biochemistry
Formaldehyde-mediated DNA-protein crosslinking: a probe for in vivo chromatin structures
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
New POU dimer configuration mediates antagonistic control of an osteopontin preimplantaion enhancer by Oct-4 and Sox-2
Genes Dev.
Transcriptional silencing in yeast is associated with reduced nucleosome acetylation
Genes Dev.
Cited by (418)
Best practices for ChIP-seq and its data analysis
2023, Rigor and Reproducibility in Genetics and Genomics: Peer-reviewed, Published, CitedChemical Biology of the Genome
2021, Chemical Biology of the GenomePolyamines regulate gene expression by stimulating translation of histone acetyltransferase mRNAs
2020, Journal of Biological ChemistryLow doses of deoxynivalenol inhibit the cell migration mediated by H3K27me3-targeted downregulation of TEM8 expression
2020, Biochemical Pharmacology